SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

49,957 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

This pairing combines a 10-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with a Blackwell 2.0 flagship-tier GPU, targeting high-resolution gaming and content creation workloads. The build sits at the 83rd combined percentile across all desktop configurations, with the CPU at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay data.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. It uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a 65 W TDP.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5070 Ti have and what type is it?

A: The GPU comes with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 1750 MHz, which translates to 28 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 83, placing it above the vast majority of desktop configurations. The CPU alone sits at the 80th percentile while the GPU reaches the 86th percentile, indicating a well-matched pair with the GPU slightly stronger relative to its peers.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the i5-13490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through its dual-channel memory bus. However, ECC memory is not supported, which limits its appeal for certain workstation error-checking scenarios.

Q: What PCIe generation does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, so the GPU can run at full bandwidth without lane-sharing constraints.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W, based on the GPU's 300 W TDP. The CPU's 65 W TDP adds relatively little to the total system power draw, so a quality 700 W unit provides sufficient headroom for this pairing.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-13490F averages 28185 across benchmarks, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500T. It trails the Intel Core i9-11950H by 0.5%, making these four processors statistically equivalent in overall performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a multi-threaded score of 22747 in Cinebench R23, which places it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its single-thread score of 3211 in the same test shows strong per-core performance for a mid-range part, and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7556 confirms that scaling from 2 threads (1959) through 4 threads (3552) and 8 threads (5731) remains efficient, reaching 7550 at max threads. This near-linear scaling indicates the hybrid core arrangement handles both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads without significant scheduling penalties.

The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 32974 places it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, while its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6604 reflects modern API efficiency. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 212363 and Vulkan score of 225122 show strong compute throughput. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at a 0.1% lower average score, the Intel Arc A550M at 0.4% higher, the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT at 2% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT at 3.1% lower — meaning the RTX 5070 Ti sits in a competitive band where small score differences separate it from previous-generation flagships.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU outranks the CPU by six percentile points. In 3DMark workloads, the CPU's 16-thread score of 7556 supports the GPU's demands in DX12 titles, while the GPU's 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides ample raw compute. The Passmark multithread score of 26569 for the CPU and the GPU's Passmark compute score of 20203 suggest that neither component bottlenecks the other in synthetic workloads, though the GPU's higher percentile implies it has more headroom relative to its peer group.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and 16 GB GDDR7 VRAM make it well-suited for high-refresh 1440p and 4K gaming, where its 896.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory-bound frame drops. The CPU's single-thread score of 3211 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing in CPU-light scenes remains consistent, though the exact FPS depends on the game engine's threading model.

Streaming: The GPU's 280 tensor cores and 70 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features. The CPU's 16 threads handle the overhead of capture software alongside game logic, and the Passmark data compression score of 328397 indicates strong throughput for real-time encoding buffers. The combined 83rd percentile suggests this system can handle simultaneous gaming and streaming without major frame loss.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9553 and Passmark multithread score of 26569 provide solid timeline scrubbing and export performance. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM allows large preview buffers for 4K timelines, and its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects rendering. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6604 indicates the GPU handles complex shader workloads that appear in video transitions and color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 MB shared L3 cache and 10 cores deliver strong CPU-based rendering in applications that rely on ray-traced scenes. The GPU's 70 RT cores accelerate real-time ray tracing, while its 896.0 GB/s bandwidth feeds the 96 ROPs efficiently. The Passmark floating point math score of 60273 for the CPU complements the GPU's FP32 throughput for mixed CPU/GPU render pipelines.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads handle parallel compilation, with the Passmark integer math score of 83723 showing strong throughput for code building. The 80th percentile ranking means it outperforms most desktop CPUs in multi-threaded developer workloads. The GPU's compute capabilities accelerate machine learning training loops, where its 280 tensor cores provide matrix operation acceleration.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3828 in Passmark and 1002 in 3DMark single-thread ensure snappy response in document editing and web browsing. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power draw low for sustained office workloads, while the GPU idles efficiently during non-graphics tasks. This system is overkill for basic productivity but handles any student workload without breaking a sweat.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K with high refresh rates will find the RTX 5070 Ti's 86th percentile GPU ranking sufficient for maxed settings in most titles. The 16 GB VRAM ensures future-proofing for texture-heavy games, while the CPU's 80th percentile position prevents it from dragging down frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. Content creators editing 4K video or rendering 3D scenes benefit from the balanced CPU/GPU pairing, where the CPU's 22747 Cinebench R23 multicore score handles timeline operations while the GPU's 43.94 TFLOPS accelerates effects and exports.

Developers working on large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 16 threads and Passmark integer math score of 83723 for parallel builds. Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads rely on the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 10 cores, while the GPU's compute capabilities handle CUDA-accelerated applications like financial modeling or scientific simulations. Students building a single system for coursework and gaming get a machine that handles everything from document editing to 3D rendering, with the 80th CPU percentile and 86th GPU percentile ensuring it outperforms the majority of desktop systems in both compute and graphics tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility on memory choice. The CPU's 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom within the platform, and the PCIe Gen 5 x16 CPU lane allocation supports future GPUs that may utilize the full bandwidth. The GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface matches the CPU's lane provision, so no bandwidth bottleneck exists at the bus level.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier Raptor Lake CPU on the same socket, as the 10-core i5-13490F at the 80th percentile leaves room for a 16-core or 24-core part to close the gap with the GPU's 86th percentile. The 700 W suggested PSU provides headroom for a more power-hungry CPU, though the current 65 W TDP keeps the system efficient. Memory upgrades from DDR4 to DDR5 would improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads, though the dual-channel bus supports both standards without platform changes. The GPU's 16-pin power connector and 300 W TDP mean a future GPU upgrade would likely require the same PSU class, making the 700 W unit a reasonable investment for one or two generations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti packs 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that ensures high-resolution textures and large compute buffers do not starve the 8960 shading units. The chip, GB203, is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors across a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². Base clock runs at 2295 MHz with a boost of 2452 MHz, while memory operates at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads, respectively.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6604 reflects strong performance under modern graphics APIs, placing the GPU at the 86th percentile. The Passmark G3D score of 32974 shows consistent DirectX performance across versions, with DX11 scoring 300 and DX9 scoring 351. The GPU's pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s indicate high fill rates for resolution scaling. The 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, matched by 43.94 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), provides compute horsepower that rivals dedicated workstation cards. For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM handles large scenes without swapping, while the 896.0 GB/s bandwidth feeds the 96 ROPs efficiently. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 225122 and OpenCL score of 212363 confirm strong cross-API compute, making this GPU capable of both gaming and professional rendering tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-S processor with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die, it features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The 65 W TDP makes it efficient for a desktop part, and the unlocked multiplier is false, meaning overclocking is restricted. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, though ECC is not supported.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multicore hits 22747, while R20 scores 9553 and R15 scores 2292. The 3DMark thread scaling from 1959 (2 threads) to 7556 (16 threads) demonstrates effective use of the hybrid core design. Single-thread performance is equally solid, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3211 and Passmark single-thread at 3828. The Passmark suite shows a balanced profile: integer math at 83723, floating point math at 60273, and extended instructions at 20837. Data compression scores 328397, while encryption reaches 17902. The 80th percentile ranking places it among the top fifth of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (0.2% higher), Intel Core i5-14500T (0.4% higher), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (0.5% higher), and Intel Core i9-11950H (0.5% lower). For real workloads, this CPU handles gaming alongside background tasks, compiles code efficiently, and processes data at rates that keep pace with the RTX 5070 Ti.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's Core 13th Gen i5-13490F with NVIDIA's GeForce 50-series RTX 5070 Ti. The CPU, released in February 2023, occupies the 80th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, released in February 2025, sits at the 86th percentile. The combined 83rd percentile indicates that this pairing outperforms 83% of all desktop configurations in the database, making it a high-tier system for its class. The CPU's Raptor Lake architecture with 10 cores and 16 threads provides a solid foundation, while the GPU's Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 16 GB GDDR7 VRAM and 8960 shading units delivers top-tier graphics performance. The 65 W CPU TDP and 300 W GPU TDP combine for a system that requires a 700 W PSU, placing it in the mainstream-to-high-end power envelope. The build targets 1440p and 4K gaming, content creation, and compute workloads, with the GPU's higher percentile relative to the CPU ensuring that graphics-intensive tasks are not unduly constrained by processor throughput.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance favors the GPU, which holds the 86th percentile versus the CPU's 80th percentile. This six-point gap suggests the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peer group, meaning that in GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming or heavy rendering, the CPU is less likely to be the limiting factor. However, the CPU's 16 threads and 24 MB L3 cache provide sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's demands in most scenarios. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics simulation or single-threaded game logic, the CPU's 80th percentile position may cap frame rates below what the GPU could otherwise deliver. The Passmark physics score of 1915 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1002 indicate that very lightly threaded tasks could see the CPU as the bottleneck, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6604 shows it pulls ahead in graphics-heavy synthetic tests.

The FPS scaling, estimated from benchmark scores, would show the GPU limiting performance at 1080p where high frame rates stress the CPU's single-thread capabilities, while at 4K the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 5731 versus the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 32974 suggests that in multi-threaded game engines, the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output. Data from the nearest rivals — the CPU outperforming the Ryzen AI 5 435 by 0.2% and the GPU trailing the RX 6900 XT by 2% — indicates that neither component is drastically mismatched. The overall balance is healthy, with the GPU leading in graphics tasks and the CPU holding its own in compute, making this a system where the bottleneck shifts depending on workload rather than permanently favoring one component.