SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000: A Functional Desktop Pairing

This pairing combines Intel’s 10-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA’s workstation-oriented Turing GPU, producing a desktop build that sits at the 71st percentile overall when accounting for both components. The CPU is a strong performer for its class, ranking in the 80th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, though older and end-of-life, remains functional at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. The data indicates a system that leans heavily on CPU capability rather than GPU headroom, making the processor the dominant partner in most workloads. Notably, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between these two components is heavily skewed toward the CPU, which is evident from the percentile gap: the i5-13490F sits at the 80th percentile across all CPUs, while the Quadro RTX 4000 sits at only the 61st percentile across all GPUs. This 19-percentage-point spread indicates that the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-bound scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions and quality settings. In CPU-centric workloads—such as multi-threaded rendering, compilation, or data processing—the processor can operate near its full potential, but the GPU will cap overall system throughput in graphics-heavy tasks.

The benchmark data supports this imbalance. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 7556 and max-thread score of 7550 are nearly identical, suggesting the processor scales well with thread count up to its 16-thread limit. Meanwhile, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15117 is modest relative to its compute capability, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 6176 that is less than half the G3D score. This discrepancy indicates the GPU is better suited for traditional rasterization than for compute-heavy workloads, which may create bottlenecks when the system is tasked with GPU-accelerated rendering or machine learning inference.

In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck will manifest differently depending on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU can likely feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, meaning the Quadro RTX 4000 becomes the limiting factor. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s workload increases further, widening the gap and making the graphics card even more of a constraint. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance—evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1002 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3211—suggests it can handle the per-thread demands of most game engines without issue, leaving the GPU as the primary performance gate.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13490F delivers a robust benchmark profile. Its average benchmark score across all tests is 28185, placing it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs. In multi-threaded tests, the processor achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 26569, both of which are strong indicators of parallel processing capability. Single-thread performance is equally solid, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3828 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3211, suggesting responsive performance in lightly threaded applications.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, by contrast, shows its age in benchmark results. Its average benchmark score is 17789, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. In synthetic graphics tests, the card achieves a PassMark G3D score of 15117 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 78844 is slightly higher than its OpenCL score, indicating reasonable API versatility. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 is notably low, suggesting that the card may struggle with modern DirectX 12 titles, despite supporting the 12 Ultimate feature set.

When comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals, the i5-13490F sits within a narrow performance band. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (average score 28128), 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500T (28065), and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28054). It trails the Intel Core i9-11950H by 0.5% (28332). These small deltas indicate that the i5-13490F is competitively positioned among mid-range processors, offering performance on par with newer or differently named chips. For the GPU, the nearest rivals are all close in average score: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, 0.7% ahead of the Quadro), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17639, 0.9% ahead), the AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 1.1% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, 1.4% ahead). This tight grouping suggests the Quadro RTX 4000 performs at a level similar to these other cards, despite being from an older generation.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It features a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with PCIe Gen 5 connectivity providing 16 CPU lanes.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a well-rounded processor. The 3DMark thread scaling is nearly linear from 2 threads (score 1959) to 8 threads (score 5731), with only a slight drop-off at 16 threads (7556) compared to max threads (7550). This indicates efficient thread utilization across the core count. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9553 and R15 multi-core score of 2292 further corroborate strong multi-threaded performance. In PassMark tests, the processor excels in integer math (83723) and floating-point math (60273), while data compression (328397) and random string sorting (34042) scores suggest solid memory and cache efficiency. The extended instructions score of 20837 indicates good SIMD throughput, which is relevant for scientific and financial workloads.

For real-world applications, these scores translate to capable performance in multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-thread scores—particularly the PassMark single-thread of 3828 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 3211—ensure snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and in games that rely on single-thread performance. The 65 W TDP is modest, suggesting the processor can be cooled with a capable air cooler, and its locked multiplier means overclocking is not an option, but the stock boost clock of 4.80 GHz is already high.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3211) can drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU’s modest PassMark G3D score of 15117 and low DirectX 12 score of 52 will limit performance in modern AAA games, especially at higher settings. Estimated 1080p gaming performance would be adequate for medium to high settings in less demanding titles, but high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming would be constrained by the GPU.

Streaming: The 10-core, 16-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without major impact on frame rates. The GPU’s lack of dedicated NVENC mention in the FACT PACK means encoding would fall to the CPU, which is well-equipped for the task given its multi-threaded strength.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance (PassMark multi-thread 26569) handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding well, while the GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and color grading. However, the GPU’s compute score of 6176 suggests that GPU-accelerated renders may not be significantly faster than CPU-only rendering.

3D rendering: The CPU excels here, with Cinebench R23 multi-core 22747 and PassMark integer math 83723 indicating strong performance in CPU-based renderers. The GPU’s Turing architecture with 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores can accelerate ray tracing and AI denoising, but its overall compute throughput (FP32 7.119 TFLOPS) is modest by modern standards.

Software development: The 16 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache are well-suited for compilation tasks, with PassMark data compression (328397) and integer math (83723) scores indicating efficient handling of build processes. The processor’s 0.2% lead over the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 in average score confirms it is competitive in this class.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3828 ensures responsive performance in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 846 indicates adequate 2D performance for desktop tasks, while the 160 W GPU TDP is manageable for a desktop workstation.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so the following figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1002 and PassMark single-thread score of 3828 suggest it can handle game logic and physics without bottlenecking. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15117 places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, indicating mid-range performance.

At 1080p with ultra settings, estimated frame rates would likely be modest—perhaps 30-50 FPS in demanding AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, given the GPU’s low DirectX 12 score of 52 and its age. In less demanding esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance could push frame rates to 100+ FPS, but the GPU would still cap performance at around 60-80 FPS in some scenarios. At 1440p, frame rates would drop further, with ultra settings likely yielding 25-40 FPS in modern games. At 4K, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth would be insufficient for ultra settings in most titles, likely resulting in 20-30 FPS or lower. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, is only 0.9% ahead in average score, so performance would be similar to that card, though the RTX 4060 may have better driver optimization for gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 71st combined percentile, with the CPU at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 61st percentile, indicating a mid-to-upper-tier desktop system that is CPU-dominant.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13490F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500T, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE, while trailing the Intel Core i9-11950H by 0.5% in average benchmark score.

Q: What memory types does the i5-13490F support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with no ECC memory support.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Is this build suitable for modern DirectX 12 games?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 is low, suggesting it may underperform in games that heavily utilize DirectX 12 features.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 160 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 450 W for the GPU.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, based on the Turing architecture, which supports ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU capability. Content creators working with CPU-based rendering—such as video editors using software encoders or 3D artists using CPU renderers—will benefit from the i5-13490F’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 and PassMark multi-thread score of 26569. Software developers compiling large codebases will find the 16 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache advantageous, while the PassMark integer math score of 83723 indicates strong performance in logic-heavy tasks.

Gamers at 1080p on medium settings could find this build acceptable for less demanding titles, but those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere, given the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking and low DirectX 12 score. Students and office workers need only modest GPU performance for document creation and web browsing, and the CPU’s single-thread score of 3828 ensures responsive day-to-day use. Small business workstations handling data processing or financial modeling would benefit from the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 328397 and floating-point math score of 60273. However, the GPU’s end-of-life status and modest compute score of 6176 make this less suitable for GPU-accelerated machine learning or heavy compute workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13490F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, meaning the GPU is limited by the older bus standard. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, leaving ample power headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future, as the suggested PSU for the current GPU is only 450 W.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Quadro RTX 4000 with a more modern GPU, as the CPU’s 80th percentile ranking suggests it can handle a much faster graphics card without bottlenecking. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU would support a newer, faster GPU, though the board must also support PCIe Gen 5. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose either platform, depending on the motherboard. The CPU’s locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) limits overclocking, but the stock boost clock of 4.80 GHz is already high. The GPU, being end-of-life, has no meaningful upgrade path within its own generation, so any GPU upgrade would involve moving to a newer architecture.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field, combining the Intel Core i5-13490F with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The combined percentile of 71 places this system in the upper-mid range of all desktop builds, with the CPU being the stronger component. The CPU’s 80th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking create a system that is well-balanced for CPU-intensive workloads but less capable in GPU-heavy tasks. The processor is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake chip with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a Turing-architecture workstation card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 160 W TDP. The system is best described as a capable workstation for CPU-bound tasks, with gaming performance that is adequate for 1080p medium settings but limited at higher resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, with a base clock of 1005 MHz and a boost clock of 1545 MHz. The memory clock runs at 1625 MHz, with an effective data rate of 13 Gbps. The card includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, supporting ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, and offers FP32 performance of 7.119 TFLOPS with FP16 performance of 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1).

In benchmark results, the GPU achieves a PassMark G3D score of 15117 and a PassMark GPU compute score of 6176. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 indicate better performance in Vulkan than OpenCL. The PassMark DirectX 10 score of 108 and DirectX 11 score of 128 are relatively strong, but the DirectX 12 score of 52 is notably weak, suggesting the card is better suited for older APIs or OpenGL workloads. The 61st percentile ranking places it in the mid-range of all GPUs, with its nearest rival—the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060—being only 0.9% ahead in average score. For rendering tasks, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p or modest 1440p workloads, but the low compute score suggests it is not a compute powerhouse. The single-slot design and 160 W TDP make it a compact, power-efficient option for workstation builds, but its end-of-life status and 2018 release date mean it lacks modern features like hardware-accelerated ray tracing efficiency or DLSS 3 frame generation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13490F

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds