SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 pairing presents a distinct performance profile that prioritizes computational throughput over raw graphics dominance. The combined benchmark percentile of 73 indicates a system that sits comfortably above the median desktop configuration, but the relationship between its components reveals a clear division of labor. The CPU, holding an 88th percentile rank among all processors, is the undisputed performance leader of this pairing, while the GPU, at the 58th percentile, operates as the primary constraint in graphics-bound scenarios. This creates a system where the processor frequently has untapped headroom, waiting on the graphics card to catch up in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the Radeon RX 7700 as the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 15,852 places it in the 58th percentile, a modest position that contrasts sharply with the CPU’s 88th percentile standing. In gaming scenarios, this imbalance means the i5-13600 will rarely be the bottleneck; instead, frame rates will be dictated by the GPU’s rendering capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 20,974, while respectable, does not match the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 31,725 in relative performance hierarchy.

However, the bottleneck shifts entirely when considering CPU-bound tasks. The i5-13600’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 demonstrates substantial processing power that the GPU cannot influence. In workloads such as data compression, where the CPU scores 383,972 in PassMark, or integer math at 111,044, the GPU is largely irrelevant. The system’s character is therefore workload-dependent: it is a CPU-first machine that handles processor-intensive tasks with ease but becomes GPU-limited in 3D rendering and high-resolution gaming.

The FPS scaling implications are significant. With no measured FPS data for this exact combination, estimates based on the GPU’s 58th percentile suggest that at 1080p, the CPU could push frame rates higher than the GPU can deliver. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the definitive constraint, and the CPU’s advantage diminishes further. The PassMark GPU compute score of 10,963 reinforces that this is not a compute-heavy graphics card; tasks like CUDA-style acceleration or OpenCL workloads will underperform relative to the CPU’s capabilities.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform provides a defined upgrade trajectory. The i5-13600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, offering flexibility in memory selection. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the processor alone ensures that future storage or GPU upgrades can leverage the latest interface standard, though the current GPU operates on PCIe 4.0 x16. This backward and forward compatibility makes the platform resilient.

The CPU’s 65-watt TDP is remarkably modest for a 14-core processor, which has implications for the entire system. The GPU’s 200-watt TDP and suggested 550-watt power supply combine to create a system that does not demand extreme PSU headroom. This suggests that a user upgrading from a mid-range build may retain their existing power supply if it meets the 550-watt recommendation. The CPU’s low power draw also means that cooling requirements are manageable, allowing for quieter operation or smaller form factors.

A sensible next upgrade hinges on the GPU. Since the CPU operates at the 88th percentile, replacing the RX 7700 with a higher-tier graphics card would balance the system and unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential. The i5-13600 has sufficient headroom to support a more powerful GPU without becoming the limiting factor. Conversely, the platform’s DDR5 support means that a memory upgrade could provide marginal gains in memory-sensitive workloads, though the CPU’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache already mitigates some memory latency concerns.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7700’s 58th percentile and PassMark G3D score of 20,974 indicate that 1080p high-refresh gaming is achievable, but frame rates will be inconsistent at 1440p. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3,758 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing and minimum FPS will be stable, but the GPU will cap maximum output.

Streaming: The i5-13600’s 20 threads provide ample capacity for encoding and gaming simultaneously. The PassMark multithread score of 31,725 suggests that software encoding will not heavily impact gaming performance, making this a capable streaming setup. The GPU also supports modern APIs, but its compute performance is less relevant for x264 encoding.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 accelerates export and rendering timelines. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is beneficial for timeline scrubbing and effects preview, but the 58th percentile compute score means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on rival cards. The combination is solid for 1080p and light 4K editing.

3D rendering: This is a CPU-dominated workload. The 14 cores and 20 threads of the i5-13600 will render scenes efficiently, as evidenced by the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11,180. The GPU’s 40 ray accelerators provide some RT support, but the 58th percentile suggests that GPU rendering will not be this system’s strength.

Software development: Compilation and build tasks benefit from the CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 22,182 and extended instructions score of 23,045. The 20 threads handle parallel builds effectively. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and basic OpenGL workloads, scoring 4.6 in OpenGL API support.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for these tasks. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4,049 ensures snappy application response, while the GPU’s 2D score of 1,206 confirms adequate desktop rendering. The 65-watt CPU TDP keeps power costs low, and the 550-watt PSU suggestion means a compact, efficient build is possible.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize multi-threaded productivity over pure gaming performance. Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU’s 26,620 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM for asset loading. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and the PassMark integer math score of 111,044, which indicates strong parallel processing.

Gamers at 1080p will find this system competent, but those seeking 1440p high-refresh experiences should look elsewhere. The GPU’s 58th percentile places it below the threshold for demanding titles at higher resolutions. Students and office workers will find the system vastly more powerful than needed, but the low 65-watt CPU TDP makes it a reasonable, if expensive, choice for a workstation that occasionally games.

Small business workstations handling data processing tasks will benefit from the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 383,972. The ECC memory support is a critical feature for data integrity in professional environments, an option not available on all competing platforms. The 10 nm process node and 215 mm² die size indicate a mature, reliable processor architecture.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. The core configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact split. The base clock of 2.70 GHz boosts to 5.00 GHz, providing a wide frequency range for both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache is substantial, reducing memory access latency.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a CPU that excels in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 places it in the 88th percentile, with the nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, trailing by 0.7% in average score. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 44,240 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-13950HX, a mobile flagship, with a delta of only -0.2%. This suggests that the i5-13600 offers desktop-class performance that rivals higher-tier mobile processors.

Single-threaded performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,758. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,049 confirms that the 5.00 GHz boost clock is effective for lightly-threaded tasks. The PassMark physics score of 1,782 is notably lower than the integer math score of 111,044, suggesting that the CPU’s architecture favors certain instruction types over others. The 65-watt TDP is remarkable given the performance on offer, indicating excellent power efficiency from the Raptor Lake design.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i5-13600 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination. All frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20,974 and 58th percentile rank suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, most modern titles will run at playable frame rates, likely exceeding 60 FPS in less demanding games but struggling to maintain high refresh rates in AAA titles.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,865 indicates that the GPU’s raw rendering power is modest. Frame rates are expected to drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles at this resolution, requiring settings reductions. The GPU’s 96 ROPs and 236.1 GPixel/s pixel rate provide sufficient fill rate for 1080p, but the 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance is not exceptional for 1440p ultra gaming.

The CPU’s role in gaming is supportive but not limiting. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,758 ensures that game logic and physics calculations are handled without delay. The PassMark physics score of 1,782, while lower, is sufficient for most game engines. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as large multiplayer battles or strategy games, the i5-13600’s 20 threads will prevent frame drops, but the GPU will still cap the maximum frame rate.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, a significant advancement over the CPU’s 10 nm node. The Navi 32 chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². This density is high, but the GPU’s performance does not match its physical complexity.

The memory subsystem is a standout feature. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for 1440p gaming and content creation. The memory clock runs at 2438 MHz with 19.5 Gbps effective speed. This large memory capacity is unusual for a GPU at this performance level and suggests a focus on productivity applications that require large frame buffers.

Compute performance is modest. The 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) figures indicate that the GPU is not optimized for compute-heavy workloads. The 40 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the 58th percentile suggests that RT performance will be underwhelming. The PassMark GPU compute score of 10,963 confirms that this is not a compute-focused card. The 2560 shading units and 160 TMUs are adequate for rasterization, but the 96 ROPs limit pixel throughput.

The GPU’s specifications are competitive in terms of memory and feature set. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern software. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, providing flexible connectivity. The dual-slot design and 267 mm length make it compatible with most mid-tower cases.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-13600 or the AMD Radeon RX 7700 the stronger component?

A: The CPU is significantly stronger. The i5-13600 holds an 88th percentile rank among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 58th percentile. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 44,240 far exceeds the GPU’s 15,852.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The i5-13600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface. ECC memory is also supported, which is unusual for a consumer desktop CPU.

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 provides strong processing power for 4K exports. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is beneficial, but its 58th percentile compute performance may slow GPU-accelerated effects.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this build?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 watts. The CPU’s 65-watt TDP is low, so a quality 550-watt power supply should be sufficient for the entire system.

Q: How does the i5-13600 compare to the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385?

A: The i5-13600 has an average benchmark score of 44,240, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44,309. The Intel chip trails by 0.2%, making them statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: Does the RX 7700 support the latest graphics APIs?

A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern games and applications.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz is the maximum frequency achievable without external overclocking methods.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture reveals a system with a significant performance disparity between components. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 44,240 places it at the 88th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (delta -0.2%), Intel Core i9-13950HX (delta -0.2%), and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (delta -0.7%). This indicates that the i5-13600 is a top-tier processor, competing with much more expensive mobile and desktop chips.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 15,852 places it at the 58th percentile, a middle-of-the-pack position. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X (delta -0.1%), AMD Radeon RX 9060 (delta -1%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (delta -1.7%). The RX 7700 is roughly equivalent to an RTX 3060 Ti in average score, but with 16 GB of VRAM compared to the latter’s typical 8 GB.

Specific benchmark scores highlight the CPU’s strengths. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 is exceptional, while the single-core score of 3,758 is strong. PassMark scores for integer math (111,044), floating-point math (81,892), and data compression (383,972) all indicate robust processing capability. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,865 and PassMark G3D score of 20,974 are respectable but not outstanding.

The combined percentile of 73 reflects the system’s overall position: above average, but not in the top tier. The CPU carries the system, while the GPU holds it back from higher performance brackets. For users who can leverage the CPU’s multi-threaded power, this is an excellent configuration. For those seeking balanced gaming performance, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

AMD Radeon RX 7700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds