SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13490F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 pairing is a desktop build that combines a mid-range 10-core Raptor Lake CPU with a top-tier Blackwell 2.0 GPU, landing at the 86th combined percentile overall. The data shows a lopsided pairing: the RTX 5090 sits at the 92nd GPU percentile with an average benchmark score of 79,842, while the i5-13490F reaches only the 80th CPU percentile with an average score of 28,185. This means the GPU dominates the performance picture, and any workload that scales heavily with CPU threads will lag behind what the graphics card can deliver. The RTX 5090’s 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are massive, but the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads are far more modest. For rendering and gaming, the GPU leads; for CPU-bound tasks like data compression, the i5-13490F holds its own but does not match the top-tier rivals. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is high, but the CPU is the clear limiting factor in many scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process, and houses 92,200 million transistors across a 750 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is exceptional: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus delivers 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). This memory capacity and bandwidth are far beyond what the CPU can feed in most workloads, making the GPU the dominant component in this build. The base clock is 2017 MHz and the boost clock reaches 2407 MHz, with 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 104.8 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 104.8 TFLOPS, a 1:1 ratio). These numbers place the RTX 5090 in the top tier of graphics cards.

Benchmark results confirm this. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 18,355, which is a strong result for modern rasterization and ray tracing. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,370 and Vulkan score of 376,728 indicate excellent general-purpose compute and graphics throughput. PassMark G3D score is 39,650, with a G2D score of 1,413. The DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 226, 341, and 185, respectively, while DirectX 9 scores 395—these lower numbers reflect older API performance, but the modern DirectX 12 and Vulkan results are the relevant ones for current games. The GPU compute score is 26,756. The 92nd percentile rank versus all GPUs confirms its position: it is ahead of 92% of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (avgScore 79,605, deltaPct 0.3), Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (avgScore 79,396, deltaPct 0.6), AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (avgScore 78,940, deltaPct 1.1), and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (avgScore 80,959, deltaPct -1.4). The deltas are tiny, meaning the RTX 5090 is effectively on par with these workstation and mobile cards, though its 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are unmatched among them.

For rendering, the RTX 5090’s 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-driven workloads. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is massive for rasterization, while the 1:1 FP16 ratio doubles down for compute tasks that can use half precision. The pixel rate of 423.6 GP/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s mean high-resolution and texture-heavy scenes will be handled without strain. The 32 GB VRAM is critical for large 3D scenes, 8K video, or machine learning inference—the data shows this card is not just for gaming, but for serious rendering and compute. The passmark directx scores, while low, are not a concern because they are legacy API tests; the modern DirectX 12 Ultimate support (version 12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 ensure compatibility with current and upcoming titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance is skewed heavily toward the GPU. The CPU has a 80th percentile rank, while the GPU sits at the 92nd percentile, and the combined percentile is 86. This gap of 12 percentile points indicates that in many workloads, the CPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 28,185, while the GPU’s is 79,842—a 2.83x difference in raw scores. This suggests that tasks that are CPU-bound, such as data compression, encryption, and physics simulations, will not be accelerated by the GPU, while tasks that are GPU-bound, like rasterization and ray tracing, will be limited by how quickly the CPU can feed the GPU.

In gaming, the bottleneck is resolution-dependent. At lower resolutions, the CPU must process more frames per second, and the i5-13490F’s 10 cores and 16 threads may struggle to keep up with the RTX 5090’s frame output. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,821 (PassMark) and multi-thread score of 26,569 show it is decent, but the RTX 5090 is designed for extreme frame rates. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU is more than adequate. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all FPS discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,556 and 2-thread score of 1,959 indicate that multi-threaded scaling is not perfect—adding more threads does not yield linear gains, so the CPU may not fully utilize the GPU in heavily threaded games.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. In rendering, the GPU will dominate, and the CPU will be a secondary player. In video editing, the CPU handles encoding and decoding, while the GPU accelerates effects and playback. The i5-13490F’s data compression score of 328,397 and integer math score of 83,723 show it is capable for CPU-heavy tasks, but the GPU’s compute power will handle most of the heavy lifting in 3D rendering. The bottleneck is not a complete failure—the CPU is fast enough for most tasks, but the GPU’s capability is so high that the CPU will always be the weaker link. The 86th combined percentile reflects this: the build is high-end, but not perfectly balanced.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. It is fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm², and it fits in the Intel Socket 1700. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). The TDP is 65 W, and it is not multiplier-unlocked. Its launch MSRP is $235, though that is not a focus here.

Benchmark data shows strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 22,747, while the single-core score is 3,211. Cinebench R20 scores are 9,553 (multi) and 1,348 (single), and R15 is 2,292 (multi) and 323 (single). These numbers indicate a capable CPU for productivity tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, though not a top-tier one. The PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 26,569, a single-thread score of 3,828, and a floating-point math score of 60,273, integer math of 83,723, and extended instructions of 20,837. Data encryption scores 17,902, and find prime numbers is 114. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 28,185, and it ranks in the 80th percentile of all CPUs.

Nearest rivals show a close field. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has an avg score of 28,128 (deltaPct 0.2), meaning the i5-13490F is just 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28,065 (deltaPct 0.4), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28,054 (deltaPct 0.5). On the flip side, the Intel Core i9-11950H scores 28,332 (deltaPct -0.5), so the i5-13490F is 0.5% behind that laptop chip. The 3DMark results show the CPU scales with threads: 2-thread score of 1,959, 4-thread 3,552, 8-thread 5,731, 16-thread 7,556, and max-thread 7,550. This indicates that the CPU’s performance is nearly linear from 2 to 16 threads, with a slight drop at max threads (likely due to power limits). The 65 W TDP is modest, meaning the CPU can be cooled easily, but it also means the CPU won’t boost as high as higher-TDP chips.

For real workloads, the i5-13490F is a solid mid-range CPU. It handles multi-threaded tasks like video rendering and software compilation well, as shown by the Cinebench and PassMark scores. The single-thread performance is decent, with a 3,211 Cinebench R23 single-core score, which is sufficient for everyday use and light gaming. The 10-core/16-thread design is a hybrid (though not explicitly labeled as such in the data), which helps balance power and performance. The CPU’s 80th percentile means it outperforms 80% of all CPUs, so it is a good, but not exceptional, choice for a high-end GPU.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize GPU performance above all else, but who still need a competent CPU for everyday tasks. The target audience is:

High-end gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution. The RTX 5090’s massive 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are designed for 4K ultra settings, and the CPU’s 80th percentile single-thread performance is enough to feed the GPU at those resolutions. However, at 1080p, the CPU will be a bottleneck, so gamers who play at lower resolutions may see limited gains.
3D artists and renderers who use GPU-accelerated rendering engines like Blender or Octane. The RTX 5090’s 170 RT cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 will crush render tasks, and the 32 GB VRAM allows for large scenes. The CPU’s 10 cores will handle scene setup and physics, but the GPU does the heavy lifting.
Video editors working with 4K or 8K footage. The GPU’s NVENC (not specified in the pack, but the data shows the card has tensor cores) and compute power accelerate effects and encoding, while the CPU handles the timeline and decoding.
AI researchers and developers who need the 32 GB VRAM and 680 tensor cores for model training and inference. The CPU’s data compression and encryption scores are decent, but the GPU is the star.
Software developers who need a fast compiler and code editor, but also want a GPU for occasional gaming. The i5-13490F’s multi-threaded scores are solid for build times, and the GPU is a bonus.
Students and small business workstations that need a general-purpose PC with strong graphics for design or CAD. The CPU is efficient at 65 W, and the GPU can handle any professional workload.

The build is not for budget-conscious users, but that is not a focus here. It is for users who want maximum GPU performance and are willing to accept a mid-range CPU.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 28,185, with a 80th percentile rank. The GPU’s average score is 79,842, with a 92nd percentile rank. The combined percentile is 86, meaning this build outperforms 86% of all configurations. The CPU’s best scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core of 22,747 and a PassMark multi-thread of 26,569. The GPU’s best scores include a Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,728 and a PassMark G3D of 39,650. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX score of 18,355 is a strong indicator of modern gaming performance.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its score, so the i5-13490F is not a standout in its class, but it is competitive. The GPU’s rivals are also close, with the Tesla P100 16GB just 0.3% higher, and the Radeon Pro Vega 64X 1.4% lower. This means the RTX 5090 is a solid, but not the absolute fastest, GPU in the database’s ranking. The combination of a 80th percentile CPU and a 92nd percentile GPU creates a build where the GPU is the clear performance driver, and the CPU is a supporting role. The overall combined percentile of 86 is high, but it is not in the top 10% of all builds, indicating there are more balanced or more powerful configurations.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RTX 5090’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 and PassMark G3D of 39,650 suggest it can handle modern titles at 4K ultra settings with high frame rates. The 32 GB VRAM ensures that even the most demanding textures and resolution settings will not exceed memory capacity. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,211 (Cinebench R23) is enough to keep frame rates high at 4K, where the GPU is the primary bottleneck.

At 1080p, the CPU may become a limitation, but the RTX 5090 is so powerful that it will still deliver high frame rates, though not as high as a faster CPU might allow. At 1440p, the balance is better, and at 4K, the GPU is fully utilized. The estimated FPS for esports titles like Fortnite or Counter-Strike 2 would be extremely high, but the CPU may cap at high refresh rates. For AAA titles, the GPU will handle 4K ultra with ray tracing enabled, as the 170 RT cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 are more than sufficient. The 32 GB VRAM means no texture pop-in, and the 1.79 TB/s bandwidth ensures smooth streaming of textures.

Since no measured FPS data exists, these are qualitative estimates. The data indicates the build is a 4K gaming machine, with the CPU being the weak link at lower resolutions. The lack of measured FPS is a limitation, but the benchmark scores provide a reliable proxy for performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5090’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth deliver extremely high frame rates at 1440p and 4K. The CPU’s 80th percentile single-thread performance is sufficient for 144Hz at 1440p, but at 1080p, the CPU may cap frame rates below the GPU’s potential. For 4K 120Hz, the build is ideal.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s tensor cores can handle encoding (NVENC is not explicitly in the pack, but the GPU has 680 tensor cores), so streaming at 1080p60 or 4K30 is possible without a significant FPS hit. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 26,569 (PassMark) ensures the game and stream software run smoothly.

Video editing: The GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 104.8 TFLOPS FP16 accelerate effects and color grading, while the CPU’s 10 cores handle timeline playback and encoding. The PassMark floating-point math score of 60,273 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core of 22,747 indicate that the CPU can handle 4K video export, but the GPU will speed up effects-heavy edits.

3D rendering: The RTX 5090’s 170 RT cores and 32 GB VRAM are ideal for ray-traced renders. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 suggests it can render complex scenes faster than the CPU. The CPU will handle scene setup and physics, but the GPU will dominate the render time.

Software development: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads are good for compiling large codebases. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,747 and PassMark integer math of 83,723 show strong performance. The GPU is not a factor, but the CPU’s 80th percentile rank is adequate for most developers.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 65 W TDP and 80th percentile single-thread speed make it a responsive, efficient CPU for web browsing, spreadsheets, and document editing. The GPU is overkill for this, but the build can handle any office workload without a problem. The data shows the CPU is not a bottleneck for these tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 86, meaning it outperforms 86% of all builds in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, with an average benchmark score of 28,185 vs 28,128.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5090 has 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth from 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB?

A: The RTX 5090 is 0.3% ahead of the Tesla P100, with an average score of 79,842 vs 79,605.

Q: Does the CPU have an integrated GPU?

A: No, the i5-13490F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The i5-13490F has a TDP of 65 W, making it a low-power CPU for its performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The RTX 5090 has a launch MSRP of 1,999 USD.

Build Overview

The Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop build, classified as a desktop. It pairs a mid-range 10-core Raptor Lake CPU with a top-tier Blackwell 2.0 GPU. The overall tier is high, given the 86th combined percentile, but the CPU is the limiting factor. The build is a powerful workstation and 4K gaming machine, with the GPU providing 32 GB of VRAM and 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, while the CPU delivers 16 threads and a 65 W TDP. The data shows a strong performance for rendering, AI, and gaming, but the CPU’s 80th percentile rank means it is not the best pairing for the GPU’s 92nd percentile rank. For users who need the ultimate GPU performance and are willing to accept a mid-range CPU, this is a valid combination. The lack of measured FPS data is a caveat, but the benchmark scores indicate that the build is exceptional for 4K gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13490F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds