SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is a desktop build that combines a 14-core Raptor Lake CPU with an Ampere-architecture GPU. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands exactly at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, giving the pairing a combined percentile of 69. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is built on the GA104 chip using Samsung’s 8 nm process, with 17,400 million transistors packed into a 392 mm² die. The GPU’s memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The base clock is 915 MHz, with a boost clock of 1410 MHz. These clock figures are notably conservative for a 30-series part, which explains why the GPU’s raw compute figures are modest relative to other Ampere cards.

Compute resources include 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The RTX 3070 TiM carries 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The FP32 throughput is 16.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 also rated at 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1). Pixel rate is 135.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 259.4 GTexel/s. For a GPU at the 50th percentile, these figures place it in the middle of the pack—capable for 1080p and 1440p rendering, but not a top-tier performer for 4K or heavy ray tracing.

Rendering implications are straightforward. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for most current titles at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, but 4K textures and ray-traced scenes may exceed this limit, causing texture swapping. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the GPU’s compute throughput, but it is not exceptional—higher-bandwidth cards in the 30-series family would handle large data sets more gracefully. The RT cores and tensor cores give the card functional ray tracing and DLSS support, but with 46 RT cores and FP32 at 16.60 TFLOPS, the performance headroom for path tracing or heavy RT effects is limited. The GPU’s end-of-life production status also suggests that driver optimizations are unlikely to yield large future gains.

The GPU’s bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes (though the CPU only exposes 16 lanes). Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern monitors. The card is triple-slot wide, measures 270 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 55 mm in width, and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 550 W, which is a moderate requirement given the 220 W TDP.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s benchmark scores are extensive. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2683 multi-core and 378 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 11180 multi-core and 1578 single-core. Cinebench R23 delivers 26620 multi-core and 3758 single-core. PassMark results include 383972 for data compression, 22182 for data encryption, 23045 for extended instructions, 109 for find prime numbers, 81892 for floating point math, 111044 for integer math, 31725 for multithread, 1782 for physics, 42040 for random string sorting, and 4049 for both single-thread and singlethread tests. The average benchmark score is 44240, placing the CPU at the 88th percentile.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the data. Its percentile is 50, and its average benchmark score is 0. This creates an asymmetry: the CPU is a solidly above-average performer, while the GPU is exactly average. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this midship position. The nearest CPU rivals illustrate the competitive landscape: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573 (0.7% higher). These rivals are all within 1% of the i5-13600, meaning the CPU trades blows with high-end mobile and desktop parts from both AMD and Intel.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU can drive demanding workloads—Cinebench R23 multi-core at 26620 is strong for a 65 W part—but the GPU’s mid-pack standing means that gaming and real-time rendering will be limited by graphics throughput. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data compression, or multi-threaded rendering, the i5-13600 punches well above its class. For GPU-bound tasks like high-refresh gaming or 3D viewport rendering, the RTX 3070 TiM will be the bottleneck. The 88th vs 50th percentile gap suggests that users upgrading from a weaker CPU would see immediate gains in productivity, while gamers upgrading from a stronger GPU would see less benefit.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. The base clock is 2.70 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support enabled. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible. The launch MSRP is $255, and the part number is SRMBS. It was released on 2023-01-03 and remains in active production.

The 14-core, 20-thread configuration is a hybrid design—performance cores handle single-threaded tasks, while efficiency cores boost multi-threaded throughput. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz is high for a 65 W TDP processor, enabling strong single-core performance. Cinebench R23 single-core at 3758 is competitive with many higher-TDP parts, and PassMark single-thread at 4049 confirms this. The 26620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is remarkable for a 65 W chip, placing it near much more power-hungry CPUs. The average benchmark score of 44240 and the 88th percentile ranking show that this CPU outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

Real workload implications are clear. Data compression at 383972 PassMark points indicates strong archiving and file-handling performance. Integer math at 111044 and floating point math at 81892 show robust number-crunching ability. The extended instructions score of 23045 suggests good SIMD throughput for media encoding and scientific applications. The multithread score of 31725 is solid for a mid-range part, and physics at 1782 supports decent simulation performance. For software development, the 20 threads handle parallel compilation well, and the single-thread speed keeps interactive tasks snappy. The 24 MB L3 cache is generous and helps with gaming and database workloads. The locked multiplier is a minor limitation for enthusiasts, but the stock boost clock is already high enough to avoid the need for overclocking in most scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, giving builders flexibility. DDR5 offers higher bandwidth, while DDR4 is more cost-effective, but the data does not specify which one this specific build uses. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported, which is useful for workstation builds that require data integrity. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking but currently underutilized by most GPUs—the RTX 3070 TiM uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it runs at full bandwidth without bottlenecking.

The GPU’s TDP is 220 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so the combined power draw is manageable—a 550 W PSU provides ample headroom for the CPU and GPU, plus peripheral components. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is simple to accommodate. The triple-slot cooler is large, so case clearance is a consideration, but the 270 mm length is standard for mid-tower cases. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot, so no upgrade is needed there.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-tier card, since the CPU has substantial headroom. The i5-13600’s 88th percentile performance can drive a more powerful GPU without becoming the limiting factor in most workloads. The 65 W TDP and Socket 1700 platform also allow for future CPU upgrades within the same generation, though the locked multiplier limits overclocking. Memory can be upgraded to faster DDR5 modules or higher-capacity DDR4 kits, depending on the current setup. The PSU’s 550 W rating supports a single high-end GPU, but a dual-GPU configuration or a power-hungry flagship would require a larger PSU. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes are ready for next-generation storage and accelerators, but the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0, so no immediate benefit is realized.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3070 TiM’s 50th percentile standing and 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 suggest it can handle 1080p and 1440p at high refresh rates in most titles, but the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit texture quality at 1440p. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and 4049 PassMark single-thread score ensure no CPU bottleneck in most games, so estimated FPS will be GPU-bound. High-refresh (144 Hz) at 1080p is feasible, but 4K high-refresh is beyond this GPU’s capabilities.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and 26620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s 184 tensor cores could accelerate NVENC-based streaming, but the data does not specify NVENC capabilities. The 88th percentile CPU ensures simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding without significant performance drops, though the GPU’s mid-pack performance may require lower game settings to maintain smooth output.

Video editing: The CPU’s data compression score of 383972 and floating point math of 81892 indicate strong performance for video encoding and timeline scrubbing. The GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS helps with effects and color grading, but the 8 GB VRAM could limit 4K multi-layer timelines. The 24 MB L3 cache and 20 threads make export times competitive with higher-tier CPUs, while the GPU accelerates preview rendering.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 26620 shows the CPU can handle CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles) efficiently, but GPU-based rendering (e.g., Octane, Redshift) will be limited by the RTX 3070 TiM’s 46 RT cores and 16.60 TFLOPS. The 50th percentile GPU is adequate for preview renders and light final renders, but heavy production workloads would benefit from a higher-tier card. The CPU’s 88th percentile ensures scene preparation and simulation remain fast.

Software development: The 20 threads and integer math score of 111044 speed up parallel compilation, while the 5.00 GHz boost clock keeps single-threaded build tools responsive. The 383972 data compression score accelerates package management and asset pipelines. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. This CPU is a strong choice for developers, though the GPU is irrelevant for most coding tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 4049 single-thread score delivers snappy response in office suites, and the 20 threads handle multitasking across many browser tabs and documents. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is sufficient for basic display output, so the RTX 3070 TiM is overkill for this scenario. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low, and the platform’s DDR4/DDR5 support allows flexible builds.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build suits gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, where the RTX 3070 TiM’s 50th percentile performance and the CPU’s 88th percentile ensure no bottleneck. At 4K, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will struggle, so 4K gamers should look elsewhere. Content creators who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks—like video encoding, data compression, or multi-threaded rendering—will benefit from the i5-13600’s 26620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, but those relying on GPU rendering should note the RTX 3070 TiM’s mid-pack compute.

Software developers will find the 20 threads and 111044 integer math score ideal for compilation, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock keeps interactive tools fast. Students and office workers can leverage the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and integrated graphics for everyday tasks, though the discrete GPU is unnecessary for this use case. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support and reliable multi-threaded performance in spreadsheet, database, or simulation workloads will appreciate the CPU’s 88th percentile ranking and 65 W TDP.

The build is less suitable for professionals doing heavy GPU compute or 4K video editing, given the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM limit. It is also not ideal for enthusiasts seeking overclocking, since the CPU’s multiplier is locked. The end-of-life status of the GPU means no future driver-based performance gains, so buyers should expect this performance level to persist.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600 has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz and a base clock of 2.70 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested PSU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 220 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, with the CPU at 88 and the GPU at 50.

Q: What is the CPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is $255.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the Intel Core i5-13600, a 14-core Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, an Ampere-architecture GPU with 8 GB GDDR6 and a 220 W TDP. The CPU is at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 88% of processors in the database. The GPU is at the 50th percentile, placing it exactly at the median of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 69, indicating that the pairing sits above the average for complete systems.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44240, while the GPU’s average benchmark score is 0 (no data). This asymmetry means that the system’s overall performance is heavily weighted toward CPU tasks. The build class is desktop, so it is intended for stationary use with a monitor, keyboard, and mouse. The production status is active for the CPU and end-of-life for the GPU, suggesting the GPU is at the end of its commercial lifespan. This pairing is a mid-range desktop system with a strong CPU and an average GPU, suitable for balanced workloads where CPU performance is prioritized.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed toward the CPU. The CPU’s 88th percentile versus the GPU’s 50th percentile creates a situation where the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the RTX 3070 TiM’s mid-pack standing means that estimated FPS will be constrained by the GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS and 8 GB VRAM, even though the CPU could handle higher frame rates. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and 4049 single-thread score ensure it will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p or 1440p, but at 4K, the GPU’s bandwidth and VRAM become the hard limit.

In CPU-bound workloads—such as data compression (383972), integer math (111044), or Cinebench R23 multi-core (26620)—the CPU is clearly the dominant component, and the GPU contributes little. Video encoding and software compilation will run at speeds dictated by the CPU, with the GPU idle or lightly loaded. Conversely, 3D rendering using GPU-based engines will be limited by the RTX 3070 TiM’s 46 RT cores and 16.60 TFLOPS, while the CPU waits. The 50th percentile GPU means that upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would yield significant gains in GPU-bound scenarios, while the CPU would remain the same. The 69th combined percentile reflects this imbalance: the system is better than average overall, but the GPU drags down the ceiling for graphics performance. For users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks, this is a well-balanced pairing; for gamers or GPU renderers, the GPU is the bottleneck.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds