SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13450HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13450HX

34,333 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13450HX + Intel Arc A370M: Benchmark Analysis

This mobile pairing combines Intel's 13th-generation Raptor Lake-HX silicon with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete graphics, targeting the performance segment of the laptop market. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors tested, while the GPU reaches the 74th percentile among all graphics cards, placing the combined platform at the 79th percentile overall.

Balance and Bottleneck

The asymmetry between CPU and GPU performance tiers is the defining characteristic of this pairing. The Intel Core i5-13450HX delivers a PassMark multithread score of 25084, which places it within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (avg score 34260) and 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (avg score 34222) and AMD EPYC 4244P (avg score 34220). This is desktop-class compute in a mobile form factor. Meanwhile, the Arc A370M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 sits within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (avg score 29197) and within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (avg score 28874), the latter being a flagship mobile GPU of its generation.

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward: the GPU is the limiting factor for gaming and graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16797 and single-core score of 1746 indicate substantial headroom for feeding the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput. In gaming scenarios, the Arc A370M's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain frame rates well before the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads become saturated.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 305990 and integer math score of 83209 demonstrate strong compute capabilities that do not rely on the GPU. Tasks like software compilation, data processing, and virtualization will be CPU-bound, and the GPU will remain mostly idle. Conversely, 3D rendering, video encoding, and GPU-accelerated compute will be firmly GPU-bound, with the CPU waiting on the A370M's 1024 shading units.

The FPS scaling pattern across resolutions reinforces this imbalance. At lower resolutions, the CPU can feed more frames to the GPU, but the A370M's 64-bit memory interface and 4 GB VRAM capacity will create a hard ceiling. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the constraint, with the CPU's advantage in single-threaded tasks (PassMark single-thread score of 3553) providing diminishing returns.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13450HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU itself is not upgradeable in any conventional sense; the laptop's motherboard and cooling solution are designed around this specific processor. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing flexibility for system integrators to balance cost and performance. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a mobile platform and may appeal to workstation users who require data integrity.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a substantial amount of I/O bandwidth for a mobile processor. This enables high-speed connectivity for storage and peripherals, though the GPU itself connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the A370M's bandwidth requirements. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 serves as a fallback display output and power-saving option when the discrete GPU is not needed.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, while the GPU's TDP is 35 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 90 W before accounting for other components. This is modest for a performance laptop, suggesting that the system can be cooled adequately in a variety of chassis designs. No suggested PSU is listed, but the low combined power draw indicates that a standard laptop power adapter will suffice; there is no need for the high-wattage power supplies associated with desktop gaming systems.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform is limited by the BGA socket. Users cannot swap the CPU or GPU independently. The practical upgrade is to add more system memory if the laptop has available slots, or to replace the storage with a faster NVMe drive to leverage the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. For users who outgrow the A370M's graphics performance, the entire laptop would need to be replaced, as the GPU is also soldered and non-upgradeable.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It operates at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosts up to 4.60 GHz. The chip is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm², and it carries 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor is unlocked, allowing overclocking on supported platforms, and it was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $326.

The Cinebench R23 results paint a clear picture of its capabilities. The multicore score of 16797 indicates strong parallel performance, driven by the combination of performance and efficiency cores. The single-core score of 1746 demonstrates excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for legacy applications and lightly threaded workloads. The R15 scores (2503 multicore, 248 single-core) and R20 scores (8728 multicore, 1232 single-core) follow the expected scaling pattern across Cinebench versions.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into specific workload characteristics. The multithread score of 25084 aligns with the CPU's 16-thread configuration. The integer math score of 83209 and floating point math score of 61776 indicate strong arithmetic throughput, while the extended instructions score of 19083 shows capable SIMD processing. The data encryption score of 16632 and data compression score of 305990 suggest that the chip handles security and compression workloads efficiently. The physics score of 1504 and find prime numbers score of 83 are more modest, reflecting the CPU's architecture trade-offs.

The average benchmark score of 34333 places the i5-13450HX at the 84th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X trails by 0.2%, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 trails by 0.3%, the AMD EPYC 4244P trails by 0.3%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H leads by 0.4%. This clustering indicates that the i5-13450HX delivers performance on par with several desktop and mobile processors from different generations and vendors, making it a versatile choice for compute-bound tasks.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity but can tolerate modest GPU capabilities. Students in engineering, computer science, or data science programs will benefit from the processor's 16 threads and 20 MB L3 cache for compilation, simulation, and data analysis tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations where data corruption is unacceptable.

Software developers will find the CPU's performance compelling. The PassMark data compression score of 305990 and integer math score of 83209 indicate fast build times and responsive IDE performance. The single-thread score of 3553 ensures that code editors and analysis tools remain snappy, while the multithread score of 25084 accelerates parallel builds and test suites.

Small business workstations that run office productivity suites, manage databases, or process financial data will benefit from the CPU's compute headroom. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration, video playback, and light photo editing, though not for demanding 3D work.

Gamers targeting low-resolution or esports titles will find the A370M adequate for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in modern titles. Content creators working with 2D graphics, audio production, or light video editing can leverage the CPU's multicore performance, but 3D artists and video editors working with high-resolution footage will hit GPU limitations quickly.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The platform sits at the 79th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and the GPU at the 74th percentile among their respective categories.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i5-13450HX has an average benchmark score of 34333, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (34260), 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (34222) and AMD EPYC 4244P (34220), and 0.4% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H (34485).

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 35 W, for a combined 90 W thermal envelope.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on supported platforms.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of March 29, 2022.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz for 14 Gbps effective. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, delivering a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is the most significant limitation for modern gaming and rendering workloads. The 8 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the modest compute throughput will limit ray-traced performance. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current graphics APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's capabilities.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 indicate that the GPU performs close to several AMD discrete options. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (avg score 29197), which trails by 0.1%. The AMD FirePro W8000 (29211) also trails by 0.1%, while the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996) trails by 0.6%. Notably, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874) trails by 1%, which is surprising given that the 6800M is typically a much higher-tier GPU; this may reflect benchmark conditions or driver differences rather than raw performance equivalence.

For rendering workloads, the A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is adequate for entry-level 3D modeling and rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM will be a hard constraint for large scenes or high-resolution textures. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will also limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive operations like texture streaming and compute shaders.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The A370M can drive esports titles at high frame rates on low settings, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will cap performance in modern AAA games. Users should expect playable frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings, but not high-refresh experiences in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming while gaming, though the GPU's modest performance will require careful settings management to maintain smooth output. The i5-13450HX's single-thread score of 3553 ensures that streaming software remains responsive.

Video editing: The CPU's multicore performance (Cinebench R23 score of 16797) accelerates video encoding and decoding, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM will limit effects and color grading in high-resolution projects. Light 1080p editing is feasible, while 4K work will be constrained.

3D rendering: The A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient for entry-level rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause bottlenecks with complex scenes. The CPU can handle geometry and physics calculations, but GPU memory will be the limiting factor.

Software development: The CPU is the star here. The PassMark integer math score of 83209 and data compression score of 305990 accelerate compilation and build processes, while the 20 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for iterative workloads.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity, but the headroom ensures smooth multitasking. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking means that office suites, web browsing, and spreadsheet analysis will never strain the system, while the GPU handles 2D acceleration effortlessly.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13450HX, a 10-core Raptor Lake-HX processor, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation. The CPU was released in January 2023 with a launch MSRP of $326, while the GPU was released in March 2022 and is now end-of-life. The platform targets the performance segment of the mobile market, offering desktop-class CPU compute in a power-efficient package.

The combined 79th percentile ranking places this pairing above the majority of systems in the benchmark database, driven primarily by the CPU's strong 84th percentile showing. The GPU's 74th percentile is respectable but indicates that graphics performance is the weaker link. The 55 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP suggest a system that can deliver sustained performance in a thin-and-light chassis, though thermal design will ultimately determine real-world behavior.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13450HX achieves an average benchmark score of 34333, placing it at the 84th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Arc A370M achieves an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The combined platform ranks at the 79th percentile, reflecting a system where the CPU is the stronger component.

The CPU's nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (34260, 0.2% behind), AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (34222, 0.3% behind), AMD EPYC 4244P (34220, 0.3% behind), and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H (34485, 0.4% ahead). This indicates that the i5-13450HX delivers performance within a 0.7% band of four different processors from multiple generations and market segments.

The GPU's nearest rivals are similarly close: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, 0.1% ahead), AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1% behind). The A370M's position between these competitors suggests that it offers consistent performance across different API workloads, as evidenced by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The data shows that the GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraint in gaming scenarios. The 1024 shading units and 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles, but the VRAM capacity will limit texture quality and resolution scaling.

At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark score of 3553) will ensure that frame pacing remains consistent, but the GPU will cap frame rates in demanding titles. Esports and older games should run smoothly, while newer AAA releases will require reduced settings. At 1440p, the GPU's bandwidth and VRAM limitations will become more pronounced, and at 4K, the system will struggle to maintain playable frame rates except in the lightest titles.

The absence of measured FPS data means these are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's Vulkan score of 28673 and OpenCL score of 29676 suggest that API overhead is well-managed, which should translate to consistent frame delivery in titles that support modern graphics APIs. Users should expect a 1080p gaming experience with medium settings as the realistic ceiling for this pairing.