SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13490F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 pairing represents a modern desktop configuration anchored by a 10-core Raptor Lake processor and a Blackwell-architecture graphics card. The combination sits at the 76th percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms a majority of current desktop builds while remaining a mainstream-class setup. The CPU itself falls into the 80th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 72nd percentile among all graphics cards, creating a balanced foundation where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in aggregate benchmark scoring.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13490F is built on the LGA 1700 socket, Intel’s mainstream desktop platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This dual-memory support is a significant flexibility point: builders can choose between the lower cost of existing DDR4 modules or the higher bandwidth of DDR5, depending on their motherboard selection and performance priorities. The CPU itself does not support ECC memory, which positions it firmly for consumer and gaming workloads rather than mission-critical server environments.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU with Gen 5 support across 16 lanes, providing ample bandwidth for the RTX 5060’s PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. The CPU’s 65W TDP is modest, and the GPU’s 145W TDP combines for a total system draw that the data suggests can be handled by a 300W suggested PSU. This low power envelope is notable: it allows for compact builds with smaller power supplies and less thermal stress on the system as a whole, making the platform suitable for smaller form factor cases. The CPU’s production status is listed as Active, meaning it remains a current product with ongoing availability.

A sensible next upgrade path from this configuration would focus on the GPU, as the LGA 1700 socket supports the full range of 13th-generation Intel processors, though the data does not specify compatibility with later generations. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide substantial multi-threaded headroom that would not bottleneck a more powerful GPU in most workloads. Alternatively, adding higher-capacity or higher-frequency DDR5 memory would be a straightforward upgrade, given the platform’s dual-channel support. The 1x 8-pin power connector on the GPU and the 300W suggested PSU leave some headroom for additional storage or peripherals without necessitating a power supply upgrade.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results reveal a processor with strong single-threaded and multi-threaded capabilities. In 3DMark tests, the i5-13490F scores 7556 in the 16-thread test and 7550 in the max-threads test, showing near-linear scaling as thread count increases from 16 to maximum. The single-thread score of 1002 and 2-thread score of 1959 indicate that the processor’s two performance cores handle lightly-threaded tasks efficiently. The 4-thread score of 3552 and 8-thread score of 5731 demonstrate progressive scaling, though the jump from 8 to 16 threads is less dramatic, suggesting the efficiency cores contribute meaningfully but not equally to performance.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R23 multi-core score of 22747 places the CPU well above average, while the single-core score of 3211 shows competitive per-thread performance. The R20 scores of 9553 multi-core and 1348 single-core, along with R15 scores of 2292 multi-core and 323 single-core, provide consistent evidence across rendering generations. PassMark results show particular strength in integer math at 83723 and floating-point math at 60273, with data compression at 328397 being a standout figure. The average benchmark score of 28185 places the CPU at the 80th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 at 28128, a delta of just 0.2% — effectively a statistical tie. The Intel Core i5-14500T trails by 0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE by 0.5%, while the Intel Core i9-11950H leads by 0.5%.

The GPU’s benchmark performance shows a different profile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 indicates solid DirectX 12 gaming capability. Geekbench results show 112787 for OpenCL and 113321 for Vulkan, with the Vulkan score slightly higher. PassMark results are mixed: the G3D score of 20891 is respectable, but the GPU compute score of 10899 is notably lower, suggesting compute-heavy workloads may not be this card’s primary strength. The average benchmark score of 26331 places the GPU at the 72nd percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 860M, scores 26401, which is 0.3% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 also scores 26421, 0.3% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, 0.8% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT trails by 1.2% at 26011. These tight deltas suggest the RTX 5060 sits in a highly competitive performance band where small architectural differences determine ranking.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements. The data clearly indicates that this section is based on inference from synthetic benchmarks, and actual in-game performance may vary based on driver optimizations, game engines, and system configuration.

Based on the CPU’s 80th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking, this system should deliver strong 1080p gaming performance and capable 1440p performance. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for most current titles at 1080p with high settings. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1002 in 3DMark suggests it can keep up with game logic and physics processing in most scenarios, while the multi-thread scores indicate headroom for background tasks during gameplay.

At 1440p, the system would likely still perform well, though the 8 GB VRAM could become a limiting factor in the most demanding titles with ultra texture packs. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20891 places it in the mid-range tier, suggesting it can handle modern games at high settings but may require compromises for 4K resolution. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 indicates the GPU handles DirectX 12 workloads efficiently, which is the primary API for current AAA games. For esports titles and less demanding games, the system would likely deliver very high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 144Hz in many cases, though these figures remain estimates rather than measured results.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who prioritize 1080p and 1440p gaming with high refresh rates. The CPU’s strong single-threaded performance and the GPU’s solid DirectX 12 capabilities make this pairing suitable for competitive shooters and action games where frame rate consistency matters more than absolute visual fidelity. The 80th percentile CPU ranking ensures that processor-intensive games like strategy titles or simulation games will run smoothly, while the 72nd percentile GPU handles the graphics load.

Content creators working with video editing or photo processing would benefit from the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 indicates strong rendering capability for video exports, and the PassMark data compression score of 328397 suggests efficient file handling during media workflows. The GPU’s compute score of 10899 is less impressive, so creators who rely heavily on GPU-accelerated rendering may find this pairing less suited to their needs than those who work primarily with CPU-based encoding.

Software developers would find this system capable for compilation tasks, with the CPU’s multi-threaded performance handling parallel builds efficiently. The 65W TDP keeps power costs low during extended development sessions. Students and small business users would benefit from the system’s balance of performance and efficiency, with the low power draw reducing heat in shared spaces. The desktop class form factor allows for easy upgrades and maintenance, making it a practical choice for users who want a system that can evolve with their needs.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is the primary scenario where this system excels. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1002 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628 combine to provide the frame rate headroom needed for 144Hz monitors in most titles. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current games at this resolution, and the CPU’s 10 cores ensure that background applications do not interfere with gameplay performance.

Streaming while gaming would work, though the system would benefit from using the GPU’s hardware encoders rather than CPU encoding. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores suggest it could handle software encoding at lower bitrates, but the 16 threads would be better utilized for game logic while the GPU handles encoding. The 65W TDP keeps thermal headroom available for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing workflows would see strong performance in timeline scrubbing and preview rendering thanks to the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 indicates that 4K video exports would complete in reasonable time, though the GPU’s compute score of 10899 means GPU-accelerated effects would not be as fast as on higher-tier cards. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with large file transfers during editing.

3D rendering in CPU-based engines would benefit from the 10-core configuration, with the PassMark floating-point math score of 60273 providing evidence of strong number-crunching ability. GPU-based rendering would be limited by the 8 GB VRAM, which restricts scene complexity for large projects. The system handles small to medium render jobs effectively.

Software development sees solid performance for compilation and testing. The PassMark integer math score of 83723 indicates strong general-purpose computing, and the 24 MB shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data. The dual-channel memory support allows for sufficient bandwidth for development tools and virtual machines.

Student and office work is handled with significant headroom. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures responsive application launches and web browsing, while the multi-threaded capabilities handle multitasking with many open applications. The low power draw makes this an efficient choice for daily use, and the desktop form factor allows for easy connectivity to multiple monitors for productivity.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with the GB206 chip containing 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. The GPU features 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, providing a pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS, matching the FP16 performance at 19.18 TFLOPS, indicates balanced compute capabilities for both gaming and general-purpose workloads.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 1750 MHz memory clock with 28 Gbps effective speed represents current-generation memory technology, but the 128-bit bus width limits overall bandwidth compared to wider-bus competitors. The 8 GB capacity is sufficient for 1080p and most 1440p gaming scenarios, but may require texture quality reductions in the most demanding titles with high-resolution texture packs.

Ray tracing is handled by 30 RT cores, while 120 tensor cores provide AI acceleration capabilities. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support with feature level 12_2 ensures compatibility with the latest rendering techniques. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 113321 indicate strong API utilization, with Vulkan showing particularly good performance. The PassMark DirectX 9 score of 225, DirectX 10 score of 127, DirectX 11 score of 200, and DirectX 12 score of 77 show varying performance across API generations, with older APIs performing relatively better.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s compute performance of 10899 in PassMark GPU compute suggests it handles compute shaders adequately but not exceptionally. The 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance is competitive for real-time rendering in game engines, but the 8 GB VRAM limits complex scene rendering with high-resolution textures and numerous objects. The dual-slot design with one 8-pin power connector keeps installation simple, and the 241 mm length fits most mid-tower cases.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles — 80th for the processor and 72nd for the graphics card — indicate a system where the CPU has more headroom than the GPU in most workloads. This means the GPU is likely the primary bottleneck in gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where graphics load increases. The CPU’s strong single-threaded performance ensures it does not hold back the GPU in most titles, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus could limit performance in VRAM-intensive games.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide substantial performance, and the GPU’s role is secondary. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22747 shows the CPU can handle demanding multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU’s compute score of 10899 indicates it would not significantly accelerate these workloads. The system is well-balanced for mixed use, where the CPU handles general computing and the GPU accelerates graphics.

The FPS scaling evidence from benchmark scores suggests that at 1080p, the GPU is the limiting factor in most games, while at lower resolutions or with reduced settings, the CPU could become the bottleneck in highly physics-intensive titles. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7556 and single-thread score of 1002 show the CPU has strong performance across thread counts, meaning game bottlenecks would more likely originate from the GPU’s rendering throughput rather than CPU processing of game logic.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i5-13490F use?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5060 have and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a 65W TDP, the GPU has a 145W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the system is 300W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 28185 is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 at 28128, and 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i5-14500T at 28065.

Q: Does this system support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The GPU provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which supports strong 1080p gaming performance but may limit 4K gaming due to the 128-bit bus width.

Q: What is the release date of the GPU?

A: The GPU was released on 2025-05-18, while the CPU was released on 2023-02-09.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The core configuration consists of a mix of performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, providing substantial data locality for frequently accessed information.

The CPU’s benchmark results show strong scaling across thread counts. The 3DMark scores progress from 1002 single-thread to 1959 for 2 threads, 3552 for 4 threads, 5731 for 8 threads, and 7556 for 16 threads, with the max-threads score of 7550 nearly identical to the 16-thread result. This indicates that the processor’s thread scheduler effectively utilizes all available cores, with minimal overhead from thread management. Cinebench results confirm this pattern, with R23 scores of 3211 single-core and 22747 multi-core showing efficient multi-threading.

PassMark results provide insights into specific workload characteristics. The data compression score of 328397 is exceptionally high, indicating strong performance in compression algorithms commonly used in file archiving and data transfer. The integer math score of 83723 and floating-point math score of 60273 show balanced general-purpose computing. The extended instructions score of 20837 suggests good support for modern instruction sets used in scientific computing and cryptography. The data encryption score of 17902 indicates the CPU handles encryption workloads adequately, though not at the level of dedicated encryption processors.

The 80th percentile ranking places this CPU among the top 20% of all processors in the benchmark database. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.5% in average benchmark score, indicating that the i5-13490F sits in a highly competitive performance tier where architectural differences between Intel and AMD offerings result in minimal practical performance differences. The CPU’s 65W TDP is notably low for a 10-core processor, suggesting efficient power management that allows sustained performance without excessive thermal output.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-13490F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, creating a system that ranks at the 76th combined percentile among all desktop configurations. The CPU’s 80th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking combine to place this system in the upper-midrange tier, capable of handling most gaming and productivity workloads with strong performance. The desktop form factor allows for component upgrades and customization, making this a flexible platform for users who want to evolve their system over time.

The system’s overall tier is defined by the balance between the CPU’s strong multi-threaded capabilities and the GPU’s solid but not exceptional rendering performance. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide headroom for future software that scales with core count, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth meet current gaming requirements but may need upgrading for future titles with higher VRAM demands. The 65W CPU TDP and 145W GPU TDP, with a 300W suggested PSU, make this an efficient system that does not require excessive cooling or power infrastructure.

The combination of Raptor Lake architecture with Blackwell 2.0 GPU architecture represents a pairing of Intel’s and NVIDIA’s current-generation mainstream technologies. The CPU’s release date of 2023-02-09 and the GPU’s release date of 2025-05-18 indicate a two-year generational gap, but the CPU’s strong performance ensures it remains relevant alongside the newer GPU. This system is positioned for users who want a capable desktop that handles modern games and productivity software without requiring the expense of top-tier components.