SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

78 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 22% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
77%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score
Top 23% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-13500E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER pairing presents an unusual balance profile. The CPU sits at the 62nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 18th percentile among all graphics cards. This 44-point gap is substantial, indicating that the processor is the stronger component relative to its respective market. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics simulation, AI inference on the CPU, or lightly-threaded productivity tasks, the Core i5-13500E will be the limiting factor when paired with a GPU of this class. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K rasterization or heavy ray tracing, the RTX 5070 SUPER becomes the constraint.

The benchmark data reveals that the CPU's average benchmark score is 6586, placing it within 0.4% of the Intel Core i9-12900E and 0.3% of the Intel Atom x7405C. This clustering suggests that the i5-13500E delivers performance comparable to previous-generation flagship silicon in mixed workloads. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690 places it just 1.7% above the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440, which is a stark reminder that the 18th percentile ranking reflects a very low position in the current GPU landscape. The FPS scaling picture is incomplete because no measured frames-per-second data exists for this exact combination; all gaming projections must be treated as estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

The bottleneck direction shifts depending on workload intensity. For 1080p high-refresh gaming, the CPU's single-core performance — evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3214 — will likely keep frame rates high, but the GPU's low percentile ranking suggests it may struggle to push beyond mid-range refresh rates. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive limiter, as the resolution increase places greater demands on the rendering pipeline rather than the processor. For productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample throughput, but the GPU's modest compute capabilities will bottleneck GPU-accelerated workloads such as OptiX denoising or CUDA-based rendering.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22772 and a single-core score of 3214. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 9564 and single-core is 1349. The R15 results show 2295 multicore and 323 single-core. These scores position the processor at the 62nd percentile overall, with an average benchmark score of 6586. The nearest rival, the Intel Atom x7405C, scores 6568, which is 0.3% lower; the Intel Core i9-10940X and Pentium Gold G6405 both score 6605, 0.3% higher; and the Core i9-12900E scores 6611, 0.4% higher. The data indicates that the i5-13500E performs nearly identically to the Core i9-12900E, despite being a lower-tier part in the same generation.

The GPU's only recorded benchmark is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2690, placing it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Quadro K1100M at 2664 (1% lower), the GeForce GT 1030 at 2662 (1.1% lower), the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 2660 (1.1% lower), and the GeForce GT 440 at 2645 (1.7% lower). These deltas are remarkably tight, with the RTX 5070 SUPER leading its closest competitor by less than 2%. The combined percentile for this build is 40, reflecting the average of both components' positions. The overall picture is a CPU that punches near the top of its class and a GPU that sits firmly in the lower quartile, creating a system that excels in processor-heavy tasks but underperforms in graphics-intensive applications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500E is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included. The processor integrates UHD Graphics 770, which provides basic display output capabilities without a discrete GPU. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the processor. The multiplier is locked, preventing user overclocking.

The Cinebench scores indicate strong multicore throughput. The R23 multicore score of 22772 suggests the processor handles heavily threaded workloads — video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation — with considerable efficiency. The single-core R23 score of 3214 shows solid per-thread performance, which benefits gaming and lightly threaded applications. The ratio between multicore and single-core scores (roughly 7:1) reflects the scaling across 14 cores. The 62nd percentile ranking means the CPU outperforms a majority of all processors in the database, though it trails the top-tier HEDT and workstation parts. The 0.3-0.4% delta against the Core i9-12900E is negligible, indicating that real-world differences between these two chips would be imperceptible in most workloads. For a desktop platform, the 65 W TDP suggests efficient operation, though the boost clock of 4.60 GHz implies transient power spikes during heavy loads.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is someone whose primary workload is CPU-intensive but who needs modest graphics capability. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium settings will find the CPU's single-core performance adequate, but the GPU's 18th percentile ranking means high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming is not realistic. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the 14-core processor, but GPU-accelerated effects or rendering will be slow. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the 20 threads, and the ECC memory support makes this viable for workstation use where data integrity is critical. Students and small business users running office applications, web browsing, and light multitasking will find the system responsive, though the discrete GPU offers little advantage over the integrated UHD Graphics 770 for such tasks.

The build class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary system intended for a desk environment. The combined percentile of 40 places this system below the midpoint of all builds in the database, meaning it is not a high-performance gaming or workstation configuration. The CPU's 62nd percentile is the main strength; users who frequently run CPU-bound tasks — scientific computing, data analysis, virtualization — will see the most value. The GPU's low position makes it unsuitable for modern AAA gaming at high settings, VR workloads, or machine learning training on the GPU. Users who need these capabilities should look elsewhere, as the RTX 5070 SUPER's benchmark score of 2690 is comparable to entry-level graphics cards from previous generations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p: The CPU's single-core R23 score of 3214 suggests it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's 18th percentile ranking indicates frame rates will be modest. Estimate 60-90 FPS in esports titles at low-to-medium settings, with AAA games likely falling below 60 FPS. No measured data exists, so these figures are projections from the synthetic benchmarks.

Streaming: The 14-core processor with 20 threads can handle encoding workloads (x264 or x265) without dedicated hardware, but the GPU's low compute performance limits its NVENC capabilities. Streaming at 1080p60 with CPU encoding is feasible, but the system will struggle with simultaneous gaming and encoding at higher resolutions.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22772 indicates strong performance in timeline scrubbing, export encoding, and effect processing on the CPU. GPU-accelerated effects in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will be slow due to the GPU's low compute scores. Editing 1080p footage is workable; 4K timelines will be sluggish.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers (e.g., Blender Cycles with CPU, V-Ray) will benefit from the 20 threads, producing render times competitive with the Core i9-12900E. GPU-based renderers will be severely limited by the RTX 5070 SUPER's low percentile, making this unsuitable for production rendering.

Software development: The multicore performance accelerates compilation, testing, and container orchestration. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low during long build sessions. ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: Word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and video conferencing are well within the CPU's capabilities. The discrete GPU is unnecessary for these tasks; the integrated UHD Graphics 770 would suffice, but the presence of the RTX 5070 SUPER adds no measurable benefit for typical office workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and future expansion. The CPU's 65 W TDP leaves substantial headroom for a more powerful GPU; the RTX 5070 SUPER has a 275 W TDP, and the system's power delivery can likely handle a higher-tier graphics card without a PSU upgrade, though the suggested PSU rating is not provided in the data. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design with dimensions of 245 mm length, 115 mm height, and 40 mm width.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU's 62nd percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a significantly stronger graphics card in most workloads. A GPU in the 50th-70th percentile would balance the system better, though specific models and scores are not available in the data. Alternatively, adding more memory (the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5) could benefit heavily threaded workloads, but the existing dual-channel configuration is already adequate. The locked multiplier prevents CPU overclocking, so any CPU upgrade would require a new socket (the LGA 1700 platform is not forward-compatible). The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures the motherboard can handle next-generation storage and expansion cards.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i5-13500E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3214 suggests it can sustain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 (18th percentile) indicates significant rendering limitations.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU is likely the bottleneck, with estimated frame rates between 30-50 FPS in modern AAA titles and 60-80 FPS in esports games. At 1440p ultra, frame rates drop to an estimated 20-35 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K ultra, the GPU's low compute resources would result in sub-30 FPS in most games. The CPU's performance is adequate for 1080p gaming, but the GPU cannot deliver high-refresh experiences at any resolution. Gamers seeking competitive frame rates should consider a stronger GPU, while those playing older or less demanding titles may find the system adequate at 1080p with medium settings.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the Intel Core i5-13500E, a 14-core Raptor Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. The CPU ranks at the 62nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, yielding a combined percentile of 40. This places the system below the midpoint of all builds in the database, indicating it is not a high-end configuration. The pairing is unbalanced: the CPU is a capable mid-range performer, while the GPU is a low-end component by current standards.

The build class is desktop, confirming a stationary form factor. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 275 W TDP suggest a total system power draw that is manageable for most desktop power supplies. The GPU's 18 GB of GDDR7 memory is generous for its performance class, but the low compute throughput limits practical use of that memory. The overall tier is mid-range for CPU performance and entry-level for GPU performance, creating a system that excels in processor-heavy productivity but falls short in graphics-intensive tasks. This is a workstation-oriented configuration with gaming as a secondary consideration.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500E has 14 cores and 20 threads, based on Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-12900E?

A: The i5-13500E has an average benchmark score of 6586, which is 0.4% lower than the Core i9-12900E's 6611, indicating nearly identical performance.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation applications where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER ranks at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this combination?

A: No, no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU pairing; all gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is based on the GB205 chip using Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process node with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The GPU has 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It includes 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The base clock is 2325 MHz with a boost clock of 2512 MHz, and memory operates at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The 18 GB GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s, texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 32.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1).

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690 places the GPU at the 18th percentile, with nearest rivals within 1.7%: the Quadro K1100M (2664), GT 1030 (2662), Arc Pro B50 (2660), and GT 440 (2645). The tight clustering suggests that, despite the modern architecture and high memory capacity, the GPU's compute throughput is comparable to entry-level parts from several generations ago. The FP32 performance of 32.15 TFLOPS is respectable on paper, but the benchmark score indicates real-world rendering performance is limited. The 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads, but the low overall score suggests these features do not compensate for the limited compute resources. For rendering tasks, the GPU's 18 GB memory is ample for large scenes, but the 672.0 GB/s bandwidth and 201.0 GPixel/s pixel rate will constrain throughput. The GPU's 275 W TDP with a 1x 16-pin power connector and dual-slot design is standard for the form factor, but the performance delivered per watt is poor given the low percentile ranking.