SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 87th percentile overall, a high-tier configuration where the CPU’s 88th percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile rankings are closely matched. This near-parity in standing suggests a system designed for balance, yet the architecture of the components reveals distinct workload asymmetries. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, with a 65 W TDP, are built for sustained throughput, while the GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are geared toward massive parallel rendering. The data indicates that for gaming, the RTX 4080 is the primary driver, but the i5-13600’s single-core strength ensures it keeps pace, while for productivity, the CPU’s multi-core scores define the ceiling.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i5-13600 and the RTX 4080 is defined by their respective percentile positions and benchmark deltas, not by any measured frame data. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 44240 places it within a tight cluster of rivals, trailing the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 by only -0.2% and the Intel Core i9-13950HX by -0.2%, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D sits just -0.7% ahead. This indicates the i5-13600 is a strong mid-to-high-tier processor, but its 65 W TDP suggests a power-constrained design that prioritizes efficiency over extreme multi-core bursts. Conversely, the RTX 4080’s average score of 54247 is effectively tied with the RTX 4080 SUPER at +0.1%, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is -2.6% behind, showing the GPU is at the top of its class for rasterization and compute.

In gaming workloads, the bottleneck is the CPU. The GPU’s 86th percentile and the CPU’s 88th percentile are close, but the i5-13600’s single-core score of 3758 in Cinebench R23 and passmark single-thread score of 4049 suggest it can feed the GPU in most scenarios. However, the CPU’s multi-core score of 26620 in Cinebench R23, while robust, is not exceptional for a 20-thread part, meaning heavily threaded game engines or background tasks could create a CPU-side limitation. The data implies that at lower resolutions, where the GPU is less stressed, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the limiting factor, while at higher resolutions, the RTX 4080’s 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 throughput takes over as the primary constraint.

For non-gaming tasks, the balance shifts. The CPU’s passmark multithread score of 31725 and data compression score of 383972 indicate that the i5-13600 handles encoding and compilation well, but the GPU’s passmark GPU compute score of 20671 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 214739 show that the RTX 4080 is disproportionately faster for parallel floating-point work. This creates a hybrid bottleneck: the CPU limits lightly-threaded tasks, while the GPU dominates any workload that can leverage its 9728 shading units. The 87th combined percentile suggests the pairing is well-matched for 1440p and 4K gaming, where the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are the decisive factors.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC, housing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus delivers 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for high-resolution textures and ray-traced scenes. The base clock of 2205 MHz and boost clock of 2505 MHz, combined with 9728 shading units, yield a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 48.74 TFLOPS, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, positions this GPU for both rasterization and compute-heavy tasks like AI inference or scientific simulation.

The RT and tensor core configuration is notable: 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. This hardware enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though the data does not specify DLSS versions or performance uplift. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 is a strong indicator of modern DX12 rendering performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 263779 and OpenCL score of 214739 show robust cross-API capability. The passmark G3D score of 34457 places the GPU in the 86th percentile, with the nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, only 0.1% ahead, meaning the base RTX 4080 is virtually indistinguishable from its SUPER variant in aggregate benchmarks.

The GPU’s 320 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 700 W, indicates a power-hungry component that demands a robust power supply, but the data shows no thermal or power throttling metrics. The triple-slot design and 310 mm length suggest a large cooler, which is typical for this performance class. The memory clock of 1400 MHz, translating to 22.4 Gbps effective, is a critical factor for bandwidth-bound scenarios; at 716.8 GB/s, the GPU can feed its 112 ROPs efficiently, which is evident in the pixel rate. For rendering, the RTX 4080’s benchmark scores suggest it can handle 4K gaming at high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means this is an inference from the compute and memory metrics.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows a strong single-core performer. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score of 3758 and multi-core score of 26620 reveal a 7.1x scaling factor across 20 threads, which is respectable for a 14-core part. The Cinebench R20 scores of 1578 (single) and 11180 (multi) follow a similar pattern. Passmark results reinforce this: single-thread score of 4049, multithread of 31725, and integer math of 111044, with floating-point math at 81892. The data encryption score of 22182 and extended instructions score of 23045 suggest strong cryptography and SIMD performance, which benefits workloads like compression or encryption. The CPU’s 88th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 44240, places it just below the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and Intel Core i9-13950HX, indicating it is a top-tier mainstream processor.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is headlined by the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567, which is a modern metric for high-end gaming. The Geekbench scores—OpenCL 214739 and Vulkan 263779—show compute versatility, while passmark G3D at 34457 and GPU compute at 20671 highlight rasterization and general compute. The 86th percentile places it just behind the RTX 4080 SUPER (+0.1%) and ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (-1.1%), showing the RTX 4080 is a near-flagship GPU. The combined percentile of 87 suggests that, as a pair, the CPU and GPU are well-balanced, with neither component dragging the other down significantly.

The combined picture is one of high performance with a slight CPU lean in gaming and a GPU lean in compute. The CPU’s single-core score of 3758 is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most games, but the 65 W TDP limits sustained multi-core workloads. The GPU’s 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth make it a rendering monster, and the CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache helps feed it. For a desktop build, this pairing is in the top 13% of all configurations, making it suitable for high-refresh 1440p gaming and content creation, though the data does not include any measured FPS to confirm specific game performance.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a high-end desktop for both gaming and productivity. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the RTX 4080’s 16 GB VRAM and 86th percentile standing, which is essential for high-detail textures and ray tracing. The CPU’s 88th percentile ensures that frame rates are not CPU-limited in most titles, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU is the bottleneck. Content creators, such as video editors or 3D renderers, will leverage the CPU’s 20 threads for encoding and the GPU’s 20671 passmark compute score for rendering tasks like Blender or After Effects. The 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance is ideal for GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU’s passmark multithread score of 31725 and data compression score of 383972 useful, while the GPU’s CUDA cores (implied by the architecture) can accelerate testing or simulations. Students in engineering or data science fields, who need to run simulations or train small machine learning models, will benefit from the GPU’s 304 tensor cores and 16 GB VRAM. Small business workstations handling video conferencing, office suites, and light CAD will find the CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 a backup, though the RTX 4080 is overkill for such tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP mean a 700 W PSU is sufficient, making this a viable build for a high-performance workstation without extreme power requirements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with the Raptor Lake architecture, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose memory based on budget or performance, though the data does not specify which memory type yields better results. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides high bandwidth for modern SSDs and GPUs, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible. The 65 W TDP is low, meaning the CPU has headroom for cooling upgrades, but the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible. The GPU’s 320 W TDP and suggested 700 W PSU leave little headroom for additional high-power components, but the system is not power-constrained for a single-GPU build.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, such as an i7 or i9 from the 13th Gen series, which would share the same LGA 1700 socket and DDR5 memory support. However, the data does not list such CPUs, so this is speculative. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded to the RTX 4080 SUPER, which the data shows is only 0.1% faster in average score, making that upgrade marginal. The memory bus is dual-channel, so adding more RAM is straightforward, but the 24 MB L3 cache is fixed. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support is future-proof for storage, but the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface does not bottleneck it, as the bandwidth is sufficient. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a feature for workstation reliability, though the data does not specify if it is enabled by default.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains an empty measuredFpsUltraByGame field and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores. The RTX 4080’s 86th percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6567 suggest it is capable of high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, but the exact figures are unknown. The CPU’s single-core score of 3758 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most games, but the lack of data means this is an inference.

At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance would likely be the limiting factor, but the GPU’s raw power would still produce high frame rates. At 1440p, the balance shifts to the GPU, and the 16 GB VRAM would handle most games at ultra settings. At 4K, the GPU’s 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth would be the primary drivers, though the CPU’s 20 threads might struggle with heavily threaded game engines. The passmark G3D score of 34457 is a strong indicator of DirectX 11 and 12 performance, but without measured FPS, these are qualitative estimates. Users should expect a high-refresh experience at 1440p and a solid 60+ FPS at 4K, but the data does not support specific numbers.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4080’s 86th percentile and 16 GB VRAM make it capable of driving 1440p monitors at high refresh rates, with the CPU’s 88th percentile ensuring minimal bottlenecks. Estimated frame rates would be high, but the lack of measured data prevents specifics.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and passmark multithread score of 31725 can handle encoding, while the GPU’s tensor cores can offload encoding tasks, though the data does not specify NVENC capabilities. The combined 87th percentile suggests a smooth streaming experience at 1080p or 1440p.

Video editing: The CPU’s data compression score of 383972 and the GPU’s 20671 compute score accelerate rendering and effects. The 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 is ideal for timeline previews, while the 16 GB VRAM handles large projects.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 76 RT cores and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 dominate ray-traced renders, with the CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache aiding scene loading. The passmark GPU compute score of 20671 indicates strong performance in Blender or similar tools.

Software development: The CPU’s passmark integer math score of 111044 and multithread score of 31725 speed up compilation, while the GPU can accelerate testing. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low for long build sessions.

Student and office work: Overkill for most tasks, but the CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the GPU is idle. The low TDP and ECC memory support make it a reliable, if expensive, workstation for research.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600 has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival?

A: The RTX 4080’s average benchmark score of 54247 is 0.1% behind the RTX 4080 SUPER, which is within the margin of error, making them effectively equal.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4080 has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this pairing?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rates are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this build?

A: The GPU has a 320 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 700 W, which is sufficient for the CPU’s 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU’s architecture and socket?

A: The CPU is based on Raptor Lake architecture and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC support, and has PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, and the launch MSRP was $255.

Benchmark scores show a strong single-core performer: Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758 and multi-core of 26620, with a passmark single-thread score of 4049 and multithread of 31725. The passmark integer math score of 111044 and floating-point math of 81892 indicate robust arithmetic capability, while data compression (383972) and encryption (22182) scores show strong throughput. The 88th percentile, with an average score of 44240, places it just behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (-0.2%) and Intel Core i9-13950HX (-0.2%), making it a high-tier mainstream CPU. The 10 nm process and 215 mm² die size are modest, but the 65 W TDP allows for efficient cooling, though the locked multiplier prevents overclocking.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, resulting in a combined percentile of 87, placing it in the top 13% of all configurations. The CPU’s 88th percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a balanced system for gaming and productivity. The CPU provides 14 cores and 20 threads with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU offers 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32, making it a high-end rendering solution. The RTX 4080 is end-of-life, with the RTX 4080 SUPER as its closest rival at +0.1%, while the CPU is active with the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D as a close competitor at -0.7%. This pairing is a high-tier desktop configuration, suitable for demanding workloads, though the lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores. The system’s overall tier is high, with the CPU’s low TDP and the GPU’s 320 W TDP requiring a 700 W PSU, making it a power-efficient high-performance build.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds