SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

19,410 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a substantial piece of silicon. Built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip (codenamed Plum Bonito), this GPU packs 57,700 million transistors onto a 529 mm² die using a 5 nm process from TSMC. The transistor density works out to 109.1M per mm², which is a dense, modern design. The GPU is configured with 6144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units. Memory is a significant highlight: 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. That memory bandwidth is enormous and directly feeds the high fill rates — the pixel rate is 479.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 959.2 GTexel/s. For compute, the FP32 throughput is 61.39 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 122.8 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Clock speeds are aggressive. The base clock is 1929 MHz, the game clock is 2365 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2498 MHz. Memory runs at 2500 MHz, which translates to 20 Gbps effective. The RT hardware consists of 96 RT cores, and while the FACT PACK lists no tensor cores, the data shows this is a pure rasterization and compute beast rather than an AI-focused accelerator. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6841, which is a strong result for modern DirectX 12 workloads. Geekbench scores are also telling: OpenCL at 50465 and Vulkan at 85612. The Vulkan score being significantly higher than OpenCL suggests the architecture scales well with lower-level APIs, which is common for RDNA 3.0.

For rendering workloads, the PassMark G3D score of 31238 indicates strong overall rasterization performance. The GPU compute score of 17689 is moderate, meaning raw compute tasks like physics simulations or certain rendering passes will be capable but not class-leading. The DirectX 12 score of 131 in PassMark is curious — it is lower than the DirectX 11 score of 356, which may reflect specific driver or benchmark quirks rather than a fundamental weakness. The DirectX 9 score of 330 and DirectX 10 score of 166 round out legacy API performance. The G2D score of 1267 is low, suggesting 2D desktop tasks are not the focus here.

The percentile ranking is 64th among all GPUs, meaning the RX 7900 XTX sits above average but not in the top tier. The average benchmark score is 19410. Interestingly, the nearest rivals listed are older or lower-tier cards: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (deltaPct +0.4), the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 (deltaPct -1), the AMD FirePro D300 (deltaPct -1.2), and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp (deltaPct +1.2). This is a peculiar set of comparators — the GTX 1060 3 GB is a much older card, yet the delta is only 0.4% in favor of the RX 7900 XTX. This suggests the average benchmark score is heavily weighted by certain tests where the RX 7900 XTX does not excel, or that the benchmark database has a wide distribution. The TITAN Xp being only 1.2% behind is surprising given the generational gap, but the data is what it is. The takeaway is that the RX 7900 XTX's average score places it in a mid-tier position, despite its massive memory and bandwidth specifications.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU, an Intel Core i5-13600, delivers strong multi-threaded and single-threaded results. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 26620 and the single-core score is 3758. The R20 results are 11180 multi-core and 1578 single-core, while R15 shows 2683 multi-core and 378 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that scales well with thread count, but also maintains excellent single-thread performance. PassMark results reinforce this: multi-thread score is 31725, single-thread score is 4049, and the average benchmark score is 44240. The CPU's percentile ranking against all CPUs is 88, which is high — this processor is in the top 12% of all CPUs in the database.

The nearest CPU rivals are all close in average score. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 has an average score of 44309 (deltaPct -0.2, meaning the i5-13600 is 0.2% behind), the Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342 (deltaPct -0.2), the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466 (deltaPct -0.5), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573 (deltaPct -0.7). The i5-13600 is essentially tied with these rivals, all within 0.7% of each other. This is a tight cluster, indicating the i5-13600 performs at a level comparable to high-end mobile HX chips and newer desktop variants.

The GPU's percentile is 64, which is notably lower than the CPU's 88. The combined percentile for this pairing is 76, reflecting the GPU as the weaker link in the overall system balance. The GPU's average benchmark score is 19410, while the CPU's average is 44240 — the CPU is more than twice as high in absolute average score, though these are different benchmark suites. The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-to-upper-tier GPU. The CPU can feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU's percentile suggests it will be the limiting factor in GPU-bound workloads.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all FPS figures in the gaming section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The pairRankByFps field is null, so there is no ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing against others based on actual frame rates.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename), part of the Core 13th Gen series. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.70 GHz and the boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz. This is a locked multiplier (unlocked is false), so overclocking headroom is limited to what the motherboard allows via BCLK adjustments. The TDP is 65 W, which is modest for a 14-core chip, indicating efficient power delivery under typical loads. The cache hierarchy is substantial: L1 is 80 KB per core, L2 is 1.25 MB per core, and L3 is 24 MB shared. This large L3 cache is beneficial for workloads that access shared data across cores.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop chip and could appeal to small business or scientific users. The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, providing basic display output without a discrete GPU. The release date was January 3, 2023, and the launch MSRP was $255.

The benchmark scores tell a story of balanced performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 is strong for a 65 W chip, and the single-core score of 3758 is excellent — this is where the 5.00 GHz boost clock pays off. PassMark integer math scores 111044, floating point math scores 81892, and extended instructions score 23045. Data compression scores 383972, which is very high, indicating strong performance in archiving or file compression tasks. Data encryption scores 22182, which is moderate. Find prime numbers scores 109, which is low, but that test is often memory-latency sensitive. Physics scores 1782, and random string sorting scores 42040.

The 88th percentile ranking means the i5-13600 outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals being within 0.7% indicates this chip is at the cusp of a performance tier — it matches or slightly trails high-end mobile CPUs like the i9-13950HX and newer desktop chips like the Ryzen 5 7500X3D. For real workloads, this means the i5-13600 can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation without bottlenecking, while also delivering snappy single-threaded performance for gaming and responsive desktop use. The 20 threads are particularly useful for parallel workloads, and the high L3 cache helps with repeated data access patterns.

# Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 3758 in Cinebench R23 and 4049 in PassMark single-thread indicates excellent per-core performance, which is critical for high-refresh gaming at lower resolutions where the CPU is the bottleneck. The GPU's 64th percentile, however, suggests it may struggle to push extremely high frame rates at 4K in demanding titles. For 1080p or 1440p high-refresh, the CPU can keep up, but the GPU's average benchmark score of 19410 is not top-tier.

Streaming: The CPU has 20 threads and a multi-thread score of 31725 in PassMark, which provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU also supports compute workloads, but the lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI-accelerated encoding. The PassMark GPU compute score of 17689 is moderate, so offloading encoding to the GPU is possible but may not be as efficient as newer solutions. The CPU's data encryption score of 22182 is reasonable for stream protection.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 and the high data compression score of 383972 indicate the CPU can handle timeline rendering and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's 24 GB of VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are excellent for holding large video buffers and applying effects in real time. The FP32 throughput of 61.39 TFLOPS helps with GPU-accelerated effects, though the 64th percentile suggests it is not the fastest option.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core strength (26620 in R23) is ideal for CPU-based rendering like Blender's Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU's 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 and 122.8 TFLOPS FP16 are strong for GPU-accelerated renders, and the 24 GB VRAM allows for large scenes without memory swapping. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6841 indicates good DirectX 12 rendering performance.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 111044 and extended instructions score of 23045 are solid for code compilation. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 24 MB L3 cache helps with frequent recompilation. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running build servers. The GPU is less relevant here, but its compute capabilities can assist with testing GPU-accelerated code.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4049 in PassMark ensures snappy spreadsheet, word processing, and web browsing performance. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can power a display without the discrete GPU, which saves power for lighter tasks. The 65 W TDP keeps cooling requirements low, making this a quiet system for a dorm room or office. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM is overkill for this scenario, but it does not hurt.

# Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all FPS figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The CPU's high single-thread performance (3758 in Cinebench R23) suggests it will not bottleneck in most games, while the GPU's 64th percentile and average score of 19410 indicate it sits in the upper-mid range of graphics cards.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-core strength will likely allow the GPU to reach high frame rates in esports titles, potentially exceeding 144 fps in less demanding games. The GPU's 960.0 GB/s bandwidth and 192 ROPs are well-suited for high pixel throughput, so 1080p ultra settings should be comfortable. At 1440p, the GPU's texture rate of 959.2 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 479.6 GPixel/s will support high detail levels, but the 64th percentile suggests that the most demanding titles may not hit 144 fps consistently. At 4K, the 24 GB VRAM and 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 are beneficial, but the GPU's overall percentile ranking indicates it is not a top-tier 4K card — expect playable frame rates but not maximum refresh rates on the latest games.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6841 is a strong indicator for modern DirectX 12 titles, suggesting good scaling with ray tracing effects, though the 96 RT cores are fewer than some competitors. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 85612 is excellent, implying that Vulkan-based games will run efficiently. These estimates should be treated as directional rather than precise.

# Who Should Build It — target users and industries

Gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh or 4K at moderate refresh rates will find this pairing capable, but the GPU's 64th percentile means it is not for those seeking maximum frame rates at 4K ultra. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 88th percentile multi-threaded performance combined with the GPU's 24 GB VRAM for large projects. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and ECC memory support. Students and small business workstations can rely on the integrated graphics for office tasks, with the discrete GPU available for occasional rendering or compute jobs.

The CPU's launch MSRP was $255, but no pricing for the GPU is mentioned beyond its launch value. The system is a desktop class build, and the combined percentile of 76 places it above average but not in the enthusiast tier. This is a system for users who need strong CPU performance for productivity and a capable GPU for gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks, rather than for those chasing absolute top-tier graphics performance.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU's percentile of 88 versus the GPU's percentile of 64 creates a clear imbalance. In CPU-bound workloads — such as software compilation, data compression (383972 in PassMark), or single-threaded tasks — the CPU will be the driver, and the GPU will idle. In GPU-bound workloads — such as high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering — the GPU's lower percentile will limit overall performance, and the CPU will have headroom.

The deltaPct values for the GPU's rivals are telling: the GTX 1060 3 GB is only 0.4% behind in average score, and the TITAN Xp is 1.2% ahead. This means the RX 7900 XTX is not significantly faster than much older cards in the benchmark database's average, which is odd given the specifications. This suggests that the GPU's benchmark scores are dragged down by certain tests (e.g., PassMark G3D and compute scores) that may not reflect real gaming performance, or that the database's weighting favors other cards. In contrast, the CPU's rivals are all within 0.7%, indicating a consistent performance level.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured data, but the percentile gap implies that in a gaming scenario, the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU will be the limit at lower resolutions with a very fast GPU. For a balanced build, the GPU should ideally have a percentile closer to the CPU's 88. The 24 GB VRAM is a unique asset that prevents VRAM-related bottlenecks, but the raw compute and rasterization scores suggest the GPU is the weaker link.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 76, which places this desktop build above average but below the top tier of systems.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385?

A: The i5-13600 has an average benchmark score of 44240, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309, a delta of -0.2%, meaning they are essentially tied.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 7900 XTX?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop chip.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 355 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 750 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the production status of the RX 7900 XTX?

A: The RX 7900 XTX is marked as End-of-life, while the CPU is Active, meaning the GPU is no longer in production.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600, a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake desktop processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, a 24 GB RDNA 3.0 GPU. The build class is desktop. The CPU holds an 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU holds a 64th percentile, and the combined percentile is 76. This places the system in the upper-mid range, with a clear strength in CPU-bound tasks and a relative weakness in GPU-bound tasks. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44240, and the GPU's is 19410, showing the CPU is the dominant component. The GPU is end-of-life, while the CPU is still active. This is a system that excels at productivity and multitasking, with gaming performance that is capable but not class-leading.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in memory choice. The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for next-generation storage and GPUs, though the RX 7900 XTX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, which is low, so any aftermarket cooler that fits Socket 1700 will suffice. The GPU requires a 750 W PSU and uses 2x 8-pin power connectors, so the PSU must have those connectors available. The GPU is dual-slot, measuring 287 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width, so case clearance is important.

The sensible next upgrade path would involve the GPU, given its lower percentile (64) and end-of-life status. Replacing the RX 7900 XTX with a higher-percentile GPU would balance the system better, as the CPU has headroom to feed a faster card. The CPU's socket and memory support are still current, so a CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change if moving to a new socket, but the i5-13600's 88th percentile means it is not the bottleneck. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails. The memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s on the GPU is a strong asset, so any replacement would need at least that to avoid regression. The 24 GB VRAM is also a differentiator, so users with large datasets or high-resolution textures should consider VRAM capacity when upgrading.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds