SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i5-13600 with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE represents a cohesive desktop build centered on a 14-core Raptor Lake processor and a Navi 33-based graphics card. The CPU, launched in early January 2023, operates with a 65 W TDP and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the GPU, released in early February 2025, brings RDNA 3.0 architecture to the table with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. This analysis relies exclusively on the benchmark data provided, which includes CPU tests like Cinebench and Passmark, alongside GPU scores from 3DMark and Geekbench. Notably, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all game-specific frame rate discussions are framed as estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake-S architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². Its base clock sits at 2.70 GHz, boosting up to 5.00 GHz under load, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache, which is substantial for a mid-range desktop part. The CPU also integrates UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output, and supports ECC memory, a feature often sought after for workstation reliability.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 places it in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Single-core performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. The Passmark multi-thread score of 31725 and single-thread score of 4049 reinforce this dual strength, while the floating-point math score of 81892 and integer math score of 111044 show robust computational throughput for scientific and financial applications.

The nearest rivals provide context for these numbers. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309 on average, a mere 0.2% higher than the i5-13600's average benchmark score of 44240, making them effectively equivalent in overall performance. The Intel Core i9-13950HX is also 0.2% ahead at 44342, while the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H leads by 0.5% with 44466. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D trails slightly at 44573, which is 0.7% behind. These deltas are tiny, suggesting that the i5-13600 punches well above its mid-range positioning, competing closely with higher-tier mobile and desktop parts.

The data implies that the i5-13600 is a versatile workhorse. For real workloads, the 20 threads and high boost clock mean it can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, while the strong single-core scores ensure snappy UI interactions and fast application launches. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with gaming and data-intensive tasks, though the lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not an option, limiting enthusiast tuning potential.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 44240, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, a strong showing for a desktop processor. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2683 multi-core and 378 single-core, while R20 sees scores of 11180 multi-core and 1578 single-core. The R23 results are particularly telling: 26620 multi-core and 3758 single-core, with the multi-core figure being roughly seven times the single-core score, indicating excellent scaling across the 14 cores. Passmark tests show a multi-thread score of 31725, a single-thread score of 4049, and specific workloads like data compression at 383972, data encryption at 22182, and extended instructions at 23045. Physics processing scores 1782, random string sorting hits 42040, and prime number finding is low at 109, which is typical for this type of integer-heavy test.

The GPU, AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109, with an average benchmark score of 42723. This places it in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, a solid mid-to-high tier position. Its nearest rivals show it is closely matched with NVIDIA's RTX 4070 SUPER, which scores 43223 on average, a 1.2% lead, and the Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43262, also 1.2% ahead. The RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, 1.3% higher, and the Quadro M6000 scores 43301, 1.3% higher. These small deltas indicate the RX 7650 GRE is competitive with much more expensive or recent cards in synthetic workloads.

Combined, the CPU and GPU achieve a combined percentile of 86, reflecting a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU holds an 88th percentile rank, five points above the GPU's 83rd, suggesting the processor has slightly more headroom relative to its peers, but the gap is modest. The combined picture is one of a capable desktop system that can handle demanding applications without a clear bottleneck, though the CPU's slight edge in percentile implies it may be slightly underutilized in GPU-bound scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the RX 7650 GRE's 83rd percentile GPU rank and the i5-13600's 88th percentile CPU rank suggest the system can push high frame rates in most titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact numbers are estimates. The CPU's strong single-core score of 4049 in Passmark and 3758 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game logic and physics are handled efficiently, while the GPU's 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides ample pixel-pushing power. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor, but the 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps maintain smooth performance in texture-heavy scenes.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 20 threads, which can encode video while gaming. The Passmark multi-thread score of 31725 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 indicate the i5-13600 has enough headroom to handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets without severely impacting game frame rates, though dedicated hardware encoders would offload this work. The GPU's lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI upscaling, but its 32 RT cores can handle ray tracing effects, albeit at lower settings.

Video editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve leverages both components. The CPU's multi-thread performance accelerates timeline scrubbing and export encoding, with the data compression score of 383972 and floating-point math score of 81892 indicating strong processing for codecs and effects. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus provide 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, enough for 1080p and some 4K editing, though 8 GB may limit complex multi-layer timelines.

3D rendering in Blender or similar tools is CPU-bound for most scenes. The i5-13600's 26620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggests render times that are competitive with higher-tier CPUs, as evidenced by its 0.2% delta to the Core i9-13950HX. The GPU can assist with viewport rendering via OpenCL, scoring 83109 in Geekbench, but its 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 20 threads, which speed up compilation. The Passmark integer math score of 111044 and extended instructions score of 23045 indicate strong performance for code compilation and analysis. The single-thread score of 4049 ensures fast IDE responsiveness, while the 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code segments.

For students and office work, the i5-13600's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed, and the 65 W TDP means low power consumption during light tasks. The Passmark single-thread score of 4049 ensures snappy document editing and web browsing, while the multi-thread capability handles background tasks like virus scans without stutter.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system where the CPU holds a higher percentile rank (88th) than the GPU (83rd), suggesting the processor is slightly more capable relative to its peers. In CPU-intensive workloads like 3D rendering or software compilation, the i5-13600 will be the primary driver, and the GPU's role is secondary, so no bottleneck occurs. However, in gaming at high resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as its 83rd percentile rank and 8 GB VRAM may struggle with ultra settings at 1440p or 4K, while the CPU's 88th percentile ensures it is not holding back frame rates.

The FPS scaling implication, though estimated, is that at 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU's strong single-core performance (4049 Passmark) and the GPU's 22.08 TFLOPS should yield high frame rates, but the GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth may cap performance in bandwidth-sensitive titles. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM could be a limiting factor, causing texture streaming issues in open-world games. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336 suggests the GPU is capable of DirectX 12 workloads, but it is 1.2% behind the RTX 4070 SUPER, indicating a slight performance deficit in rasterization.

The combined percentile of 86 is higher than either component's individual percentile, which is unusual and suggests the pairing leverages the strengths of both parts. The CPU's 0.2% delta to the Ryzen AI Max 385 and the GPU's 1.2% delta to the RTX 4070 SUPER mean that the system as a whole is competitive with builds using those components, but the GPU is the more likely candidate for an upgrade if performance falls short. The 65 W CPU TDP and 170 W GPU TDP imply the system is power-efficient, with a suggested PSU of 450 W, leaving little headroom for overclocking or adding power-hungry peripherals.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 86, indicating the system outperforms 86% of all desktop builds in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600 compare to the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385?

A: The i5-13600 has an average benchmark score of 44240, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen AI Max 385's score of 44309, making them virtually identical in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may limit 4K texture-heavy workloads.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the i5-13600 cannot be overclocked. Its boost clock of 5.00 GHz is the maximum achievable frequency.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, which accounts for the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 170 W TDP, leaving minimal headroom for additional components.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The RX 7650 GRE's average benchmark score of 42723 is 1.2% lower than the RTX 4070 SUPER's 43223, indicating nearly equivalent performance in synthetic tests.

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The i5-13600 scores 3758 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is a strong result for desktop applications and gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the benchmark data does not specify which type is used. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe SSDs. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a basic display output, useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without a discrete GPU.

The suggested PSU of 450 W for the GPU is modest, but the CPU's 65 W TDP means the total system draw is manageable. However, the 1x 8-pin power connector on the GPU limits upgrade potential, as higher-tier cards typically require more power. The dual-slot design and 204 mm length make it compatible with most mid-tower cases, and the 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support multiple monitors.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 88th percentile rank indicates it has headroom to support more powerful graphics cards. The 24 MB L3 cache and 20 threads are sufficient for gaming and productivity, so the CPU is unlikely to be a bottleneck. The platform's support for DDR5 means memory upgrades are possible, though the dual-channel configuration is already standard. The 10 nm process and 65 W TDP suggest the CPU runs cool, so a capable air cooler is sufficient, but the locked multiplier limits tuning.

Gaming Performance

Since there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's 88th percentile rank and the GPU's 83rd percentile rank suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, the system can achieve high frame rates in most games, likely exceeding 60 FPS in AAA titles and 100+ FPS in esports titles. The GPU's 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are key factors, though the 8 GB VRAM may cause stutters in games with large textures.

At 1440p, the estimated performance drops, as the GPU's memory bandwidth becomes a limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2336 indicates DirectX 12 capability, but the 128-bit bus may reduce performance in bandwidth-heavy scenes. The CPU's strong single-core score of 4049 in Passmark ensures that frame pacing is smooth, with no CPU-induced stutters. In ray tracing workloads, the 32 RT cores provide some capability, but performance is likely to be lower than NVIDIA counterparts, as the RTX 4070 SUPER is 1.2% faster in average benchmarks.

For competitive gaming at 1080p, the system should excel, with the CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's high pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s delivering low latency and high frame rates. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM is likely insufficient for ultra settings, and the estimated frame rates would drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles. Users should consider lowering settings or resolution to maintain playable performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600, a 14-core Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, an 8 GB RDNA 3.0 GPU. The CPU sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 83rd percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 86. This places the system in the upper tier of desktop builds, competitive with systems featuring the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 or Intel Core i9-13950HX, as the deltas are all under 1%.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44240 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with a 0.2% difference from the Ryzen AI Max 385 and Core i9-13950HX. The GPU's average score of 42723 is 1.2% behind the RTX 4070 SUPER, indicating strong performance for its class. The system is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, content creation, and software development, with the CPU providing ample multi-threaded power and the GPU handling graphics workloads effectively.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use, and the components are production-active, ensuring ongoing support. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $255, and the GPU is $279, though these are stated once for reference. The overall tier is high, with the combined percentile of 86 indicating that the system outperforms the majority of builds in the database.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh-rate play, as the CPU's strong single-core performance and the GPU's 83rd percentile rank ensure smooth frame rates in esports and AAA titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and 26620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which accelerates export times and render passes. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the Passmark integer math score of 111044 and the 24 MB L3 cache, reducing build times.

Students and office workers seeking a versatile desktop for coursework, research, and productivity will find the i5-13600's integrated graphics and low 65 W TDP appealing, allowing for quiet and efficient operation. Small business workstations that need reliability and ECC memory support can leverage the CPU's features, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM handles moderate CAD or data visualization tasks. The system is also suitable for streamers, as the CPU's multi-thread performance can handle encoding, though a dedicated capture card would be optimal.

Users who play at 1440p should be aware of the GPU's 8 GB VRAM limitation, which may require lowering texture settings in some games. For 4K gaming, this system is not ideal, as the GPU is likely to be a bottleneck. However, for the majority of gaming and productivity scenarios, this build offers a balanced and capable experience, backed by benchmark data showing 86th percentile combined performance.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p gaming but may be a constraint at higher resolutions. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 32 ray tracing cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Clock speeds are 1720 MHz base, 2695 MHz boost, and 2350 MHz game clock, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s, while FP32 performance is 22.08 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The average benchmark score of 42723 is 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, indicating near-parity in synthetic tests. For rendering workloads, the 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests strong rasterization capability, while the 32 RT cores provide some ray tracing performance, though likely lower than NVIDIA's dedicated RT cores.

The GPU's 170 W TDP and single 8-pin power connector make it power-efficient, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. Its dual-slot design and 204 mm length ensure compatibility with most cases, and the display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting high refresh rates and multi-monitor setups. The 8 GB VRAM is a potential limitation for future games or 4K textures, but for its target market of 1080p and 1440p gaming, it provides solid performance, as evidenced by its 83rd percentile rank and close proximity to the RTX 4070 SUPER in benchmark scores.