SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 form a desktop pairing defined by a stark performance imbalance. The CPU is a high-end 14-core processor that outperforms nearly all rivals in its class, while the GPU is an entry-level graphics card that sits near the bottom of the performance hierarchy. This combination yields a system that excels in processor-intensive workloads such as software compilation, data processing, and productivity tasks, but it is severely constrained in graphics-heavy applications like modern gaming and 3D rendering. The data indicates a build where the GPU is the definitive bottleneck for any visual workload, while the CPU provides a massive headroom for multitasking and compute tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It is a desktop-class processor with 14 cores and 20 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The chip features a substantial cache hierarchy, including 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus and includes support for ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is critical. The processor also integrates UHD Graphics 770 and connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, offering modern connectivity for storage and expansion cards.

Benchmark data shows the i5-13600 is a formidable multi-core performer. In Cinebench R23, it scores 26620 points in the multi-core test and 3758 points in the single-core test. This multi-core result places the processor in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of available processors. The single-core score of 3758 is strong, though the multi-core advantage is more pronounced. In PassMark tests, the processor achieves a multi-thread score of 31725 and a single-thread score of 4049. The data also shows strong performance in specific compute tasks: a floating-point math score of 81892 and an integer math score of 111044, indicating robust mathematical processing capabilities.

The average benchmark score for the i5-13600 is 44240. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (average score 44309, delta -0.2%), the Intel Core i9-13950HX (average score 44342, delta -0.2%), the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (average score 44466, delta -0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (average score 44573, delta -0.7%). The deltas show that the i5-13600 is within 0.7% of these competitors, meaning its overall performance is statistically similar to those chips despite the difference in core counts and configurations. This suggests the i5-13600 is well-optimized for its architecture and clock speeds, delivering performance that matches or nearly matches processors from newer generations or higher tiers.

In real workloads, the high multi-thread scores translate directly to faster video encoding, 3D model rendering, and data compression tasks. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11180 and R15 multi-core score of 2683 further confirm this trend, showing consistent scaling across benchmark versions. The PassMark data compression score of 383972 is exceptionally high, indicating the processor handles file archiving and data transfer tasks with ease. The data encryption score of 22182 and extended instructions score of 23045 demonstrate capability in security and cryptography workloads. For software developers, the find prime numbers score of 109 and random string sorting score of 42040 show balanced performance across different algorithm types, making the CPU versatile for compiling code and running tests.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a low-power graphics card based on the Ampere architecture, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process node. It features the GA107 chip with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). It has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation processors. For ray tracing and AI acceleration, the card includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, offering the hardware foundation for DirectX 12 Ultimate features.

The GPU's compute specifications are modest. It delivers 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 2.706 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. These figures indicate the card is designed for basic rendering tasks rather than high-end gaming or professional visualization. The 50 W TDP and single-slot design with no power connectors make it an energy-efficient option that can be powered by a 250 W power supply. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and offers four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Benchmark results confirm the RTX 4010's entry-level positioning. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 2893 points. This places the GPU in the 18th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it performs better than only 18% of the graphics cards in the database. The nearest rivals in terms of average score are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (score 2907, delta -0.5%), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (score 2910, delta -0.6%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (score 2913, delta -0.7%). The deltas are small, but the rival cards have vastly different specifications; the RTX 4060 Ti models have significantly more memory and higher bandwidth, yet they score nearly identically due to the benchmark's nature. The NVIDIA Quadro P600 is also a close rival with a score of 2923 and a delta of -1%, indicating the RTX 4010's performance level is comparable to older professional cards.

For rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM capacity is a limiting factor. Modern 3D scenes with high-resolution textures will quickly exceed this memory pool, causing performance degradation or outright failure to load. The 96.00 GB/s bandwidth is also low, which constrains data transfer between the GPU and memory. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low overall compute throughput means ray-traced scenes will render slowly. The 24 tensor cores support DLSS and AI-based features, but the card's low FP32 performance limits the base rendering speed that DLSS would upscale from. In professional applications, the card can handle basic 2D design and light 3D work, but it is not suited for complex simulations or high-fidelity visual effects.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data shows a system with a powerful CPU and a weak GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 44240 places it in the 88th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 2893 places it in the 18th percentile. This results in a combined percentile of 53, which is the median of all systems in the database. The disparity is stark: the CPU outperforms 88% of its peers, while the GPU outperforms only 18% of its peers. This means the system's overall performance tier is dragged down significantly by the graphics card, even though the processor is top-tier.

Specifically, the CPU scores 26620 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a strong result for productivity tasks. The GPU scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a low result for gaming and rendering. The benchmark results indicate the system is well-suited for CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data analysis, and office productivity, where the GPU is not a factor. However, for GPU-bound workloads like gaming, video editing with effects, or 3D rendering, the system will perform poorly due to the graphics card's limitations. The data suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck in any scenario; rather, the GPU is the limiting factor for all visual tasks.

The percentile positions highlight the imbalance. The CPU's 88th percentile means it is among the top 12% of all processors, suitable for demanding multi-threaded applications. The GPU's 18th percentile means it is in the bottom 18% of all graphics cards, suitable only for light graphical workloads. The combined percentile of 53 reflects a system that is average overall, but this average is misleading because it masks the extreme variance between components. Users who primarily run CPU-intensive software will see excellent performance, while those who run GPU-intensive software will see poor performance. The benchmark data clearly identifies the GPU as the component that needs upgrading to unlock the system's full potential.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so the gaming performance figures below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as rough expectations rather than verified results. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, meaning there is no empirical gaming data for the Intel Core i5-13600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010. Based on the CPU's strong multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620) and the GPU's low 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893, the system is expected to be heavily GPU-limited in gaming.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the RTX 4010's 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will likely cause low frame rates in modern titles. Games with high texture detail will exceed the VRAM capacity, leading to stuttering or texture pop-in. The GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly one-tenth of what high-end cards offer, so frame rates are expected to be in the low to mid-20s in demanding AAA games. Esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are less GPU-intensive, might achieve playable frame rates around 60 FPS, but the CPU's high single-thread score of 4049 (PassMark) will not compensate for the GPU's low fill rate.

At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the situation worsens. The GPU's limited bandwidth and low pixel rate (28.19 GPixel/s) will struggle to drive the increased pixel count, resulting in frame rates that drop below playable levels. The card is not designed for high-refresh gaming or high-resolution gaming. The 6 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but enabling ray tracing will further reduce performance to slideshow levels. For users who prioritize gaming, the data suggests that this GPU is the wrong choice for anything beyond casual or older titles at low settings. The estimated frame rates are speculative, but the benchmark scores clearly indicate that the GPU is the primary constraint.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The GPU's low 3DMark score (2893) and 4 GB VRAM will not sustain high frame rates at 1080p in modern games. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark 4049) is irrelevant when the GPU is the bottleneck, so the system will underdeliver for competitive gaming.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-core strength (Cinebench R23 26620) can handle software encoding for streaming, but the GPU's weak rendering performance means games will run poorly while streaming. The system could stream CPU-based content, but gaming while streaming will result in very low frame rates.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this scenario, with high multi-thread scores (PassMark multi-thread 31725) that accelerate rendering and export times. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits real-time preview of effects and color grading, making the workflow sluggish for complex projects.

3D rendering: The CPU's 14 cores and high Cinebench scores (R23 multi-core 26620) will render CPU-based scenes quickly. GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow due to the RTX 4010's low compute performance (2.706 TFLOPS), and the 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU's high integer math score (PassMark 111044) and data compression score (383972) speed up code compilation and testing. The GPU is not a factor, making this an ideal workstation for developers.

Student and office work: Highly capable. The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4049) handles everyday tasks like web browsing, documents, and spreadsheets with ease. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can drive displays, so the dedicated GPU is only needed for specific tasks. The system is efficient with a 65 W TDP CPU and 50 W GPU.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. It is ideal for software developers who compile code frequently and benefit from the 14 cores and 20 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 111044 and data compression score of 383972 indicate fast build times and efficient handling of large codebases. Students in computer science or engineering fields will find the system capable of running simulations, virtual machines, and development tools without issue. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking ensures it will remain relevant for years of productivity work.

Small business workstations that handle accounting, database management, and office applications will perform well, as these tasks are CPU-bound and do not require a powerful GPU. The CPU's ECC memory support adds reliability for data-critical workloads. However, content creators who work with video or 3D graphics should avoid this build unless they plan to upgrade the GPU immediately. The 4 GB VRAM and low compute performance of the RTX 4010 will severely hinder rendering and editing tasks. Gamers at 1080p who play older or less demanding titles might find the system usable, but those seeking high-refresh or high-detail gaming should look elsewhere.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance relative to its rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600 scores 26620 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it in the 88th percentile. Its average benchmark score is 44240, which is within 0.7% of rivals like the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309) and Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342).

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. This is a low capacity and bandwidth for modern gaming and rendering.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark score and percentile?

A: The GPU scores 2893 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it in the 18th percentile among all GPUs. This is a low score, comparable to the NVIDIA Quadro P600 (2923).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstations where data integrity is critical. It also supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 53, which is the median. This reflects the imbalance between the high-performing CPU (88th percentile) and low-performing GPU (18th percentile).

Q: What is the power consumption of the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has a TDP of 50 W and is a single-slot card with no power connectors. The suggested power supply is 250 W.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 includes UHD Graphics 770, which can be used for basic display output and light tasks when the dedicated GPU is not needed.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i5-13600 processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 graphics card. The CPU is a high-end Raptor Lake chip with 14 cores and 20 threads, achieving an 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The GPU is an entry-level Ampere card with 4 GB VRAM, achieving an 18th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 53, placing this system at the median overall. This is a fundamentally unbalanced pairing: the CPU provides top-tier compute performance for productivity, while the GPU offers minimal graphical capability. The system is best classified as a productivity workstation rather than a gaming or rendering machine, given the extreme disparity in component capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU's average benchmark score of 44240 is in the 88th percentile, indicating it can handle nearly any processor-intensive task. The GPU's average score of 2893 is in the 18th percentile, meaning it is far weaker than the CPU. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will limit frame rates regardless of the CPU's power, as the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 suggests low graphics throughput. The CPU's high single-thread score (PassMark 4049) does not help with GPU-bound workloads.

For CPU-bound workloads like software development or data processing, the GPU is not a bottleneck at all, and the CPU performs excellently. The data compression score of 383972 and multi-thread score of 31725 show that the CPU can handle heavy compute loads without assistance from the GPU. However, for any workload that uses the GPU, such as 3D rendering or gaming, the GPU's low compute capacity (2.706 TFLOPS) and limited memory bandwidth (96.00 GB/s) will be the limiting factor. In such cases, the CPU will be mostly idle while waiting for the GPU to finish. The benchmark data indicates that upgrading the GPU to a more capable card would unlock the system's full potential, while upgrading the CPU would provide no benefit for GPU-bound tasks.