SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

This pairing combines Intel's 10-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA's compact workstation-class Ada Lovelace GPU, landing in the 88th combined percentile across all CPU and GPU pairings. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 95th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system that leans heavily on graphics capability. The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13490F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places it in the LGA1700 ecosystem alongside other 12th and 13th generation Core processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility to reuse existing DDR4 modules or move to newer DDR5 kits depending on motherboard choice. This is a meaningful consideration because the platform's memory support directly affects achievable bandwidth in memory-sensitive workloads.

The PCIe implementation on the CPU provides Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes available from the processor itself. This is a forward-looking feature that allows the system to take advantage of PCIe 5.0 devices, though the GPU in this pairing uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which remains fully compatible and sufficient for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's bandwidth needs. The absence of a PCIe 5.0 requirement on the GPU means the platform's Gen 5 lanes can be reserved for future storage or other expansion cards.

Power requirements for this system are modest. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 70 W TDP with a suggested PSU rating of 250 W. The GPU draws power directly from the slot, as it has no power connectors, which simplifies cabling and makes this an excellent candidate for compact builds. The combined thermal envelope of roughly 135 W for the two primary components means a capable air cooler for the CPU and a standard case airflow setup will suffice; there is no need for elaborate liquid cooling or oversized power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade path from this configuration depends on workload priorities. For CPU-bound tasks, moving to a higher-core-count LGA1700 processor within the same socket generation would be a direct swap, though the 13490F's 10 cores already provide strong multi-threaded performance. For GPU-bound work, the RTX 4000 SFF's 95th percentile ranking leaves significant headroom above most desktop cards, so upgrading the GPU would require moving to a larger form factor or accepting diminishing returns. The platform's DDR5 support means a memory upgrade from DDR4 to DDR5 (if not already using the newer standard) would be the most impactful cost-effective improvement for memory-sensitive applications.

The CPU is unlocked? No — the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not officially supported. The 65 W TDP and 4.80 GHz boost clock are the operating limits, and the system's stability should be planned around those figures. The platform's Gen 5 PCIe lanes also ensure that any future expansion cards (network adapters, storage controllers, capture cards) will not be bandwidth-limited, extending the system's usable life.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 28,185, placing it at the 80th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 28,128 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28,065 (0.4% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28,054 (0.5% ahead), and the Intel Core i9-11950H scores 28,332 (0.5% behind). This is a remarkably competitive band — the entire group sits within 1% of each other, meaning the 13490F is essentially performance-equivalent to these alternatives in aggregate benchmarks, and the choice between them should rest on platform features and price rather than raw speed.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 117,088, placing it at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GB10 at 117,393 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 at 118,976 (1.6% ahead), the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB at 114,395 (2.4% behind), and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile at 113,944 (2.8% behind). The RTX 4000 SFF holds its own against these much larger or older cards, which is notable given its compact dual-slot design.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the RTX 4000 SFF scores 124,812 in Geekbench OpenCL and 109,364 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Vulkan score is about 12% lower than the OpenCL score, which suggests the card's compute workload performance is slightly stronger under OpenCL, but both figures are well above the 95th percentile threshold. The CPU's 3DMark scores scale predictably with thread count: 1,959 for 2 threads, 3,552 for 4 threads, 5,731 for 8 threads, 7,556 for 16 threads, and 7,550 for max threads. The near-identical 16-thread and max-thread scores (7,556 vs 7,550) indicate that the CPU is fully utilized at 16 threads, with no additional benefit beyond that point.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is to its peers. This is not a balanced pairing in percentile terms — the GPU outperforms the CPU by 15 percentile points — but it is a deliberate configuration for graphics-heavy workloads where the GPU is the primary compute engine.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². Its base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and it carries 24 MB of shared L3 cache along with 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though ECC memory is not supported.

Cinebench results show strong single-core performance: 323 in R15, 1,348 in R20, and 3,211 in R23 single-core tests. Multi-core scores scale impressively: 2,292 in R15, 9,553 in R20, and 22,747 in R23. The R23 multi-core score is roughly 7x the single-core score, which reflects the efficiency of the 10-core, 16-thread configuration under full load. This is typical of a hybrid architecture where performance cores handle the heavy lifting and efficiency cores contribute to multi-threaded throughput.

PassMark results break down the workload characteristics. The multi-thread score is 26,569, while single-thread is 3,828. Integer math scores 83,723, floating-point math scores 60,273, and extended instructions score 20,837. Data compression scores 328,397 and data encryption scores 17,902. The prime number finding score is just 114, which indicates the CPU is not optimized for that specific workload pattern, but the physics score of 1,915 is respectable for gaming physics calculations.

The 3DMark thread scaling tells a clear story: 2-thread score of 1,959, 4-thread of 3,552, 8-thread of 5,731, and 16-thread of 7,556. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads is about 32%, which is less than the doubling one might expect from doubling thread count, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 threads for the 3DMark workload. However, the near-flat 16-thread to max-thread result (7,556 vs 7,550) confirms the CPU is fully saturated at 16 threads.

For real workloads, this CPU is a solid all-rounder. The 4.80 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded responses in everyday applications and lightly-threaded games, while the 10 cores provide enough parallelism for video encoding, compilation, and rendering tasks. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this pairing already includes. The 65 W TDP keeps cooling requirements modest, and the locked multiplier means the performance is predictable and consistent across systems.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates an asymmetric pairing where the GPU holds the 95th percentile while the CPU holds the 80th percentile. This 15-point gap suggests the GPU is the dominant component, and in most graphics-intensive scenarios, the CPU will be the limiting factor before the GPU reaches its ceiling. However, the CPU's 80th percentile ranking is by no means weak — it sits within 1% of several comparable processors — so the bottleneck is relative rather than absolute.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,556 and single-thread score of 1,002 indicate strong gaming-relevant performance. For high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU's single-thread and 2-thread scores (1,959) will often dictate the maximum frame rate, as games typically rely on a few heavily-loaded threads. At higher resolutions, the GPU's workload increases and the CPU has more headroom, shifting the bottleneck toward the GPU.

The GPU's Geekbench scores (124,812 OpenCL, 109,364 Vulkan) suggest it can handle demanding compute loads, but the lower Vulkan score hints that some game engines using Vulkan may see slightly reduced performance compared to OpenCL-based workloads. In gaming, this means DirectX 12 titles (the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate) are likely to perform at the higher end, while Vulkan titles may see a small performance penalty.

Since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing, estimates must be drawn from the percentile positions. At 1080p with high refresh rates, the CPU's 80th percentile ranking will likely cap frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios — esports titles and older games — while the GPU's 95th percentile ensures it is not the limiting factor. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's workload increases substantially, and the CPU's 80th percentile position becomes less relevant, allowing the GPU to stretch its legs. The absence of measured FPS data means these are projections, not verified results, but the score differential is consistent with a GPU-forward system.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize graphics compute over raw CPU throughput. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking makes it suitable for professionals working with 3D rendering, video editing, and GPU-accelerated compute tasks, where the 20 GB VRAM and Ada Lovelace architecture provide substantial headroom. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking is sufficient for these workloads, though it will not be the star of the show.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit most from this pairing, as the GPU's high percentile ensures smooth frame rates in demanding titles, while the CPU's 80th percentile handles game logic and physics without becoming a severe bottleneck. At 1080p with high refresh rates, the CPU may limit performance in esports or CPU-bound titles, so gamers targeting 240 Hz or higher at 1080p should look for a stronger CPU.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or GPU rendering will find the 20 GB VRAM and 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth useful for large textures and complex scenes. The CPU's multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 22,747 provides adequate CPU-side encoding and export performance, though dedicated encoding tasks may benefit from a higher-core-count processor.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 10-core, 16-thread configuration and the 24 MB L3 cache, which helps with parallel build tasks. Students and small business workstations running office productivity, web development, or data analysis tools will find the CPU's single-thread score of 3,828 (PassMark) sufficient for responsive daily use, while the GPU provides compute acceleration for any data science or CAD workloads.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU+GPU pairing support PCIe 5.0?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The system can support PCIe 5.0 devices (such as NVMe storage) on the CPU's lanes, while the GPU operates at PCIe 4.0 speeds.

Q: What is the power draw of this configuration?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 70 W TDP. The GPU's suggested PSU rating is 250 W, and the GPU requires no power connectors — it draws power from the PCIe slot.

Q: Can I use DDR4 memory with this build?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The choice depends on the motherboard, as boards typically support one standard or the other.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 28,185, which is within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (28,128), Intel Core i5-14500T (28,065), and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28,054), and 0.5% behind the Intel Core i9-11950H (28,332).

Q: Is the GPU's 20 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming?

A: The 20 GB VRAM and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample capacity for high-resolution textures and large scenes. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking suggests it is among the top 5% of GPUs for memory-intensive workloads.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-13490F has no integrated graphics. A discrete GPU is required, which this pairing provides.

Q: What is the GPU's form factor?

A: The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a dual-slot card measuring 168 mm in length and 69 mm in height, designed for small-form-factor systems.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1440p, the GPU's 95th percentile ranking and the CPU's 16-thread 3DMark score of 7,556 suggest this pairing can drive high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU's 80th percentile position ensuring no severe bottleneck at this resolution. The GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 99.84 GPixel/s pixel rate support modern game engines with ray tracing and DLSS.

For streaming, the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads handle encoding overhead while the GPU's Ada Lovelace architecture provides dedicated hardware for video encoding. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 26,569 indicates sufficient headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads, though the lack of measured FPS data means streaming performance is estimated.

For video editing, the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,747 provides solid CPU-side encoding, while the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 124,812 handles GPU-accelerated effects.

For 3D rendering, the GPU's 6,144 shading units and 48 RT cores deliver strong performance on GPU-accelerated renderers, while the CPU's 10 cores handle scene preparation and physics. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking places it above most desktop cards for rendering workloads, though the 70 W TDP indicates it is designed for efficiency rather than absolute peak throughput.

For software development, the CPU's 83,723 integer math score and 24 MB L3 cache support fast compilation of large codebases, while the 16 threads enable parallel build tasks. The GPU's compute capability accelerates any CUDA-based development or testing workloads, making this a capable developer workstation.

For student and office work, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,828 (PassMark) ensures responsive application launches and document editing, while the GPU's compact size and low power draw make it suitable for quiet, space-constrained environments. The 250 W suggested PSU rating means this system can run on a modest power supply, reducing system cost and noise.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13490F, a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, a compact workstation GPU. The CPU holds the 80th percentile among all processors, and the GPU holds the 95th percentile among all GPUs, giving the combined system an 88th percentile ranking. This places the build in the upper echelon of desktop configurations, with the GPU providing the majority of the performance advantage.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 28,185 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 117,088 create a system that is roughly 4x more powerful on the GPU side in raw benchmark terms. This is a GPU-forward build designed for graphics-intensive tasks, with the CPU providing adequate support without being the primary performance driver. The system's 88th combined percentile indicates it outperforms the vast majority of desktop builds, making it a high-tier configuration for its intended use cases.

The lack of measured FPS data means this assessment is based on benchmark scores and percentile rankings rather than direct gaming tests. The scores suggest a system capable of high-end gaming and professional graphics work, but actual frame rates will vary depending on game optimization, driver maturity, and system configuration.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on the AD104 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 720 MHz and a boost clock of 1,560 MHz, with memory clocked at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It features 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, 48 ray tracing cores, and 192 tensor cores. The memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial: 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 19.17 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (1:1 ratio), with a pixel rate of 99.84 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 299.5 GTexel/s. The 48 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 192 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for DLSS and other neural network workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines and professional applications.

In Geekbench benchmarks, the GPU scores 124,812 in OpenCL and 109,364 in Vulkan. The OpenCL score is about 14% higher than Vulkan, suggesting the card's compute performance is better optimized for OpenCL workloads. The Vulkan score, while lower, still places the GPU at the 95th percentile, indicating strong performance across both APIs.

The GPU's power characteristics are notable for a workstation card: 70 W TDP with no power connectors, drawing power entirely from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W, making this one of the most power-efficient high-performance GPUs available. The dual-slot design and compact dimensions (168 mm length, 69 mm height) allow it to fit in small-form-factor cases, while the four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups. The 20 GB VRAM is a significant advantage over typical consumer cards, providing headroom for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and complex 3D scenes without memory swapping.