SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
77%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score
Top 23% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i5-13500E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop platform that targets the upper-midrange of the benchmark database, holding a combined percentile of 65. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 6586, sits at the 62nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU, averaging 23172, ranks at the 68th percentile among all graphics cards. This system is positioned for high-refresh-rate gaming at demanding resolutions and for content creation workflows that leverage both the processor’s multi-core muscle and the graphics card’s rasterization power. Crucially, the database contains no measured FPS data for this specific combination, meaning all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores, not direct gameplay captures.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh-rate gaming, this pairing is a strong candidate, but with caveats. The RTX 3080’s 68th percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 suggest it can drive frame rates well beyond standard 60 FPS targets at 1440p. The Core i5-13500E’s single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3214, provides the necessary per-thread speed to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most titles, making this a viable setup for 144Hz-class monitors. However, because no measured FPS exists, the margin of performance in specific titles remains an estimate.

Streaming while gaming is a workload where this combination excels, primarily due to the CPU’s core and thread count. With 14 cores and 20 threads, a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 indicates ample headroom to handle game encoding and broadcast software simultaneously. The RTX 3080’s 272 tensor cores also offload encoding tasks via NVENC, but the processor’s raw multi-threaded capacity ensures that even software-based encoding will not choke the system, as its multi-core score is roughly 7x its single-core score, showing strong scaling.

Video editing and rendering workloads will find this platform highly capable. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9564 and R15 multi-core score of 2295 demonstrate sustained throughput for timeline scrubbing and export processes. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 25086 and its dedicated RT cores contribute to accelerated effects and final frame rendering. This combination places the system in a position to handle 4K video editing with relative ease, where the CPU manages decode and effects, and the GPU accelerates render and export tasks.

For 3D rendering and CAD applications, the RTX 3080 is the primary engine. Its GeekBench OpenCL score of 152423 highlights substantial compute throughput for viewport manipulation and final frame rendering. The CPU’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 20 threads provide the necessary scene preparation and physics calculations, while the GPU’s 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance ensures that complex scenes are rendered without stutter. This is a workstation-grade pairing for single-GPU rendering tasks.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s compile times and the GPU’s compute capabilities for testing. The i5-13500E’s high multi-core score in Cinebench R23 (22772) translates to faster code compilation and parallel test execution. The 10 nm process node and 65W TDP mean the system can run for extended periods under load without excessive heat output, making it a sensible choice for a developer’s workstation. The presence of ECC memory support also adds stability for long-running build servers.

Student and office work is arguably over-served by this hardware, but the performance headroom ensures longevity. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1349 ensures snappy application launches and responsive multitasking across office suites. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display tasks, though the dedicated RTX 3080 handles any graphical workload thrown at it. This is a system that will never feel slow for document processing, web browsing, or spreadsheet analysis.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-13500E delivers an average benchmark score of 6586, which places it at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs tracked. In the Cinebench suite, the processor scores 2295 in R15 multi-core, 323 in R15 single-core, 9564 in R20 multi-core, 1349 in R20 single-core, 22772 in R23 multi-core, and 3214 in R23 single-core. These numbers reveal a processor whose multi-threaded performance is roughly seven times its single-threaded performance, a ratio that indicates strong parallel scaling for heavily threaded workloads.

The nearest rivals in the database show how tightly packed this CPU is within its performance tier. The Intel Atom x7405C scores 6568, a mere 0.3% lower, while the Intel Core i9-10940X scores 6605, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Pentium Gold G6405 also scores 6605, and the Intel Core i9-12900E scores 6611, a 0.4% advantage. This clustering suggests that the i5-13500E’s average benchmark score is not uniquely distinctive; its value comes from the combination of multi-core throughput and the specific architectural features rather than a dominant lead over these specific competitors.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 posts an average benchmark score of 23172, ranking at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. Its headline 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 indicates strong DirectX 12 gaming performance. In compute workloads, the GeekBench OpenCL score of 152423 is particularly impressive, dwarfing the Vulkan score of 33620, which suggests the card’s compute potential is far greater than its graphics API performance in synthetic tests. The PassMark G3D score of 25086 reinforces its position as a high-end graphics solution.

The GPU’s nearest rivals show a similar tight clustering to the CPU. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, just 0.3% higher, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and AMD Radeon RX 6600M score 23250 and 23273 respectively, both 0.3-0.4% higher. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276, 0.4% higher. This indicates the RTX 3080 is operating at a performance plateau where minor architectural differences, not raw score, dictate its standing. The combined picture is a system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, with the GPU having a slight edge in percentile ranking over the CPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i5-13500E is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between the lower cost of DDR4 or the higher bandwidth of DDR5, though the memory bandwidth figure is not specified in the database. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, providing a modern interface for current and future expansion cards.

The RTX 3080 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at the older standard’s speed. The GPU has a 320W TDP with a suggested PSU of 700W, which is a sensible recommendation given the CPU’s 65W TDP. This leaves substantial headroom for additional drives, fans, and peripherals without requiring a PSU upgrade, assuming the 700W unit is of reasonable quality.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count processor on the same socket, as the LGA 1700 socket supports the full range of 13th-generation Intel processors. Given the CPU’s 62nd percentile standing, moving to a processor with more cores would improve multi-threaded workloads like rendering, while the GPU would remain the primary bottleneck in gaming. Alternatively, upgrading the GPU to a newer generation would require checking PSU headroom, as the RTX 3080’s 320W draw is already substantial.

Memory upgrades are the most straightforward path, as the platform’s support for DDR5 means a switch from DDR4 could yield higher bandwidth for CPU-bound tasks. The 24 MB shared L3 cache is substantial, but adding faster memory would improve the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU in gaming scenarios. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a diagnostic fallback, but any serious gaming or compute work relies on the discrete GPU.

Who Should Build It

The primary audience for this build is the gamer who wants high refresh rates at 1440p without stepping into the extreme high-end. The RTX 3080’s 68th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 62nd percentile position create a balanced platform that will handle most titles at high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact expectations should be tempered. For gamers at 1080p, this system is overkill for many titles, but for those targeting 1440p or entry-level 4K, the combination of the CPU’s single-core speed and the GPU’s rasterization power is appropriate.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will find this build efficient. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 provides the throughput for encoding and rendering, while the GPU’s GeekBench OpenCL score of 152423 accelerates effects and final output. This is not a top-tier workstation, but it is a capable single-system solution for a freelance creator or a small studio handling multiple projects.

Software developers, particularly those working on large codebases, will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads and high multi-core score. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for long compile sessions. For students and office professionals, this is a future-proof system that will handle any academic or business software, though the hardware is significantly more powerful than required for such tasks.

Small business workstations that need to handle occasional rendering or video tasks alongside standard office applications will find this build versatile. The CPU’s 65W TDP means it can be housed in a reasonably compact case with adequate cooling, and the GPU’s dual-slot design and 285mm length fit most mid-tower cases. The 700W suggested PSU is a realistic requirement that most pre-built systems in this class already include.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500E is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². Its base clock is 2.40 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and it operates at a 65W TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache. This configuration is unlocked in terms of thread count but has a locked multiplier, meaning overclocking is not supported.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that is strong in single-threaded tasks but exceptional in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 is roughly seven times the single-core score of 3214, indicating excellent parallel scaling. This is a result of the 14 cores (likely a mix of performance and efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the mix) handling multi-threaded tasks with ease. In real-world workloads, this translates to faster video exports, quicker code compiles, and smoother multitasking.

The processor’s 62nd percentile ranking places it above the median but not in the top tier. Compared to rivals, it is virtually identical in average score to the Intel Atom x7405C (0.3% higher) and the Intel Core i9-10940X (0.3% lower). This suggests that in pure average benchmark terms, the i5-13500E is not a standout, but its architectural advantages—such as the 24 MB L3 cache and support for DDR5—provide benefits not captured in the average score. The 10 nm process node also implies better power efficiency than older architectures, though specific efficiency figures are not provided.

For real workloads, the single-core score of 1349 in Cinebench R20 indicates responsive application behavior, while the multi-core score of 9564 in the same test shows it can handle heavy parallel tasks. The 65W TDP is notably low for a processor with this core count, which suggests it will run cool under typical loads, allowing for quieter cooling solutions. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation reliability.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i5-13500E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination in this database, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores. The RTX 3080’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which is the foundation for modern gaming. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 25086 and its 8,704 shading units suggest it can handle high resolutions and detail settings.

In practical terms, this system should deliver high frame rates at 1440p in most titles, potentially exceeding 100 FPS in competitive games like first-person shooters, given the CPU’s single-core strength. At 4K, the GPU’s 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor, but it should still manage 60 FPS in many games at high settings. The CPU’s 4.60 GHz boost clock ensures it will not hold the GPU back in CPU-bound scenarios.

The lack of measured FPS data means these expectations should be treated as directional rather than precise. The GPU’s 68th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms the majority of graphics cards, and the CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking ensures a reasonable balance. For esports titles at 1080p, the system is likely overkill, but for demanding AAA games at 1440p, it is appropriately matched. At 4K, the system will require settings adjustments to maintain high refresh rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combination holds a combined percentile of 65 against all other builds in the database.

Q: Does the Core i5-13500E support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the processor’s clock speeds cannot be manually increased beyond the 4.60 GHz boost clock.

Q: What type of memory does the RTX 3080 use?

A: The GPU uses 10 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 320-bit bus width, delivering a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific build?

A: No, the database contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i5-13500E and RTX 3080 combination, so all gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for the RTX 3080?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W, while the GPU itself has a 320W TDP.

Q: Which architecture is the RTX 3080 based on?

A: The GPU is based on the Ampere architecture, built on Samsung’s 8 nm process node with the GA102 chip.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13500E supports ECC memory, a feature useful for error-correcting workloads in professional applications.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core i5-13500E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65W TDP, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card with a 320W TDP, generating a combined system that targets the upper-midrange of the performance spectrum. The combined percentile of 65 indicates that this build outperforms the majority of tracked configurations, but it does not sit at the top tier.

The CPU’s 62nd percentile and the GPU’s 68th percentile show a well-balanced system where the GPU has a slight edge in relative performance. This is a pairing that makes sense for a builder who wants strong all-around performance without chasing the highest-end components. The CPU provides excellent multi-threaded throughput for productivity tasks, while the GPU delivers high-end rasterization performance for gaming and compute.

In terms of class, this is a desktop build that requires a dedicated GPU and a power supply of at least 700W. The CPU’s 65W TDP allows for modest cooling solutions, while the GPU’s 285mm length and dual-slot design require a case with sufficient clearance. The platform supports modern connectivity including PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU and PCIe 4.0 from the GPU, making it relevant for current and near-future peripherals.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the more capable component in this pairing, with a 68th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 62nd percentile. This suggests that in gaming workloads, the CPU may be the limiting factor in certain scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where frame rates are high and per-thread performance becomes critical. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3214 is solid, but it is not exceptional, and in CPU-bound titles, it could restrict the RTX 3080 from reaching its full potential.

In multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the balance shifts. The CPU’s multi-core score of 22772 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle heavy parallel tasks, but the GPU’s compute capabilities—evidenced by its GeekBench OpenCL score of 152423—mean the GPU will often be the faster processor for these tasks. For workloads like Blender or Premiere Pro that can use both, the system is well-balanced, with the CPU handling scene management and the GPU accelerating render output.

The lack of measured FPS data makes bottleneck analysis more speculative, but the percentile difference of 6 points suggests a mild GPU-leaning system. At 1080p, the CPU might bottleneck in less optimized games, while at 4K, the GPU’s memory bandwidth and processing power become the limiting factor. The RTX 3080’s 10 GB memory is a potential constraint at 4K with high textures, while the CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache is ample for most gaming workloads. Overall, this is a balanced build where neither component is dramatically over- or under-powered relative to the other, but the GPU has a slight edge in peak capability.