SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on an Intel 10 nm process node. Its configuration pairs performance cores with efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The chip carries 24 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core. This is a locked multiplier part, with a 65 W TDP, and it sits in the 88th percentile when compared against all CPUs in the benchmark database. The average benchmark score of 44240 places it in a tight cluster with several notable rivals. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309, a mere 0.2% higher; the Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342, also 0.2% ahead; the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466, 0.5% ahead; and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573, 0.7% ahead. These sub-1% deltas indicate that the i5-13600 is performance-equivalent to a top-tier mobile i9 from the previous generation and a high-end X3D desktop part.

Looking at the synthetic workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 reveals substantial all-core throughput, while the single-core score of 3758 shows strong per-thread performance that will matter for latency-sensitive tasks. The Cinebench R20 scores of 11180 multi-core and 1578 single-core continue this pattern, as do the R15 scores of 2683 multi-core and 378 single-core. The PassMark suite adds depth: multi-thread score of 31725, single-thread score of 4049, integer math at 111044, floating-point math at 81892, and extended instructions at 23045. Data compression scores 383972, while data encryption hits 22182. Physics simulation scores 1782, random string sorting scores 42040, and finding prime numbers scores 109. These numbers suggest a CPU that excels at both short-burst single-threaded work and sustained multi-core loads, with the 20 threads giving it headroom for parallel workloads. The architecture is mature Raptor Lake, which means the performance profile is well understood: high clock speeds on the performance cores and efficiency cores that handle background tasks. For real workloads, this translates to snappy application launches, fast compilation times, and smooth multitasking, though the locked multiplier means overclocking headroom is absent.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 88th percentile position and single-core strength, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758 and PassMark single-thread score of 4049, suggest it can feed a high-refresh-rate monitor in most titles. The data shows the CPU is within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, a processor known for gaming performance, indicating the i5-13600 will not be a bottleneck in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU pairing, which sits in the 59th percentile, will likely cap frame rates at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallel resources for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 31725 and data compression score of 383972 indicate the CPU can handle the extra load of streaming software without significant frame drops. The 65 W TDP also means thermal headroom for sustained all-core activity during extended broadcasts.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 and floating-point math score of 81892 point to strong performance in rendering timelines and applying effects. The 20 threads will accelerate export times, and the single-core performance keeps the interface responsive. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, though the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit very complex projects.

3D rendering: The multi-core scores are the key indicator here. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 places this CPU in a competitive position for CPU-based rendering, and the 0.2% delta to the Intel Core i9-13950HX — a high-end mobile i9 — shows it punches above its desktop mid-range class. For GPU rendering, the Radeon RX 9060's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 will handle moderate scenes, but the 8 GB VRAM is a constraint.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 111044 and extended instructions score of 23045 suggest strong compilation performance. The 14 cores will parallelize build systems, while the single-thread score of 4049 keeps IDE interactions fluid. The 65 W TDP allows for quiet cooling in a development workstation.

Student and office work: The i5-13600 is overkill for basic productivity, but the data shows it will never be the limiting factor. The PassMark single-thread score of 4049 ensures instant response in document editors and spreadsheets, while the multi-thread capacity means background antivirus scans or system updates will not cause noticeable lag. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 74 for this pairing masks a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU components. The Intel Core i5-13600 sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 rests at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. This 29-percentile-point gap indicates the CPU is substantially stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own peers. In practical terms, the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most workloads; the GPU will hit its performance ceiling first. The benchmark data supports this: the GPU's average benchmark score of 16014 places it within 0.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129) and 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852), both of which are mid-range parts that historically pair with less powerful CPUs. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and Intel Core i9-13950HX, both of which are high-end parts, confirming the CPU's class. For 1080p gaming, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3758) can push high frame rates, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture quality and resolution. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as its 59th percentile position means it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at those resolutions. For productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the balance shifts: the CPU's multi-core strength (Cinebench R23 multi-core 26620) will handle CPU-based rendering well, but GPU-accelerated workloads will be limited by the Radeon RX 9060's compute throughput of 21.43 TFLOPS and its 8 GB memory capacity. The data suggests this is a pairing where the CPU has significant headroom for future GPU upgrades, but the current GPU may leave performance on the table in CPU-light, GPU-heavy scenarios.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and the GPU's 59th percentile ranking indicate that 1080p is the sweet spot. The CPU's strong single-core performance will drive high frame rates, and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most titles at this resolution. The 0.7% delta to the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D suggests the CPU will not hold back the GPU in most games.

Content creators on a CPU-heavy workflow: Video editors and 3D artists who rely on CPU rendering will benefit from the i5-13600's multi-core scores, which are within 0.5% of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H. The 20 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 will handle rendering tasks, though GPU acceleration will be limited by the Radeon RX 9060.

Software developers: The integer math score of 111044 and multi-thread score of 31725 make this a strong build for compiling large codebases. The 65 W TDP allows for a compact, quiet workstation, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support offers flexibility in platform cost.

Students and small business users: The i5-13600's 88th percentile CPU performance ensures longevity for general productivity. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output, and the 65 W TDP means low power draw during typical office workloads. The GPU can be added for occasional gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks.

Not for 4K gaming: The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 59th percentile ranking make this pairing unsuitable for high-refresh 4K gaming. The CPU has the horsepower, but the GPU will be the limiting factor.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 44240, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309, -0.2% relative to the i5-13600), Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342, -0.2%), Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466, -0.5%), and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573, -0.7%). These sub-1% deltas show the i5-13600 is effectively tied with these parts, despite being a lower-tier desktop chip compared to some of these mobile or X3D variants. The GPU's average benchmark score is 16014, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129, -0.7% relative to the RX 9060), AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, +1%), AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852, +1%), and AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679, +2.1%). The GPU is essentially a match for the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 7700, both of which are older mid-range parts. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 74, reflecting the CPU's strength and the GPU's mid-range position. The GPU's specific benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322, Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183, Geekbench Vulkan score of 39476, and PassMark G3D score of 17631. The PassMark GPU compute score is 9919. These numbers indicate the GPU is capable for 1080p gaming and light compute, but its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus (288.0 GB/s) will limit high-resolution textures and heavy GPU compute workloads.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600 compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D?

A: The two CPUs are nearly identical in average benchmark score, with the Ryzen 5 7500X3D scoring 44573 against the i5-13600's 44240, a delta of -0.7% for the Intel part. Both sit in the same performance tier, though the Ryzen has 3D V-Cache while the i5-13600 relies on higher clock speeds.

Q: What is the GPU's performance class relative to NVIDIA?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060's average benchmark score of 16014 is within 0.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129), meaning the two are effectively performance equals in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the boost clock of 5.00 GHz is the maximum achievable without modifying the base clock, which is not a typical overclocking path.

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This allows builders to choose between older, cheaper DDR4 or newer, faster DDR5.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for ray tracing?

A: The Radeon RX 9060 has 28 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but its 59th percentile performance ranking and 8 GB VRAM suggest ray tracing will be limited to lower resolutions and settings.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 132 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, indicating a modest overall system power draw.

Q: What is the CPU's release date and launch price?

A: The CPU was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $255. The GPU was released later, on August 4, 2025.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture using the Navi 44 chip, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 149.2M per mm². The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1700 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Compute resources include 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 28 RT cores. The pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and features a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a. The 59th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 16014 place it in the mid-range segment. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 shows moderate DX12 performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 and Vulkan score of 39476 indicate solid compute capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 17631 and GPU compute score of 9919 further confirm its mid-range status. The GPU is within 0.7% of the RTX 3060 Ti and 1% of the RX 7700, making it a capable 1080p gaming card. However, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will cause performance drops in games that exceed this memory capacity, particularly at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs. For rendering workloads, the 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 is adequate for moderate scenes, but the memory bandwidth and capacity will limit complex, large-texture workloads. The 28 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the GPU's overall performance tier suggests it will handle ray tracing only at lower settings and resolutions.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose their memory platform based on budget and performance preferences. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe drives. The 65 W TDP means the CPU is easy to cool with a capable air cooler, and the platform does not demand an exotic power delivery system. For the GPU, the suggested PSU is 300 W, and the card itself has a 132 W TDP with a single 8-pin power connector. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is forward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 88th percentile performance leaves significant headroom. The CPU's nearest rivals in average score include the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and Intel Core i9-13950HX, both of which are high-end parts, confirming the i5-13600 has performance to spare. A GPU upgrade to a part in a higher percentile would balance the system without requiring a CPU change. On the memory front, the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means a platform upgrade to DDR5 would require a new motherboard, but the current CPU can run both types. The socket 1700 platform is mature, with a wide range of motherboards available at various price points. The CPU's 65 W TDP also means a small form factor build is viable, provided the GPU's dimensions fit. The GPU's dual-slot design and 1x 8-pin connector are standard, and the 300 W suggested PSU leaves room for a modest CPU and a few drives. For users looking to extend the system's life, adding more memory (up to the platform's limit) or upgrading the GPU would be the primary paths, as the CPU's performance is unlikely to become a bottleneck in most applications.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600, a 14-core, 20-thread desktop CPU from the Raptor Lake generation, with the AMD Radeon RX 9060, a mid-range desktop GPU from the RDNA 4.0 generation. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 74. The CPU is a strong performer, sitting in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44240 that rivals high-end mobile i9s and desktop X3D parts. The GPU is more modest, sitting in the 59th percentile with an average benchmark score of 16014, placing it in the same class as the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 7700. The imbalance is clear: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a mid-range part. This makes the build suitable for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads like software development, video editing, and CPU-based rendering, while still offering competent 1080p gaming. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 132 W TDP combine for a system that is power-efficient and easy to cool. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility. The overall tier, based on the 74th combined percentile, places this build in the upper-mid range of desktop systems, with the CPU providing longevity and the GPU offering adequate, but not exceptional, graphics performance. This is a balanced build for productivity first, gaming second.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3758, PassMark single-thread 4049) indicate it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 16014, which is 0.7% below the RTX 3060 Ti (16129), suggest 1080p gaming performance in line with that older mid-range card. At 1080p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth should handle most games at high settings, with frame rates typically in the 60-100+ FPS range depending on the title, though the data does not provide specific numbers. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 suggests moderate DX12 performance, which is relevant for newer game titles. At 1440p, the GPU's memory bandwidth and 8 GB capacity will become limiting factors, likely requiring lowered settings to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU's 0.7% delta to the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, a gaming-focused part, implies the CPU will keep pace in CPU-bound scenarios like competitive shooters or strategy games. The GPU's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 is adequate for rasterized gaming, but its 28 RT cores suggest ray tracing will be a performance hit, likely requiring DLSS-like upscaling (though the GPU does not have dedicated tensor cores). For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread strength will drive very high frame rates, but the GPU may cap them. For AAA single-player games, the GPU will be the limiting factor at any resolution above 1080p. Overall, this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming, with the CPU ensuring smooth frame delivery and the GPU providing mid-range visual quality. Users seeking 1440p or 4K gaming should expect to lower settings or upgrade the GPU.