SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13450HX + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13450HX

34,333 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It features 10 cores and 16 threads, operating at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration places the chip in the upper-midrange mobile segment, with a TDP of 55 W, making it suitable for performance-oriented laptops that still require reasonable power efficiency.

Benchmark results show a processor that is competitive with established desktop parts from previous generations. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16797 indicates strong sustained throughput for multi-threaded workloads, while the single-core score of 1746 reflects solid per-thread performance for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score drops to 8728 and single-core to 1232, which is consistent with the scaling pattern expected from a 10-core, 16-thread design. The older Cinebench R15 numbers (2503 multi-core, 248 single-core) follow the same trend.

The PassMark suite provides additional granularity. The multi-thread score of 25084 and single-thread score of 3553 show balanced performance across both metrics. Integer math reaches 83209, floating-point math hits 61776, and extended instructions score 19083, indicating robust computational capability for workloads that leverage SIMD and encryption instructions. Data compression scores 305990, which is particularly strong for archiving and data-heavy tasks. However, the prime number finding score of 83 is notably low, suggesting that the CPU's integer-heavy prime calculation path is not a strong point. Physics simulation scores 1504, and random string sorting reaches 31940.

The CPU's overall average benchmark score is 34333, placing it at the 84th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show how tightly clustered this performance tier is: the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X scores 34260 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222 (0.3% lower), the AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220 (0.3% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 34485 (0.4% higher). This means the i5-13450HX sits within a 0.7% performance band of four very different processors from different generations and market segments, which is remarkable given that the 3700X is a desktop part and the EPYC 4244P is a server chip. For real workloads, this means the i5-13450HX delivers performance comparable to a desktop Ryzen 7 3700X from the previous generation, which is a strong result for a mobile processor.

The memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel bus and ECC capability. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only) provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and discrete GPUs. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 serves as a fallback display solution, though the primary graphics workload will be handled by the discrete GPU in this build.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13450HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X?

A: The two processors are nearly identical in average benchmark score. The i5-13450HX scores 34333, while the 3700X scores 34260, a difference of only 0.2% in favor of the Intel part. This is notable because the 3700X is a desktop CPU, while the i5-13450HX is a mobile chip.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Arc A550M sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49737. This places it in the upper tier of graphics processors, roughly on par with high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations.

Q: Does the Arc A550M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 16 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which means it has hardware-accelerated ray tracing capability. The RT core count of 16 is substantial for a mobile GPU.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Arc A550M?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, with 14 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: How does the CPU perform in encryption workloads?

A: The PassMark data encryption score is 16632, while extended instructions score 19083. These numbers indicate solid AES and SIMD performance, which is relevant for VPNs, disk encryption, and secure communication workloads.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, which allows for overclocking. However, since this is a mobile processor on the Intel BGA 1964 socket, overclocking headroom is typically limited by laptop cooling and power delivery.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, which places the pairing in the top 15% of all CPU+GPU combinations. This indicates a well-matched system where both components contribute meaningfully to overall performance.

# Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the combination of the i5-13450HX and Arc A550M provides a strong foundation. The CPU's single-thread score of 3553 in PassMark ensures that game logic and physics updates are processed without bottlenecking the GPU, while the GPU's 86th percentile ranking indicates it can drive high frame rates at competitive settings. However, no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so exact frame rates cannot be stated.

Streaming while gaming benefits from the CPU's 16 threads and strong multi-thread score of 25084 in PassMark, which allows simultaneous encoding and gaming without severe degradation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16797 further supports this, as encoding workloads scale well with core count. The GPU's 16 RT cores can also offload some encoding tasks via hardware acceleration.

Video editing is a strong use case for this build. The CPU's multi-thread performance (8728 in Cinebench R20, 16797 in R23) handles timeline rendering and export tasks efficiently, while the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate effects, color grading, and GPU-accelerated encoding. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines with multiple effects layers.

3D rendering workloads will favor this system. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads provide substantial CPU-based rendering throughput, as evidenced by the Cinebench scores, while the GPU's compute capabilities (2048 shading units, 8.397 TFLOPS FP32) support GPU-accelerated renderers. The 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance is particularly relevant for applications that use mixed-precision compute.

Software development sees benefits from the CPU's balanced architecture. Compilation tasks, which are often multi-threaded, will leverage the 16 threads effectively, as indicated by the PassMark multi-thread score of 25084. The data compression score of 305990 speeds up package management and build artifact compression. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Student and office work is well-served by this configuration. The single-thread performance (3553 in PassMark single-thread) ensures snappy application launches and responsive document editing, while the GPU's capabilities are more than adequate for productivity applications. The 84th percentile CPU ranking means this system will not feel sluggish for general-purpose workloads.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i5-13450HX and Intel Arc A550M. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than empirical measurements.

Based on the CPU's 84th percentile ranking and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking, this system should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most modern titles. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p textures and moderate 1440p usage, though 4K gaming would likely require reduced settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 3553 suggests it can keep up with the GPU in most gaming scenarios without creating a CPU bottleneck.

For competitive esports titles, which are typically lighter on GPU load and more dependent on CPU single-thread performance, the i5-13450HX should excel. The high boost clock of 4.60 GHz and strong single-core Cinebench scores indicate responsive frame pacing. For AAA titles with heavy GPU demands, the Arc A550M's performance tier, as indicated by its proximity to the RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% lower) and RX 6900 XT (2.4% lower) in benchmark scores, suggests it can handle high settings at 1080p.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The i5-13450HX and Arc A550M are well-balanced for a mobile platform. The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile are closely aligned, meaning neither component dramatically outclasses the other. In CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation (PassMark physics score of 1504) and data compression, the processor will be the limiting factor. In GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering, the graphics card will determine performance.

The FPS scaling between the two components cannot be analyzed directly because no measured FPS data exists for this pairing. However, the benchmark scores suggest that at 1080p, the GPU may become the limiting factor in graphically intensive titles, while at lower resolutions or with reduced settings, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more relevant. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads provide ample multi-threading headroom for background tasks while gaming, reducing the likelihood of stutter from competing workloads.

The memory subsystem is a potential bottleneck point. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, and the GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. While the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for its performance class, it is lower than what high-end desktop GPUs typically offer. This may manifest as a limitation in memory-intensive games or at higher resolutions where texture streaming demands more bandwidth.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize 1080p and 1440p gaming with high settings, as the GPU's performance tier (86th percentile) is suited for these resolutions. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3553 PassMark) ensures that even CPU-intensive titles will run smoothly. Competitive gamers who play esports titles will benefit from the high boost clock and responsive frame pacing.

Content creators working with video editing will find the CPU's multi-thread performance (16797 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU's compute capabilities (8.397 TFLOPS FP32) well-suited for rendering and export tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines with moderate effects stacks.

Software developers will appreciate the 16 threads for compilation and the ECC memory support for reliability. The data compression score of 305990 accelerates build artifact handling. Students and small business users will find the system responsive for office applications, web browsing, and multitasking, with the GPU providing headroom for occasional photo editing or light video work.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13450HX achieves an average benchmark score of 34333, placing it at the 84th percentile among all CPUs. This puts it in a tight performance cluster with the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (34260, 0.2% lower), AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (34222, 0.3% lower), AMD EPYC 4244P (34220, 0.3% lower), and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H (34485, 0.4% higher). The differences are within 0.7% across all four rivals, meaning the i5-13450HX delivers performance that is effectively identical to these very different processors.

The Intel Arc A550M GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 49737, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, 0.4% higher), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, 0.5% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951, 2.4% higher), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, 2.6% lower). The GPU's position between the RX 6800 XT and RX 6900 XT, with the RTX 5070 Ti and RX Vega 64 very close by, indicates mobile GPU performance that rivals high-end desktop parts from recent generations.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85, reflecting a system where both components are in the upper quartile of their respective categories. The Geekbench scores for the GPU (49894 OpenCL, 49580 Vulkan) show consistent performance across different compute APIs, which is important for cross-platform compatibility in rendering and compute workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile platform, meaning the processor is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently. The system's memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing for flexibility in memory choice, though the dual-channel bus limits maximum bandwidth compared to quad-channel configurations. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, ensuring the graphics card has sufficient bandwidth.

The GPU has a TDP of 60 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, bringing the combined thermal package to approximately 115 W before accounting for other components. The GPU is marked as end-of-life in production status, which means it is no longer being manufactured, though it remains a capable performer at its 86th percentile ranking. The GPU also has no suggested PSU figure in the data, and its slot width is listed as IGP, indicating it is integrated into the laptop rather than a discrete card with a standard power connector.

For a sensible next upgrade, users would need to consider a full platform change since the BGA socket is not upgradeable. The GPU's end-of-life status suggests that future driver support may eventually taper off, though the DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support provide a solid software foundation. The CPU's active production status and 55 W TDP make it a good fit for laptops with adequate cooling, and the launch MSRP of $326 provides context for its performance tier.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13450HX with the Intel Arc A550M in a laptop configuration. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-HX part running at up to 4.60 GHz boost, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile chip with 2048 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 85 places this system in the top 15% of all CPU+GPU pairings, indicating that both components are well-matched and contribute meaningfully to overall performance.

The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile are closely aligned, suggesting a balanced system where neither component is severely bottlenecked by the other. The CPU's average benchmark score of 34333 and the GPU's 49737 place this build in the upper-midrange to high-end tier of laptop configurations. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the CPU's 16797 Cinebench R23 multi-core score combine to handle a wide range of workloads, from gaming to content creation.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus with 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute capabilities are substantial: 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio), a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s. These figures translate to strong performance in GPU-accelerated rendering, where the FP16 throughput can be leveraged for mixed-precision workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility for modern games and applications.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 49894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49580 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 49737. This places it at the 86th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% higher), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (0.5% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (2.4% higher), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (2.6% lower). The GPU's performance tier is particularly impressive given that it is a mobile part competing with high-end desktop GPUs from the previous generation. The 16 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features. The GPU is designated as end-of-life, but its performance remains competitive, and the 86th percentile ranking confirms it as a capable mobile graphics solution.