SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT form a desktop pairing that sits at the 72nd combined percentile, indicating a system positioned well above the median for overall performance. The CPU, a Raptor Lake-S part on Intel Socket 1700, is built on a 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. It offers 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation-oriented tasks. Its thermal design power is rated at 65 W, which is a modest figure for a 14-core part. The GPU, in contrast, is a high-power RDNA 3.0 architecture part, the Navi 31 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC with a massive 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. It is an end-of-life product with a 300 W TDP, requiring a 700 W power supply, and it demands dual-slot space with 2x 8-pin power connectors.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13600’s architecture is Raptor Lake, and its benchmark scores reveal a processor that is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded workloads relative to its class. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 26,620 points in the multicore test and 3,758 points in the single-core test. This multicore result is a dominant figure, placing the CPU in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, which means it outperforms the vast majority of desktop and mobile processors available. The single-core score of 3,758 is also high, signifying strong responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, clearly translates into heavy parallel processing capability, as shown by a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11,180 and a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2,683. The data suggests that this CPU is not just a mid-range option but a formidable compute engine, with its nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and Intel Core i9-13950HX, both of which have average scores within 0.2% of the i5-13600’s.

Looking at more specific workloads, the PassMark suite provides insight into specialized tasks. The floating-point math score of 81,892 and integer math score of 111,044 indicate robust arithmetic capabilities, which are critical for scientific computing and financial modeling. The data compression score of 383,972 is exceptionally high, suggesting that the CPU handles archival and compression tasks with ease. The data encryption score of 22,182 and extended instructions score of 23,045 show that the processor can accelerate cryptographic and SIMD workloads effectively. The single-thread score of 4,049 in PassMark reinforces the strong single-core performance seen in Cinebench, which is beneficial for legacy applications and games that rely on fewer threads. The average benchmark score of 44,240, which places it just 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, indicates that the i5-13600 is a top-tier performer that can rival even more expensive or specialized parts in synthetic tests. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache is substantial, aiding in keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this desktop build is defined by a CPU that is in the top 12% of all processors and a GPU that sits at the 55th percentile. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 is a standout figure, placing it far ahead of typical mid-range parts. Its nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and Intel Core i9-13950HX, have average scores of 44,309 and 44,342, respectively, with deltaPct values of -0.2% relative to the i5-13600. This means the i5-13600 is effectively neck-and-neck with those high-end mobile and desktop parts, despite being a lower-tier model in the Core i5 lineup. On the GPU side, the RX 7900 XT’s average benchmark score is 13,745, which is just 0.5% lower than the AMD Radeon 660M and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, and 1.5% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623 is a strong indicator of modern DirectX 12 gaming performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 71,068 and OpenCL score of 12,756 show substantial compute throughput.

The percentile positions tell a story of imbalance: the CPU is a high-end performer, but the GPU, while powerful in absolute terms, is only slightly above average in the broader database of all GPUs. This is largely due to the inclusion of integrated and mobile graphics in the database, which skews the percentile. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 29,009 is a massive number, indicating excellent rasterization performance. The combined percentile of 72 for the entire build suggests that the pairing is well above average, but the CPU is clearly the more dominant component in terms of its relative standing. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 16,828 is lower than the G3D score, hinting that while the GPU excels at graphics rendering, its raw compute performance, while strong, is not its primary strength. The data shows a system that is extremely capable for CPU-intensive tasks, with GPU performance that is solid but less exceptional when viewed in the context of the entire GPU market.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p, this CPU-GPU combination is capable of driving very high frame rates. The CPU’s single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,758, ensures that game logic and physics are processed quickly, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,623 suggests it can handle the graphical load. The CPU’s high percentile (88) relative to the GPU’s (55) means that the processor will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming, allowing the RX 7900 XT to operate near its full potential.

For streaming, the 14 cores and 20 threads of the i5-13600 are a major asset. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 indicates that there is ample headroom to encode video using x264 or x265 while simultaneously playing a game. The PassMark data encryption score of 22,182 also shows that the CPU can handle the overhead of stream encryption without significant performance dips. This makes the system highly suitable for a single-PC streaming setup.

Video editing workflows benefit from both the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, with a PassMark multithread score of 31,725, will accelerate timeline scrubbing and rendering in software like Adobe Premiere Pro. The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle large 4K or 8K video buffers and GPU-accelerated effects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 12,756 suggests that the GPU can offload some rendering tasks from the CPU, leading to faster export times.

3D rendering is a scenario where this build excels. The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2,683 and R20 multicore score of 11,180 are direct indicators of CPU-based rendering performance in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D. The GPU’s 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 84 RT cores provide substantial hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders. The combination allows for a hybrid rendering workflow where the CPU handles some frames and the GPU handles others, maximizing throughput.

Software development is another strong suit. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 4,049 in PassMark ensures fast compilation of single files, while the multicore score of 31,725 in PassMark multithread will speed up full project rebuilds. The support for ECC memory is a critical feature for developers who require data integrity. The GPU’s compute capabilities, shown by a PassMark GPU Compute score of 16,828, can be used for accelerating test suites or machine learning model training.

For student and office work, this system is overkill but highly future-proof. The CPU’s integrated graphics, UHD Graphics 770, provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed, saving power. The 65 W TDP of the CPU is efficient for a 14-core part, and the fast single-core performance ensures that office applications like spreadsheets and word processors feel snappy. The 20 GB of VRAM is far more than needed for office tasks, but it ensures that any future software requirements are met without concern.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,758 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623 indicate that this system is capable of high frame rates in modern titles. At 1080p resolution, the CPU is likely to be the primary driver of performance, and its high percentile (88) suggests it can feed the GPU adequately for frame rates well above 144 FPS in most esports titles, and above 100 FPS in demanding AAA games. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a factor, and the RX 7900 XT’s raw rasterization power, as shown by a PassMark G3D score of 29,009, should still deliver smooth gameplay, likely in the 80-120 FPS range for most games. At 4K, the GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage, preventing texture-related stuttering, and the 800.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that high-resolution textures are streamed quickly. The GPU’s 84 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing, but the performance impact will vary by game. Based on the benchmark scores, the estimated frame rates for this system are high, but they should be treated as estimates since no direct measurement exists for this pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU is the more dominant component relative to its peers. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile, while the GPU is at the 55th percentile. This suggests that in many CPU-intensive workloads, the processor will be the star, but in gaming, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 is a top-tier result, while the GPU’s average benchmark score of 13,745 is only slightly above the median. This imbalance means that in tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will often finish its part of the job before the GPU is done, or vice versa, leading to potential idle time. In gaming, the FPS scaling is likely to be smooth as long as the resolution is not too high. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance will push high FPS, but the GPU may still be the bottleneck if the game is graphically heavy. At 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the bottleneck, as its percentile is lower, but the 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth will help it manage large textures. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,049 and the GPU’s texture rate of 804.4 GTexel/s show that both components are fast, but the CPU’s relative dominance suggests that upgrading the GPU in the future would yield a more balanced system.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at gamers who want to play at 1440p or 4K with high settings, but who also engage in CPU-heavy tasks like video editing or 3D rendering. The CPU’s 88th percentile performance, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620, makes it a powerful workstation chip, while the GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM and 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it suitable for content creators who use GPU-accelerated rendering. Software developers will appreciate the ECC memory support and the fast compilation times indicated by the PassMark integer math score of 111,044. Students and small business workstations would find this system overkill for basic tasks, but it offers a long lifespan before needing an upgrade. The CPU’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows builders to choose based on their budget and performance needs. The system is not ideal for those who purely game at 1080p with low settings, as the CPU’s power would be wasted, but for users who want a single system to handle both gaming and productivity, this is a strong pairing.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It contains 57,700 million transistors and has a die size of 529 mm², making it a large and complex chip. The GPU has 5,376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units, with 84 ray tracing cores. It lacks dedicated tensor cores, relying on its compute units for all workloads. The memory subsystem is a 20 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. The boost clock is 2394 MHz, with a game clock of 2025 MHz and a base clock of 1387 MHz. The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 51.48 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is 103.0 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s. In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 5,623 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 71,068 in Geekbench Vulkan, and 12,756 in Geekbench OpenCL. The PassMark G3D score is 29,009, and the GPU compute score is 16,828. These scores indicate that the GPU is a strong rasterizer, but its compute performance is relatively lower than its graphics performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score suggests it is capable of handling modern DirectX 12 games, while the Vulkan score shows excellent performance in Vulkan-based titles and compute workloads. The 20 GB of VRAM is a standout feature, allowing for massive texture loads and high-resolution rendering. The GPU’s 84 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but the performance is not as strong as its rasterization, as indicated by the lower compute scores relative to the G3D score.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build comprising the Intel Core i5-13600 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a 300 W RDNA 3.0 part. The combined percentile for this build is 72, placing it above the average for all desktop configurations. The CPU’s percentile of 88 is significantly higher than the GPU’s percentile of 55, indicating that the processor is the more powerful component in relative terms. This pairing is best described as a high-CPU-performance system with a solid but less exceptional GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 44,240 is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i9-13950HX, a high-end mobile part, and within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 13,745 is within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon 660M and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. The build is designed for users who need substantial CPU power for productivity tasks, with the GPU providing enough performance for high-resolution gaming. The lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance is estimated, but the benchmark scores suggest a capable gaming machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to the GPU’s?

A: The CPU is in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 55th percentile of all GPUs, showing that the CPU is relatively stronger.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 supports ECC memory, which is a feature often required for workstation stability.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The CPU scores 26,620 points in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is a high result for a 14-core part.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 7900 XT is 700 W, and it requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this combination, so all gaming frame rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture and is fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, allowing for fast NVMe SSDs and future GPUs. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, which is low for a 14-core part, meaning that the existing power delivery system has headroom for a more power-hungry CPU in the same socket, such as a Core i9-13900K if the motherboard and cooling allow it. The GPU, with a TDP of 300 W and a suggested PSU of 700 W, leaves room for a slightly more powerful GPU if the power supply is upgraded. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a newer model that has a higher percentile, as the CPU is already in the top 12% of all processors. The motherboard should be chosen carefully to support the CPU’s ECC memory feature, which requires a chipset that supports it. The platform supports up to 24 MB of shared L3 cache, and the memory bus is dual-channel, meaning that adding more memory will not increase bandwidth but can increase capacity. The CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed. The upgrade path is straightforward: keep the CPU and motherboard, and focus on GPU upgrades or adding more memory, as the CPU’s performance is already near the top of its platform.