SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

178,050 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D form an unusual pairing: a mid-range, 14-core desktop processor attached to the highest-tier consumer GPU in the GeForce 40-series. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 98th percentile among all graphics cards. The combined build percentile is 93, placing this system firmly in the top tier for desktop performance. However, the data reveals a significant imbalance: the RTX 4090 D’s average benchmark score of 178,050 dwarfs the CPU’s average of 44,240, a ratio of roughly 4:1. This gap suggests that in many workloads, the GPU will be the dominant force, but the CPU’s own capabilities must be examined to understand where it becomes the limiting factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates that the Core i5-13600 is a strong performer in its own right, but it is clearly outclassed by the RTX 4090 D in raw compute throughput. The CPU’s multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 26,620 and single-core score of 3,758 are respectable for a 65W part, yet the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,587 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 278,621 point to a graphics card that can generate frames and process data far faster than the processor can feed it in many scenarios.

In gaming, the bottleneck will almost always be the CPU at lower resolutions. The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1,578 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,049, is solid but not exceptional compared to the GPU’s capabilities. At 1080p, the CPU is likely to limit frame rates in titles that rely heavily on single-threaded game logic, because the RTX 4090 D can render frames faster than the i5-13600 can issue draw calls. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, but the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads still provide enough headroom for most games.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 31,725 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 show that it can handle multi-threaded tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, but the GPU’s CUDA cores (14,592 shading units) and tensor cores (456) will vastly accelerate any workload that can leverage GPU compute. Data compression (PassMark score 383,972) and encryption (22,182) are CPU-bound, so the i5-13600 will be the bottleneck there. Conversely, floating-point math (PassMark 81,892) and integer math (111,044) are CPU tasks, but the GPU’s 73.54 TFLOPS of FP32 performance dwarfs any CPU arithmetic.

The FPS scaling evidence is missing because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. However, based on the benchmark scores, the CPU is likely to bottleneck the GPU at 1080p in CPU-intensive games, while at 4K, the GPU’s 1.01 TB/s bandwidth and 24 GB VRAM will dominate. The 88th percentile CPU rank versus the 98th percentile GPU rank means that in balanced workloads, the GPU will sit idle waiting for the CPU roughly 10% of the time, based on percentile delta.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4090 D is built on the AD102 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. It features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is among the highest available in consumer hardware, making it suitable for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and AI inference workloads.

Clock speeds are set at a base of 2280 MHz and a boost of 2520 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The GPU has 14,592 shading units, 456 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, delivering a pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,149.1 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 73.54 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), which is notable for mixed-precision workloads.

Ray tracing and tensor hardware are substantial: 114 RT cores and 456 tensor cores. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,587 places it in the 98th percentile, meaning it outperforms 98% of all GPUs. In Geekbench OpenCL, the score of 278,621 is 3.1% behind the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (which scores 183,725 on average in the nearestRivals list, but that is a different metric). The Vulkan score of 246,941 is similarly strong. These benchmarks indicate that the RTX 4090 D excels at both rasterized and ray-traced rendering, with the tensor cores providing acceleration for DLSS and other AI-based features.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM allows loading large scenes and textures without swapping. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and compute shaders are not memory-bound. The pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s means it can drive high-resolution displays with ease, while the texture rate of 1,149.1 GTexel/s supports complex materials. The only limitation is the triple-slot design and 425 W TDP, which require a robust cooling solution and an 800 W PSU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 93, placing it in the top 7% of all desktop builds.

Q: How does the RTX 4090 D compare to the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell?

A: The RTX 4090 D has an average benchmark score of 178,050, which is 2.2% lower than the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell’s score of 182,109.

Q: Does the Core i5-13600 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU lists ECC memory as supported, alongside DDR4 and DDR5 memory types.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4090 D has a memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s, using 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and PCIe support?

A: The Core i5-13600 uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: How does the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score compare to its rivals?

A: The i5-13600 scores 26,620, while its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, has an average score of 44,309 (which is a different benchmark aggregate). The CPU’s percentile is 88, meaning it is slower than 12% of all CPUs.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the RTX 4090 D is marked as end-of-life, with its predecessor being the GeForce 30 series and successor being the GeForce 50 series.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-13600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S processor with a 65W TDP, while the GPU is a 425W behemoth with 24 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile of 93 indicates that this system outperforms 93% of all tracked builds, but the disparity between the CPU’s 88th percentile and the GPU’s 98th percentile creates a lopsided configuration.

The i5-13600 is a mainstream desktop processor, launched in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $255. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The RTX 4090 D, released in December 2023 with a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD, is a triple-slot card measuring 304 mm in length. This pairing is not typical: the CPU is priced at a fraction of the GPU, and the GPU’s performance envelope far exceeds what the CPU can consistently feed in gaming.

In terms of class, this is a high-end gaming and workstation desktop. The GPU’s 98th percentile rank means it is among the fastest graphics cards available, while the CPU’s 88th percentile rank is above average but not flagship-level. The build is capable of 4K gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, but the CPU may hold back performance in CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or heavy multitasking.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i5-13600 uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the RTX 4090 D will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs, but the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes are available for future NVMe storage or other devices.

The CPU has a TDP of 65W, while the GPU has a TDP of 425W, and the suggested PSU is 800W. This leaves headroom for additional components, such as multiple drives or a high-end cooling solution, but the total system power draw will be high. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must support that.

A sensible next upgrade would be to move to a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, such as an i9 from the 13th generation, if the workload demands more CPU throughput. However, the current CPU’s 14 cores are sufficient for most gaming and productivity tasks. The GPU is end-of-life, so upgrading it would require moving to the GeForce 50 series, but the RTX 4090 D’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth remain competitive.

Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the user can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or faster DDR5, but the dual-channel bus limits bandwidth compared to higher-end platforms. The CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache is shared, which helps with multi-threaded performance, but the lack of a vCache (3D) option means it falls behind in some gaming scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4090 D is capable of driving high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, but the CPU’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,758) will likely limit frame rates at 1080p in CPU-bound titles. At 4K, the GPU’s 98th percentile rank ensures it can maintain high FPS, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and 65W TDP can handle software encoding, but the GPU’s NVENC (via its Ada Lovelace architecture) is more efficient. The PassMark data compression score of 383,972 shows the CPU can handle encoding, but the GPU’s tensor cores could offload this work.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 is strong for timeline editing, but the GPU’s 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 and 24 GB VRAM accelerate effects and rendering. The GPU’s 3DMark score of 8,587 indicates it can handle complex compositing.

3D rendering: The GPU is the primary driver here, with its 14,592 shading units and 456 tensor cores. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 31,725 in PassMark will handle scene preparation, but rendering will be GPU-bound.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 111,044 and extended instructions score of 23,045 indicate strong compile performance. The GPU’s compute capabilities can be used for CUDA-based development, but the CPU’s 14 cores are sufficient for most builds.

Student and office work: This is overkill for such tasks. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,049 in PassMark handles office applications, but the GPU’s power draw and size make it impractical for typical student use.

Who Should Build It

This build targets enthusiasts who prioritize GPU performance above all else. Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit from the RTX 4090 D’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth, though they should accept that the CPU may not fully utilize the GPU at lower resolutions. Content creators working with 3D rendering or AI inference will find the GPU’s 456 tensor cores and 73.54 TFLOPS indispensable, while the CPU’s 14 cores provide adequate support for asset preparation.

Developers using CUDA or Vulkan APIs will appreciate the GPU’s Vulkan score of 246,941 and OpenCL score of 278,621. Small business workstations that require GPU-accelerated tasks, such as CAD or video production, could use this build, but the 425W TDP and triple-slot design demand a capable case and cooling.

Students and office workers should avoid this configuration; the CPU alone would suffice, and the GPU adds cost and power draw without benefit for typical productivity tasks. The combined percentile of 93 makes this a top-tier system, but the imbalance means it is best suited for GPU-bound workloads, not balanced computing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-core performer: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 and PassMark multi-thread score of 31,725. The single-core scores are 3,758 in Cinebench R23 and 4,049 in PassMark, which are above average but not top-tier. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44,240, placing it at the 88th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (avg score 44,309, 0.2% slower) and the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44,342, 0.2% slower).

For real workloads, the CPU excels at multi-threaded tasks like video encoding and data compression (PassMark score 383,972). The floating-point math score of 81,892 and integer math of 111,044 indicate robust arithmetic performance. The find prime numbers score of 109 is low, suggesting weaker performance in specific integer-heavy algorithms. The physics score of 1,782 in PassMark is modest, which may affect gaming physics simulations.

The CPU’s 65W TDP keeps power draw low, but the boost clock of 5.00 GHz ensures responsive single-threaded performance. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is limited, but the stock performance is sufficient for most users. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, but the discrete GPU makes it irrelevant.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44,240, with a percentile of 88. Its best results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 31,725. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 178,050, with a percentile of 98. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 8,587, Geekbench OpenCL is 278,621, and Geekbench Vulkan is 246,941.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is the star. The GPU’s score is 4.0 times higher than the CPU’s, and its percentile is 10 points higher. The combined percentile of 93 reflects the GPU’s dominance. In the nearestRivals list for the GPU, the RTX 4090 D trails the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 2.2% (score 182,109), the A100 SXM4 80 GB by 3.1% (183,725), and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation by 3.6% (184,664). This indicates that the RTX 4090 D is within 5% of professional-grade GPUs, despite being a consumer card.

For the CPU, the rivals are all within 0.7% of its score, meaning the i5-13600 sits in a tightly contested mid-range tier. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is 0.7% faster (score 44,573), which suggests that gaming-specific optimizations could favor that rival, but the i5-13600’s 20 threads give it an edge in multi-threaded workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 88th percentile and the GPU’s 98th percentile imply that the GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates, but the CPU’s single-thread performance will cap FPS in certain titles.

At 1080p, the CPU’s Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1,578 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,049 suggest that games with heavy single-threaded logic, such as simulation titles, may see frame rates limited to what the CPU can produce. The GPU’s 3DMark score of 8,587 indicates it can render frames far faster, so the CPU would be the bottleneck. At 1440p, the balance shifts, and at 4K, the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensure that it remains the limiting factor, with the CPU providing adequate support.

The lack of measured data means these are qualitative estimates. The GPU’s 98th percentile rank suggests it can handle the most demanding games at maximum settings, while the CPU’s 88th percentile rank means it is not a weak link in most scenarios, but it is not a flagship part either. For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, users may see lower FPS than the GPU is capable of, but at 4K, the system should deliver excellent performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds