SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500H

22,468 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500H is a 12-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It carries a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 45 W TDP. The hybrid design pairs performance and efficiency cores, though the fact pack does not specify the exact core distribution. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a locked multiplier part, so overclocking is not supported.

Benchmark data places this CPU at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the processors in the database. The average benchmark score across all tests is 22,468. In multi-threaded workloads, the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,099 and max-thread score of 6,160 show strong scaling as thread counts increase. The 8-thread score of 4,550 and 4-thread score of 3,385 demonstrate that performance gains are consistent but taper off slightly at higher thread counts, which is typical for a hybrid architecture with shared resources.

Single-thread performance is equally important for everyday responsiveness. The 3DMark single-thread score of 967 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,775 indicate that the 4.70 GHz boost clock delivers competitive per-core throughput. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,397 reinforces this. For real-world workloads, this means snappy application launches, responsive web browsing, and solid performance in lightly threaded applications like office suites and legacy software.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14,081 is particularly telling. This is a widely used rendering benchmark, and the result positions the i5-13500H as a capable processor for content creation tasks that utilize all available cores. The PassMark multithread score of 21,366 and integer math score of 72,724 further confirm strong parallel processing capability. Data compression scores are also high at 254,661 in PassMark, suggesting efficient handling of archive extraction and file management tasks.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i5-13500H sits within a narrow band of similarly performing mobile processors. It trails the Intel Core i7-1270P by 0.2%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U by 0.7%, and the Intel Core i5-12500H by 0.7%. It leads the AMD Ryzen 5 220 by 0.8%. These deltas are minuscule, meaning the i5-13500H is effectively performance-equivalent to these competitors in aggregate benchmark scores. The practical takeaway is that users switching between these CPUs would notice little difference in day-to-day tasks.

The 45 W TDP classifies this as a performance-oriented mobile processor, likely found in larger laptops or workstations with adequate cooling. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units provides a fallback display output and basic graphics acceleration, though the dedicated Arc A370M GPU handles demanding visual workloads.

# FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i5-13500H?

A: The CPU has 12 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: How does the i5-13500H compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-1270P?

A: The i5-13500H has an average benchmark score of 22,468, which is 0.2% lower than the i7-1270P's average score of 22,502. This is a negligible performance difference.

Q: What is the L3 cache size on this processor?

A: The L3 cache is 18 MB shared across all cores. Each core also has 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 cache.

Q: What memory types does the i5-13500H support?

A: It supports DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4, LPDDR4X, LPDDR5, and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The i5-13500H ranks at the 75th percentile, meaning it scores higher than 75% of all CPUs in the benchmark database.

Q: What PCIe version and lane count does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes dedicated to CPU-connected devices.

Q: Does the CPU have an unlocked multiplier for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the processor cannot be overclocked beyond its factory boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined system places at the 75th percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings in the database. The CPU's average benchmark score is 22,468, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 29,175. These two components together form a balanced mobile platform that outperforms the majority of competing laptop configurations.

The CPU's performance across synthetic benchmarks shows a clear pattern. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score of 7,464 and single-core score of 1,053 demonstrate strong scaling from one core to all cores. The Cinebench R15 results of 2,304 multicore and 249 single-core follow the same trend. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show that the CPU gains roughly 1.5x performance going from 4 threads (3,385) to 8 threads (4,550), and another 1.35x going from 8 to 16 threads (6,099). This indicates efficient utilization of the hybrid core layout.

PassMark results provide insight into specialized workloads. The floating-point math score of 52,123 and integer math score of 72,724 show strong arithmetic capability. Extended instructions score 14,872, which covers SIMD workloads like multimedia processing. Data encryption scores 14,938, and random string sorting scores 27,955. The physics score of 1,289 and prime number finding score of 74 are lower in absolute terms but represent specialized tasks where the architecture's hybrid nature may not be optimal.

The GPU's benchmark results are more limited, with only two Geekbench scores available. The OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 place the Arc A370M at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, averages 29,197, a mere 0.1% difference. The AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29,211, also 0.1% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28,996, which is 0.6% behind the Arc. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28,874, putting the Arc A370M 1% ahead despite the RX 6800M being a much larger, higher-power GPU in most implementations.

The combined picture shows a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks while providing solid GPU compute performance. The CPU's 75th percentile ranking and GPU's 74th percentile ranking are closely aligned, suggesting neither component dramatically outperforms the other. This balance is unusual in mobile platforms, where one component often bottlenecks the other.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i5-13500H paired with the Intel Arc A370M targets users who need a capable mobile workstation without requiring flagship-level performance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14,081 makes it suitable for content creators who work with photo editing, light video rendering, and 3D modeling. The PassMark data compression score of 254,661 indicates efficient handling of large file archives, which benefits developers working with repositories and build artifacts.

Software developers will appreciate the 16 threads for parallel compilation tasks. The 3DMark max-thread score of 6,160 shows that the CPU maintains performance when all threads are active, which is common during code builds. The DDR4 and DDR5 memory support provides flexibility for system integrators, though the specific memory configuration is not detailed in the data.

Students and small business users represent another target demographic. The single-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,775, ensures smooth operation of office productivity suites, web browsers with many tabs, and communication tools. The 75th percentile CPU ranking means this system outperforms most laptops in its class, providing headroom for future software demands.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with moderate settings would find this configuration viable, though the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus limit high-resolution or high-detail gaming. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking indicates it handles esports titles and older games comfortably. Content creators working with 2D graphics or light 3D workloads will find the Arc A370M's compute capability sufficient, as evidenced by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676.

The build class is laptop, so this configuration is not intended for desktop users building custom systems. It represents a complete mobile solution where the CPU and GPU are integrated into a single chassis, likely with shared cooling and power delivery.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles are nearly identical at 75 and 74 respectively, indicating a well-matched pairing. Neither component dramatically outclasses the other, which minimizes bottlenecking in most workloads. However, the nature of the tasks determines which component becomes the limiting factor.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, and spreadsheet calculations, the i5-13500H's 16 threads provide ample parallelism. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,099 and PassMark multithread score of 21,366 show that the CPU can sustain high throughput. In these scenarios, the Arc A370M is largely idle, and the CPU is the sole determinant of performance. The 75th percentile ranking suggests these tasks will complete faster than on most laptops.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high settings or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A370M becomes the limiting factor. Its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus width with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth restrict texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution framebuffers. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking is respectable, but it trails dedicated gaming GPUs that occupy higher percentile positions. The 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance indicate moderate compute throughput, sufficient for entry-level rendering but not for professional-grade workloads.

The memory system presents a potential bottleneck. The CPU supports dual-channel memory across multiple types, but the GPU has only 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is significantly lower than what larger GPUs offer, and it will constrain performance in memory-intensive scenarios like high-resolution textures or large compute buffers. The 64-bit bus width is the physical limitation here.

The CPU's 45 W TDP and GPU's 35 W TDP combine for 80 W of thermal load, which is manageable for a larger laptop chassis. The CPU's boost clock of 4.70 GHz and GPU's boost clock of 2050 MHz suggest that thermal headroom is available, but sustained loads may cause clock reductions if cooling is inadequate. The data does not specify sustained clock behavior, but the TDP figures imply a balanced power envelope.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a ball-grid array design soldered directly to the motherboard. This means the CPU is not user-upgradeable. The GPU is also integrated into the system, so neither component can be swapped independently. Upgrades on this platform are limited to memory, storage, and potentially the display or battery in a laptop form factor.

The CPU supports a wide range of memory types including DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4, LPDDR4X, LPDDR5, and LPDDR5X in dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows system integrators to choose memory based on cost and performance targets. The memory bus is dual-channel, which provides adequate bandwidth for the CPU's 16 threads. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 8 CPU lanes offers high-speed connectivity for NVMe storage and other peripherals, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU's TDP is 35 W, and the CPU's TDP is 45 W, totaling 80 W for the core computing components. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, which is typical for a laptop where the power adapter is proprietary. The slot width is listed as IGP, indicating the GPU is integrated into the motherboard rather than a removable module. This further reinforces that upgrades are not feasible for the GPU.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity or speed, since the CPU supports multiple memory generations. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes would also provide tangible benefits, particularly for data-intensive workloads like video editing or large database operations. However, the soldered CPU and integrated GPU mean that any future performance improvement would require a complete system replacement.

The production status of the CPU is Active, while the GPU is End-of-life. This suggests that the CPU may still be available for new systems, but the GPU is being phased out. Users considering this platform should be aware that the GPU is no longer in production, which may affect long-term driver support and availability of replacement parts.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M's 74th percentile GPU ranking and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance support esports titles at 1080p with high refresh rates. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 967 and boost clock of 4.70 GHz ensure the processor can feed the GPU with frames in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth limit performance in modern AAA titles, where texture quality and resolution may need to be reduced.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads provide headroom for encoding workloads alongside gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14,081 indicates sufficient processing power for software encoding, while the GPU's fixed-function hardware can offload encoding tasks. The PassMark data encryption score of 14,938 suggests the CPU can handle stream encryption overhead without significant impact on other tasks.

Video editing: The CPU's multicore performance, evidenced by the 3DMark max-thread score of 6,160, handles timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export encoding. The GPU's OpenCL score of 29,676 provides acceleration for effects and transitions that leverage GPU compute. The 4 GB VRAM may limit the use of GPU-accelerated effects on large timelines, but smaller projects will run smoothly.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14,081 indicates the CPU can handle rendering tasks in Blender or similar software. The GPU's 8 RT cores and 1024 shading units provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing and rasterization, though the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest compared to desktop GPUs. Rendering times will be longer than on high-end workstations but acceptable for hobbyists or students.

Software development: The 16 threads and PassMark integer math score of 72,724 accelerate compilation, testing, and analysis tasks. The data compression score of 254,661 speeds up dependency fetching and build artifact management. The CPU's single-thread performance, shown by the PassMark single-thread score of 3,397, ensures responsive IDE interaction and code navigation.

Student and office work: The CPU's 75th percentile ranking and single-thread performance handle word processing, spreadsheets, presentations, and web research without strain. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU provides a fallback display output, and the dedicated GPU accelerates any graphics tasks. The 45 W TDP allows for a slim laptop design with adequate battery life for a full day of classes or meetings.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13500H processor with the Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-H part with a 45 W TDP, and the GPU is a DG2-128 chip based on Xe-HPG architecture with a 35 W TDP. The combined percentile ranking is 75, placing this system above the majority of laptop configurations in the benchmark database.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 22,468 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 29,175 indicate a platform that can handle a wide range of tasks. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-1270P (0.2% faster), Intel Core Ultra 5 135U (0.7% faster), and Intel Core i5-12500H (0.7% faster), while the AMD Ryzen 5 220 trails by 0.8%. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% faster), AMD FirePro W8000 (0.1% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% faster), while the AMD Radeon RX 6800M trails by 1%.

This is a mid-to-upper tier mobile platform, suitable for users who need more than integrated graphics but do not require flagship gaming or workstation performance. The CPU's 75th percentile ranking and GPU's 74th percentile ranking are closely aligned, creating a balanced system that avoids significant bottlenecking in most workloads.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than definitive measurements.

Based on the GPU's 74th percentile ranking and the CPU's 75th percentile ranking, this system is estimated to handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 RT cores suggest that modern games with ray tracing enabled will run at reduced settings or lower resolutions. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but will struggle with 1440p or high-resolution texture packs.

Esports titles like Counter-Strike, League of Legends, and Valorant should achieve high frame rates at 1080p, given the GPU's 74th percentile ranking. The CPU's single-thread performance, shown by the 3DMark single-thread score of 967, ensures minimal CPU bottlenecks in these lightly threaded games. For AAA titles, expect playable frame rates at 1080p with medium settings, with drops to low settings for the most demanding releases.

The GPU's 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints for gaming performance. These figures are significantly lower than larger GPUs, which limits fill rate and texture streaming in complex scenes. The 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate and 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate provide a baseline for expected performance, but actual results will vary by title and driver optimization.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. This is a compact, efficient design intended for thin-and-light laptops.

The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units provide the computational backbone. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The 8 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is a notable feature for a mobile GPU in this class. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 place the GPU at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The average benchmark score is 29,175. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29,197, a negligible 0.1% difference. The AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29,211, also 0.1% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28,996, which is 0.6% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28,874, placing the Arc A370M 1% ahead despite the RX 6800M typically having significantly higher power draw and memory bandwidth.

The GPU's TDP is 35 W, which is modest for a discrete GPU. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, providing sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's compute and memory requirements. The production status is End-of-life, with a release date of March 29, 2022. This means the GPU is no longer in active production, though existing systems with this GPU will continue to receive driver support. The display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning the specific ports vary by laptop model.