SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13450HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13450HX

34,333 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a mobile processor from the Core 13th Gen family, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node and a die size of 257 mm². It packs 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a high-core-count part for a laptop CPU, and the 55 W TDP classifies it as a performance-oriented mobile chip, though the platform's power delivery will ultimately shape sustained workloads.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, which indicates strong multi-threaded capability relative to the broader market. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 16,797 and single-core score of 1,746 show a balanced profile: the multicore result is roughly 9.6 times the single-core figure, reflecting efficient scaling across the 10 cores and 16 threads. The Cinebench R20 scores of 8,728 (multicore) and 1,232 (single-core) follow the same pattern. For real workloads, this means the i5-13450HX can handle heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with considerable ease, while the single-core performance remains competitive for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications.

The PassMark results add further nuance. The multithread score of 25,084 and single-thread score of 3,553 show strong aggregate throughput. More specifically, integer math at 83,209 and floating-point math at 61,776 demonstrate robust arithmetic capability, which is relevant for scientific computing and financial modeling. Data compression scores 305,990, indicating fast archival and file-handling operations, while data encryption at 16,632 suggests decent but not exceptional cryptographic throughput. The extended instructions score of 19,083 and find prime numbers score of 83 point to solid SIMD and algorithmic performance. The physics score of 1,504 and random string sorting score of 31,940 round out the picture, showing competent handling of simulation and sorting workloads.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-13450HX delivers an average benchmark score of 34,333. This is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (34,260), 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (34,222), and 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4244P (34,220). Meanwhile, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 34,485, which is 0.4% higher than the i5-13450HX. These deltas are marginal, meaning the i5-13450HX sits in a tightly contested performance band where no single rival has a decisive edge. In practice, this translates to near-parity with these alternatives across mixed workloads, with the Intel part's advantage lying in its combination of core count and clock speed rather than any architectural supremacy.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i5-13450HX and Intel Arc A350M. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for any game or resolution, so all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate expectations rather than empirical results.

The Arc A350M's benchmark scores provide the primary basis for gaming estimates. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and Vulkan score of 24,747 place the GPU at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. This suggests the A350M is capable of playable frame rates at 1080p for many titles, but it is not a high-end gaming part. The GPU's average benchmark score of 24,647 is within 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744) and 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763), while being 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442) and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24,277). These deltas indicate that the A350M performs in the range of older desktop GPUs and lower-tier mobile workstation GPUs, which aligns with expectations for a 4 GB entry-level discrete GPU.

Given the CPU's 84th percentile ranking and the GPU's 70th percentile ranking, the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios at typical resolutions. The i5-13450HX's strong single-thread score of 3,553 and multicore score of 25,084 on PassMark suggest it can feed frames efficiently to the GPU. However, the A350M's modest compute throughput (3.379 TFLOPS FP32) and limited memory bandwidth (112.0 GB/s over a 64-bit bus) will cap performance in graphically intensive titles. For esports and older games, 1080p high-refresh gaming is plausible, but for modern AAA releases at ultra settings, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS at 1080p. Since there is no measured data, these are estimates grounded in the benchmark deltas and should be verified by real-world testing.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU benchmark scores together paint a picture of a balanced-but-modest mobile platform. The i5-13450HX achieves an average benchmark score of 34,333, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The Arc A350M achieves an average benchmark score of 24,647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 77, which reflects a system that is above average overall but not exceptional in any single dimension.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16,797 is a strong indicator of productivity performance, while the single-core score of 1,746 ensures snappy single-threaded responsiveness. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 24,747 and OpenCL score of 24,546 are closely matched, suggesting consistent compute performance across different APIs. The delta between the GPU and its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744), is only -0.4%, meaning the A350M is essentially equivalent to that older desktop card in raw compute terms.

For the combined picture, the 77th percentile ranking indicates that this laptop configuration sits above the median of all tested systems. The CPU is clearly the stronger component, nearly matching the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X in average score (34,333 vs. 34,260, a 0.2% delta). The GPU, while not a standout, holds its own against the RX 590 and RTX A5000 Mobile, making it adequate for entry-level gaming and light GPU-accelerated workloads. This is a system designed more for CPU-bound productivity than for high-end gaming or professional GPU rendering.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core i5-13450HX ranks in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 84% of tested processors. This indicates strong multi-threaded capability, suitable for demanding productivity tasks like video editing and compilation.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A350M's average benchmark score of 24,647 is 0.4% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744) and 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763), but 0.8% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442) and 1.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24,277). This places it in the same performance class as those GPUs.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, which reflects a system that is above average overall. The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 70th percentile together indicate a configuration where the CPU is the stronger component.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores, not empirical frame-rate measurements.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation use cases where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and bandwidth?

A: The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is modest by modern standards and may limit performance in high-resolution textures or large datasets.

Q: How does the CPU's single-core performance compare to its multicore performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1,746, while the multicore score is 16,797, a roughly 9.6x ratio. This indicates efficient scaling across the 10 cores and 16 threads, making the CPU suitable for both single-threaded and heavily threaded workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this configuration. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 70th percentile ranking indicates that the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the A350M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance at higher resolutions and quality settings, regardless of the CPU's capability. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,553 and multicore score of 25,084 on PassMark mean it can handle game logic, physics, and AI calculations without holding back the GPU.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the i5-13450HX is the star, and the GPU plays a secondary role. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16,797 demonstrates that the CPU can sustain high throughput across all cores, which is essential for these tasks. The GPU's compute scores (OpenCL 24,546, Vulkan 24,747) are sufficient for light GPU acceleration but will not accelerate heavy rendering workloads significantly.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, can be inferred from the percentile gap. Since the GPU is 14 percentile points below the CPU, it is the limiting factor in frame rate generation. In CPU-heavy scenes with low graphical demand, the CPU could push higher FPS, but the GPU will cap the maximum frame rate. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenes, the CPU has ample headroom. This imbalance suggests that users prioritizing gaming should consider a stronger GPU, while those focusing on productivity will find the CPU more than adequate.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It packs 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 3.379 TFLOPS for FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio).

Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a clear limitation for modern games and GPU-accelerated workloads, as 4 GB VRAM can be exhausted by high-resolution textures or large datasets. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for data transfer, though it is narrower than the x16 interface found on higher-end GPUs.

The GPU's benchmark scores put it at the 70th percentile, with an average score of 24,647. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, scores 24,744, a delta of -0.4%, indicating the A350M is nearly identical in performance to that older desktop card. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24,763, a -0.5% delta, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24,442, a 0.8% delta, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24,277, a 1.5% delta. These comparisons show that the A350M is not a high-performance GPU by current standards; it is positioned at the entry level of discrete mobile graphics.

For rendering workloads, the 6 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for ray-traced effects, but the modest compute throughput (3.379 TFLOPS) will limit ray tracing performance. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support ensures compatibility with modern games that require DX12 features, while Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 cover cross-platform needs. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, meaning Intel has ceased production, which may affect driver support longevity. Overall, this GPU is suitable for esports, older titles, and light creative work, but it will struggle with AAA games at high settings and professional 3D rendering.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13450HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support adding a layer of reliability for workstation tasks. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and other peripherals, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is the practical limit for graphics.

The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 25 W, giving a combined power draw of 80 W for the two primary components. The suggested PSU is not specified for this GPU, but the low TDP values indicate that a modest power supply is sufficient for the platform. The integrated graphics, UHD Graphics 710, provides a fallback display output, though the discrete A350M is the primary GPU.

For a sensible next upgrade, the primary limitation is the GPU. Users seeking better gaming or GPU-accelerated performance would need to replace the entire laptop or seek an external GPU solution, as the mobile form factor precludes component swaps. Memory upgrades are possible if the laptop supports SODIMM modules, and storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives could improve load times. The CPU's active production status and strong benchmark standing mean it is not a bottleneck for most workloads, so upgrading other components would yield more benefit than replacing the processor. The platform's DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity ensure it is not obsolete, but the end-of-life status of the GPU suggests a future system replacement is the most viable path for major performance gains.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13450HX with the Intel Arc A350M in a laptop class configuration. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread mobile processor from the Raptor Lake-HX series, designed for high-performance laptops. The GPU is an entry-level discrete mobile graphics card with 4 GB of VRAM, also from Intel. The combined percentile of 77 places this system above average, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and the GPU at the 70th percentile.

This is not a flagship gaming laptop nor a workstation-class machine; it sits in the upper-midrange of laptop performance, with a strong CPU and a modest GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 34,333 places it just 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, a desktop processor, indicating that this laptop can handle desktop-class productivity workloads. The GPU's average score of 24,647 is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590, meaning it delivers playable but not high-end gaming performance.

The overall tier is defined by the 77th combined percentile, which suggests this system is suitable for users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity while accepting GPU limitations for gaming and graphics work. It is a balanced configuration in the sense that neither component is dramatically over- or under-powered relative to the other, but the CPU is clearly the stronger half. This makes the build ideal for students, developers, and professionals who need strong compute performance and occasional light gaming or GPU acceleration.

Who Should Build It

The target users for this CPU+GPU pairing are those who need strong CPU performance in a laptop form factor without requiring high-end gaming or GPU compute. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings will find the A350M adequate for esports and older titles, based on its 70th percentile ranking and comparability to the RX 590. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D modeling, or software development will benefit from the i5-13450HX's 84th percentile CPU ranking and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16,797, which indicates rapid rendering and compilation times.

Developers and data scientists will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 83,209 and floating-point score of 61,776, which support heavy computation. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU capable for coursework, while the GPU can handle light visualization tasks. Small business workstations that run productivity suites, database operations, or virtualization will leverage the CPU's multithread score of 25,084 and data compression score of 305,990. However, users whose primary need is gaming at high settings or professional GPU rendering should look elsewhere, as the A350M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are limiting factors.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,553 on PassMark ensures it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU's 70th percentile ranking and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance will cap FPS in graphically intensive titles. Esports games at 1080p should achieve high refresh rates, while AAA games will require medium-to-low settings for smooth play.

Streaming: The i5-13450HX's multicore score of 25,084 on PassMark provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming, but the GPU's modest compute and 4 GB VRAM may struggle with simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding. Dedicated encoding via the GPU is possible but may impact frame rates.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16,797 indicates fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing for 1080p and some 4K footage. The GPU's OpenCL score of 24,546 can accelerate effects and transitions, but the 4 GB VRAM limits work with large projects or high-resolution textures.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will benefit from the 10 cores and 16 threads, with the R23 multicore score of 16,797 providing solid performance for Blender or similar tools. GPU rendering is possible via the A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will constrain scene complexity and render times.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 83,209 and multithread score of 25,084 support fast compilation and testing. The data compression score of 305,990 speeds up build artifact handling, and the 20 MB L3 cache aids in large codebase navigation.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 3,553 ensures responsive application use, while the CPU's 84th percentile ranking guarantees smooth multitasking. The GPU is adequate for office graphics, presentations, and light creative work, making this a versatile laptop for academic and professional tasks.