SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

31,087 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-13600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER pairing represents a desktop configuration where the balance of components is heavily skewed toward graphics throughput in gaming workloads, yet retains enough CPU headroom for multi-threaded productivity tasks. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 76th percentile among all graphics cards, and the combined system percentile is 82. This gap of 12 percentile points between the two components suggests that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where rasterization and shading demands outpace the CPU's per-core throughput.

The CPU's benchmark data reinforces this interpretation. In Cinebench R23, the i5-13600 scores 26,620 in multi-core and 3,758 in single-core. The single-core score is comparatively strong, which means the CPU can feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic without becoming a bottleneck in most titles. However, the multi-core score, while robust, is not in the top tier of desktop processors, so in CPU-intensive simulations or heavily threaded game engines, the CPU could become the constraint. The PassMark data shows a single-thread score of 4,049 and a multithread score of 31,725, with floating-point math at 81,892 and integer math at 111,044. These figures indicate that the CPU handles physics calculations and game logic efficiently, but the GPU's raw compute — 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance — is the dominant force in frame generation.

FPS scaling evidence is absent from this FACT PACK because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than empirical results. Given the GPU's 76th percentile position and the CPU's 88th percentile position, the data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU may occasionally limit frame rates in esports titles where frame rates exceed 200 FPS, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU will almost certainly be the bottleneck. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on the GPU with 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth further supports this, as memory-bound scenarios will favor the GPU's capabilities.

The CPU's TDP of 65 watts against the GPU's 285 watts TDP is another indicator of balance. The power envelope disparity means the GPU draws significantly more power and produces more heat, requiring a robust cooling solution and a power supply rated for at least 600 watts, as suggested by the GPU's `suggestedPsu` field. This is not a balanced pairing in terms of power draw, but in terms of workload distribution, the CPU has enough headroom to avoid being a major bottleneck. The PassMark data compression score of 383,972 and encryption score of 22,182 show that the CPU handles data-intensive tasks well, but these are not gaming workloads. In gaming, the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads are more than sufficient for modern titles, and the single-thread performance is adequate for the vast majority of game engines.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 44,240, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 with an average score of 44,309 (a delta of -0.2%), the Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44,342 (-0.2%), the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44,466 (-0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 44,573 (-0.7%). These deltas are all negative, meaning the i5-13600 scores slightly lower than each rival, but the differences are marginal — less than 1% in every case. This places the CPU in a performance tier where it trades blows with high-end mobile and desktop parts, though it is not a top-tier halo product.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 31,087, placing it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 at 31,206 (-0.4%), the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q at 31,220 (-0.4%), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell at 31,532 (-1.4%), and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX at 31,676 (-1.9%). Again, the deltas are negative, indicating that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores slightly below these rivals, but the differences are small, ranging from -0.4% to -1.9%. The GPU's individual benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,569, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 199,267, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 53,683. The PassMark G3D score is 31,811, with a GPU compute score of 18,372.

The combined picture is a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity and high-resolution gaming. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11,180 and R15 multi-core score of 2,683 indicate strong rendering performance for its class. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,569 is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark that stresses ray tracing and mesh shaders, and the score suggests the GPU is capable of handling next-generation game workloads. The CPU's PassMark extended instructions score of 23,045 and find prime numbers score of 109 are lower-tier results, but these are niche tests. Overall, the data shows a system where the CPU slightly outpaces the GPU in percentile terms, but the GPU's raw compute power in FP32 and its 16 GB VRAM capacity make it the more significant contributor to gaming performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 13th-generation Raptor Lake desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm². It features 14 cores and 20 threads, which is a hybrid configuration of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact split. The base clock is 2.70 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared, with 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, and the CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface with PCIe Gen 5, providing 16 lanes from the CPU.

The benchmark scores for the CPU are strong for a mid-range desktop part. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 26,620 is impressive for a 65-watt TDP part, indicating that the hybrid architecture efficiently manages power across the cores. The single-core score of 3,758 is also competitive, suggesting that the performance cores can boost to high frequencies when needed. The Cinebench R20 scores of 11,180 multi-core and 1,578 single-core follow a similar pattern, and the R15 scores of 2,683 multi-core and 378 single-core are consistent.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into real-world workloads. The multithread score of 31,725 and single-thread score of 4,049 are both solid, but the data compression score of 383,972 is exceptionally high, indicating that the CPU handles file archiving and compression tasks with ease. The data encryption score of 22,182 is moderate, which is typical for a consumer CPU without dedicated encryption hardware. The floating-point math score of 81,892 and integer math score of 111,044 show that the CPU is balanced across different math operations, which is beneficial for scientific computing and financial modeling. The random string sorting score of 42,040 is a memory-latency-sensitive test, and the result suggests the cache hierarchy is effective.

The CPU's production status is active, and it was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $255. The multiplier is not unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited, but the boost clock of 5.00 GHz is already high. The part number is SRMBS, and the architecture is Raptor Lake-S, which is a refinement of the previous Alder Lake design. The 10 nm process node, while not the most advanced, is mature and well-characterized. The CPU's 88th percentile position among all CPUs confirms its strong multi-threaded performance, but it is not a flagship part. The nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, are within 1% of its average score, so the performance differences are negligible in real-world use.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical measurements. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,569 and PassMark G3D score of 31,811 indicate that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a high-end graphics card capable of running modern titles at ultra settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,049 in PassMark suggests that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games.

At 1080p resolution, the estimated frame rates for esports titles like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2 would likely exceed 300 FPS, but the CPU's performance cores may limit the absolute maximum in CPU-bound scenarios. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU would likely deliver frame rates in the 120-180 FPS range, depending on the title. At 1440p, which is the sweet spot for this GPU, the estimated frame rates for demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Alan Wake 2 would be in the 60-100 FPS range with ray tracing enabled, and higher without ray tracing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-resolution textures and ray-traced effects.

At 4K, the estimated frame rates would drop to 40-60 FPS for the most demanding titles at ultra settings, but with DLSS or frame generation, which the GPU supports through its tensor cores, the playable frame rates could increase significantly. The GPU's FP32 performance of 44.10 TFLOPS is substantial, but 4K ultra settings push the shading units and RT cores to their limits. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads are more than adequate for gaming at any resolution, as most games use fewer than 8 cores, and the single-thread performance is strong enough to avoid stuttering.

The absence of measured FPS data means that these estimates carry a degree of uncertainty. The benchmark scores, however, are consistent with a GPU that places in the 76th percentile, which is a high-end tier. The CPU's 88th percentile position ensures that it is not a weak link. For competitive gamers seeking high refresh rates at 1080p, the CPU may be the limiting factor in some titles, but for immersive 1440p or 4K gaming, the GPU will dominate the performance profile.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 76th percentile position and 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance make it well-suited for 1440p high-refresh-rate displays. Estimated frame rates would exceed 144 FPS in most esports titles and approach 100 FPS in AAA titles at ultra settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,049 ensures minimal input lag, though at 1080p, the CPU may cap frame rates in extremely fast games.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder, which is part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, offloads video encoding from the CPU. The CPU's multi-thread score of 31,725 provides ample headroom for game capture, stream encoding, and background tasks simultaneously. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM prevents memory bottlenecks when streaming at high bitrates.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 and PassMark data compression score of 383,972 indicate strong performance in video editing software that utilizes multi-threading. The GPU's 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading, and the 16 GB VRAM handles 4K timelines with ease.

3D rendering: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620, which is competitive for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's FP32 and FP16 performance, both at 44.10 TFLOPS, provide substantial acceleration for GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane. The 66 RT cores also accelerate ray-traced rendering tasks.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 111,044 and random string sorting score of 42,040 are relevant to compilation and code analysis tasks. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency. The GPU is less critical for development but can accelerate machine learning workloads through its 264 tensor cores.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65-watt TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide an energy-efficient baseline for everyday tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,049 ensures responsive application launching, and the multi-thread score of 31,725 handles multitasking across many browser tabs and office documents. The GPU is overkill for this scenario but does not hinder basic productivity.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process node, with a die size of 379 mm² and 45,900 million transistors. The chip is the AD103, and the transistor density is 121.1 million per mm². The GPU features 8,448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It has 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, which accelerate ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The base clock is 2,340 MHz, and the boost clock is 2,610 MHz. The memory clock is 1,313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective, and the memory interface is 256-bit, providing 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s.

The GPU's pixel rate is 250.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 689.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 44.10 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 44.10 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio, which is unusual and suggests the GPU does not specialize in FP16 compute. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The power consumption is 285 watts, and the GPU requires a 600-watt power supply. The card is triple-slot wide, measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, and uses a single 16-pin power connector. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a.

The benchmark scores for the GPU are strong but not top-tier. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,569 is a modern benchmark that stresses ray tracing and mesh shaders, and the score places the GPU in the upper mid-range of current hardware. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 199,267 is high, indicating strong compute performance, while the Vulkan score of 53,683 is lower, suggesting that the GPU's Vulkan drivers may not be as optimized. The PassMark G3D score of 31,811 and GPU compute score of 18,372 are consistent with a high-end card.

The GPU's 76th percentile position among all GPUs is notable, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA TITAN RTX, which scores 31,676 (a delta of -1.9%). This means the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER performs within 2% of a previous-generation flagship, which is impressive for a mid-cycle refresh. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, and it was released on January 23, 2024, with a launch MSRP of 799 USD. The predecessor is the GeForce 30 series, and the successor is the GeForce 50 series. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for content creation, as it allows for large textures and complex scenes without out-of-memory errors.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is ideal for gamers targeting 1440p resolution with high refresh rates. The GPU's 76th percentile position and 16 GB VRAM ensure that modern games run at ultra settings with ray tracing enabled, and the CPU's 88th percentile position prevents bottlenecks in most scenarios. Estimated frame rates would be in the 80-120 FPS range for demanding AAA titles at 1440p ultra, making this a strong choice for immersive single-player experiences.

Content creators who work with 4K video editing, 3D rendering, or machine learning will benefit from the GPU's 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 264 tensor cores. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 accelerates CPU-based rendering, and the 20 threads handle video encoding and effects processing in parallel. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for GPU-accelerated rendering, as it allows for larger scenes and higher-resolution textures.

Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 111,044 and its 20 threads. The GPU is less relevant for development, but its tensor cores can accelerate local machine learning experiments. The CPU's ECC memory support is a niche feature that may appeal to developers working on data integrity-sensitive applications.

Students and small business workstations will find this pairing overkill, but the CPU's 65-watt TDP and integrated graphics provide a low-idle power draw. The GPU can be disabled for basic office work, and the system can be repurposed for gaming or content creation later. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,049 ensures snappy performance in office applications, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency in multitasking scenarios. This is not a budget build, but it is a versatile one that handles a wide range of workloads with ease.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600 has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 256-bit bus width.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU's boost clock is 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The GPU's FP32 performance is 44.10 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is also 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1).

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 82.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The GPU's production status is end-of-life, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in a desktop configuration (buildClass: desktop). The CPU is a 13th-generation Raptor Lake part with 14 cores and 20 threads, clocked between 2.70 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost, with a 65-watt TDP. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture part with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, 8,448 shading units, and a 285-watt TDP. The CPU scores in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU scores in the 76th percentile of all GPUs, yielding a combined percentile of 82.

The overall tier of this build is upper mid-range to high-end. The CPU's average benchmark score of 44,240 is within 1% of rivals like the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and Intel Core i9-13950HX, meaning it delivers near-flagship performance in multi-threaded tasks. The GPU's average benchmark score of 31,087 is within 2% of the NVIDIA TITAN RTX, a previous-generation flagship, indicating that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER provides excellent rasterization and ray tracing performance. The CPU's 88th percentile position outpaces the GPU's 76th percentile, so the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads, but the CPU has enough headroom to avoid severe frame rate drops. This is a well-balanced system for 1440p gaming and demanding productivity tasks, with the caveat that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds