SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, Bandwidth, Clocks, RT/Tensor Hardware, and Rendering Implications

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, and houses 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, which are modest figures for a 40-series card but are complemented by the architecture's efficiency. Memory configuration consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. This bandwidth figure is critical for texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering, though it trails higher-tier cards in the same family. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz, translating to 21 Gbps effective, which is a notable specification for sustained throughput in demanding scenes.

The RTX 4070 integrates 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. These resources produce a pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s. For ray tracing, the GPU includes 46 dedicated RT cores, while 184 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated workloads such as DLSS and other neural network tasks. The FP32 compute throughput is rated at 29.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating balanced performance for both standard shading and mixed-precision workloads. The pixel and texture rates suggest that the card is well-suited to 1440p rendering, where the balance between fill rate and compute power aligns with modern game engines.

Benchmark results for the GPU show strong DirectX performance. The PassMark G3D score is 26927, which places the card at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3854, indicating robust performance in modern API workloads. Compute-oriented tests reveal a PassMark GPU Compute score of 14720, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 154858 and 174152, respectively. The DirectX 11 score of 244 and DirectX 12 score of 103 (from PassMark) suggest that the card excels in legacy and contemporary APIs alike, though the DirectX 9 score of 320 is notably higher, reflecting strong raw rasterization capability. The G2D score of 1164 indicates adequate 2D performance, which is less critical for gaming but relevant for desktop workflows.

For rendering, the combination of 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p ultra-texture packs and moderate 4K workloads, though 4K at maximum settings may strain the memory capacity in texture-heavy titles. The RT and tensor core counts are substantial for a mid-to-high-end card, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based upscaling. The data shows that the RTX 4070 is not a top-tier GPU—its 81st percentile ranking places it below the highest performers—but it sits comfortably above the majority of installed hardware, making it a capable choice for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming and entry-level 4K. The nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (0.4% ahead) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (1.3% behind), illustrate that the desktop RTX 4070 occupies a competitive niche where small percentage differences separate it from older and mobile counterparts.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for the Intel Core i5-13600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is defined by the CPU's 88th percentile ranking and the GPU's 81st percentile ranking, yielding a combined percentile of 85 across all systems. This places the pairing in the upper echelon of desktop configurations, though not at the absolute top. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44240, while the GPU's average score is 37648, indicating that the processor provides a slightly stronger relative performance foundation than the graphics card.

Looking at CPU-specific scores, the Core i5-13600 achieves 26620 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3758 in single-core, both strong figures for a 14-core processor. In Cinebench R20, scores are 11180 multi-core and 1578 single-core, while R15 yields 2683 multi-core and 378 single-core. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 31725 and a single-thread score of 4049, with additional workload scores such as integer math at 111044, floating-point math at 81892, and data compression at 383972. The extended instructions score is 23045, and the find prime numbers score is 109, indicating solid performance in specialized tasks.

The CPU's nearest rivals highlight its competitive position. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 has an average score of 44309, a delta of -0.2% relative to the i5-13600, meaning the Intel chip is marginally behind. Similarly, the Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342, also -0.2% behind the i5-13600. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466, a -0.5% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573, a -0.7% delta. These figures show that the i5-13600 is within 1% of several high-end processors, some of which are mobile parts or newer architectures, underscoring its strong price-to-performance positioning despite not being a flagship.

For the GPU, the PassMark G3D score of 26927 is the primary gaming-oriented metric, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 provides a modern DX12 benchmark. The nearest rivals for the GPU are the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (0.4% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (1.3% behind), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (1.3% ahead). These deltas are small, indicating that the RTX 4070 is tightly clustered with a range of GPUs, some of which are older desktop parts and others are mobile variants. The data suggests that the RTX 4070's desktop advantage is not overwhelming, but its feature set—including newer RT and tensor cores—provides benefits beyond raw score comparisons.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU and GPU are well-matched, with the CPU slightly ahead in percentile terms. This balance means that in most workloads, neither component will consistently bottleneck the other. The CPU's 88th percentile and GPU's 81st percentile create a configuration that excels in multi-threaded productivity and high-refresh-rate gaming, though the GPU may limit performance in extreme 4K scenarios where the CPU's headroom is less relevant.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. The die size is 215 mm², and the CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700. It features a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which is a significant boost range that allows the processor to scale from power-efficient operation to high-performance single-threaded tasks. The TDP is 65 W, indicating a mainstream power envelope that is suitable for standard desktop cooling solutions.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides ample fast memory for the 14 cores, with the L3 cache being particularly important for gaming and productivity workloads that benefit from shared data access. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is uncommon for consumer desktop CPUs but valuable for workstation-class reliability. The integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 770, providing basic display output and hardware acceleration without a discrete GPU.

The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity, though the RTX 4070 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is not officially supported, but the boost clock of 5.00 GHz is already high for a non-K SKU. The release date is January 3, 2023, and the launch MSRP is $255, positioning it as a mid-range desktop processor.

Benchmark scores for the i5-13600 reveal strong multi-threaded performance, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 being particularly impressive for a 65 W part. Single-thread performance is also robust, with the R23 single-core score of 3758 and PassMark single-thread score of 4049. The PassMark multi-thread score of 31725 confirms that the CPU handles heavily threaded workloads efficiently. Real-world workloads such as data compression (383972 in PassMark) and data encryption (22182) show that the processor is well-suited to productivity tasks, while the floating-point math score of 81892 and integer math score of 111044 indicate balanced compute capabilities.

The 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs means the i5-13600 outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market, including many older high-end parts. Its nearest rivals, which include the Intel Core i9-13950HX (a mobile chip) and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (a gaming-focused desktop chip), show that the i5-13600 competes with a wider range of products than its naming suggests. The delta percentages of -0.2% to -0.7% indicate that the i5-13600 is within striking distance of these rivals, making it a versatile choice for users who need strong multi-threaded performance without the cost or power draw of a flagship. The architecture's efficiency, combined with the 5.00 GHz boost clock, makes it a capable processor for compilation, rendering, and simulation workloads, while the integrated UHD 770 provides a fallback for basic tasks.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is also compatible with 12th Gen Alder Lake and some 13th Gen Raptor Lake processors, though the specific support depends on motherboard BIOS versions. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on budget and performance needs. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class, and the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency in many workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes is a key upgrade feature, as it allows for future high-bandwidth storage devices or GPUs, though current GPUs like the RTX 4070 use PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully backward compatible.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, which is modest and allows for a wide range of cooling solutions, from stock coolers to mid-range air or liquid coolers. The GPU's TDP is 200 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W, which means a typical system with this pairing would require a power supply in the 550-650 W range to provide adequate headroom. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, which is a newer standard, and the card is dual-slot with dimensions of 240 mm length, 110 mm height, and 40 mm width, fitting most mid-tower cases. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting high refresh rates and multi-monitor setups.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the CPU has more headroom than the GPU in gaming workloads, given the CPU's 88th percentile versus the GPU's 81st percentile. An upgrade path could involve moving to a higher-tier GPU, such as a card with better ray tracing performance or more VRAM, while keeping the i5-13600. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs will not be bottlenecked by the interface. Alternatively, memory upgrades from DDR4 to DDR5 (if not already using DDR5) could improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads, though the CPU's dual-channel design limits the gains compared to quad-channel platforms. The 65 W TDP also means the CPU can be paired with a more powerful GPU without exceeding typical PSU capacity, as the combined draw of 265 W (65 W CPU + 200 W GPU) leaves ample room within the 550 W suggested PSU for other components.

The platform's production status is active for the CPU, while the GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. This suggests that while the GPU may be phased out, the CPU platform remains viable for future upgrades. The socket 1700 is also used by the 14th Gen processors (though not explicitly confirmed in the fact pack), so a user could potentially upgrade to a higher-core-count CPU within the same socket, subject to motherboard compatibility. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation use, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support provides cost-effective memory options.

# FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of the Intel Core i5-13600 and RTX 4070 combination?

A: The combined percentile is 85, with the CPU at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 81st percentile among all components. This places the system in the upper tier of desktop configurations, suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming and demanding productivity tasks.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-13600 has an average score of 44240, which is -0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and Intel Core i9-13950HX, -0.5% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, and -0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D. These deltas are all within 1%, indicating very close performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The memory clock is 1313 MHz, effective 21 Gbps.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors and useful for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W and the GPU has a TDP of 200 W, leaving headroom for other components within the suggested PSU rating.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. The CPU is still active in production.

Q: What benchmark scores indicate the GPU's gaming performance?

A: The PassMark G3D score is 26927, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3854. These scores place the GPU at the 81st percentile, indicating strong performance for 1440p gaming and entry-level 4K.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing is ideal for gamers targeting 1440p resolution with high refresh rates, as the GPU's 81st percentile performance and the CPU's 88th percentile ensure that most modern titles will run smoothly at high settings. The 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p ultra textures, while the RT cores enable ray tracing at playable frame rates. For 4K gaming, the system will handle less demanding titles or those with DLSS, but the GPU may struggle with the most demanding games at maximum settings.

Content creators, particularly those working with video editing, 3D rendering, and data processing, will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 and PassMark multi-thread score of 31725 indicate that the i5-13600 can handle rendering tasks efficiently, while the GPU's compute scores (PassMark GPU Compute of 14720 and Geekbench OpenCL of 154858) accelerate GPU-accelerated workflows like video encoding and machine learning inference. The ECC memory support is a bonus for professionals requiring data integrity.

Developers and students in computer science or engineering fields will find the system capable for compiling large codebases, running simulations, and using virtual machines. The 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallel processing power, and the 65 W TDP makes it a practical choice for dorm rooms or small offices where power consumption and heat are concerns. Small business workstations that need a balance of CPU and GPU power for tasks like CAD, financial modeling, or data analysis would also benefit, as the system can handle both compute-intensive and graphics-intensive workloads without significant bottlenecks.

The system is not ideal for users seeking maximum 4K gaming performance or heavy 8K video editing, as the GPU's VRAM and bandwidth may be limiting. Similarly, users who require extreme multi-threaded performance for tasks like scientific simulations or large-scale machine learning training would be better served by a higher-core-count CPU. However, for the majority of users who need a well-rounded desktop that excels in both productivity and gaming, this is a strong choice.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the fact pack. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile rankings of the components.

Given the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 26927 (81st percentile) and the CPU's single-thread score of 4049 (88th percentile), the system is expected to deliver high frame rates at 1440p in most games. At 1440p ultra settings, the RTX 4070 should achieve 60-100+ FPS in most AAA titles, with lighter esports titles exceeding 144 FPS. The 12 GB VRAM is likely sufficient for 1440p ultra textures in current games, though future titles with larger texture packs may require reducing settings to high.

At 1080p, the system will likely be CPU-limited in many games, as the GPU's performance is more than sufficient for this resolution. The CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread performance (3758 in Cinebench R23 single-core) should drive frame rates well above 144 FPS in competitive titles, making this a viable setup for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, with estimated frame rates in the 30-60 FPS range for demanding games at ultra settings, depending on the title and whether DLSS is enabled.

Ray tracing performance will be a mixed bag. The 46 RT cores are capable of enabling ray-traced effects, but the 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute means that fully ray-traced scenes at 1440p may require DLSS to maintain playable frame rates. The tensor cores support DLSS, which can significantly boost performance in supported titles by rendering at a lower resolution and upscaling. The benchmark scores do not directly measure FPS, so these estimates are qualitative and should be treated as rough guidance rather than precise expectations.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600, a 14-core Raptor Lake desktop processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, an Ada Lovelace-based GPU. The combination is a desktop-class system designed for high-performance gaming and productivity. The CPU's 88th percentile and GPU's 81st percentile produce a combined percentile of 85, indicating that this system outperforms the vast majority of desktop configurations currently in use.

The CPU is a mid-range processor with a 65 W TDP, featuring 14 cores and 20 threads with a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The GPU is a 200 W card with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. Both components are well-matched, with the CPU providing a slight performance edge in percentile terms. The system is not a top-tier enthusiast build—the GPU's 81st percentile and the CPU's 88th percentile place it below flagship components—but it represents a sweet spot for users who want strong performance without the power draw and cost of the highest-end parts.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is upper-mid-range to high-end, depending on the specific workloads. For gaming at 1440p, this system is highly capable, and for productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU's multi-threaded performance is competitive with much more expensive processors. The fact that the GPU is end-of-life may affect long-term availability, but the CPU's active status ensures ongoing support.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13600 and RTX 4070 is characterized by the CPU's 88th percentile versus the GPU's 81st percentile. This 7-percentage-point gap indicates that the CPU has slightly more headroom than the GPU, but the difference is not large enough to create a significant bottleneck in most workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at 1080p or heavily threaded productivity tasks, the GPU may be the limiting factor, as its 81st percentile performance could prevent the system from fully utilizing the CPU's capabilities. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or ray-traced workloads, the CPU's performance is more than adequate, and the GPU will be the primary constraint.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, can be inferred from the percentile difference. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4049) is likely to drive frame rates that exceed the GPU's rendering capacity, meaning the GPU will be the bottleneck in most games. At 1440p, the balance shifts, and the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor, but the CPU still provides enough headroom to avoid stuttering or frame drops. At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck, as the CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620) is sufficient to feed the GPU at any resolution.

For productivity workloads, the bottleneck depends on the specific task. For data compression (PassMark score of 383972) or encryption (22182), the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU is largely idle. For GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding or machine learning, the GPU's compute performance (PassMark GPU Compute of 14720) becomes the limiting factor. The system is well-balanced overall, with neither component consistently holding back the other in a way that would significantly degrade performance. Users who prioritize gaming at 1080p or 1440p may find the GPU to be the upgrade bottleneck, while those who focus on multi-threaded CPU workloads may want to consider a higher-core-count processor in the future.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds