SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen family and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The CPU operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts up to 4.80 GHz, while maintaining a thermal design power of 65 W. This is a locked multiplier part, indicated by the "F" suffix meaning it lacks integrated graphics, so users must pair it with a discrete GPU.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mainstream chip: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and performance tuning. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 80th percentile among all CPUs tested, meaning it outperforms roughly four out of five processors in the database. The average benchmark score across all tests is 28185. In 3DMark tests, the processor scores 1002 in single-thread, 1959 in 2-thread, 3552 in 4-thread, 5731 in 8-thread, and 7556 in 16-thread tests, with max-thread score reaching 7550. The scaling from 2 to 8 threads is nearly linear, but the jump from 8 to 16 threads adds only about 32% more performance, reflecting the hybrid core architecture where not all cores are equal.

Cinebench results confirm strong multi-core capability: R15 multicore scores 2292, R20 multicore scores 9553, and R23 multicore scores 22747. Single-core Cinebench scores are 323 in R15, 1348 in R20, and 3211 in R23. These numbers indicate that the i5-13490F is competitive in both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads. PassMark tests show integer math at 83723, floating point math at 60273, extended instructions at 20837, and data compression at 328397. The multithread PassMark score is 26569, while single-thread is 3828.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-13490F sits in a tight cluster. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500T, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE, while trailing the Intel Core i9-11950H by 0.5%. This means the CPU is essentially performance-equivalent to a mobile i9 from a previous generation, which is notable for a mid-range desktop part. For real-world workloads, the 24 MB L3 cache and high boost clock of 4.80 GHz translate to responsive application performance, while the 10-core/16-thread layout handles modern multi-threaded productivity tasks without excessive power draw.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA106 chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. The GPU is equipped with 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS support. Clock speeds are set at 1515 MHz base and 1755 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming and modest 1440p workloads, but the narrow bus width can become a limiting factor in bandwidth-heavy scenarios. Pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s, while FP32 compute reaches 8.087 TFLOPS with FP16 at the same 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern game APIs.

The RTX 3050 OEM occupies the 57th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15199. PassMark G3D score is 11857, while GPU compute scores 5779. Geekbench results show OpenCL at 60740 and Vulkan at 57103. DirectX performance in PassMark varies: DirectX 9 scores 137, DirectX 10 scores 61, DirectX 11 scores 86, and DirectX 12 scores 58. The older DirectX 9 score being highest suggests the architecture handles legacy workloads efficiently, while DirectX 12 scores indicate modern API performance that is adequate but not exceptional.

In nearest rival comparisons, the RTX 3050 OEM is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7600, 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon 680M, 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580, and 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060. This places it in direct competition with integrated graphics from AMD's top iGPUs and previous-generation discrete cards. The RX 7600 being essentially tied is noteworthy, as that card is generally considered faster in raw rasterization, but the benchmark aggregate shows parity in this dataset.

With a TDP of 130 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W, the RTX 3050 OEM is power-efficient for a discrete GPU. It uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern monitor connectivity. The card interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its performance class. For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p textures comfortably, while the tensor cores provide acceleration for AI-assisted features.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 69, indicating it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all tested system configurations. This is a solid mid-range position, but the gap between CPU and GPU performance tiers is significant.

The CPU's 80th percentile ranking contrasts sharply with the GPU's 57th percentile. In practical terms, the processor is capable of feeding a much faster graphics card than the RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 and PassMark multithread score of 26569 demonstrate headroom for heavier workloads, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 and average benchmark score of 15199 show it lagging behind the processor's relative standing.

The average benchmark scores tell a similar story: the CPU averages 28185 across all tests, while the GPU averages 15199. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, scores 28128 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Core i9-11950H scores 28332 (0.5% ahead). The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600, scores 15171 (0.2% behind), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 scores 15290 (0.6% ahead).

This CPU-GPU imbalance suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform admirably, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card will be the limiting factor. The combined picture is a balanced budget gaming machine that excels in productivity and multitasking, but cannot fully exploit the CPU's potential in gaming at higher resolutions or with demanding graphical settings. The 3DMark scores for the CPU (7556 in 16-thread, 5731 in 8-thread) indicate strong physics and logic processing, which offloads work from the GPU in game simulations.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity while accepting mid-range GPU capability for gaming and creative work. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium to high settings will find the RTX 3050 OEM sufficient, especially in esports titles where the CPU's high boost clock of 4.80 GHz and 24 MB L3 cache provide snappy frame pacing. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking means it handles game logic, AI, and physics calculations without bottlenecking, but the GPU's 57th percentile limits visual fidelity at higher resolutions.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, as Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 and PassMark floating point math score of 60273 indicate strong compute throughput. However, GPU-accelerated rendering will be constrained by the RTX 3050 OEM's 8 GB VRAM and 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is adequate for 1080p projects but struggles with 4K timelines or complex scenes.

Software developers and students compiling code or running virtual machines will appreciate the CPU's multithreaded performance and 65 W TDP, which keeps power consumption and cooling requirements modest. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows budget-conscious builders to choose cheaper memory without sacrificing compatibility. Small business workstations handling office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and light database work will find the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 83723 and data compression score of 328397 more than sufficient for daily tasks.

The RTX 3050 OEM's 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores make it a viable entry point for users experimenting with ray-traced effects or DLSS in supported games, though performance will be modest. Users who primarily game at 1080p with competitive settings, or who need a capable productivity machine with occasional gaming, will find this pairing appropriate.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance analysis reveals a clear CPU-favored pairing. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile while the GPU is at the 57th percentile, creating a 23-percentile-point gap. This means the processor is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the graphics card is relative to its own class.

In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data processing, or office multitasking, the i5-13490F will not be the limiting factor. PassMark multithread score of 26569 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 demonstrate ample headroom. The GPU, however, will bottleneck in GPU-heavy tasks like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming. With only 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM, the RTX 3050 OEM will saturate before the CPU reaches its limits in these scenarios.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and settings. At 1080p with lower graphical settings, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (1002 in 3DMark single-thread, 3828 in PassMark single-thread) ensures the GPU is the primary constraint. At higher resolutions or with ultra settings, the GPU's 57th percentile ranking becomes the dominant limiting factor, and the CPU will spend most of its time idle. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this imbalance—better than average overall, but the CPU is being held back by the GPU in graphics-intensive applications.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 130 W TDP of the GPU mean the system has modest power requirements, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. This leaves little headroom for overclocking (though the CPU is multiplier-locked) or adding power-hungry peripherals, but it also means thermals and noise are manageable in standard desktop cases.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p: The RTX 3050 OEM with 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth can drive 1080p displays at high refresh rates in lighter titles, while the CPU's boost clock of 4.80 GHz and 24 MB L3 cache ensure consistent frame delivery. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle with the most demanding AAA games at maximum settings, but esports and older titles will run smoothly.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming, as Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 indicates substantial multi-thread capacity. The GPU's tensor cores also enable NVENC-based streaming with minimal performance impact, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous game and encode buffers at higher resolutions.

Video editing: The CPU handles timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export encoding efficiently, with PassMark data compression score of 328397 and integer math score of 83723 supporting these tasks. The GPU accelerates effects preview and rendering with 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance, though 4K timelines may require proxy workflows.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender will perform well, with Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 handling complex scenes. GPU-based rendering via CUDA will be limited by the RTX 3050 OEM's 8 GB VRAM and 8.087 TFLOPS, making it suitable for small projects or draft renders, but not production-scale work.

Software development: Compilation and testing benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and 80th percentile ranking, with PassMark extended instructions score of 20837 supporting modern instruction sets. The GPU is adequate for UI rendering and basic graphics debugging, but not for GPU compute development.

Student and office work: The CPU's high single-thread performance (3828 in PassMark) ensures responsive application launches and smooth multitasking, while the 65 W TDP keeps energy costs low. The GPU is more than sufficient for spreadsheets, document editing, web browsing, and video playback, making this a capable all-rounder for academic and professional use.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the test database contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries for this pairing. All frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 and 57th percentile ranking, the RTX 3050 OEM is positioned as a 1080p gaming card. At 1080p with ultra settings, most modern AAA games will likely run between 40-60 FPS, with lighter titles exceeding 60 FPS. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1002 in 3DMark single-thread) ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may cause texture quality reductions in memory-heavy games.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 30 FPS in demanding titles, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes a limiting factor. The CPU's performance headroom means that lowering graphical settings will yield meaningful FPS improvements, as the processor can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them at higher settings. For esports titles like competitive shooters, the CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock and 24 MB L3 cache should deliver frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings.

Ray tracing performance will be modest given the 18 RT cores and the GPU's overall 57th percentile ranking. DLSS support via the 72 tensor cores can help recover performance in supported titles, but the 8 GB VRAM and bandwidth constraints remain. Users seeking high-refresh 1080p gaming or 1440p at medium settings should adjust expectations accordingly.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13490F uses the LGA 1700 socket, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory standards. This provides flexibility for builders who want to reuse existing DDR4 memory or invest in newer DDR5 platforms. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, enabling future graphics cards or NVMe storage to run at the latest interface speeds, though the RTX 3050 OEM currently uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU means most LGA 1700 motherboards with adequate VRM cooling can handle it without issue. The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, which is modest by modern standards. A sensible first upgrade would be a more powerful graphics card, as the CPU's 80th percentile ranking provides substantial headroom for a faster GPU. For example, a GPU with higher memory bandwidth and more VRAM would better utilize the CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7556 in gaming scenarios.

Memory upgrades are also viable: the CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5, allowing users to increase capacity or switch to faster modules. The 24 MB L3 cache benefits from higher memory bandwidth, so DDR5 would improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads. The platform also supports future 13th Gen and 14th Gen processors on the same socket, though the 13490F's performance is already strong enough that a CPU upgrade may not be necessary for several years.

The production status of the CPU is listed as Active, meaning it remains available for purchase. The GPU is marked as End-of-life, indicating it is no longer in production, though existing stock and used markets will supply it. Upgrading the GPU to a current-generation model would rebalance the system, as the current configuration leaves CPU performance underutilized in GPU-bound scenarios.

# FAQ

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i5-13490F?

A: The launch MSRP is $235.

Q: How does the i5-13490F compare to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 in average benchmark scores?

A: The i5-13490F has an average benchmark score of 28185, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435's score of 28128.

Q: What memory types does the RTX 3050 OEM support?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Core i5-13490F?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the RTX 3050 OEM has a TDP of 130 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 OEM compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has an average benchmark score of 15199, which is 0.6% lower than the RTX 2060's score of 15290.

Q: Does the i5-13490F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the "F" suffix in the model name indicates that this CPU does not include integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, meaning it outperforms approximately 69% of tested system configurations.