SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT form a desktop pairing aimed at 1080p gaming and mixed productivity. The CPU is a current-generation 14-core part on Intel Socket 1700, while the GPU is an end-of-life RDNA 2 design. The combined benchmark percentile of 77 places this build above the majority of systems in the database, though the data shows a clear split: the processor is the dominant component, while the graphics card is competent but not exceptional.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU also supports ECC memory, a feature uncommon in consumer desktop parts. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring the graphics card and NVMe storage have access to modern high-bandwidth interfaces. The GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the motherboard’s PCIe Gen 5 slot.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest for a 14-core processor, and the GPU’s suggested PSU is 450 W. This combination means a typical mid-range power supply will have ample headroom for the entire system, including drives and peripherals. The GPU draws its power from a single 8-pin connector, which is standard for this performance class. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is limited to memory and BCLK adjustments, but the boost clock of 5.00 GHz already provides strong single-thread performance out of the box.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier Raptor Lake CPU, as the Socket 1700 socket supports the full 13th Gen lineup. The motherboard’s PCIe Gen 5 support also future-proofs the storage and GPU connections. The GPU, however, is end-of-life, so the primary long-term upgrade path is a newer graphics card, which would leverage the CPU’s strong multi-core and single-core scores without bottlenecking. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on the GPU is adequate for current titles, but future releases may demand more, making a GPU swap the most logical first major investment.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the CPU’s 3,758 Cinebench R23 single-core score and the GPU’s 17,166 Passmark G3D score indicates this system can drive high frame rates in 1080p esports titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures minimal frame pacing issues, while the GPU’s pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s handles geometry and rasterization efficiently. For competitive shooters, this pairing is well-suited to 144 Hz monitors.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample resources for encoding and gameplay simultaneously. The Passmark multithread score of 31,725 shows significant parallel processing headroom, which supports software encoding without heavily impacting frame rates. The GPU’s 32 ray accelerators and 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance can also offload some encoding tasks, though the CPU is the stronger partner here.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 indicates strong performance in timeline rendering and export tasks. The CPU’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large media files, and the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM can handle 1080p previews and effects. The Passmark floating-point math score of 81,892 further supports color grading and filter application. This build is capable for hobbyist and semi-professional editing workloads.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11,180 demonstrates good performance in CPU-based renderers like Blender’s Cycles. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 10,111 and Vulkan score of 81,306 also allow for GPU-accelerated rendering, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit very complex scenes. For architectural visualization and product renders, this system is workable but not top-tier.

Software development: The Passmark data compression score of 383,972 and integer math score of 111,044 indicate fast compilation and code analysis. The CPU’s 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-core score of 4,049 ensures snappy IDE responsiveness. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code modules.

Student and office work: The CPU’s UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback for basic tasks, though the discrete GPU is more than capable. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,049 and data encryption score of 22,182 show strong performance in spreadsheet calculations and document processing. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low during light loads, making this a practical daily driver.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than tested results. The data clearly shows the CPU is far stronger than the GPU, so the graphics card will be the primary limiter in most gaming scenarios.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 17,166 suggests it can handle modern titles at 60+ FPS in many cases, though demanding games may dip below that threshold. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 280.3 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures, but high-resolution texture packs may cause stuttering. The 128-bit memory bus is a notable constraint, limiting bandwidth compared to wider-bus competitors.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle with ultra settings, likely delivering 40-60 FPS in AAA titles. The CPU’s strong single-core score helps maintain minimum frame rates, but the GPU’s 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance is not enough for consistently high frame rates at this resolution. Lowering settings to high or medium would make 1440p playable, but the card is clearly optimized for 1080p.

At 4K, this pairing is not recommended for modern gaming. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are insufficient for 4K textures, and the pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s will bottleneck heavily. The CPU would not be the limiting factor here; the GPU simply lacks the raw throughput for 4K ultra settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking among all processors contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking. This means the CPU is capable of driving a much stronger graphics card than the RX 6650 XT without becoming a bottleneck. In CPU-bound scenarios like competitive gaming at low settings, the CPU’s 3,758 single-core score ensures maximum frame generation, while the GPU may be idle.

In GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 62 and DirectX 11 score of 169 show moderate performance, but the GPU’s 32 ray accelerators are not sufficient for demanding ray-traced effects. The CPU, meanwhile, has headroom to spare, as indicated by its nearest rivals being higher-end mobile and desktop parts.

For productivity, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The Passmark multithread score of 31,725 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 show the CPU can handle demanding multi-threaded workloads without issue. The GPU’s compute score of 7,532 is respectable but not a primary driver for CPU-centric tasks. The balance is such that the CPU will rarely bottleneck the GPU in gaming, but the GPU will frequently bottleneck the CPU in high-resolution scenarios.

FAQ

Q: Does this build support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory kits.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz.

Q: Is the GPU compatible with PCIe Gen 5 motherboards?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is backward compatible with PCIe Gen 5 slots and will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and type?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 includes UHD Graphics 770, which provides a basic display output and can handle light graphics tasks without a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the CPU’s process node and die size?

A: The CPU is built on Intel’s 10 nm process and has a die size of 215 mm².

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and recommended PSU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 176 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W, which is modest for this performance class.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who primarily play at 1080p and are willing to accept medium-to-high settings in the most demanding titles. The GPU’s 65th percentile ranking means it is not a high-end card, but the CPU’s 88th percentile ranking ensures the system will not become obsolete quickly. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming, and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance supports high refresh rates in esports.

Content creators who work with 1080p video editing and light 3D rendering will find the CPU’s multi-core performance sufficient. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 and Passmark multithread score of 31,725 indicate the CPU can handle rendering tasks without excessive wait times. The GPU’s compute capabilities add some acceleration, but the CPU is the primary driver.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads and high integer math score of 111,044. Students and office workers will find the system responsive for everyday tasks, with the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,049 ensuring snappy application launches. Small business workstations running database or virtualization workloads will also perform well, given the CPU’s data encryption score of 22,182.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44,240, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 with a score of 44,309 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44,342 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44,466 (0.5% higher). The CPU is also 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, which scores 44,573. This places the i5-13600 in elite company, competing with higher-tier mobile and desktop parts.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19,765, placing it at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla K40m at 19,885 (0.6% higher), the AMD FirePro D300 at 19,637 (0.7% lower), and the AMD FirePro W7000 at 19,905 (0.7% higher). The NVIDIA Quadro K5200 scores 19,602, which is 0.8% lower. The GPU’s position in the 65th percentile is mid-range, and its rivals are primarily workstation and professional cards, not gaming-focused parts.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, which is stronger than the GPU alone but weaker than the CPU alone. This indicates the CPU is the main driver of the system’s overall performance, while the GPU holds the system back from reaching higher tiers. The data suggests the pairing is balanced for 1080p gaming but not for higher resolutions.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600 with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT. The CPU is a current-generation Raptor Lake part with 14 cores and 20 threads, while the GPU is a previous-generation RDNA 2 design with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 77 places this build in the upper-middle tier of systems in the database.

The CPU is clearly the stronger component, with an 88th percentile ranking compared to the GPU’s 65th percentile. This means the system is well-suited for CPU-intensive tasks like video editing, software development, and 3D rendering. The GPU is capable for 1080p gaming but will limit the system in higher-resolution scenarios. The build is practical for a user who prioritizes productivity and plays games at 1080p.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 features 14 cores and 20 threads, using a hybrid architecture with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It is built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The CPU has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC memory support available.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,620 and single-core score of 3,758. The R20 multicore score is 11,180, and the single-core score is 1,578. The Passmark multithread score is 31,725, and the single-thread score is 4,049. These numbers indicate strong multi-threaded performance for a 65 W part, rivaling higher-TDP processors in the nearest rivals list.

The CPU’s data compression score of 383,972 and encryption score of 22,182 show excellent performance in data-heavy tasks. The integer math score of 111,044 and floating-point math score of 81,892 further demonstrate its versatility. The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking confirms it performs at a level near much more expensive processors, making it a strong foundation for a balanced desktop build.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds