SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13490F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 represents a desktop configuration that sits at the 75th percentile overall. This is a combination of a 10-core Raptor Lake processor with a 24 MB shared L3 cache and a 16 GB RDNA 4.0 graphics card built on a 4 nm process. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all frame rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i5-13490F and the Radeon RX 9070 is characterized by the CPU’s position in the 80th percentile against all CPUs and the GPU’s position in the 69th percentile against all GPUs. This 11-point gap suggests the processor has more relative headroom in synthetic workloads than the graphics card, but the real bottleneck depends on the specific workload type. The CPU’s 3DMark results show a strong scaling curve: 7556 with 16 threads, 5731 with 8 threads, 3552 with 4 threads, and 1959 with 2 threads. This scaling indicates that the processor benefits significantly from additional threads, and in multi-threaded scenarios, the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor before the GPU reaches its limits.

For gaming at high resolutions, the data points toward the GPU being the primary constraint. The RX 9070’s PassMark G3D score of 25381 places it in the 69th percentile, while its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 reflects modern rendering loads. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth provide ample data throughput for texture-heavy scenes. In contrast, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1002 in 3DMark and 3211 in Cinebench R23 suggest it can feed the GPU adequately in most scenarios. However, in lightly-threaded tasks like legacy game engines or certain physics calculations, the CPU’s 2-thread score of 1959 becomes the ceiling, potentially limiting frame rates before the GPU is fully utilized.

The PassMark data reveals where the CPU excels and where it lags. The processor scores 328397 in data compression and 83723 in integer math, both indicating strong throughput for compute-heavy tasks. However, the find prime numbers score of 114 is notably low, suggesting the architecture is not optimized for every instruction type. This means in mixed workloads, the CPU might stall on specific operations even while other metrics show headroom. The GPU’s compute score of 14737 in PassMark GPU Compute and 131539 in Geekbench OpenCL confirm it is a capable compute device, but its DX9 score of 343 and DX10 score of 141 indicate older API performance is not the primary strength. For a balanced system, the data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU may bottleneck in certain titles, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive limiting factor.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is built on the Navi 48 chip using the RDNA 4.0 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. Memory runs at 2518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective speed across a 256-bit bus, yielding 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is a substantial asset for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The shading units total 3584, with 224 texture mapping units and 128 render output units. The 56 ray accelerators provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing workloads.

The GPU’s benchmark scores paint a specific picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 reflects performance in modern DirectX 12 titles, which is the most relevant metric for current gaming. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 58705 and OpenCL score of 131539 indicate strong compute capability for general-purpose GPU workloads. The PassMark G3D score of 25381 places the GPU at the 69th percentile, while the G2D score of 1280 shows 2D rendering is not a bottleneck. The DirectX 11 score of 281 is considerably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 74 in PassMark, which is an unusual inversion but likely reflects the specific test methodology rather than real-world performance. The pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s indicate the GPU can handle high fill-rate demands. The FP32 performance of 36.13 TFLOPS matches the FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio, which is notable for compute workloads that can leverage either precision.

The RX 9070’s nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z with an average score of 23736 (0.6% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S with 24063 (-0.8%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile with 23628 (1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER with 24170 (-1.2%). This range of competitors shows the RX 9070 sits in a performance tier where differences are within a few percent, meaning the 16 GB VRAM and modern architecture are the differentiators rather than raw rasterization speed. The 220 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU indicate the power envelope is manageable for a dual-slot card with 2x 8-pin connectors.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13490F achieves an average benchmark score of 28185, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 with an average score of 28128, a delta of 0.2%, effectively a tie. The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065 (0.4% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28054 (0.5% behind), and the Intel Core i9-11950H scores 28332 (0.5% ahead). This clustering means the i5-13490F is positioned in a highly competitive segment where single-digit percentage differences separate processors. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 and single-core score of 3211 demonstrate strong sustained multi-threaded performance and competitive single-thread responsiveness. The PassMark multithread score of 26569 and single-thread score of 3828 corroborate this balance.

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 achieves an average benchmark score of 23877, placing it at the 69th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z at 23736 (0.6% ahead of the RX 9070), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S at 24063 (0.8% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile at 23628 (1.1% ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER at 24170 (1.2% behind). These small deltas in the 1-2% range indicate the RX 9070 is not a performance outlier but rather a solid mid-to-upper-tier card. The combined percentile of 75 for this CPU+GPU pairing reflects the sum of the parts rather than a synergistic boost.

The combined picture shows a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity while remaining competitive in gaming. The CPU’s 80th percentile ranking is higher than the GPU’s 69th percentile, suggesting the processor has more relative performance headroom. In workloads that scale with CPU threads, such as rendering or compilation, this system will perform above its GPU tier. In pure gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will cap the experience. The data indicates this is a well-matched pair for 1440p gaming, where the CPU can maintain frame pacing and the GPU provides adequate rasterization and ray tracing throughput.

Who Should Build It

The target user for the Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 combination is a desktop builder seeking balanced performance at the 75th percentile overall. Gamers playing at 1440p with high refresh rate monitors will find the 16 GB VRAM and 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance sufficient for modern titles with high texture quality. The CPU’s 80th percentile ranking ensures it will not be the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, though the 2-thread score of 1959 suggests older or poorly-threaded games may not hit maximum frame rates. Content creators working with video editing software that leverages multi-threading will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 131539 for accelerated effects.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 83723 and data encryption score of 17902, which indicate strong general-purpose compute. The 24 MB L3 cache and 10 cores with 16 threads provide ample parallelism for build tools. Students and small business workstations can leverage the 65 W TDP of the CPU and 220 W TDP of the GPU, which together suggest a system that does not require exotic cooling solutions. The DDR4 and DDR5 memory support offers flexibility in platform cost, though the data does not specify which memory type yields better performance. The launch MSRP of $235 for the CPU and 549 USD for the GPU positions this as a mid-range to upper-mid-range build, though pricing discussions are outside the scope of this analysis.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and the TDP is 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option. The release date was 2023-02-09, and the part number is SRMC0.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1959 with 2 threads to 3552 with 4 threads, 5731 with 8 threads, and 7556 with 16 threads. The max threads score of 7550 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score, indicating no additional benefit beyond the 16 threads. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9553 and single-core score of 1348 show a strong ratio of roughly 7:1, which is typical for a hybrid architecture. The PassMark data compression score of 328397 is exceptional, suggesting the processor handles data-intensive workloads efficiently. The floating point math score of 60273 and extended instructions score of 20837 indicate robust SIMD performance for scientific and engineering applications.

The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 at 28128 average score (0.2% higher), which is statistically indistinguishable. The Intel Core i5-14500T at 28065 (0.4% lower) and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE at 28054 (0.5% lower) are also close. The Intel Core i9-11950H at 28332 (0.5% higher) shows the i5-13490F competes with previous-generation i9 mobile parts. The single-thread score of 3828 in PassMark and 3211 in Cinebench R23 indicate the processor is well-suited for lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing and office applications, though the 2-thread 3DMark score of 1959 suggests there is a slight drop-off when only two threads are active.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RX 9070’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6290 and the CPU’s 8-thread score of 5731 indicate the system can drive high frame rates in modern titles. The 16 GB VRAM ensures texture streaming does not become a bottleneck at high settings. Estimates suggest 1440p gaming will be smooth, with the GPU being the more likely limit.

Streaming while gaming benefits from the CPU’s 16 threads, which allow the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 to handle encoding overhead. The GPU’s 14737 PassMark compute score can offload some encoding tasks, though the data does not specify encoder quality. The 65 W CPU TDP leaves thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will leverage the CPU’s PassMark floating point score of 60273 for color processing and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 131539 for effects. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support provides adequate bandwidth for 4K timelines.

3D rendering in Blender or similar tools will use the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 and the GPU’s 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The 53,900 million transistors on the GPU provide substantial compute throughput, though the data does not include specific render benchmark scores.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 83723 and data compression score of 328397, which speed up compilation and packaging. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface supports fast NVMe storage for source code.

Student and office work is well-served by the CPU’s single-thread score of 3828 and the GPU’s G2D score of 1280. The 65 W CPU TDP and 220 W GPU TDP suggest a system that runs quietly under typical office loads, though the data does not specify acoustic characteristics.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results. The RX 9070’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6290 and PassMark G3D score of 25381 indicate strong rasterization performance. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 5731 and single-thread score of 1002 suggest it can maintain adequate frame pacing at common gaming resolutions.

At 1080p ultra settings, the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor in many titles. The 2-thread score of 1959 indicates that games relying on fewer threads may not achieve the maximum frame rates the GPU can theoretically output. Estimates suggest frame rates in the range of 100-140 FPS for esports titles and 70-100 FPS for AAA games, though these are rough projections. At 1440p ultra settings, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures, and the pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s handles the increased resolution. Estimates suggest 60-90 FPS for demanding titles and 90-120 FPS for optimized games. At 4K ultra settings, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. The 69th percentile ranking means the RX 9070 is not a top-tier card, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6290 suggests 4K gaming will require settings adjustments. Estimates suggest 40-60 FPS for modern AAA titles at native 4K ultra, with lower settings required for higher frame rates. These figures are estimates based on benchmark scores and should be validated with real-world testing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Radeon RX 9070. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-S processor on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, released in February 2023. The GPU is a Navi 48-based RDNA 4.0 card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, released in March 2025. The combined percentile is 75, placing this system in the upper quarter of all tracked configurations. The CPU’s 80th percentile and GPU’s 69th percentile create a system that is stronger in CPU-bound workloads than GPU-bound ones. The 65 W CPU TDP and 220 W GPU TDP suggest a power-efficient pairing that does not require extreme cooling or power delivery. The 10 nm CPU process and 4 nm GPU process reflect different manufacturing generations, but the system operates cohesively. The 24 MB L3 cache and 16 GB VRAM provide ample on-chip storage for active data.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core i5-13490F?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F achieves an average benchmark score of 28185, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the Radeon RX 9070 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Radeon RX 9070 has an average score of 23877. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z with 23736, which is 0.6% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6800S is 0.8% lower at 24063.

Q: What memory types does the Core i5-13490F support?

A: The Core i5-13490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How many ray accelerators does the RX 9070 have?

A: The RX 9070 has 56 ray accelerators dedicated to ray tracing workloads, with a boost clock of 2520 MHz and a game clock of 2070 MHz.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, indicating the system performs better than 75% of tracked configurations in the database.

Q: Does the Core i5-13490F have an unlocked multiplier?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported. The processor has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: What is the PassMark G3D score of the RX 9070?

A: The RX 9070 scores 25381 in PassMark G3D, placing it at the 69th percentile among all GPUs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13490F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is the interface for the RX 9070’s PCIe 5.0 x16 bus. The RX 9070 has a TDP of 220 W and the suggested PSU is 550 W, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP, so the total system power draw is within a standard mid-range power supply envelope. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors and fits in a dual-slot form factor. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a.

The upgrade path is constrained by the Socket 1700 platform, which is specific to Intel 12th and 13th generation processors. Since the i5-13490F is already at a high percentile (80th), a meaningful CPU upgrade within the same socket would be to a higher-core-count 13th generation part, though the data does not specify which models are compatible. The GPU upgrade path is more open, as the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface is forward-compatible with future graphics cards. The 550 W suggested PSU leaves some headroom for a moderate GPU upgrade, but a significantly more powerful card would likely require a larger power supply. The 16 GB VRAM on the RX 9070 is already substantial, so a GPU upgrade would be driven by performance needs rather than capacity. The DDR4/DDR5 support means memory upgrades depend on the motherboard’s specific slot type, which is not specified in the data. Overall, the most sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU within the same power envelope, as the CPU’s 80th percentile ranking indicates it has more headroom than the GPU’s 69th percentile.