SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

77%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

50,951 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500E paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is a formidable desktop combination that pairs a modern 14-core Raptor Lake processor with a high-end RDNA 2 graphics card. The data indicates a system with significant compute capability, though the CPU occupies a mid-tier percentile while the GPU sits firmly in the upper echelon of performance, creating an interesting dynamic for various workloads. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data, which contains no measured frame rates, so all gaming performance is estimated from the aggregate scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is built on the Navi 21 chip using TSMC's 7 nm process, a substantial die measuring 520 mm² containing 26,800 million transistors. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1825 MHz, a game clock of 2015 MHz, and a boost clock of 2250 MHz. Memory is a 16 GB pool of GDDR6 running at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed across a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is substantial, providing enough capacity and throughput for demanding textures and high-resolution rendering tasks.

The compute layout includes 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation pipelines. Ray tracing hardware is present with 80 dedicated RT cores, though the card has no tensor cores listed. Pixel rate is 288.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 720.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 23.04 TFLOPS for FP32 and 46.08 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. These specifications translate to strong raw rasterization performance, with the pixel and texture rates suggesting the card can handle high-resolution rendering with heavy fragment shader workloads.

Benchmark results confirm this capability. In PassMark’s G3D test, the card scores 26732, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The compute-oriented PassMark GPU Compute score is 14547. Geekbench scores are notably high: 177021 in Metal, 187673 in OpenCL, and 148525 in Vulkan. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4079. Comparing to its nearest rivals, the RX 6900 XT’s average benchmark score of 50951 is 1.9% higher than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001), 2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957), and 2.4% higher than the Intel Arc A550M (49737). It trails the NVIDIA CMP 50HX (51790) by 1.6%. For rendering, the FP32 and FP16 numbers indicate the card is well-suited for real-time graphics and general compute tasks, though the absence of tensor cores means AI-accelerated workloads will rely on standard shader or compute paths rather than dedicated hardware.

The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensures compatibility with modern graphics pipelines. The card uses a triple-slot cooler, requires two 8-pin power connectors, and has a TDP of 300 W. Its physical dimensions are 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined system percentile is 74, indicating this pairing outperforms nearly three-quarters of all tracked desktop configurations. The CPU contributes with an average benchmark score of 6586, placing it at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 50951, at the 86th percentile. The disparity between the 62nd and 86th percentiles is significant, suggesting the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers.

CPU-specific results show strong multi-core throughput. In Cinebench R23, the i5-13500E scores 22772 multi-core and 3214 single-core. Cinebench R20 scores are 9564 multi-core and 1349 single-core. Cinebench R15 scores are 2295 multi-core and 323 single-core. The CPU’s nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Atom x7405C (avg 6568) is 0.3% slower, the Intel Core i9-10940X (avg 6605) is 0.3% faster, the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (avg 6605) is 0.3% faster, and the Intel Core i9-12900E (avg 6611) is 0.4% faster. This shows the i5-13500E sits in a performance band very close to several other processors, with differences under half a percent.

GPU benchmark scores reinforce its high standing. The PassMark G3D score of 26732 is a strong indicator of rasterization performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 187673 is the highest among the listed GPU benchmarks, suggesting excellent compute throughput for general-purpose tasks. The combined picture is a system where the GPU leads in relative performance, and the CPU, while competent, is closer to mid-pack. The 74th combined percentile reflects the GPU pulling the overall rating upward.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6900 XT’s 86th percentile GPU ranking and 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide ample headroom for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p or 4K. The 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handle large texture sets, and the 80 RT cores support ray-traced effects. However, the CPU’s 62nd percentile position means frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios may be limited.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread CPU provides solid multitasking capability, with a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 22772 indicating it can handle encoding while gaming. The GPU’s 14547 PassMark Compute score supports hardware-accelerated encoding or rendering tasks. The system can manage concurrent gaming, encoding, and chat applications without severe bottlenecks, though the GPU’s 300 W TDP and suggested 700 W PSU require adequate power.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core strength (22772 in Cinebench R23) accelerates timeline processing and export tasks. The GPU’s 187673 Geekbench OpenCL score and 46.08 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerate effects, color grading, and GPU-accelerated renders. The 16 GB VRAM prevents out-of-memory errors on large projects. This is a capable editing workstation for 4K footage.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 and 46.08 TFLOPS FP16 performance, combined with 5120 shading units, make it strong for real-time viewport rendering and GPU-based renderers. The CPU’s 22772 multi-core Cinebench R23 score supports CPU-based rendering tasks. The 128 ROPs and 720.0 GTexel/s texture rate handle complex scenes efficiently.

Software development: The 14 cores and 20 threads provide parallel compilation capability, with the 9564 Cinebench R20 multi-core score indicating solid build times. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache speed up data access. The GPU’s compute performance (187673 OpenCL) supports parallel workloads like unit testing or simulation.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3214 ensures responsive application use, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for all-day operation. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, and ECC memory support adds reliability for data-intensive tasks. This is a powerful yet efficient setup for productivity.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a clear performance hierarchy. The GPU at the 86th percentile is the dominant component, while the CPU at the 62nd percentile is the relative weak point. In gaming, this means at 1080p or with lighter graphics settings, the CPU is likely to limit frame rates, as the GPU has more than enough headroom to render frames quickly. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, as pixel throughput demands exceed the CPU’s ability to feed it. The passmark G3D score of 26732 versus the CPU’s average score of 6586 illustrates this gap.

For compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering, the GPU’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance takes precedence, and the CPU’s 22772 multi-core Cinebench R23 score is sufficient to avoid stalling. In CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, the CPU is the limiting factor, though its 14 cores mitigate this. Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 20 threads, but the GPU’s 300 W TDP and the system’s combined percentile of 74 suggest power and thermal headroom are adequate. The nearest rival comparisons show the CPU is only 0.4% behind the Intel Core i9-12900E, so the bottleneck is not severe, but in FPS scaling, the GPU’s higher percentile means it is the stronger performer.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 86th percentile ranking and 26732 PassMark G3D score suggest it can deliver high frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most titles. The 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth support ultra-quality textures at high resolutions, while the 128 ROPs ensure efficient pixel fill. The CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking and 3214 single-core Cinebench R23 score are adequate for most games, though very CPU-intensive titles may see frame rates capped.

At 1080p, the CPU may limit performance in esports titles, but the GPU’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance can push very high frame rates. At 1440p, the system is balanced, with the GPU handling the increased pixel load. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, but its 86th percentile means it still outperforms most cards. Ray tracing is supported via 80 RT cores, but performance will vary by title. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, so modern games will run well. These are estimates, not measured results.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This system suits gamers targeting 1440p or 4K, given the GPU’s 86th percentile and 16 GB VRAM. The CPU’s 62nd percentile is sufficient for most gaming workloads, but those seeking maximum frame rates at 1080p may find the CPU limiting. Content creators in video editing benefit from the CPU’s 22772 multi-core Cinebench R23 score and the GPU’s 187673 OpenCL score. 3D artists can leverage the GPU’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 and 128 ROPs for viewport rendering and final output.

Software developers gain from the 14 cores and 20 threads, with the 9564 Cinebench R20 multi-core score indicating efficient compilation. Students and office workers benefit from the CPU’s 3214 single-core score for responsive applications and the 65 W TDP for low operating costs. Small business workstations can use ECC memory support and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 as a backup. The GPU’s end-of-life status means it is a known quantity, and the 700 W suggested PSU provides ample headroom. The combined percentile of 74 indicates this is a capable system for demanding users.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13500E is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Raptor Lake-S architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark scores show a solid multi-core performer. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 indicates strong parallel throughput for rendering, video encoding, and compilation. The single-core score of 3214 ensures responsive single-threaded applications. Cinebench R20 scores of 9564 multi-core and 1349 single-core confirm this trend, as do R15 scores of 2295 and 323. The average benchmark score of 6586 places it at the 62nd percentile, with nearest rivals within 0.4% performance. This means the CPU is competitive with older and newer models in its class, but not a standout.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and can handle light graphics tasks. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported. The production status is active, and the release date is January 3, 2023, meaning it is a current-generation part. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with gaming and data-intensive workloads, while the 65 W TDP keeps cooling requirements modest. For real workloads, this CPU handles multitasking well, but its 62nd percentile means it is not a top-tier performer.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is based on Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, so a modern GPU can run at full bandwidth, though the RX 6900 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU has ECC memory support, useful for workstation builds. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails.

The GPU has a 300 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 700 W, leaving headroom for the CPU’s 65 W TDP and other components. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU, as the RX 6900 XT is end-of-life, but the PCIe 4.0 interface is adequate. The CPU can be upgraded to a higher-tier Raptor Lake processor on the same socket, though the 62nd percentile suggests it is not a bottleneck for most tasks. Memory can be upgraded to DDR5 for higher bandwidth, but the current setup supports both types.

The platform is mature, with the CPU being an active production part. The socket 1700 has been used across multiple generations, so upgrade options exist. The 700 W PSU provides enough power for a future GPU upgrade, but a higher-wattage unit may be needed for top-end cards. The triple-slot GPU requires ample case space, and the 267 mm length should fit most mid-tower cases.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, meaning this system outperforms 74% of tracked desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900E?

A: The i5-13500E has an average benchmark score of 6586, which is 0.4% lower than the i9-12900E’s 6611 score.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RX 6900 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13500E supports ECC memory, which is useful for error-correcting workloads.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6900 XT is 700 W, which accounts for its 300 W TDP.

Q: Are there any measured FPS figures for this system?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RX 6900 XT is at the 86th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 50951.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500E

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds