SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

48,477 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT: Desktop Build Analysis

This build pairs Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with AMD's RDNA 2 flagship GPU, creating a desktop-class configuration that ranks at the 87th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU alone sits at the 88th percentile against all processors, while the GPU occupies the 85th percentile against all graphics cards, indicating a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other in aggregate benchmark terms.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process from Intel, featuring 14 cores and 20 threads. This hybrid configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split. The processor runs at a 2.70 GHz base clock and reaches 5.00 GHz at boost, with a 65 W TDP that classifies it as a mainstream desktop part rather than a high-power enthusiast chip. The die size measures 215 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 26,620 points in multi-core and 3,758 in single-core. The R20 run produces 11,180 multi-core and 1,578 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 2,683 multi-core and 378 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that handles heavily threaded workloads with ease, while the single-core scores remain competitive for everyday responsiveness. The single-thread Passmark result of 4,049 reinforces this picture, showing that the chip does not sacrifice per-core performance for its multi-core muscle.

The Passmark suite reveals workload-specific strengths. Integer math scores 111,044, floating-point math reaches 81,892, and extended instructions hit 23,045. Data compression achieves 383,972, while data encryption manages 22,182. The physics score of 1,782 and prime number finding at 109 suggest the CPU handles scientific and simulation tasks competently. Random string sorting at 42,040 rounds out a profile that suits content creation, software compilation, and data processing.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-13600 sits remarkably close to much more expensive parts. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44,309 average, just 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core i9-13950HX, a mobile flagship, averages 44,342, also 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44,466, a 0.5% lead, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D posts 44,573, 0.7% ahead. The i5-13600's average benchmark score of 44,240 places it within striking distance of all four, meaning the 14-core desktop chip essentially trades blows with these alternatives despite their different market positions.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-13600 compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D averages 44,573, which is 0.7% higher than the i5-13600's 44,240. The difference is marginal and within normal run-to-run variation.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Radeon RX 6800 XT features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop processor and beneficial for workstation-style reliability.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU provide?

A: The i5-13600 offers Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU. The GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the CPU's PCIe 5.0 lanes provide headroom for future expansion.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing hardware configuration?

A: The RX 6800 XT includes 72 ray accelerators (RT cores) as part of its RDNA 2 architecture, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate with the 12_2 feature level.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The Radeon RX 6800 XT carries a 300 W TDP and the suggested PSU rating is 700 W. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors.

Q: How does the GPU perform in Passmark G3D compared to its nearest rival?

A: The RX 6800 XT scores 24,980 in Passmark G3D. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, averages 47,743 overall but the delta between the two GPUs in aggregate score is 1.5%.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT employs the Navi 21 chip on a 7 nm TSMC process, packing 26,800 million transistors into a 520 mm² die. The RDNA 2 architecture drives 4,608 shading units, 288 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation pipelines. Clock speeds span 1,825 MHz base, 2,015 MHz game clock, and 2,250 MHz boost. The memory subsystem pairs 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, producing a pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 648.0 GTexel/s.

Compute performance reaches 20.74 TFLOPS for FP32 and 41.47 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The 72 ray accelerators provide dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing, and the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C. The dual-slot card measures 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3,689. Geekbench results show 181,337 in Metal, 171,304 in OpenCL, and 136,875 in Vulkan. The Passmark suite yields 24,980 in G3D, 13,245 in GPU compute, and lower scores in legacy DirectX tests: 155 in DX10, 264 in DX11, 100 in DX12, and 265 in DX9. The G2D score of 1,030 indicates solid 2D acceleration. These numbers position the RX 6800 XT as a high-end graphics solution that excels in compute-heavy tasks and modern API workloads.

Against its nearest rivals, the RX 6800 XT averages 48,477. The NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile scores 47,743, putting the AMD card 1.5% ahead. The Intel Arc A550M averages 49,737, which is 2.5% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49,957, 3% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 posts 50,001, also 3% higher. The RX 6800 XT holds its ground against these competitors, with the largest gap being only 3% despite the varied architectures and generations involved.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 87 indicates strong overall balance, but examining the individual components reveals where bottlenecks may appear. The CPU's average benchmark score of 44,240 against an 88th percentile ranking shows it outperforms 88% of all processors. The GPU's 48,477 average and 85th percentile ranking places it slightly lower in relative standing. This creates a configuration where the CPU has marginally more headroom than the GPU, meaning graphics workloads are more likely to be the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios.

The CPU's nearest rivals all score within 0.7% of it, while the GPU faces competitors that are up to 3% ahead. This asymmetry suggests the GPU is the weaker link when compared to peer components, but the difference is small enough that most applications will see balanced utilization. In CPU-intensive workloads like data compression, encryption, or physics simulation, the i5-13600's Passmark scores of 383,972, 22,182, and 1,782 respectively will drive performance. In GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the RX 6800 XT's 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth become the determining factors.

The 65 W CPU TDP combined with the 300 W GPU TDP means the power envelope is dominated by the graphics card. The suggested 700 W PSU provides ample headroom for both components under simultaneous load, and the CPU's modest power draw reduces the risk of thermal throttling in CPU-bound scenarios. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU matches the CPU's Gen 5 capability, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck at the bus level.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6800 XT's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures and modern game engines. The CPU's single-core score of 3,758 in Cinebench R23 and 4,049 in Passmark single-thread ensure frame pacing remains stable in CPU-bound scenes.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads handle encoding workloads without stealing resources from the GPU. A Passmark multithread score of 31,725 indicates the i5-13600 can manage simultaneous gaming and encoding duties, though the GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support also enables hardware-accelerated encoding paths.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 26,620 and Passmark integer math at 111,044 show strong performance for timeline rendering and effect processing. The GPU's 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates preview rendering and export tasks, while 16 GB VRAM handles large project files.

3D rendering: The GPU's 72 ray accelerators provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced scenes. Geekbench OpenCL at 171,304 and Vulkan at 136,875 indicate strong compute throughput for render engines that leverage GPU acceleration. The CPU's floating-point math at 81,892 assists with CPU-based rendering fallbacks.

Software development: The CPU's data compression score of 383,972 accelerates build times and source control operations. The 20 threads allow parallel compilation, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency on frequently accessed code paths. The GPU is largely secondary in this workload.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance handles document processing and web browsing with ease. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU dominates. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for all-day academic use.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the LGA 1700 socket, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through dual-channel configuration. The memory controller's flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum supported speeds. ECC memory support adds a reliability layer suitable for workstation use. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is future-proof for next-generation GPUs and NVMe storage, while the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The platform's 65 W TDP leaves substantial thermal and power headroom for a future CPU upgrade within the LGA 1700 socket family. The suggested 700 W PSU for the GPU provides enough capacity for a more power-hungry processor, though the exact wattage of potential upgrades is not specified in the FACT PACK. The GPU's 300 W TDP and dual 8-pin connectors are standard for high-end cards, and the dual-slot form factor fits most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count LGA 1700 processor to boost multi-threaded performance, as the current CPU already sits within 0.7% of several high-end rivals. Alternatively, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes could accommodate a newer GPU when the RX 6800 XT's end-of-life status becomes a concern. The 16 GB VRAM provides longevity for memory-hungry applications, so GPU upgrades would focus on compute throughput rather than capacity.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600 achieves an average benchmark score of 44,240, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals cluster tightly: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 at 44,309 (-0.2%), Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44,342 (-0.2%), Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44,466 (-0.5%), and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 44,573 (-0.7%). The i5-13600 trails all four but by less than one percentage point, demonstrating that this mainstream desktop chip competes with mobile flagships and specialized variants.

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT averages 48,477, ranking at the 85th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile at 47,743 (1.5% behind), Intel Arc A550M at 49,737 (2.5% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at 49,957 (3% ahead), and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50,001 (3% ahead). The RX 6800 XT beats one competitor, trails three, and the maximum delta is only 3%.

The combined configuration sits at the 87th percentile overall, reflecting a pairing where both components perform above average but neither dominates the other. The CPU's slightly higher percentile position (88 vs 85) suggests the processor has marginally more performance headroom than the GPU in this build.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600 (Raptor Lake, 14 cores, 20 threads) with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (RDNA 2, 16 GB GDDR6). The CPU was released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $255, while the GPU launched on 2020-10-27 with a launch MSRP of 649 USD. The GPU is now end-of-life, while the CPU remains in active production.

The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and the GPU's 85th percentile ranking combine for an 87th percentile overall build, placing this configuration in the upper tier of desktop systems. The i5-13600's 65 W TDP makes it an efficient choice, while the RX 6800 XT's 300 W TDP is typical for a high-performance graphics card. The pairing suits 1440p and 4K gaming, content creation, and compute workloads, with the CPU providing strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU delivering substantial rasterization and ray tracing capabilities.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1440p or smooth 4K gameplay will benefit from the RX 6800 XT's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, paired with the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,049 in Passmark. The GPU's 72 ray accelerators enable ray-traced effects in supported titles, though performance in heavy RT workloads depends on the specific game engine.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will leverage the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 and the GPU's 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The 16 GB VRAM handles large textures and complex scenes, while the CPU's 20 threads accelerate export and encoding tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's data compression score of 383,972 and integer math at 111,044, which speed up build processes. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency on repeated access patterns, and ECC memory support adds stability for long-running test suites.

Students and office workers in STEM fields can rely on the CPU's single-core performance for interactive applications and the GPU's compute capabilities for simulation or data visualization. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps energy costs manageable, while the GPU's compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 171,304) support parallel workloads.

Small business workstations handling data processing will benefit from the CPU's encryption score of 22,182 and floating-point math at 81,892. The platform's DDR4/DDR5 flexibility and PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide room for expansion, and the overall 87th percentile ranking ensures this build remains relevant for demanding professional applications.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The data shows no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, meaning frame rates cannot be quoted with certainty.

Based on the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 24,980 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,689, this build should handle modern titles at high settings. The 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory for 1440p and 4K textures without capacity-related stuttering. The GPU's 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggests strong rasterization performance, while the 72 ray accelerators offer moderate ray tracing capability.

The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by Cinebench R23 single-core at 3,758 and Passmark single-thread at 4,049, should prevent CPU bottlenecks in most gaming scenarios. The 14 cores and 20 threads also ensure background tasks do not interfere with game performance. For competitive titles at 1080p with high refresh rates, the combination should deliver high frame rates, while 4K gaming will lean more heavily on the GPU's 85th percentile standing. These are estimates only; actual performance varies by game, settings, and system configuration.