SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500HX

29,270 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-13500HX paired with the Intel Arc A350M presents a striking imbalance in raw compute capability versus graphics throughput. The CPU sits at the 81st percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 70th percentile among all graphics cards — a gap that immediately signals the processor is the dominant partner in this pairing. When a CPU outperforms its GPU by eleven percentile points, the graphics subsystem becomes the natural limiting factor in almost any task that relies on rendering.

Benchmark results confirm this asymmetry. The CPU’s multi-threaded 3DMark score of 7885 at max threads shows substantial headroom, while the GPU’s average benchmark score of 24647 places it in a tier where modern gaming workloads will consistently hit its ceiling first. The single-thread 3DMark score of 972 and the PassMark single-thread score of 3582 indicate that even lightly-threaded workloads — which typically favor the CPU — will still encounter GPU-imposed frame rate caps in graphics-intensive scenarios.

FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data pack, as no measured frame rates exist for this exact combination. However, the percentile delta between components tells a clear story: the CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them. In CPU-bound titles at lower resolutions, the Arc A350M will saturate well before the i5-13500HX breaks a sweat. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions or with heavy effects, the bottleneck shifts even more decisively toward the graphics card.

The 14-core, 20-thread configuration with a 4.70 GHz boost clock gives this processor enough muscle to handle background tasks, streaming encoding, and game logic simultaneously without becoming the constraint. The data suggests that any perceived performance ceiling in this laptop build will trace back to the GPU, not the CPU — a critical distinction for buyers who prioritize upgradeability or external GPU expansion.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all gaming frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of both components, and should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

The Arc A350M’s benchmark scores suggest entry-level 1080p gaming capability. With an average GPU benchmark score of 24647, it sits within 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile — though the latter is a workstation part, making the comparison more about compute alignment than gaming pedigree. The GPU’s 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output pipelines, combined with a 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth over a 64-bit bus, point to modest fill-rate ceilings.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated frame rates would likely fall into the 30-60 FPS range for esports titles and older AAA games, while newer, more demanding releases would struggle to maintain playable framerates. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory capacity further constrains texture-heavy titles, particularly at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs. The 6 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the modest FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS means ray-traced workloads will exact a heavy toll on frame rates.

The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 1730.5 in Cinebench R23 and 972 in 3DMark single-thread ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. For competitive titles like first-person shooters or MOBAs, the i5-13500HX can easily maintain high frame delivery, but the Arc A350M will cap output well below what the CPU could theoretically support. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes even more of a limiting factor, and the estimates suggest only older or less demanding games would remain playable.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500HX is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, drawing 55 W of TDP. The chip uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, indicating a soldered, non-upgradeable mobile design.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor with strong multi-threaded capability and respectable single-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18334 places it well above typical mobile processors, while the single-core score of 1730.5 demonstrates solid per-thread efficiency. The 3DMark thread scaling shows a clear progression: 1899 at 2 threads, 3607 at 4 threads, 5712 at 8 threads, 7307 at 16 threads, and 7885 at max threads. This scaling curve indicates that the processor benefits from additional threads up to about 16, after which gains diminish — consistent with a hybrid architecture mixing performance and efficiency cores.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This substantial L3 allocation helps with data-heavy workloads like compression and encryption, where the PassMark scores of 331896 for data compression and 19267 for data encryption show strong results. The floating-point math score of 70885 and integer math score of 96195 further underscore the processor’s compute versatility.

At the 81st percentile among all CPUs, the i5-13500HX outperforms its nearest rivals by narrow margins. It sits 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Phi 7210, 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, and trails the AMD EPYC 9654 by 0.5% and the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X by 0.6%. These tight deltas place the i5-13500HX in the upper-midrange tier of processors, competitive with desktop parts from previous generations despite being a mobile chip.

The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support as a notable feature for workstation use. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for storage and expansion, while the integrated UHD Graphics 710 offers a basic display output fallback. The unlocked multiplier allows enthusiast tuning, though the mobile form factor limits practical overclocking headroom.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need substantial CPU compute power but can tolerate modest graphics performance. The 81st CPU percentile versus 70th GPU percentile clearly defines the audience: processor-centric workloads take priority over gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks.

Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation will find the i5-13500HX’s multi-threaded scores compelling. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 18334 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 27753 indicate capable performance for rendering tasks that scale across cores. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7307 reinforces this strength in heavily threaded professional applications.

Software developers and data analysts benefit from the processor’s strong integer and floating-point math scores — 96195 and 70885 respectively — as well as the robust data compression and encryption throughput. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compute jobs where data integrity matters.

Students and office workers who run productivity suites, web applications, and light coding will experience responsive performance thanks to the strong single-thread score of 3582 in PassMark. The Arc A350M handles basic display tasks and light media acceleration without issue, making this a well-rounded daily driver.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations could find this build acceptable for esports and older titles, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit modern AAA gaming. Users who prioritize gaming should look elsewhere, but those who game occasionally as a secondary activity may find the performance adequate.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel BGA 1964 socket means the CPU is permanently soldered to the motherboard, eliminating any possibility of processor upgrades. This is a sealed platform — buyers should select the configuration knowing that the i5-13500HX is the final CPU they will own in this system.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, offering flexibility depending on the laptop’s design. The ECC memory capability is unusual for a consumer mobile chip and suggests potential workstation-oriented laptop designs. With a 55 W TDP, the cooling solution required is moderate, and the power delivery system does not need to accommodate extreme CPU loads.

The GPU is also soldered, as is typical for mobile discrete graphics. The Arc A350M carries a 25 W TDP, which is low for a discrete GPU but appropriate for thin-and-light designs. No suggested PSU is listed for this mobile configuration, and the power connector information is absent — consistent with an integrated laptop solution where external power supply specifications vary by model.

PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU with 20 lanes provides substantial bandwidth for NVMe storage and potential future peripherals. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. For users seeking more graphics power, an external GPU enclosure over Thunderbolt or similar high-bandwidth interfaces would be the only viable path, though the laptop must support such connectivity.

The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, which may affect long-term driver support availability. The CPU remains active in production. A sensible next upgrade would be a completely new laptop with a higher-tier GPU, as this platform offers no meaningful component-level upgrade paths beyond memory and storage.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M’s benchmark scores indicate this is not a high-refresh gaming platform. With an average GPU score of 24647 and only 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, achieving 144 Hz or even 100 Hz in modern titles is unrealistic. Esports games at lower settings might approach 60-90 FPS, but the GPU will cap performance well below the CPU’s capability.

Streaming: The i5-13500HX’s multi-threaded strength — 18334 in Cinebench R23 and 27753 in PassMark multi-thread — provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The 14 cores can handle game logic, encoder threads, and streaming overhead simultaneously. The GPU’s limited graphics performance, however, means streamed gameplay will be at modest quality settings.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 331896 and floating-point math score of 70885 support smooth timeline editing and export workflows. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle basic effects and color grading but may struggle with complex GPU-accelerated filters or high-resolution timelines.

3D rendering: Multi-threaded rendering workloads will excel on this CPU — the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9792 and R15 multi-core score of 2863 demonstrate strong render throughput. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Arc A350M’s modest compute capability, making CPU-based renderers the preferred choice on this system.

Software development: Integer math performance of 96195 and the extended instructions score of 20200 in PassMark indicate fast compilation and code analysis. The 20 threads accelerate parallel builds, while the strong single-thread score of 3582 ensures responsive IDE interactions and quick unit test execution.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance and 14-core configuration handle document processing, spreadsheet calculations, and multitasking with ease. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 provides a fallback display solution, and the discrete GPU accelerates browser rendering and video playback. ECC memory support adds data integrity for long-running academic computations.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500HX ranks at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29270.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A350M have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13500HX supports ECC memory, which is notable for a mobile processor and beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Arc A350M ranks at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24647.

Q: Can this laptop configuration be upgraded with a better CPU?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 76, reflecting the CPU’s stronger relative performance compared to the GPU.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350M includes 6 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), providing hardware ray tracing capability.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13500HX processor with the Intel Arc A350M discrete GPU. The combined percentile of 76 places this system in the upper-midrange tier of laptop configurations, driven primarily by the CPU’s strong 81st percentile ranking rather than the GPU’s 70th percentile.

The pairing represents a CPU-first design philosophy, where the processor carries the system’s performance identity. The i5-13500HX delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a mobile form factor, while the Arc A350M provides entry-level discrete graphics that outpaces typical integrated solutions but trails midrange dedicated GPUs.

This build suits users who prioritize compute-heavy workloads like software development, content creation, and data processing over gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. The 14-core, 20-thread CPU with 24 MB of L3 cache offers exceptional multitasking capability, while the GPU handles everyday graphics tasks and light gaming adequately.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows consistent strength across workloads. The 3DMark scores scale from 972 single-thread to 7885 max-threads, demonstrating efficient thread utilization. Cinebench results confirm this pattern: R15 multi-core of 2863 and single-core of 252, R20 multi-core of 9792 and single-core of 1382, and R23 multi-core of 18334 with single-core of 1730.5.

PassMark results reveal specialized strengths: data compression at 331896, data encryption at 19267, extended instructions at 20200, floating-point math at 70885, integer math at 96195, multi-thread at 27753, physics at 1634, random string sorting at 36373, and single-thread at 3582. The average benchmark score of 29270 places the CPU at the 81st percentile, with nearest rivals within 0.6% either direction.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more limited, with Geekbench OpenCL at 24546 and Vulkan at 24747, yielding an average of 24647 and a 70th percentile ranking. Nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 at 0.4% higher, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 0.5% higher, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT at 0.8% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 at 1.5% lower.

The combined picture shows a system where CPU performance exceeds GPU performance by a significant margin. The CPU’s 81st percentile versus the GPU’s 70th percentile means that in balanced workloads, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor. For CPU-bound tasks, this system performs at a high level; for GPU-bound tasks, it performs at an entry-to-mid level.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The die contains 7,200 million transistors across 157 mm², with a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. This is Intel’s entry-level Alchemist mobile GPU, now end-of-life.

The GPU operates with a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. Memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed across a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. The 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs provide the core rendering pipeline, while 6 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing.

Compute performance includes 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 6.758 TFLOPS of FP16 with 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate reaches 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate hits 105.6 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern APIs.

The 70th percentile ranking places the Arc A350M near the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile in average benchmark scores, though these comparisons mask architectural differences. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p gaming at moderate settings but limits texture quality and resolution scaling. The 64-bit memory bus constrains bandwidth-sensitive workloads, and the 25 W TDP indicates power efficiency is prioritized over raw performance.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s modest FP32 and FP16 throughput means it handles light 3D rendering and basic GPU acceleration, but heavy compute tasks will be slow. The 6 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but with only 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 behind them, ray-traced scenes will render at low performance levels. The GPU is best suited for display output, video decode, and light graphics acceleration, with the CPU carrying the majority of compute workloads.