SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
77%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score
Top 23% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500E is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen family and runs on the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The base clock sits at 2.40 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the thermal design power is rated at 65 W — a modest figure for a chip with this core count. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 pool. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled, making this a flexible option for workstation-style builds that require error correction.

The processor integrates UHD Graphics 770, which provides basic display output but is not intended for demanding graphical workloads. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which provides substantial bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not officially supported; users must rely on the chip's automatic boost behavior. The production status is active, with a release date of January 3, 2023, and the part number is SRMFW. The die size measures 215 mm², and the process node is 10 nm, manufactured by Intel.

In synthetic CPU benchmarks, the i5-13500E delivers a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2295 and a single-core score of 323. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score jumps to 9564 with a single-core score of 1349. The more demanding Cinebench R23 test yields a multicore score of 22772 and a single-core score of 3214. These numbers place the chip at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms a majority of processors currently in the market. The average benchmark score across all tests is 6586.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database provide context for these results. The Intel Atom x7405C scores 6568, which is 0.3% lower than the i5-13500E, making them statistically equivalent in aggregate performance. The Intel Core i9-10940X scores 6605, representing a 0.3% advantage for the older high-end chip. The Intel Pentium Gold G6405 also scores 6605, again 0.3% ahead. The Intel Core i9-12900E scores 6611, which is 0.4% higher. These deltas are minuscule, meaning the i5-13500E sits in a tightly contested performance band where a few points separate it from both low-end and high-end alternatives from different generations.

For real-world workloads, the multicore Cinebench R23 score of 22772 suggests strong multi-threaded throughput for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core R23 score of 3214 indicates solid responsiveness in lightly threaded applications such as web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software. The 14-core hybrid layout — though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact performance/efficiency core split — provides a balance between parallel throughput and power efficiency, as reflected in the 65 W TDP. The chip's position at the 62nd percentile means it handles most consumer workloads comfortably while remaining a mid-pack performer relative to the entire CPU landscape.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results for this CPU-GPU pairing come entirely from the individual component scores; the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussion must therefore be treated as estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. This is an important caveat for interpreting the data.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 6586, with a percentile rank of 62 among all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 16129, with a percentile rank of 59 among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the system is 61, which reflects a balanced pairing where both components land in a similar performance tier. This alignment suggests that neither component is drastically overpowered or underpowered relative to the other.

Looking at the GPU benchmarks specifically, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 2626. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 78927, while the Vulkan score is 47784. Passmark results include a G3D score of 20349, a G2D score of 989, and a GPU compute score of 10006. The DirectX tests show scores of 132 for DX10, 163 for DX11, 78 for DX12, and 234 for DX9. These figures indicate that the GPU delivers strong compute and graphics performance across a range of APIs.

The GPU's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 with an average score of 16014, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3060 Ti. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351, coming in 1.4% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT also scores 16361, 1.4% higher. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862, which is 1.7% lower. These deltas are small, placing the RTX 3060 Ti in a competitive band where generational and brand differences are minimal in aggregate metrics.

The combined picture from these scores is a system that performs at the 61st percentile overall. For gaming, the estimated FPS at ultra settings would depend heavily on the specific game and resolution, but the benchmark data suggests that this pairing is capable of handling modern titles at 1080p and likely 1440p with adjustments to settings. The CPU's single-core performance is adequate for high-refresh gaming, while the GPU's 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides solid rasterization and ray tracing capability for its class.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The GPU contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 44.4 million per mm². The base clock is 1410 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz. Memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K workloads, though the 8 GB capacity may become a limiting factor in texture-heavy titles at higher resolutions.

The GPU has 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 38 dedicated RT cores, while 152 tensor cores accelerate AI and DLSS workloads. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 253.1 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 16.20 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, the latter at a 1:1 ratio, which is notable for compute tasks that can leverage mixed precision. The TDP is 200 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. The card is dual-slot and requires a single 12-pin power connector, measuring 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connectors. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance for modern games. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78927 and Vulkan score of 47784 show strong cross-platform compute and rendering capability. Passmark G3D score of 20349 places the GPU at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 59% of the graphics cards in the database. The Passmark DirectX scores — 132 for DX10, 163 for DX11, 78 for DX12, and 234 for DX9 — are interesting in that DX9 and DX11 scores are higher than DX10 and DX12, which may reflect driver optimizations or benchmark methodology differences rather than raw capability.

For rendering workloads, the RTX 3060 Ti's 38 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is beneficial for 3D modeling and visualization programs that support RTX. The 152 tensor cores accelerate AI-based features like DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported games without sacrificing image quality. The 448 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for large textures and complex scenes, while the 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles compute-heavy tasks like video effects and scientific simulations. The GPU's end-of-life production status means it is no longer manufactured, but it remains a capable option in the used or clearance market, with a launch MSRP of 399 USD.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 61 indicates that the CPU and GPU are well matched for a balanced system. The CPU's 62nd percentile and GPU's 59th percentile are close enough that neither component will consistently dominate the other in a way that creates a severe bottleneck. However, the nature of workloads will determine which component becomes the limiting factor.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as real-time strategy games, physics simulations, or software compilation, the i5-13500E's performance at the 62nd percentile will set the ceiling. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3214 suggests that frame rates in games that rely heavily on single-thread performance will be decent but not exceptional, potentially limiting very high refresh rate targets like 240 Hz in esports titles. The multicore score of 22772 provides strong headroom for threaded workloads, so productivity applications that leverage all 14 cores will see good scaling.

In GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming or ray-traced rendering, the RTX 3060 Ti's 59th percentile will be the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2626 and the Passmark G3D score of 20349 indicate that the GPU can handle modern games at 1440p with high settings, but at 4K ultra settings, the 8 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth may prove restrictive. The estimated FPS scaling would show diminishing returns as resolution increases, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint in graphically intensive scenes.

For a balanced workload mix, the data suggests that the system will perform within the 61st percentile range across most applications. The CPU's 65 W TDP means it generates less heat and draws less power than the GPU's 200 W TDP, so the GPU will be the more significant power consumer and heat source. This is typical for a gaming or rendering system where the GPU handles the bulk of the visual processing.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500E has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The i5-13500E ranks at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6586.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile compared to all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti ranks at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16129.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i5-13500E supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation applications that require data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing and tensor core count?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has 38 RT cores for ray tracing and 152 tensor cores for AI acceleration.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3060 Ti is 550 W, with the GPU's TDP rated at 200 W.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the estimated FPS from the benchmark scores suggests the system can exceed 144 FPS in many esports titles, given the CPU's single-core score of 3214 and the GPU's strong rasterization performance. At 1440p, the GPU's 59th percentile will likely hold frame rates above 60 FPS in most games with adjusted settings, though 240 Hz targets may be out of reach in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, as the multicore Cinebench R23 score of 22772 indicates strong parallel throughput. The GPU's 152 tensor cores can also offload encoding via NVENC, though the FACT PACK does not specify NVENC capabilities — the tensor cores are listed for AI acceleration. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for streaming overlays and capture software without significant impact on gaming performance.

Video editing: The CPU's multicore performance at the 62nd percentile, combined with the GPU's compute score of 10006 in Passmark GPU compute, suggests smooth timeline scrubbing and faster exports in editors that leverage GPU acceleration. The 448 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with large 4K video files, while the 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22772 indicates strong CPU-based rendering performance for tasks like Blender's Cycles engine. The GPU's 38 RT cores and 16.20 TFLOPS provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, making it suitable for real-time viewport rendering and final-frame GPU rendering in supported software, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's 62nd percentile and 20 threads allow for fast compilation of large codebases, while the single-core score of 3214 ensures responsive IDE performance. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build processes.

Student and office work: The CPU's modest 65 W TDP and the GPU's 200 W TDP mean the system is efficient enough for daily tasks. The Passmark G2D score of 989 indicates solid 2D graphics performance for document processing and web browsing. The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed, though the FACT PACK does not provide benchmarks for the iGPU.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing targets users who need a balanced desktop system for 1080p and 1440p gaming, content creation, and light workstation tasks. Gamers at 1080p will benefit from the CPU's 62nd percentile and GPU's 59th percentile, which together should deliver high frame rates in most titles with high settings. At 1440p, the system remains viable, though the 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality adjustments in the most demanding games.

Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's 20 threads and the GPU's RT and tensor cores useful for accelerating workflows. The 448 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput support effects rendering and compute tasks. Software developers will appreciate the 14 cores for compilation and the ECC memory support for data integrity. Students and small business users can use this system for office productivity, web research, and light multitasking without feeling underpowered, given the CPU's single-core score of 3214.

The system is not aimed at budget-conscious builders, as the RTX 3060 Ti had a launch MSRP of 399 USD, and the FACT PACK does not list a launch price for the CPU. Instead, it targets users who want a single system that handles both gaming and productivity without major compromises.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13500E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This means builders can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not specify which memory type is optimal. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-compatible with newer GPUs and NVMe drives, though the RTX 3060 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP. This leaves headroom for additional components like extra storage or fans. The GPU's 200 W TDP is the primary power draw, so a 550 W PSU should suffice for the base system, but adding more hardware may require a higher-wattage unit, which the FACT PACK does not specify.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU with more VRAM and higher bandwidth, as the RTX 3060 Ti is end-of-life and its 8 GB capacity may become a bottleneck in future titles. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a newer GPU can run at full bandwidth. The motherboard would need to be compatible with the 1700 socket, and the 65 W TDP means the CPU cooling requirements are modest, allowing the existing cooling solution to be retained.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13500E, a 14-core Raptor Lake desktop processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, an Ampere-based graphics card. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 61, placing it in the upper-mid tier of all systems in the benchmark database. The CPU's 62nd percentile and GPU's 59th percentile indicate a balanced pairing where both components perform at a similar level relative to their respective markets.

The system is designed for users who need a versatile desktop that can handle gaming at 1080p and 1440p, content creation, and productivity tasks. The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps power consumption manageable, while the GPU's 200 W TDP provides substantial graphical throughput. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means performance estimates are derived from the individual benchmark scores, but the data strongly suggests a capable system for its class.