SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13490F and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance tier, with the CPU ranking in the 80th percentile and the GPU in the 66th percentile. The combined build sits in the 73rd percentile, indicating a system that is solidly above average for general workloads but with distinct strengths in multi-threaded processing over raw graphics throughput. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data, as no measured FPS figures exist for this exact combination.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13490F compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435?

A: The i5-13490F has an average benchmark score of 28,185, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen AI 5 435's score of 28,128. This places the two processors in a statistical tie, with the Intel chip holding a marginal edge in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A750 ranks in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This means it performs better than roughly two-thirds of the graphics cards in the benchmark database, though it sits below the top tier of high-end offerings.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types. It features a dual-channel memory bus, allowing for either standard DDR4 or faster DDR5 modules depending on the motherboard chosen.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU wattage for the Intel Arc A750 is 550 W. This figure accounts for the GPU's 225 W TDP alongside the rest of the system's power draw.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F has 10 cores and 16 threads. This configuration is designed to handle both single-threaded tasks and heavily parallel workloads effectively.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A750 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This high bandwidth is crucial for texture-heavy gaming and compute tasks.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-13490F has a locked multiplier. The multiplierUnlocked field is false, meaning users cannot adjust the clock multiplier for manual overclocking, though boost behavior is still automatic.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13490F is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which anchors this desktop build. The architecture is Raptor Lake-S, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more common DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits. Memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, so the choice between memory types will be dictated by the motherboard's specific slot support and the user's budget priorities.

For PCIe connectivity, the CPU provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself. This means the primary graphics card slot can run at PCIe 5.0 x16 speeds, though the Intel Arc A750 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU will operate fine in the Gen 5 slot, downgrading to Gen 4 speeds, but the slot is future-proofed for a newer graphics card that might take advantage of the higher bandwidth. The system has no integrated graphics, as the CPU lacks an iGPU, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

The Arc A750 requires a 550 W suggested PSU and uses 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connectors. The GPU's TDP is 225 W, which is a significant draw but within the range of most mid-range power supplies. A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the Arc A750 with a higher-tier GPU that can leverage the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, as the CPU's 80th percentile ranking leaves headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, so a future GPU upgrade would primarily stress the PSU, not the processor's thermal envelope. The platform's support for DDR5 also means that a memory upgrade from DDR4 to DDR5 would be possible, but only with a motherboard change, as the CPU supports both but the memory controller operates over the same dual-channel bus regardless of type.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It operates at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts up to 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The chip is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It lacks ECC memory support and an integrated GPU, making it a pure compute-focused part for desktop use.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 22,747 in multi-core and 3,211 in single-core. The single-core score of 3,211 is respectable, but the multi-core score reveals the chip's real strength: it is nearly 7 times higher than the single-core score, indicating excellent scaling across its 16 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 26,569 reinforces this, while the single-thread score of 3,828 is lower relative to other high-end chips. The 3DMark tests show a similar pattern, with the 16-thread score of 7,556 nearly matching the max-threads score of 7,550, suggesting the CPU saturates its thread count effectively without significant overhead.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 80 means it outperforms 80% of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 28,185 places it in a dead heat with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (0.2% ahead), Intel Core i5-14500T (0.4% ahead), and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (0.5% ahead). It also edges out the Intel Core i9-11950H by 0.5%. For real workloads, this means the i5-13490F excels at tasks that use all cores, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The high single-thread score of 3,211 in Cinebench R23 also indicates it handles everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications like web browsing and office productivity with ease. The PassMark data encryption score of 17,902 and data compression score of 328,397 suggest robust performance for file archiving and security-related tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this build is skewed toward the processor. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking is notably higher than the GPU's 66th percentile, indicating the processor has more headroom relative to the broader market than the graphics card. This means that in CPU-bound workloads, such as high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions or physics simulations, the Arc A750 will likely be the limiting factor. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12,534 is solid, but the CPU's PassMark physics score of 1,915 shows a fundamental mismatch in raw compute potential for certain tasks.

In gaming, the bottleneck will vary by title and resolution. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU is more likely to be the constraint because frame rates are typically higher, putting more pressure on the graphics card to push pixels. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3,211) can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's 66th percentile ranking means it will struggle to keep up with the CPU's frame generation capability in lighter games. Conversely, at 4K resolution, the GPU becomes the unequivocal bottleneck, as the resolution demands more from the graphics card's 8 GB of memory and 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 for the GPU indicates it can handle modern DX12 titles, but the CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,556 is far higher relative to its peers. This discrepancy suggests that in multi-threaded non-graphics workloads, the CPU will breeze through tasks while the GPU lags in compute-heavy scenarios like GPU rendering or machine learning inference. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5,368 is notably lower than the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 83,723, showing that for integer-heavy tasks, the CPU dominates. For a balanced system, users should expect the GPU to limit high-FPS gaming scenarios, while the CPU will excel in productivity and rendering tasks that are not GPU-accelerated.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build can deliver strong frame rates in esports titles, but the Arc A750's 66th percentile ranking means it will not consistently hit 144+ FPS at ultra settings in demanding AAA games. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,211 in Cinebench R23 ensures minimal bottleneck in CPU-light games, but the GPU will cap performance in graphically intensive scenes.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,747, can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets while gaming, but the GPU's lack of a dedicated encoder in the data means users might rely on CPU encoding, which will tax the processor further. The PassMark multithread score of 26,569 suggests headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming, but expect lower FPS in GPU-bound titles.

Video editing benefits significantly from the CPU's multi-threaded prowess. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9,553 and PassMark integer math score of 83,723 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times for 1080p and 1440p footage. The GPU's 8 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth help with GPU-accelerated effects, but the 66th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier accelerator for heavy color grading or 4K timelines.

3D rendering is where the CPU shines. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,747 places it in the upper echelon for CPU-based rendering, making it suitable for Blender or Cinema 4D scenes that rely on the processor. The GPU's FP32 performance of 17.20 TFLOPS offers some acceleration, but its percentile ranking suggests it will not outperform a mid-range NVIDIA or AMD card for render engines that favor CUDA or OpenCL.

Software development is a strong suit for this pairing. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 328,397 and extended instructions score of 20,837 speed up code compilation and test execution. The GPU's Vulkan 1.4 support and OpenGL 4.6 APIs are adequate for graphics programming, but the CPU will be the primary driver of productivity.

For student and office work, this build is overkill but efficient. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,828 ensures snappy application launches, while the 65 W TDP keeps power draw low for long work sessions. The GPU's 66th percentile is irrelevant for spreadsheets or web apps, but the system's 73rd combined percentile ensures it handles multitasking without breaking a sweat.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Based on the Intel Arc A750's PassMark G3D score of 12,534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612, the GPU is positioned to handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at medium to high settings. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for modern titles at these resolutions, but the 66th percentile ranking suggests it will trail top-tier cards. For esports games like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the i5-13490F's single-thread score of 3,211 in Cinebench R23 can push frame rates high, potentially exceeding 144 FPS, but the GPU will still need to render the frames, so expect around 100-144 FPS at 1080p ultra depending on the title.

For AAA games at 1080p ultra, the GPU is the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,612 is modest, indicating the card can run modern DX12 games, but frame rates will likely hover in the 60-90 FPS range at 1080p. At 1440p, the 8 GB memory capacity and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth become strained, and frame rates will drop to 40-60 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K, the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is insufficient for consistent 60 FPS in most games, so users should expect 30-50 FPS at best with reduced settings.

The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores, such as the PassMark multithread score of 26,569, prevent it from bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,556 indicates the CPU can handle the draw calls and game logic of modern titles without issue. However, the GPU's percentile ranking of 66 means that in GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will often be waiting on the graphics card, making the Arc A750 the primary limiter for high-refresh gaming.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over peak GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p resolution who play a mix of esports and AAA titles will find the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3,211) keeps frame rates high in competitive games, while the GPU handles mainstream titles at medium to high settings. For 1440p, the build is acceptable for casual gaming, but the GPU's 66th percentile ranking means it is not ideal for ultra settings or high refresh rates.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers, will benefit most from this pairing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,747 and PassMark integer math score of 83,723 make it a workhorse for rendering, encoding, and compilation. The GPU's 8 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate acceleration for effects and previews, but it is not the primary draw.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's PassMark data compression score of 328,397, which speeds up build times and test runs. The GPU's Vulkan and OpenGL support are sufficient for graphics development, but the CPU is the star for most coding tasks. Students and office workers will find the system far more powerful than needed, but the 65 W CPU TDP and 550 W PSU requirement keep it efficient for long workdays, and the 73rd combined percentile ensures it handles any multitasking scenario.

Small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications, such as data analysis or financial modeling, will excel with this CPU. The PassMark multithread score of 26,569 and floating point math score of 60,273 indicate robust performance for number-crunching tasks. The GPU is secondary, but its 8 GB memory can handle basic visualization needs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13490F and the Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor on Socket 1700, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile ranking is 73, placing this system in the upper quarter of all desktop builds in the database. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking drives the overall score, while the GPU's 66th percentile slightly drags it down.

The build class is explicitly desktop, meaning it is intended for a stationary tower with full-size components. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 225 W TDP combine for a system that requires a 550 W PSU, making it a mid-range power consumer. The Arc A750 is a dual-slot card with 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, supporting modern displays. The GPU is end-of-life according to the data, with Battlemage as its successor, but it remains a capable option for this pairing.

Overall, this build is a CPU-first system. The i5-13490F is a high-performing processor that eclipses the GPU in relative market position. For users who need heavy compute for rendering, development, or data processing, this pairing offers a strong foundation. For gamers, the GPU is adequate but not exceptional, making the system a better fit for those who prioritize productivity with occasional gaming rather than a dedicated gaming rig.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13490F achieves an average benchmark score of 28,185, placing it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, scores 28,128, making the Intel chip 0.2% faster. The Intel Core i5-14500T trails by 0.4% with a score of 28,065, and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is 0.5% behind at 28,054. The CPU also outperforms the Intel Core i9-11950H, which scores 28,332, by 0.5%. In specific tests, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,747 and single-core score of 3,211 are notable highlights, as is the PassMark multithread score of 26,569.

The Intel Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20,582, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the Intel Arc B570, which scores 20,556, a 0.1% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.2% behind with 20,534, while the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662, making it 0.4% faster than the A750. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M trails by 0.5% with a score of 20,480. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 and PassMark G3D score of 12,534 are the most relevant for gaming, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 85,631 indicates strong compute potential.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the dominant component. The CPU's 80th percentile is 14 points higher than the GPU's 66th percentile, and the combined percentile of 73 reflects this gap. The CPU's average score of 28,185 is significantly higher than the GPU's 20,582, suggesting that in mixed workloads, the processor will often be waiting on the graphics card. The data indicates a well-matched pair for CPU-bound tasks, but for graphics-intensive applications, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13490F

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds