SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500H

22,468 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500H paired with the Intel Arc A350M is a mobile-only combination, and it exists in a specific niche: a mid-tier 13th-generation laptop processor matched with Intel's entry-level discrete Arc graphics. The data shows a CPU sitting at the 75th percentile of all processors and a GPU at the 70th percentile, which together produce a combined percentile of 73 — a solidly upper-mid-tier laptop platform. Notably, the FACT PACK for this pairing contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame-rate discussion on this page is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13500H is a 12-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on Intel's 10 nm process under the Raptor Lake-H codename, part of the Core 13th Gen family. It runs a 2.60 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W — a standard-H-class power envelope that prioritizes sustained multi-core throughput over the thin-and-light efficiency of lower-tier mobile chips. The cache layout consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3, which is a healthy pool for a mobile part and helps feed all 16 threads in heavily parallel workloads.

The benchmark profile tells a clear story about throughput. In Cinebench R23, the chip posts 14081 in multi-core and 1775 in single-core; in the older R20 run it scores 7464 multi-core and 1053 single-core, and in R15 it lands at 2304 multi-core and 249 single-core. The multi-to-single ratio in R23 is roughly 8:1, which for a 12-core/16-thread design indicates that the hybrid core arrangement is being exploited well in fully threaded rendering loads — this is a processor that scales meaningfully when software uses every thread, without collapsing when it doesn't.

Thread scaling is visible directly in the 3DMark CPU tests: 967 single-thread, 1887 on 2 threads, 3385 on 4 threads, 4550 on 8 threads, and 6160 at maximum threads. Two things stand out. First, the jump from single to 4 threads more than triples the score, meaning lightly threaded but parallel-aware applications — audio processing, photo exports, code compilation with several workers — will feel substantially faster than the single-core figure suggests. Second, the step from 8 threads to max threads is comparatively modest (4550 to 6160), showing diminishing returns past eight simultaneous threads, which is typical behavior for a hybrid architecture where the throughput cores do the heavy lifting.

The PassMark suite reinforces this. Integer math sits at 72724, floating point at 52123, data compression at 254661, and encryption at 14938 — figures that describe a processor comfortable with everyday compute, archival compression, and disk-cryptography tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 21366 against a single-thread score of 3397 again shows roughly 6:1 scaling. The physics score of 1289 and prime-number score of 74 are ordinary for this class.

Against its nearest rivals, the i5-13500H is essentially dead-center of a tightly packed group. Its average benchmark score of 22468 sits 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-1270P (22502), 0.7% behind both the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U (22618) and its direct predecessor-class peer the Core i5-12500H (22625), and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 220 (22289). Those margins are within run-to-run noise. Practically, a buyer choosing between these chips should expect indistinguishable aggregate performance, and the 75th percentile placement confirms this is an above-average processor in the broader database, even if it is not the leader of its own immediate cohort.

For real workloads, that translates to: snappy general desktop use driven by the 4.70 GHz boost and 1775 R23 single-core score, capable code compilation thanks to 16 threads, and genuinely usable rendering and video-encode throughput from the 14081 R23 multi-core result.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Core i5-13500H have?

A: It has 12 cores and 16 threads, built on Intel's Raptor Lake-H architecture at a 10 nm process node.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: It is a laptop-class pairing. The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket (soldered), and both components carry mobile TDPs — 45 W for the CPU and 25 W for the GPU.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its rivals?

A: The data shows it effectively tied with its closest competitors: within 0.7% of the Core i7-1270P, Core Ultra 5 135U, and Core i5-12500H, and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 220.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A350M have, and is that enough for modern games?

A: It has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That capacity is the main constraint for high-texture gaming at higher resolutions; it is best suited to modest settings.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this pairing, so all frame-rate expectations on this page are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: Is the Arc A350M still in production?

A: No. Its production status is End-of-life, having launched in March 2022. The CPU, by contrast, is listed as Active.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4, LPDDR4X, LPDDR5, and LPDDR5X across a dual-channel bus, giving laptop manufacturers flexibility between standard and low-power memory.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A350M is Intel's entry-level discrete mobile GPU from the first Arc generation, codenamed DG2-128 on the Xe-HPG architecture. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process, with 7200 million transistors packed into a 157 mm² die — a density of 45.9M transistors per square millimeter, which reflects a modern, efficiency-oriented design rather than a large brute-force chip.

The hardware inventory is modest but coherent: 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, 24 render output units, and 6 ray-tracing cores. It boosts to 2200 MHz from a 1150 MHz base. The theoretical output figures are 52.80 GPixel/s of pixel fill, 105.6 GTexel/s of texture fill, 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32, and 6.758 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 rate. Memory is the defining limitation: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a narrow 64-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) for 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For rendering and gaming, that bandwidth and capacity set a hard ceiling on texture quality and resolution before compute becomes the limit.

The presence of 6 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support means hardware ray tracing is available, but at this shader count the practical use is limited to light RT effects at reduced settings. Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 round out a complete modern API stack.

Its compute standing is captured by two Geekbench results: 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan, for an average score of 24647 and a 70th percentile position against all GPUs. The rival table places it 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590, 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. What that means for rendering: this GPU delivers throughput in the same band as mainstream discrete cards from the preceding era — competent for GPU-accelerated effects, light OpenCL/Vulkan compute, and hardware video block work, but not a serious rendering engine. For 3D viewport work and GPU render previews it will function; for production-scale GPU path tracing it will not.

The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and with a 25 W TDP and IGP-style integration (no power connectors), it is designed to coexist with the CPU inside a single laptop thermal envelope.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is well balanced in percentile terms — 75th percentile CPU, 70th percentile GPU, 73rd combined — but balance in a laptop does not mean equal capability in every workload. It means each component is roughly as strong as the other relative to its own market.

In gaming, the GPU is the limiter. The Arc A350M's 4 GB VRAM, 64-bit bus, and 24647 average score place it firmly below the CPU's ability to feed it; the i5-13500H's 8-thread score of 4550 and max-thread score of 6160 far exceed what a 3.379 TFLOPS GPU can rasterize. Frame rates in games will be GPU-bound at nearly every resolution, and the 4 GB buffer will be exhausted before shader throughput saturates at higher texture settings.

In productivity, the situation inverts. The CPU's 14081 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 21366 PassMark multithread result can be fully exercised regardless of the GPU, so compilation (16 threads), compression (254661 in PassMark data compression), and CPU rendering are CPU-bound and unaffected by the modest discrete GPU. GPU compute tasks — OpenCL/Vulkan acceleration in creative software — will be bottlenecked by the A350M, but that is a niche use for this class of machine.

One structural caveat: with both components sharing a laptop chassis and a combined nominal TDP envelope, sustained all-core CPU load and sustained GPU load will compete thermally. The data does not include chassis-specific measurements, so the degree of that interference cannot be quantified here.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so every frame-rate statement below is an estimate inferred from the benchmark scores, not a direct measurement.

The evidence base for estimation is the Arc A350M's average score of 24647, its 70th percentile rank, and its rival proximity to the Radeon RX 590, RTX A5000 Mobile, RX 6600 XT, and GTX 1630 — all within a 1.5% band. A GPU scoring in this range is generally capable of playable frame rates in esports and older AAA titles at 1080p with reduced settings, while demanding modern games likely require lowered resolutions or settings adjustments to stay smooth. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are the binding constraints: texture-heavy modern titles will hit the memory ceiling before the shader array, so medium or low texture presets are advisable.

Ray tracing is technically available through the 6 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, but the estimate is that it should be treated as off or minimal — the raw 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput leaves little headroom for RT overhead at playable frame rates.

The CPU side will not be the concern. With 967 single-thread and 1887 two-thread 3DMark CPU scores plus the 1289 PassMark physics score, the i5-13500H has ample headroom for game logic, physics, and background tasks at the frame rates this GPU can deliver. High-refresh esports gaming at competitive settings is the most realistic performance target; 1440p or 4K ultra-quality gaming is not.

Who Should Build It

Because this is a laptop-class pairing (buildClass: laptop), "building" means selecting a notebook that carries this combination — and the data defines a clear user profile.

Students and general office users are the core audience: the 75th percentile CPU delivers fast everyday responsiveness (1775 R23 single-core) and effortless multitasking across 16 threads, while the discrete GPU adds capability beyond the integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU for light gaming and GPU-accelerated playback. Software developers benefit from the 14081 R23 multi-core score and 3385 four-thread 3DMark result, which support fast parallel compilation, container work, and IDE responsiveness. Casual to mid-tier gamers — those targeting 1080p at reduced settings or esports titles — get a meaningful step up from integrated graphics. Content creators doing photo editing and light video work will find the combination usable, though the 4 GB VRAM argues against heavy GPU-accelerated editing workloads.

Who should look elsewhere: professional 3D artists, GPU rendering specialists, and gamers targeting high resolutions or ultra presets. The A350M's 70th percentile score and entry-level memory subsystem are disqualifying for those use cases. Note also the GPU's End-of-life production status — buyers considering this pairing new should verify availability and driver-support expectations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Estimated, not measured — but the GPU's 24647 average score and rival proximity to the RX 590 and GTX 1630 suggest 1080p esports gaming at high frame rates with competitive settings is achievable, while the CPU's 6160 max-thread score guarantees the processor will never be the frame limiter.

Streaming: The 12-core/16-thread CPU can handle encoding and game logic simultaneously — the 4550 eight-thread 3DMark score indicates substantial headroom beyond what most games demand — but the GPU's 4 GB buffer and modest raster throughput mean streaming while gaming will require encoder settings that spare GPU resources.

Video editing: The 14081 R23 multi-core score drives timeline scrubbing and CPU-based exports well for a mobile chip. GPU acceleration exists (24546 OpenCL), but the 64-bit bus and 4 GB VRAM cap how much of the pipeline can be offloaded, making hybrid CPU-first editing the realistic workflow.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is genuinely capable for a laptop — the R23 multi-core result and 21366 PassMark multithread score support overnight renders and iterative previews. GPU rendering is not this machine's strength; 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 RT cores define a preview-only role.

Software development: Compilation, virtualization, and containerized environments scale well across 16 threads, and the 3397 PassMark single-thread score keeps single-pass builds and IDE operations responsive. This is one of the strongest use cases for the pairing.

Student and office work: Everyday productivity, web workloads, documents, and browser multitasking sit far below the CPU's capabilities; the dual-channel DDR5-class memory support and 75th percentile placement make this platform comfortably overqualified for standard office tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build: a mobile-H-series processor on the soldered Intel BGA 1744 socket paired with a 25 W entry-level discrete GPU integrated into the same portable platform. The CPU is an Active-production Raptor Lake-H part released in early January 2023; the GPU is an End-of-life Alchemist-generation part from March 2022 — a combination most likely found in mid-generation thin-performance notebooks.

In tier terms, the data places this firmly in upper-mid territory: 75th percentile CPU, 70th percentile GPU, 73rd combined. That is a machine meaningfully above average across the whole database while sitting below enthusiast and workstation classes — a balanced, efficiency-conscious mobile platform rather than a performance flagship.

Benchmark Performance

Exact figures, CPU first. Cinebench: 2304 multi / 249 single (R15), 7464 multi / 1053 single (R20), 14081 multi / 1775 single (R23). 3DMark CPU tests: 967 single-thread, 1887 two-thread, 3385 four-thread, 4550 eight-thread, 6160 max-thread, and 6099 on the 16-thread test. PassMark: 21366 multithread, 3397 single-thread, 72724 integer math, 52123 floating point, 254661 data compression, 14938 encryption, 27955 string sorting, 14872 extended instructions, 1289 physics, 74 prime numbers. The CPU average benchmark score is 22468 at the 75th percentile.

GPU figures: 24546 Geekbench OpenCL and 24747 Geekbench Vulkan, for an average of 24647 at the 70th percentile, with theoretical rates of 3.379 TFLOPS FP32, 52.80 GPixel/s, and 105.6 GTexel/s.

The combined picture is coherent: a processor whose average score lands within a fraction of a percent of the Core i7-1270P, Core Ultra 5 135U, and Core i5-12500H, and a GPU whose average lands within a fraction of a percent of the Radeon RX 590, RTX A5000 Mobile, RX 6600 XT, and GTX 1630. Neither component overshoots the other's class, which is exactly what the 73rd combined percentile reflects — a pairing with no wasteful imbalance, just two mid-tier mobile parts performing at their level.

Upgrade Path and Platform

As a BGA 1744 mobile platform, this combination offers no CPU socket upgrade path — the processor is soldered, and the multiplier is locked regardless. The practical platform facts are these: memory support spans DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4, LPDDR4X, LPDDR5, and LPDDR5X on a dual-channel bus, though actual memory type depends on what the laptop manufacturer soldered or socketed; maximum RAM is therefore a chassis decision rather than a CPU limit. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 8 CPU lanes, sufficient for a fast NVMe SSD at full platform speed. The GPU connects over PCIe 4.0 x8, has a 25 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and carries no suggested PSU figure — appropriate for an integrated mobile part, so desktop-style PSU headroom planning does not apply here.

Thermally, the nominal component TDPs are 45 W (CPU) and 25 W (GPU), and any upgrade consideration on a laptop should center on cooling headroom and the chassis's ability to sustain those figures under combined load, since the data shows both components are meant to be exercised simultaneously.

A sensible next upgrade for someone outgrowing this machine is a step to a higher-tier GPU class — the A350M's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are the clearest ceiling in the data — while retaining a CPU of this class, since the i5-13500H's 22468 average score already matches or beats its listed rivals and sits at the 75th percentile. Buyers moving to a successor platform gain more from GPU headroom and VRAM capacity than from CPU replacement; the benchmark deltas against the Core i7-1270P and Core Ultra 5 135U are under one percent, confirming the processor is not the component holding this build back.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500H + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500H

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds