SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 sits in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, placing it firmly in the upper tier of desktop processors despite being a mid-range part. Its 14 cores and 20 threads use Intel's hybrid Raptor Lake architecture, combining performance and efficiency cores on a 10 nm process. The base clock of 2.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz give it strong single-threaded headroom, which shows clearly in the benchmark data.

Cinebench R23 multicore results of 26,620 points and single-core of 3,758 points reveal a processor that excels at both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The single-core figure is particularly meaningful for everyday responsiveness, as many applications still rely on one or two threads. The multicore score, meanwhile, demonstrates that this chip can handle substantial parallel workloads without breaking a sweat, and it trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 by only 0.2% in average benchmark score — a negligible margin that places these chips in the same performance class.

The PassMark suite provides a more granular view of where this CPU's strengths lie. Integer math scores of 111,044 and floating-point math of 81,892 indicate robust general-purpose computation, while the extended instructions score of 23,045 suggests solid SIMD performance for multimedia and scientific tasks. Data compression at 383,972 points shows strong throughput for archiving and file management workloads, and the multithread score of 31,725 reinforces the multicore capability seen in Cinebench.

The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample data locality for performance-sensitive applications. With dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, the memory controller offers flexibility for different build budgets and performance targets. ECC memory support is a notable inclusion, making this CPU viable for entry-level workstations where data integrity matters. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output, though the pairing with a discrete GPU makes this largely redundant in this build.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is remarkably modest given its performance envelope. This efficiency means cooling requirements are manageable, and power delivery is not a limiting factor in most motherboard selections. The 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry delivers competitive performance-per-watt, and the die size of 215 mm² reflects a design that balances core count with manufacturing economics.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 represents the entry point of the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 16,900 million transistors packed into a 149 mm² die. The GPU's 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the mid-range tier, and the data shows a card that delivers competent 1080p gaming performance without pushing into high-end territory.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For modern games at 1080p, this capacity is generally sufficient, though the bandwidth figure indicates that memory-bound scenarios at higher resolutions could expose limitations. The memory clock of 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective) is standard for this class, and the 8 GB capacity aligns with expectations for a card at this performance level.

The compute configuration includes 2,560 shading units, 80 tensor cores, and 20 RT cores. The FP32 throughput of 13.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, provides a baseline for rasterization performance. The tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-accelerated features, while the RT cores handle ray tracing workloads — though the modest core count suggests ray tracing will require careful settings management at higher resolutions. The pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s indicate balanced rasterization capabilities for the target resolution class.

DirectX 12 Ultimate support with feature level 12_2 ensures compatibility with the latest graphics APIs, and Vulkan 1.4 support provides additional rendering flexibility. The PCIe 5.0 x8 interface offers ample bandwidth for the GPU's memory requirements, and the display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connections, supporting modern high-refresh-rate monitors.

Benchmark results paint a nuanced picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,502 reflects modern API performance, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 90,334 and 89,381 respectively show competitive compute capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 17,326 places the card in a workable mid-range position, and the GPU compute score of 9,184 indicates reasonable throughput for compute-accelerated tasks. The card draws 130 W and requires a 300 W power supply, with a single 8-pin connector — modest power requirements that make it suitable for a wide range of systems.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 5050's PassMark G3D score of 17,326 and 3DMark Steel Nomad result of 2,502 suggest this pairing delivers smooth framerates at 1080p with high settings. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and strong single-core performance prevent bottlenecking in most gaming scenarios, though the GPU's 66th percentile position means 1440p high-refresh gaming will require settings compromises.

Streaming: The CPU's robust multicore performance — evidenced by the 26,620 Cinebench R23 multicore score — provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's tensor cores and NVENC-class hardware acceleration complement this, though the modest 8 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous game and encode buffers at higher resolutions.

Video Editing: The combination of high single-thread performance (3,758 in Cinebench R23) and strong multicore throughput suits timeline editing and export workloads. The GPU's 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects processing and rendering, while the 320.0 GB/s bandwidth handles video data streams competently.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 20 threads handle scene processing efficiently, and the GPU's 20 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The 8 GB VRAM may constrain complex scenes with high-resolution textures, but the overall 77th combined percentile indicates this build handles moderate rendering workloads effectively.

Software Development: The 14 cores and 20 threads provide fast compilation times, with the PassMark multithread score of 31,725 and integer math score of 111,044 indicating strong throughput for build processes. The 65 W TDP means sustained all-core loads are thermally manageable, and ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running development servers.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and 4,049 PassMark single-thread score ensure snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU's capabilities are largely superfluous for document processing and web browsing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback, though the discrete GPU handles any graphics-accelerated tasks with ease.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform provides a clear upgrade path within the Raptor Lake generation. The CPU's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory means users can choose based on motherboard selection and budget, with dual-channel operation available in either configuration. The 65 W TDP leaves substantial thermal and power headroom within most motherboard VRM designs, and the PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes ensures bandwidth for next-generation storage and expansion cards.

The GPU's PCIe 5.0 x8 interface is forward-compatible, and the 300 W suggested PSU requirement means most existing power supplies will accommodate this card without upgrade. The single 8-pin power connector is universally supported, and the dual-slot form factor fits standard chassis designs. For future upgrades, the platform can accommodate higher-end Raptor Lake CPUs within the same socket, though the 65 W TDP of the i5-13600 suggests the current CPU is well-matched to typical mid-range cooling solutions.

Memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, but the dual-channel bus width supports both DDR4 and DDR5 modules. The 24 MB shared L3 cache benefits from the high data rates that DDR5 provides, though DDR4 remains a viable cost-conscious option. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation use, though it requires compatible motherboards and registered or unbuffered ECC modules.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44,240 places it in the 88th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44,309, 0.2% faster), Intel Core i9-13950HX (44,342, 0.2% faster), and Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44,466, 0.5% faster). The margins are remarkably tight — the i5-13600 trades blows with laptop-class flagship processors, an impressive result for a 65 W desktop part.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 21,035 lands in the 66th percentile, with closest competitors being the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21,153, 0.6% faster), AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21,237, 1% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20,713, 1.6% slower). The RTX 5050 sits in a dense performance cluster where small percentage differences translate to negligible real-world variation.

The combined percentile of 77 reflects a pairing where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU in relative terms. This asymmetry is characteristic of a build where the processor provides headroom for future GPU upgrades or CPU-intensive workloads, while the GPU defines the gaming performance ceiling. The Cinebench R20 scores of 11,180 multicore and 1,578 single-core, along with the R15 scores of 2,683 multicore and 378 single-core, confirm consistent performance scaling across benchmark generations.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Core i5-13600 support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing flexibility in motherboard and memory selection.

Q: What is the TDP of the RTX 5050 and what power supply is recommended?

A: The GPU has a 130 W TDP, and the suggested PSU rating is 300 W, requiring a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385?

A: The Core i5-13600 has an average benchmark score of 44,240, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen AI Max 385's score of 44,309 — a negligible performance difference.

Q: Does the RTX 5050 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 20 RT cores as part of the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games and applications.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 5050?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not officially supported, though the boost clock of 5.00 GHz provides high stock performance.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU uses Intel's 10 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC's 5 nm process, with the GPU die measuring 149 mm² and containing 16,900 million transistors.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear asymmetry: the CPU's 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 66th percentile. This 22-point gap indicates that the processor is substantially more capable than the graphics card in relative terms. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (383,972 PassMark score), and multithreaded rendering, the i5-13600 provides ample headroom that the GPU cannot match.

Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios such as high-resolution gaming with ray tracing enabled, the RTX 5050 becomes the limiting factor. The 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth may constrain texture-rich scenes, and the 66th percentile GPU score suggests that framerates will be moderate rather than exceptional. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,502, while respectable, indicates the GPU is the bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads.

The CPU's 20 threads and 14 cores provide enough parallel processing power to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios at 1080p, but the GPU's mid-range positioning means that CPU utilization may drop below 100% in lighter titles. This imbalance is not necessarily detrimental — it means the system has headroom for future GPU upgrades without changing the platform, and CPU-intensive productivity tasks benefit from the processor's strength.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050. The pairing represents a CPU-first system where the processor's 88th percentile performance significantly outpaces the GPU's 66th percentile standing. The combined percentile of 77 places this system in the upper-mid range of overall performance, suitable for a broad range of tasks from gaming to productivity.

The 65 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP result in a thermally efficient system that does not require exotic cooling or oversized power supplies. The 300 W suggested PSU rating confirms that this build is power-conscious, making it suitable for compact or standard ATX chassis. The CPU's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory adds configuration flexibility, while the GPU's dual-slot design and single 8-pin connector simplify installation.

This is a balanced system for 1080p gaming and productivity, with the CPU providing exceptional responsiveness and multitasking capability. The GPU delivers competent graphics performance, though users seeking higher resolutions or maximum ray tracing quality will need to manage settings carefully. The platform's upgrade path through Socket 1700 and PCIe 5.0 ensures relevance for several years.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p with high refresh rates will find this build well-suited, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,049 PassMark single-thread score) ensuring high minimum framerates and the GPU providing sufficient throughput for competitive titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 26,620 Cinebench R23 multicore score, while the GPU's 20 RT cores and 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate effects and previews.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and 111,044 integer math score, which translate to faster build times and responsive test environments. Students and office workers will find the 88th percentile CPU performance delivers snappy application launches and smooth multitasking, with the GPU providing headroom for any graphics-accelerated coursework. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support and reliable performance for data processing will find the CPU's feature set compelling.

The build suits users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity while maintaining competent gaming capability. The 66th percentile GPU ensures playable framerates at 1080p, and the 77th combined percentile indicates a system that handles most tasks without frustration. Users who may upgrade their GPU in the future without changing the platform will find this CPU-centric approach provides a solid foundation.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The GPU's 66th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 17,326 suggest that 1080p gaming at high settings is achievable in most titles, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,502 indicating modern API efficiency.

For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's balanced rasterization capabilities should deliver high framerates at competitive settings. Demanding AAA games at 1080p with ultra settings will likely see framerates in the playable range, though the 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth may require texture quality reductions in memory-heavy titles. Ray tracing workloads will stress the 20 RT cores, and users should expect to enable DLSS or reduce ray tracing quality to maintain smooth performance.

At 1440p, the GPU's 66th percentile positioning suggests that medium to high settings will be necessary for demanding titles, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom to avoid bottlenecking. The 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 82.30 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate a card that handles 1440p with settings adjustments. The estimates reflect a system optimized for 1080p gaming, with 1440p viable at reduced settings and 4K requiring significant compromises.