SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 represents a high-end desktop combination built around a 14-core Raptor Lake processor and an Ada Lovelace graphics card. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data, which contains no measured frame rate results for this exact pairing. All performance characterizations regarding gaming are therefore estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, housing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1920 MHz with a boost clock of 2475 MHz, paired with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 192-bit bus. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s, which is substantial for 1440p gaming and adequate for 4K in many titles, though the 192-bit bus width places a ceiling on bandwidth-intensive workloads compared to wider-memory designs.

The GPU features 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors. Ray tracing hardware includes 46 RT cores, while 184 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated tasks such as DLSS. The compute throughput is rated at 29.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 operations, indicating balanced performance for traditional rasterization and emerging AI-enhanced rendering techniques. Pixel fill rate is 158.4 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 455.4 GTexel/s, numbers that support smooth high-resolution rendering with detailed textures.

The RTX 4070 AD103 holds a 50th percentile position among all GPUs, placing it squarely in the middle of the performance distribution. This percentile ranking means half of all GPUs in the database outperform it, and half underperform it. For rendering workloads, the 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is the headline figure, providing strong raw throughput for 3D rendering tasks in applications like Blender or Maya, though the 12 GB VRAM capacity may constrain very large scenes or high-resolution texture sets.

The GPU's memory subsystem, with 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, is well-matched to its 192-bit bus and 12 GB capacity. GDDR6X memory at 21 Gbps effective speed delivers the bandwidth needed for 1440p gaming with high texture quality settings. The presence of 46 RT cores means ray-traced effects are feasible, but performance will vary by title and resolution. The tensor cores enable DLSS upscaling, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported games, effectively extending the GPU's lifespan for future titles with heavier rendering demands.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the Intel Core i5-13600 show a strong all-around performer. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 26,620 points in multi-core and 3,758 points in single-core tests. These figures place the CPU in the 88th percentile among all processors, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database. The multi-core score reflects the 14-core, 20-thread configuration effectively handling heavily threaded workloads, while the single-core score demonstrates the 5.00 GHz boost clock delivering responsive single-threaded performance.

In older Cinebench versions, the i5-13600 scores 11,180 points in R20 multi-core and 1,578 points in R20 single-core, with R15 results of 2,683 multi-core and 378 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 31,725 and a single-thread score of 4,049. The average benchmark score across all tests is 44,240, which places the CPU within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and Intel Core i9-13950HX, and 0.5% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H. The closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 0.7% ahead. These near-identical scores indicate the i5-13600 trades blows with flagship mobile and desktop processors from competing families.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 69%, reflecting a system that sits above the majority of desktop configurations. The GPU contributes its 50th percentile ranking, while the CPU's 88th percentile pulls the overall position upward. This combination yields a system where the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers, which has implications for workload balance as detailed in subsequent sections.

PassMark sub-tests reveal specific strengths: integer math scores 111,044, floating-point math scores 81,892, and extended instructions score 23,045. Data compression scores 383,972, data encryption scores 22,182, and random string sorting scores 42,040. Physics calculations score 1,782, and prime number finding scores 109. These figures paint a picture of a CPU that excels at computational tasks, particularly integer and floating-point operations, which benefit content creation and scientific workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame rate expectations here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and hardware specifications, not observed results.

Based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and its 29.15 TFLOPS compute throughput, this system should deliver solid 1440p gaming performance. The 12 GB VRAM capacity and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient resources for modern titles at high settings without exceeding memory limits. The 192-bit memory bus is a potential constraint at 4K resolution, where bandwidth demands increase significantly, potentially causing performance drops in memory-heavy scenes.

The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and 5.00 GHz boost clock suggest it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 14-core configuration with 20 threads provides ample headroom for background tasks during gaming, such as Discord, browser tabs, or streaming software. The 24 MB shared L3 cache helps maintain low latency access to frequently used data, improving frame pacing in CPU-bound titles.

For esports titles at 1080p, the high single-core score of 4,049 in PassMark and 3,758 in Cinebench R23 indicate the CPU can push very high frame rates. The GPU's 158.4 GPixel/s pixel fill rate supports fast rasterization, making this combination well-suited for competitive gaming where frame rates above 144 FPS are desirable. At 1440p, the GPU's compute and memory resources become more evenly balanced with the CPU's capabilities, likely delivering high refresh rate performance in most titles.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The 50th percentile ranking suggests the RTX 4070 AD103 is average among all GPUs, and 4K gaming typically requires higher-tier GPUs to maintain 60 FPS at ultra settings. The 12 GB VRAM may also be limiting for 4K textures in the most demanding titles, though many games remain playable with adjusted settings. Ray tracing at 4K would stress the 46 RT cores significantly, likely requiring DLSS to maintain playable frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU relative to their respective peer groups. The CPU sits in the 88th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 50th percentile. This 38-percentage-point gap indicates the processor is the stronger component when compared to other CPUs, while the GPU is more mid-pack among GPUs.

In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios. The CPU's high single-thread performance and substantial core count mean it can feed the GPU with frames efficiently, but the GPU's 50th percentile position caps maximum achievable frame rates. For 1080p gaming, the CPU may occasionally become the bottleneck in lightly threaded titles where its 5.00 GHz boost clock determines performance, but this is unlikely given its top-tier percentile ranking.

For productivity tasks, the CPU's 88th percentile position and 14-core configuration make it the driving force. Multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering will leverage the CPU's 20 threads effectively, while the GPU contributes through its 29.15 TFLOPS compute for GPU-accelerated tasks. The balance shifts toward the CPU in these scenarios, with the GPU acting as a co-processor for specific operations.

The FPS scaling picture, inferred from the benchmark scores, suggests that increasing resolution from 1080p to 1440p to 4K will progressively shift the bottleneck from a relatively balanced state to GPU-bound. At lower resolutions, the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures high frame rates are achievable, while at higher resolutions, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors. The combined 69th percentile for the system reflects a configuration where one component (CPU) is above average and the other (GPU) is average, with overall performance determined by the weaker link in each workload type.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 88th percentile single-thread performance supports high frame rates, while the GPU's 50th percentile position enables 1440p gaming at high settings with refresh rates around 100-144 Hz depending on the title. Esports games at 1080p should easily exceed 144 FPS given the CPU's boost clock of 5.00 GHz and the GPU's 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread CPU provides dedicated cores for encoding workloads alongside gaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 22,182 indicates solid cryptographic performance, which supports secure streaming protocols. The GPU's tensor cores can also accelerate encoding tasks, though the CPU alone has sufficient headroom for software encoding while gaming.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 indicates the CPU handles timeline rendering and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth support real-time preview of 4K footage with color grading effects. The 29.15 TFLOPS compute accelerates effects and transitions in GPU-accelerated editors.

3D rendering: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide strong CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU's 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates GPU-based render engines. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most scenes, though extremely complex scenes may require lower texture resolutions. The 88th CPU percentile and 50th GPU percentile combine for a capable mid-range rendering workstation.

Software development: The CPU's high single-thread score of 4,049 in PassMark benefits compilation tasks, which are often single-threaded. The 24 MB L3 cache and 20 threads support parallel builds and test suites. The data compression score of 383,972 indicates fast repository operations and artifact handling.

Student and office work: The CPU's 88th percentile ranking handles multitasking across office applications with ease. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output for productivity tasks without needing the discrete GPU active. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption moderate for daily use, while the 20 threads support virtualization for development coursework.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers at 1440p resolution who want high settings without extreme frame rate demands. The GPU's 50th percentile position delivers solid performance at this resolution, while the CPU's 88th percentile ensures no processor-induced stuttering. Gamers at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors will find the CPU capable of driving very high frame rates, though the GPU may limit maximum FPS in the most demanding titles.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 14-core configuration and the GPU's compute throughput. The 12 GB VRAM accommodates 4K video timelines and moderate 3D scenes. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the single-thread performance and 20 threads for parallel builds, particularly with the 24 MB L3 cache reducing memory latency.

Students in engineering or computer science programs can leverage the CPU's multi-threaded performance for simulations and compilation, while the GPU supports CUDA-based coursework. Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-tasking and occasional GPU acceleration for design or data visualization will find this combination sufficient. The system's combined 69th percentile position indicates it outperforms most desktop configurations, making it a reasonable choice for users who need above-average performance across mixed workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65 W. This is a locked multiplier processor, meaning overclocking is not supported through multiplier adjustment, though the high boost clock already provides strong stock performance.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration provides low-latency access to frequently used data across all cores, which is critical for gaming and productivity workloads that exhibit temporal locality. The L3 cache size of 24 MB is generous for a mid-range desktop processor and contributes to the strong single-thread performance.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the memory bandwidth figure is not specified in the data. The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the RTX 4070 AD103's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and future expansion.

The benchmark scores show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,758 and multi-core score of 26,620 place it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The PassMark multithread score of 31,725 and single-thread score of 4,049 corroborate this balanced performance profile. The average benchmark score of 44,240 puts it within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, indicating competitive performance with a popular gaming-focused rival.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and hardware acceleration for video playback, useful for troubleshooting or office systems where the discrete GPU is not required. The processor was released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $255, and remains in active production.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600 holds an 88th percentile position, meaning it outperforms 88% of all CPUs in the database based on its average benchmark score of 44,240.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has an average score of 44,573, which is 0.7% higher than the i5-13600's 44,240. This difference is negligible in real-world terms.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 AD103 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor and beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU's compute performance in TFLOPS?

A: The GPU delivers 29.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 operations, indicating balanced compute capability for gaming and general-purpose workloads.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 69%, placing it above the majority of desktop configurations in the database.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking via multiplier adjustment is not supported. The 5.00 GHz boost clock provides high stock performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports the 13th Gen Core series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to retain existing DDR4 modules or upgrade to DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported for error-checking in critical workloads.

The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring compatibility with the latest GPUs and NVMe storage. The RTX 4070 AD103 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the Gen 5 slot, running at the lower speed without performance degradation. The motherboard should support BIOS updates for Raptor Lake processors if using an older 600-series chipset.

The GPU has a TDP of 200 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W, providing headroom for additional components. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, leaving ample power budget for overclocking memory or adding storage drives. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector, which may necessitate an adapter for older power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 88th percentile ranking means it can support significantly more powerful graphics cards without bottlenecking. The 14-core configuration and 24 MB L3 cache provide headroom for future gaming or productivity demands. Alternatively, upgrading to a higher core count CPU on the same socket would be possible, though the i5-13600's performance already exceeds most usage requirements.

The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory offers flexibility for incremental upgrades, though the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. The PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage expansion with next-generation NVMe drives. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 200 W TDP of the GPU make this a relatively power-efficient combination, with the 550 W suggested PSU providing ample margin for overclocking memory or adding peripherals.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds