SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

48,477 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT pairing is a study in balanced component choices. The CPU, with a 65 W TDP, is a power-efficient workhorse, while the GPU is a high-end, power-hungry rendering monster with a 300 W TDP. The data shows a system with a combined percentile ranking of 83, placing it in the top tier of desktop configurations. The benchmark scores indicate that this is a machine built for high-fidelity gaming at demanding resolutions and for accelerating creative workloads that can leverage the GPU’s massive compute throughput.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between these two components is heavily skewed by resolution and workload type. The CPU, which sits at the 80th percentile among all CPUs, provides a strong foundation, but its single-thread and multi-thread scores are not in the same league as its GPU counterpart. The GPU, ranking at the 85th percentile among all GPUs, is the clear performance leader in this pairing. This dynamic suggests that at lower resolutions, such as 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, as it must feed frames to a GPU capable of producing them at a very high rate. The 3DMark scores for the CPU support this: the single-thread score is 1002, while the 2-thread score is 1959, showing a clear scaling ceiling for lightly-threaded tasks.

The bottleneck shifts decisively to the GPU at higher resolutions, where the rendering load increases significantly. The RX 6800 XT’s 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth become the primary drivers of frame rates. In this scenario, the i5-13490F’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 4.80 GHz boost clock are more than sufficient to keep the GPU fed with data. The wide gap between the CPU’s single-thread score (1002) and its max-thread score (7550) indicates that the processor has ample headroom for parallel tasks, but the GPU is the component that will dictate the upper limits of gaming performance at 1440p and 4K.

The FPS scaling in this system will be non-linear. At 1080p, the CPU’s performance, particularly its single-thread capability, will cap the maximum frame rate. At 1440p, the balance begins to shift toward the GPU, and at 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the sole bottleneck. The data indicates that the CPU is not weak, but the GPU is disproportionately powerful, making this a system that is best utilized in scenarios where the GPU is fully saturated. For productivity tasks, the balance is more straightforward: the CPU handles physics and logic (scoring 1915 in Passmark Physics), while the GPU handles rendering and compute (scoring 13245 in Passmark GPU Compute), allowing both components to work in parallel without significant contention.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13490F demonstrates robust performance in both synthetic and application-based benchmarks. Its average benchmark score is 28185, placing it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, scores 28128, a delta of just 0.2%, indicating these processors are statistically tied. The i5-13490F also outperforms the Intel Core i5-14500T by 0.4% and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE by 0.5%, while trailing the Intel Core i9-11950H by 0.5%. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 22747 in multi-core and 3211 in single-core, showcasing a strong balance between parallel throughput and single-thread responsiveness. The 3DMark tests show a clear scaling pattern from 1959 (2-thread) to 7556 (16-thread), with the max-thread score of 7550 confirming that the processor is effectively utilized with all 10 cores and 16 threads active.

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is a formidable performer in its own right. Its average benchmark score is 48477, placing it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. The data shows it is 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, but trails the Intel Arc A550M by 2.5%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by 3%, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 by 3%. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3689 and Passmark G3D score of 24980 confirm its high-end status. The combined picture is a system that excels in GPU-bound scenarios, with the CPU playing a supporting but capable role. The combined percentile of 83 reflects that while the CPU is strong, the GPU is the standout component, dragging the overall system performance upward.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific combination of the Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT. Therefore, all frame rate expectations discussed here are estimates based on the individual component benchmark scores and their relative performance percentiles. The data indicates that this system is exceptionally well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and for playable 4K experiences.

At 1440p, the RX 6800 XT’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures. The GPU’s 72 ray accelerators and 4608 shading units suggest it can handle ray tracing effects, though with a performance hit. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3211 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing and minimum frame rates remain stable, preventing stutter in CPU-light scenes. At 1080p, the CPU may become a limiting factor in esports titles where frame rates exceed 200 FPS, but the GPU will still deliver very high numbers. At 4K, the GPU is the sole bottleneck, and the 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be pushed to its limits, likely resulting in lower but playable frame rates for most titles. These are estimates, not measured results, but the underlying data strongly supports a high-performance gaming experience.

Who Should Build It

This system is an excellent choice for gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh-rate monitors. The GPU’s 85th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 80th percentile ranking combine to deliver a smooth, high-fidelity experience in most modern titles. The 16 GB VRAM buffer is not just for gaming; it is a practical asset for content creators working with 4K video or large 3D scenes. Video editors using software that leverages GPU acceleration will see significant benefits from the 13245 Passmark GPU Compute score and the 181337 Geekbench Metal score.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s 16 threads, which can significantly reduce compilation times for large projects, while the GPU is capable of accelerating CUDA-like workloads via OpenCL (171304) and Vulkan (136875). Students in STEM fields can use this for simulation and data analysis, and small business workstations handling CAD or video conferencing will find the performance more than adequate. The CPU’s 65 W TDP makes it an efficient choice for systems that run for long periods, while the GPU’s performance ensures that demanding tasks are completed quickly. This is a system for users who prioritize performance in GPU-accelerated tasks and high-resolution gaming over raw CPU compute power.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1440p, this pairing is designed to push high frame rates in competitive and AAA titles. The GPU’s 85th percentile performance ensures that the rendering pipeline is rarely the bottleneck, while the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3211 in Cinebench R23 prevents frame pacing issues. The combined 83rd percentile ranking indicates a system that will consistently deliver a smooth gaming experience.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache provide enough headroom to encode a video stream using x264 software encoding while gaming. The GPU’s dedicated compute units can also handle encoding via hardware encoders, offloading the work from the CPU. The 7550 3DMark max-thread score shows that the CPU has the parallel capacity to handle both the game and the stream without significant performance degradation.

Video Editing: This is a GPU-accelerated workload, and the RX 6800 XT excels here. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will dramatically speed up effects rendering and timeline scrubbing in 4K. The CPU’s 22747 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will handle encoding and export tasks efficiently, making this a capable machine for a video editing workstation.

3D Rendering: The GPU is the primary workhorse for rendering in applications like Blender or Maya. Its 4608 shading units and 128 ROPs provide massive parallel compute power, as evidenced by the 24980 Passmark G3D score. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads will handle scene preparation and physics simulations, but the final render times will be dictated by the GPU’s performance.

Software Development: Compilation is a multi-threaded task, and the i5-13490F’s 7556 3DMark 16-thread score indicates it can handle large codebases with ease. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, reducing wait times. The GPU is less critical here, but its compute capabilities could be used for running local machine learning tests or accelerating scientific computing tasks, making this a versatile development machine.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks, but it is a future-proof investment. The CPU’s 3828 Passmark single-thread score ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking in office suites. The GPU is dormant during these tasks, but its presence ensures that the system can handle any unexpected heavy workload, such as a student running a complex simulation or a designer creating high-resolution graphics.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders flexibility in choosing a memory kit, but the dual-channel memory bus means that the memory bandwidth is dictated by the chosen memory standard. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and offers future-proofing for next-generation storage devices. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means that the power delivery system on the motherboard is not heavily stressed, leaving headroom for a future CPU upgrade within the same socket generation.

The GPU requires a 700 W suggested PSU and uses two 8-pin power connectors. This is a high power draw, so any upgrade to a more powerful GPU would necessitate checking the PSU’s capacity. The sensible next upgrade path for this system is the GPU, as the CPU is robust enough to support a more powerful graphics card. However, the CPU’s locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) limits overclocking, so the primary way to gain more CPU performance would be to upgrade to a higher-tier Socket 1700 processor. The system is well-balanced, and the data suggests that the GPU will be the first component to become a bottleneck in the future, making it the target for the next upgrade cycle.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is crucial for gaming performance, as it reduces the need to access slower system memory.

The benchmark data shows a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1002 (single-thread) to 7556 (16-threads), showing a 7.5x improvement, which is excellent for a 10-core part. The Cinebench R23 scores of 22747 (multi-core) and 3211 (single-core) indicate that this CPU is capable of both heavy multi-threaded workloads and responsive single-threaded tasks. The Passmark data is particularly illustrative: a score of 83723 in integer math and 60273 in floating-point math show strong arithmetic capabilities, while a score of 328397 in data compression and 17902 in data encryption indicate its utility in data-center-like tasks. The 80th percentile ranking confirms that this is a top-tier mainstream processor, beating the vast majority of CPUs on the market. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which is already part of this build.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this system is 83, placing it in the top tier of desktop configurations.

Q: How does the i5-13490F compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435?

A: The i5-13490F has an average benchmark score of 28185, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen AI 5 435’s score of 28128.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 6800 XT?

A: The RX 6800 XT has a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, provided by 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the CPU’s boost clock of 4.80 GHz is the maximum.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6800 XT is 700 W, and it requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck at 4K resolution?

A: At 4K, the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the rendering load becomes the dominant factor, and the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed it.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported by the Intel Core i5-13490F.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is a high-end graphics card built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It features 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die. The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The core clocks are set at a base of 1825 MHz, a game clock of 2015 MHz, and a boost clock of 2250 MHz, with the memory running at an effective 16 Gbps.

The compute power is substantial, with 4608 shading units, 288 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. This translates to 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 41.47 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1). The GPU also includes 72 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The benchmark scores reflect this power: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3689 and a Passmark G3D score of 24980. The Geekbench scores are also strong, with 181337 in Metal, 171304 in OpenCL, and 136875 in Vulkan, indicating excellent cross-platform compute performance.

The 85th percentile ranking places it above the vast majority of GPUs. The data shows it is 1.5% faster than the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile but 3% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is a key feature, ensuring that it will not run out of memory in modern games at high resolutions or in large 3D rendering scenes. With a TDP of 300 W, it is a power-hungry card, but its performance is commensurate with its consumption. This is a GPU that is well-suited for high-fidelity gaming and GPU-accelerated content creation, and it is the clear star of this system.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13490F

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds