SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13450HX + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13450HX

34,333 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13450HX and Intel Arc A570M form a mobile pairing that targets a specific performance tier within laptop computing. The data indicates a system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in their respective percentile standings, suggesting a balanced platform for both productivity and gaming. The CPU’s 84th percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs place this build in the upper mid-range of laptop performance, with a combined percentile of 86. This analysis relies exclusively on the benchmark scores provided, as no measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussions are therefore estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i5-13450HX and the Arc A570M is best understood by comparing their average benchmark scores and percentile positions. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 34333, placing it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, with an average score of 58239, sits at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The closeness of these two percentiles—a mere 4-point gap—indicates that neither component is dramatically overpowered or underpowered relative to the other in a general sense. This suggests a system where the CPU and GPU are capable of feeding each other without one creating a severe, constant bottleneck.

However, the nature of the workload changes which component becomes the limiting factor. For single-threaded or lightly threaded tasks, the CPU’s performance is strong, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1746. This high single-core capability ensures that the GPU is not starved of data in gaming scenarios that depend on a fast primary thread. In contrast, for massively parallel workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads can become the constraint, as the GPU’s compute capabilities, while respectable, are not in the same class as the CPU’s multi-threaded throughput. The data shows the CPU’s multi-core might through a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16797, which is a significant 862% higher than its single-core score, highlighting its parallel processing strengths.

The potential bottleneck shifts more decisively toward the GPU in high-resolution gaming. The Arc A570M’s memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory are adequate for 1080p, but at higher resolutions, the GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will likely be the limiting factor. The CPU’s performance headroom, as suggested by its 84th percentile ranking, means it is less likely to hold back the GPU at 1440p or 4K, where the rendering load is heavier. Conversely, in esports titles at low settings and high frame rates, the CPU’s single-core performance and the system’s overall balance become more critical, potentially making the CPU the primary driver of frame rates.

The PassMark test results further illustrate this balance. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 25084 and integer math score of 83209 are robust, while its floating-point math score of 61776 shows strong arithmetic capability. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239, which is competitive with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct of -0.3%), indicates that for compute-heavy tasks using the GPU, the Arc A570M can perform at a level that may outpace the CPU's own capabilities. This suggests a system where the GPU can handle parallel compute offload, but the CPU remains the central orchestrator, and the balance is generally harmonious.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance is characterized by a strong showing in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. In Cinebench R23, it scores 16797 points in multi-core and 1746 points in single-core. These scores place it in the 84th percentile, with its average score of 34333 being nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, which has an average score of 34260 (a deltaPct of 0.2%). This indicates that the mobile i5-13450HX performs on par with a previous-generation desktop Ryzen 7, a notable achievement for a laptop processor. The CPU’s average score also slightly edges out the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and the AMD EPYC 4244P, both at 34222 and 34220 respectively (deltaPct of 0.3%), while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H by a slight margin (34485, deltaPct of -0.4%).

The GPU’s benchmark performance is represented by a single Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, placing it in the 88th percentile. This score puts it in close competition with several high-end desktop graphics cards. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT by a negligible margin (58392, deltaPct of -0.3%) and the NVIDIA P102-100 by a similar amount (58528, deltaPct of -0.5%). It leads the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by a small margin (58085, deltaPct of 0.3%) and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 by a larger margin (58657, deltaPct of -0.7%). These close deltas suggest that the Arc A570M’s raw compute throughput is competitive with these established desktop parts, which is a strong indicator of its capability in GPU-accelerated workloads.

The combined picture is one of high-tier mobile performance. The CPU’s average score of 34333 and the GPU’s average score of 58239, when taken together, place this build at the 86th overall percentile. This is a system that can handle demanding tasks without compromise, though the data suggests it is not a top-of-the-line, halo product. The CPU’s performance is closer to its rivals than the GPU’s is, with the CPU’s closest rival being only 0.4% ahead, while the GPU’s closest rival is 0.3% ahead. This indicates that while both are strong performers, the GPU has a slight edge in relative standing compared to its competition.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination. Consequently, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations of expected performance. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, confirming the absence of empirical testing data.

Based on the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking and its OpenCL score of 58239, which is competitive with desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, the Arc A570M is capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming in most titles. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p ultra settings in many current games. However, for more demanding titles or those with high texture requirements, the 8 GB VRAM could become a limitation at higher resolutions. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1746 indicates that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, allowing the Arc A570M to perform to its potential.

At 1440p, the estimated performance would be lower, likely requiring a mix of high and medium settings to maintain playable frame rates. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS suggests it has the raw compute power for 1440p, but the memory subsystem may be a limiting factor. The 128-bit bus width and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards, which could impact performance in memory-intensive scenes. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the high single-core CPU performance and the GPU’s capabilities should allow for very high frame rates, even at 1080p with competitive settings.

For 4K gaming, the data suggests that this system would struggle. The GPU’s compute and memory bandwidth are not sufficient for consistent 4K performance in demanding titles, and the 8 GB VRAM would be a significant constraint. Users targeting 4K would likely need to significantly reduce graphical settings or rely on upscaling technologies. Overall, the estimated gaming performance is strong for 1080p and acceptable for 1440p, but not suited for high-end 4K gaming.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is designed for laptop users who need a balance of high CPU and GPU performance. The data indicates that it is suitable for gamers who primarily play at 1080p and want to experience high refresh rates. The CPU’s 84th percentile and GPU’s 88th percentile performance ensure that modern titles can be played with high settings without a significant bottleneck. This is also a compelling choice for content creators, such as video editors and 3D artists, who require strong multi-core CPU performance for rendering and encoding, as well as GPU acceleration for effects and compositing.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, which can accelerate compilation times and running virtual machines. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 25084 and data encryption score of 16632 are evidence of its strong throughput in these tasks. Students in engineering or computer science fields, who need a machine for both coding and occasional gaming, would find this system well-suited to their needs. Finally, small business workstations that require a mix of productivity applications, data analysis, and light content creation would benefit from this build’s balanced performance.

The system is not tailored for users who prioritize extreme multi-GPU performance or who need the absolute maximum CPU compute for heavy server-like workloads. The 55W TDP of the CPU and 75W TDP of the GPU indicate a power-constrained mobile environment, which is typical for laptops. Users who need a desktop-class workstation with unlimited power headroom should look elsewhere. The target user is one who wants a single, capable laptop for a wide range of tasks, from gaming to development to content creation, without sacrificing performance in any one area.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The CPU has a 20 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache, along with 80 KB per-core L1 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for CPU-attached devices. The chip includes an integrated UHD Graphics 710, although the system is expected to use the discrete Arc A570M for graphics.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16797 is 862% higher than its single-core score of 1746, demonstrating the effectiveness of its 10-core configuration. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25084 and integer math score of 83209 further confirm its strength in parallel processing. Its performance is comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, which has an average score of 34260, showing that this mobile chip can compete with older desktop parts. The single-core performance, while not as dominant, is still strong at 3553 in PassMark single-thread tests, which is sufficient for most gaming and general productivity tasks.

The CPU’s 84th percentile ranking means it outperforms 84% of all CPUs in the benchmark database. This places it in a high-performance tier, suitable for demanding applications. The data compression score of 305990 and extended instructions score of 19083 indicate its capability in data-intensive and modern instruction set workloads. The CPU’s 55W TDP is a defining characteristic, as it allows for strong performance in a laptop form factor, but also sets a power limit that affects sustained performance. The unlocked multiplier suggests overclocking potential, though this is typically limited in mobile platforms.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It features 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are substantial, with an FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS and an FP16 performance of 10.65 TFLOPS. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. The 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for ray-traced effects, although the overall performance in RT-heavy workloads will be limited by the GPU’s compute power. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places it at the 88th percentile, and its performance is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a high-end desktop GPU. This is a remarkable result for a mobile part and suggests that the Arc A570M can deliver desktop-class compute performance in a laptop.

The 8 GB VRAM is a double-edged sword. It is sufficient for 1080p and most 1440p gaming, but may be a limiting factor for 4K texturing or large 3D scenes. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, while adequate, is not exceptional, and may bottleneck performance in memory-intensive applications. The GPU’s 75W TDP indicates it is a power-efficient part, but this also caps its maximum performance. The data shows a GPU that is powerful for its class, but not a top-tier competitor to the highest-end desktop parts. Its performance is most comparable to upper-mid-range desktop GPUs from the previous generation.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming. The CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 1746) and the GPU’s high 88th percentile ranking should allow for frame rates that can take advantage of 144Hz or 165Hz monitors in most esports and many AAA titles. The close performance to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in OpenCL suggests that the GPU is not a bottleneck at this resolution.

Streaming: The 10-core, 16-thread CPU is capable of handling game encoding and streaming simultaneously. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16797 indicates that there is enough headroom for a software encoder (like x264) while gaming, or the user can leverage the GPU’s dedicated media encoders if available. The system’s balanced performance ensures that streaming does not significantly degrade game performance.

Video Editing: This build is an excellent choice for video editing. The CPU’s multi-core performance (PassMark multi-thread score of 25084) will accelerate timeline scrubbing and rendering, while the GPU’s 58239 OpenCL score can be used for effects, transitions, and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines with multiple layers.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the primary workhorse for CPU-based rendering, with its 16 threads providing a significant advantage. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16797 ensures that Blender, Maya, or Cinema 4D CPU renders will be reasonably fast. The GPU can also be used for GPU-accelerated rendering, and its OpenCL performance is competitive, allowing for hybrid rendering workflows.

Software Development: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads are ideal for compiling code, running build servers, and managing virtual machines. The PassMark data encryption score of 16632 and integer math score of 83209 are strong indicators of performance in these tasks. The system can handle large codebases and multiple development tools without stuttering.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks like word processing and web browsing, but its performance ensures that it will remain responsive for years. The CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark score of 3553) makes applications launch quickly, and the 84th percentile ranking means it can handle complex spreadsheets and data analysis with ease.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13450HX with the Intel Arc A570M in a laptop form factor. It represents a high-tier mobile configuration, with a combined percentile of 86. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a 55W TDP, and the GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6 part with a 75W TDP. The pairing is notable for its balance, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and the GPU at the 88th percentile, suggesting that neither component will consistently bottleneck the other. This is a system that is capable of handling a wide range of tasks, from high-refresh gaming to demanding content creation, and its overall tier is upper-mid-range to high-end for mobile platforms.

The CPU’s performance is comparable to desktop parts like the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, while the GPU’s performance is comparable to desktop parts like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. This indicates that, despite being a laptop, the system can deliver desktop-class performance in many scenarios. The build’s strength is its versatility, as it is not specialized for any one task but rather offers a high level of performance across the board. It is a premium configuration that should be considered for users who need a single, powerful machine for work and play.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-13450HX and Intel Arc A570M is 86, indicating it outperforms 86% of all tested system combinations.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its single-core performance?

A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 16797, which is approximately 862% higher than its single-core score of 1746, showing a strong emphasis on multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the closest rival to the Intel Arc A570M based on average benchmark scores?

A: The closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which has an average score of 58392, a deltaPct of -0.3% compared to the Arc A570M's score of 58239.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc A570M?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus width and a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, running at an effective speed of 14 Gbps.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the combination of the Intel Core i5-13450HX and Intel Arc A570M. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the socket for the Intel Core i5-13450HX?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket that is not upgradeable in a traditional desktop sense.

Q: What API support does the Intel Arc A570M provide?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, providing compatibility with modern game APIs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is built for the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable; the laptop's motherboard and processor are a single unit. The memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, but the type used is determined by the laptop manufacturer. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are used for the GPU and other high-speed devices, while the GPU itself connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This platform is designed for a fixed configuration, so the primary upgrade path for a user would be to increase the amount of system RAM or storage, assuming the laptop has accessible slots.

The power requirements are modest, with the CPU having a TDP of 55W and the GPU a TDP of 75W. This results in a combined maximum power draw of 130W for the two primary components, which is typical for a performance laptop. The suggested PSU is null, which is expected for a laptop, as the power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power supply and battery. A sensible next upgrade for this platform is to ensure the laptop has sufficient RAM (at least 16 GB, ideally 32 GB, given the CPU's 16 threads) and a fast NVMe SSD to complement the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support, minimizing any potential storage bottlenecks. The platform is a closed design, so future upgrades are limited to peripherals and external GPUs, if the laptop supports them.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13450HX + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13450HX

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds