SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Intel Core i5-13600 with the AMD Radeon RX 6400 presents one of the most pronounced CPU-to-GPU performance imbalances in the benchmark database. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes at the 35th percentile among all graphics cards. This 53-point gap defines the entire character of this build: the processor is not the limiting factor in any graphics-bound workload, and the GPU will saturate long before the CPU breaks a sweat.

The data shows that the i5-13600 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 and a single-core score of 3,758. These figures place it within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and within 0.5% of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, meaning it trades blows with some of the fastest consumer processors available. Meanwhile, the RX 6400's PassMark G3D score of 7,673 puts it statistically tied with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (deltaPct 0) and just 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 is a clear indicator of its entry-level positioning.

In CPU-limited workloads—software compilation, data compression, spreadsheet calculations, or any single-threaded task—the i5-13600 will perform at a level befitting its 88th percentile ranking. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,049 and multi-thread score of 31,725 confirm this. However, in any 3D gaming scenario, the RX 6400's 35th percentile position means the GPU will be the bottleneck at virtually every resolution. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data—so all FPS discussion must be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores.

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: this is a GPU-limited build for gaming, a CPU-limited build for compute tasks, and a balanced build for almost nothing in between. The 65-watt TDP of the CPU and the 53-watt TDP of the GPU mean neither component will thermally throttle in a typical desktop chassis, but the performance ceiling is set entirely by the graphics card in any visual workload. For users who primarily run CPU-intensive applications with occasional light gaming, this imbalance is acceptable. For anyone expecting high-refresh gaming, the data suggests the GPU will be the constraining factor in nearly every title.

Benchmark Performance

The i5-13600's average benchmark score of 44,240 places it just 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44,309) and 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44,342). This is remarkable company for a mid-range desktop processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 26,620 is particularly strong, indicating sustained all-core performance that rivals much more expensive processors. The single-core R23 score of 3,758 shows excellent per-thread performance, which translates directly to responsiveness in everyday applications and decent performance in lightly-threaded games.

The RX 6400's average benchmark score of 6,001 places it at the 35th percentile, with its nearest rivals being the GTX 770M (6,000, deltaPct 0), the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (5,996, deltaPct 0.1), and the FirePro W4100 (5,987, deltaPct 0.2). These are all older or lower-tier parts, confirming the RX 6400's position as an entry-level discrete GPU. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 32,011 and Vulkan score of 16,372 show that the card has some compute capability, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30 and DirectX 11 score of 70 indicate modest real-world graphics performance.

The combined picture is a system that scores at the 62nd percentile overall—respectable for a desktop build, but pulled down significantly by the GPU. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and the GPU's 35th percentile ranking create a composite that reflects the weaker component more than the stronger one. In CPU-heavy benchmarks like PassMark Integer Math (111,044) or Floating Point Math (81,892), this system will outperform many high-end laptops and older desktops. In GPU-heavy workloads like 3DMark Steel Nomad or PassMark G3D, it will fall behind even mid-range laptops from several generations ago. The data suggests that users should expect a system that excels at productivity, development, and content creation on the CPU side, while graphics performance remains firmly entry-level.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-13600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. This flexibility is significant: users can choose to reuse existing DDR4 memory to save on build costs, or invest in DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop processor and valuable for workstation use. The platform also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring that future GPU upgrades will not be bottlenecked by the interface.

The RX 6400 uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface, which is narrower than the full x16 slot that most GPUs use. This is a potential bottleneck in itself, as the card's bandwidth is limited by the x4 connection. However, for a card with only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 128.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, the x4 interface is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most workloads. The GPU has a suggested PSU of 250 watts, which is remarkably low, and the CPU's 65-watt TDP means the entire system can run on a modest power supply. The GPU requires no power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot.

The upgrade path is clear: the CPU is not the bottleneck, so the next sensible upgrade is the GPU. A user could replace the RX 6400 with a higher-tier Radeon RX 6000 series card or a competing NVIDIA offering, and the i5-13600 would have no trouble feeding it. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that even the fastest current GPUs will have adequate bandwidth. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads will remain relevant for years, and the socket 1700 platform supports a range of 13th-generation and 12th-generation processors, though the i5-13600 is already near the top of the mid-range. For users who want more CPU performance, upgrading to an i7 or i9 on the same socket is possible, but the data suggests the i5-13600 is already within 0.5% of some of the best CPUs available, so such an upgrade would yield diminishing returns.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-13600 a good match for the AMD Radeon RX 6400?

A: The data indicates a significant mismatch. The CPU ranks at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 35th percentile. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor; in CPU-heavy tasks, the GPU is irrelevant. The pairing is only sensible if the primary use case is productivity with occasional light gaming.

Q: What is the CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-13600's average benchmark score of 44,240 is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44,309) and 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44,342). It is 0.5% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44,466) and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44,573). These are all near-parity results.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6400 have, and is it sufficient?

A: The RX 6400 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a very limited configuration for modern games, which often require 6 GB or more at higher settings. The 4 GB capacity will be a constraint in many current titles.

Q: Does this build support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the i5-13600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. Users can choose either memory type, though the motherboard must match the chosen type.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 250 watts, and the CPU has a 65-watt TDP. A quality 400-watt power supply would be more than adequate, though the exact figure depends on other system components.

Q: Is the RX 6400 capable of ray tracing?

A: The RX 6400 has 12 ray accelerators (RT cores) and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. However, its raw performance (3.565 TFLOPS FP32) is low, so ray tracing performance will be limited. The card is not designed for ray-traced gaming.

Q: What is the release date of the CPU?

A: The i5-13600 was released on 2023-01-03, and the RX 6400 was released on 2022-01-18. The CPU is still in active production, while the GPU is end-of-life.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not suitable for high-refresh gaming. The RX 6400's PassMark G3D score of 7,673 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 176 indicate entry-level performance that will struggle to maintain high frame rates at any resolution above 1080p. The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,758) cannot compensate for the GPU's limitations. Estimated frame rates in demanding titles would likely fall well below 60 FPS at medium settings.

Streaming: The i5-13600's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, as the PassMark multi-thread score of 31,725 indicates strong parallel processing capability. However, the RX 6400's limited GPU performance means that the gaming side of the stream will suffer. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU in the CPU could potentially be used for encoding, but the discrete GPU's low performance remains the bottleneck.

Video editing: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 will handle video encoding and rendering well, and the PassMark data compression score of 383,972 suggests fast file operations. However, the RX 6400's 4 GB VRAM and low compute scores (PassMark GPU compute of 2,812) will limit GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering. The system can edit video, but real-time effects and high-resolution timelines will be constrained by the GPU.

3D rendering: The CPU excels at this task, with Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11,180 and R23 multi-core score of 26,620 providing strong CPU-based rendering performance. However, GPU-accelerated renderers will be severely limited by the RX 6400's FP32 performance of 3.565 TFLOPS. The system is better suited to CPU-based rendering pipelines.

Software development: This is the strongest scenario for this build. The CPU's 20 threads and high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4,049) will handle compilation, testing, and virtual machines with ease. The PassMark integer math score of 111,044 and floating point math score of 81,892 indicate strong compute throughput. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU provides snappy performance for office applications, web browsing, and multitasking. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display output, making the discrete GPU optional for non-gaming workloads. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data integrity. This build is overkill for most student tasks but will handle anything thrown at it.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 24 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 50.5 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units, along with 12 ray accelerators. It has no tensor cores, as these are an NVIDIA feature.

The memory subsystem is the card's most significant limitation. With 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, the RX 6400 achieves a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. This is extremely low by modern standards and will cause performance drops in any workload that exceeds the 4 GB VRAM capacity. The memory clock is 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), which helps mitigate the narrow bus but cannot compensate for the capacity deficit.

Clock speeds are decent for the architecture: a base clock of 1923 MHz, a game clock of 2039 MHz, and a boost clock of 2321 MHz. The pixel rate is 74.27 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 111.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.565 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These figures place the card in the entry-level segment, confirmed by its 35th percentile ranking.

The benchmark scores are consistent with this positioning. The PassMark G3D score of 7,673 is the card's best result, but it ties with the GTX 770M and barely edges out the Quadro K4000M. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 is very low, indicating poor DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 32,011 and Vulkan score of 16,372 show moderate compute capability, but the PassMark GPU compute score of 2,812 is weak. The DirectX scores (9: 93, 10: 54, 11: 70, 12: 30) show that the card performs best in older APIs, which is typical for entry-level GPUs.

For rendering, the RX 6400's 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraints. GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane will be slow and limited by memory capacity. The 12 ray accelerators provide some ray tracing capability, but the low overall performance means ray-traced renders will be impractically slow. The card is better suited to traditional rasterization at low settings.

Who Should Build It

This build is suited for users who prioritize CPU performance and need only basic graphics capability. The target audience includes software developers who spend most of their time compiling code and running virtual machines—the CPU's 20 threads and strong single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4,049) are ideal for this work, and the GPU is sufficient for multiple monitors and basic UI rendering.

Students in computer science or engineering programs would benefit from the CPU's compute power (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620) for assignments involving data processing or simulation, while the GPU handles light gaming or media playback. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity in long-running computations.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office applications would find the CPU's performance (PassMark multi-thread score of 31,725) more than adequate, and the low power requirements (65 W CPU TDP, 53 W GPU TDP) keep operating costs down. The GPU is not necessary for these workloads, but it provides a modest boost for tasks like photo editing or light video playback.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications like video encoding or 3D modeling (CPU-based renderers) would appreciate the i5-13600's performance. The RX 6400 is sufficient for previewing 3D scenes at low settings, but it will not accelerate GPU-based rendering workflows. The 4 GB VRAM and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors here.

Gamers at 1080p with low to medium settings and a willingness to accept entry-level frame rates are the only gaming audience for this build. The RX 6400's 35th percentile ranking means it will handle esports titles and older games, but modern AAA titles will require significant compromises. The CPU will not be the limiting factor in any game.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-13600, a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Raptor Lake generation, with the AMD Radeon RX 6400, an entry-level RDNA 2.0 GPU. The CPU is a mainstream desktop part with a 65-watt TDP, released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $255. The GPU is a low-profile, single-slot card with a 53-watt TDP, released on 2022-01-18 with a launch MSRP of 159 USD.

The combined percentile for this build is 62nd, which places it in the mid-range of all systems in the database. This overall tier is a direct result of the massive disparity between the CPU's 88th percentile and the GPU's 35th percentile. The build's average benchmark scores reflect this imbalance: the CPU averages 44,240, while the GPU averages 6,001. The composite score is pulled up by the CPU but held back by the GPU.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is designed for a standard tower case with expandability. The CPU's socket 1700 platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface (16 lanes from the CPU) ensures future GPU upgrades will not be bandwidth-limited. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x4 interface is a potential bottleneck, but not for the card's current performance level.

Overall, this is a lopsided build that prioritizes CPU performance at the expense of GPU capability. It is a sensible choice for productivity-focused users who occasionally game, but it is not a balanced gaming system. The upgrade path is clear: replace the GPU first, as the CPU is already performing at a level within 0.7% of some of the fastest processors available.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The die size is 215 mm², and the CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65-watt TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

Benchmark results for the CPU are strong across the board. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2,683, and the single-core score is 378. The R20 scores are 11,180 multi-core and 1,578 single-core. The R23 scores are 26,620 multi-core and 3,758 single-core. These show excellent scaling from single-core to multi-core workloads, indicating well-balanced performance.

In PassMark tests, the CPU scores 383,972 in data compression, 22,182 in data encryption, 23,045 in extended instructions, 109 in finding prime numbers, 81,892 in floating point math, 111,044 in integer math, 31,725 in multi-thread, 1,782 in physics, and 42,040 in random string sorting. The single-thread score is 4,049. These results show a processor that excels at integer and floating point operations, with particularly strong performance in data compression and sorting tasks.

The CPU's 88th percentile ranking places it among the top 12% of all processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 44,240 is within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, a specialized gaming processor, and within 0.5% of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H. This means the i5-13600 delivers performance comparable to significantly more expensive or newer processors.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and can handle video playback and light 2D workloads. It is not suitable for gaming, but it does provide a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or is removed. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is rare for desktop processors and valuable for workstation use cases where data integrity is critical.

For real-world workloads, the i5-13600 delivers excellent performance in compiled code execution, data processing, and multi-threaded applications. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded performance. The 65-watt TDP means the CPU can be cooled by a capable air cooler, keeping system noise and thermals manageable. The processor is in active production status, ensuring continued availability and support.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds