SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

81 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 19% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
77%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score
Top 23% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500E and Intel Arc A310 represent a peculiar pairing: a robust 14-core desktop processor designed for serious throughput, matched with an entry-level graphics card whose performance ceiling is modest. The data shows a system that is fundamentally lopsided, yet possesses a clear logic for specific professional and compact workloads. This analysis relies strictly on the provided benchmark data to unpack the capabilities and limitations of this desktop combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500E is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This non-unlocked multiplier chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation reliability.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a high-performance compute engine. In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves 22,772 points in multi-core and 3,214 points in single-core tests. The multi-core figure is particularly strong, indicating that the combination of 14 cores and 20 threads is highly effective for parallel workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering. The single-core score of 3,214 is also competitive, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications.

In the broader context, the i5-13500E sits at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, placing it above the median but not in the top tier. Its average benchmark score of 6,586 puts it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Atom x7405C, 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-10940X, 0.3% behind the Intel Pentium Gold G6405, and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i9-12900E. This shows that while the chip is not a flagship, it trades blows with older high-end models, delivering comparable multi-threaded performance in a modern, power-efficient package.

For real workloads, the data implies the i5-13500E is a workhorse. The 22,772 Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggests it can handle substantial rendering tasks, while the 9,564 score in Cinebench R20 and 2,295 in R15 multi-core reinforce its consistent scaling across generations of the benchmark. The single-core scores (3,214 in R23, 1,349 in R20, 323 in R15) indicate strong per-thread performance that benefits operating system responsiveness and application load times. The 62nd percentile ranking means it outperforms a majority of CPUs in the database, making it a solid foundation for a productivity-focused system.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimated from the benchmark scores of the Intel Arc A310 and the CPU's capabilities.

The Intel Arc A310 is an entry-level graphics card with a 40th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 7,550 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon R7 250 (0.1% behind) and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (0.4% behind), and it is 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. This places it in a performance class that is fundamentally unsuited for high-refresh gaming at demanding resolutions.

Given the GPU's modest compute power (2.688 TFLOPS FP32) and 4 GB of VRAM, the estimated gaming experience is limited. At 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing would likely struggle to maintain smooth frame rates in modern titles. The Arc A310’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 29 and DirectX 11 score of 33 are very low, indicating poor performance in modern graphics APIs. The DirectX 9 score of 69 is relatively higher, suggesting it might handle older or less demanding games better.

While the CPU is more than capable of feeding frames, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The i5-13500E’s strong single-core performance would not help much in GPU-bound scenarios. For esports titles or older games, 1080p at medium or low settings might be playable, but the data does not support expectations of high-refresh gaming. The 4 GB VRAM is also a limitation at higher resolutions or with high-resolution textures, potentially causing stuttering or texture pop-in. Therefore, gaming on this system should be viewed as a secondary or casual use case, not a primary feature.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmarks shows a system with a powerful CPU and a weak GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 6,586, while the GPU's is 7,550. However, these numbers are not directly comparable due to different test suites. The CPU's percentile rank of 62 versus the GPU's percentile rank of 40 highlights the discrepancy in their relative standings.

In CPU-specific tests, the i5-13500E demonstrates a clear strength. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,772 is its most impressive result, while the single-core score of 3,214 is also robust. These scores indicate a processor that can handle both heavy multi-threaded tasks and responsive single-threaded work.

For the GPU, the Geekbench scores are more informative. The OpenCL score of 30,607 and Vulkan score of 28,964 show a capable compute unit in those specific APIs. However, the PassMark scores reveal a different story in DirectX environments. The G3D score of 5,433 is low, and the DirectX 10/11/12 scores of 31, 33, and 29 respectively are exceptionally poor, indicating severe limitations in modern gaming and graphics workloads.

The combined percentile of the build is 51, which places it in the middle of the pack. This is a result of the high CPU percentile being dragged down by the low GPU percentile. The data suggests that this is not a balanced system; it is a high-performance CPU paired with a low-performance GPU, creating a specific profile for non-graphical or light graphical tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The i5-13500E’s 62nd percentile ranking versus the Arc A310’s 40th percentile ranking clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In any application that uses the GPU heavily, such as gaming or 3D rendering with the GPU, the Arc A310 will be the bottleneck, capping performance well below what the CPU could support.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software compilation, or spreadsheet analysis, the i5-13500E can operate at its full potential. The GPU will not impede these workloads, as they rely primarily on the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads. The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this: the low DirectX scores of the GPU would prevent any game from reaching high frame rates, regardless of the CPU's strength.

This imbalance is a critical design consideration. The system is not suited for gaming, where the GPU bottleneck would dominate. However, it could be a sensible choice for a workstation where the GPU is only used for basic display output or light compute acceleration, leaving the CPU to handle the heavy lifting. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 30 W TDP of the GPU also mean the system is power-efficient, which is a positive for always-on or compact builds.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The Arc A310’s low DirectX 12 score of 29 and 4 GB VRAM make it incapable of driving high frame rates at modern settings. The CPU is not the limiting factor here; the GPU simply lacks the necessary performance.

Streaming: Potentially problematic. While the i5-13500E’s 20 threads can handle encoding, the GPU’s weak graphics performance would struggle with game capture and rendering simultaneously. The GPU would likely be the bottleneck, leading to dropped frames or reduced quality.

Video editing: A strong scenario for the CPU, but not the GPU. The i5-13500E’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,772 suggests it can handle 4K video timelines and effects processing. However, the Arc A310’s low compute scores mean GPU-accelerated effects would be slow. This is best for CPU-centric editing workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU is excellent for CPU-based rendering, with its high multi-core scores. However, the GPU is unsuitable for GPU-accelerated rendering, with its low FP32 performance of 2.688 TFLOPS. The system would be fine for CPU-only render engines but not for GPU-based ones.

Software development: Highly suitable. The i5-13500E’s 14 cores and 20 threads are ideal for compiling code, and its strong single-core performance (3,214 in R23) ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output and 2D UI rendering.

Student and office work: More than adequate. The CPU’s performance ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, web browsing with many tabs, and light coding. The GPU is fine for document editing, spreadsheets, and video playback. The 4 GB VRAM is not a concern for these tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else and have minimal or no need for discrete GPU power. The primary audience is content creators who work with CPU-intensive applications like video encoding, batch photo processing, or software compilation. The i5-13500E’s 22,772 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides the necessary horsepower for such tasks.

Software developers are another target group. The 20 threads accelerate builds and test runs, while the 62nd percentile CPU ranking ensures the system is responsive. The low-power GPU is adequate for a development environment, which rarely requires high-end graphics.

Students and office workers would also find this build sufficient. The CPU handles word processing, spreadsheets, and research easily, and the system’s low TDP (65 W CPU + 30 W GPU) makes it quiet and efficient for a dorm room or cubicle.

Conversely, gamers should avoid this build. The GPU’s 40th percentile ranking and low DirectX scores make it a poor choice for any modern gaming, even at 1080p. Small business workstations might find it useful for database management, accounting software, or other CPU-bound tasks, but they would need to ensure their software does not rely on GPU acceleration.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500E uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i5-13500E has ECC memory support, which is beneficial for data integrity in workstation use.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-10940X?

A: The i5-13500E has an average benchmark score that is 0.3% behind the i9-10940X, making them nearly equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's DirectX 12 benchmark score?

A: The Arc A310 scores 29 in the PassMark DirectX 12 test, indicating very low performance in modern graphics APIs.

Q: What is the total TDP for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 30 W, making this a low-power combination.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i5-13500E includes Intel UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a backup for display output.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build featuring the Intel Core i5-13500E and Intel Arc A310. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor, while the GPU is an entry-level Xe-HPG chip. The combined percentile ranking for this pair is 51, placing it in the middle of all builds in the database.

The system’s overall tier is defined by its CPU’s strength (62nd percentile) and GPU’s weakness (40th percentile). It is not a balanced gaming machine, nor is it a high-end rendering workstation. Instead, it is a CPU-centric desktop that excels at multi-threaded productivity tasks while offering only basic graphics capabilities. The data suggests this is a niche build for specific professional or educational uses where GPU acceleration is not required.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is based on the DG2-128 chip and uses the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It has 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU features 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. Its memory subsystem is a 64-bit bus connecting to 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, delivering a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The clocks are fixed at 1750 MHz for both base and boost, with the memory running at 15.5 Gbps effective.

The compute capabilities are modest, with an FP32 performance of 2.688 TFLOPS and FP16 of 5.376 TFLOPS. The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. It is a single-slot card that requires no power connectors, with a TDP of just 30 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W.

Benchmark results confirm its entry-level status. The PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and GPU compute score of 2,157 are low. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 30,607 and Vulkan score of 28,964 are more respectable, indicating some compute strength in those APIs. However, the DirectX scores are abysmal, with DirectX 12 at 29 and DirectX 11 at 33. This suggests the GPU is better suited for compute tasks in OpenCL/Vulkan than for gaming. The 40th percentile ranking and proximity to the Radeon R7 250 (0.1% behind) and GTX 1650 (1% ahead) place it in the lowest performance tier for modern games. For rendering, it is not a viable option for GPU-accelerated engines due to its low FP32 throughput.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13500E is built for Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. For an upgrade, a user could consider a more powerful GPU on the same platform, as the PCIe Gen 5 slots are backward compatible. However, the CPU’s 65 W TDP and the system’s overall power profile would allow for a higher-TDP GPU, as the suggested PSU for the current GPU is only 200 W.

The upgrade path is primarily about the GPU. The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in most scenarios, so swapping the Arc A310 for a stronger GPU would directly improve graphics performance. The motherboard would need to support PCIe Gen 5 to fully utilize the CPU’s lanes, but a Gen 4 GPU would still function. Memory upgrades are also possible, with support for both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing users to choose their preferred type based on the motherboard. The CPU is a locked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option, but the platform itself has room for a more powerful GPU, making this a sensible base for a future graphics upgrade while retaining the high-performance CPU.