SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13420H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13420H

18,511 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13420H and Intel Arc A350M form a laptop pairing that lands in the 71st percentile overall, a solid mid-range position for mobile computing. The CPU is the clear performance leader, with an average benchmark score of 18511 and a 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU, with an average score of 24647, sits at the 70th percentile. This combination prioritizes processor-heavy tasks like productivity and content creation over high-end gaming, where the 4 GB graphics memory and 64-bit bus width will be the primary constraints. The data indicates a capable, balanced system for mainstream users, but it is not a high-performance gaming rig.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation, and is fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The chip, designated DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and can boost up to 2200 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective. This configuration is paired with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a total bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

The graphics core comprises 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output pipelines. Crucially, it includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, a feature that brings hardware-accelerated ray tracing to this entry-level mobile segment. The GPU also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility with modern titles. Compute performance is rated at 3.379 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 6.758 TFLOPS for FP16, with a 2:1 ratio, while the pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s.

In benchmark terms, the Arc A350M scores 24546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24747 in Geekbench Vulkan. These results place it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs, a competitive position for a mobile part. The nearest rivals provide context: the AMD Radeon RX 590 scores 24744, which is 0.4% higher, while the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24763, 0.5% higher. Conversely, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24442, 0.8% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24277, 1.5% lower. This suggests the A350M performs essentially on par with a desktop RX 590, a remarkable feat for a 25 W mobile GPU, but it also means the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are the limiting factors for high-resolution textures and complex scenes.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, indicating a system that outperforms roughly 71% of all recorded configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score is 18511, while the GPU's is 24647. The CPU's single-thread performance in 3DMark is 948, and its 2-thread score is 1871. Scaling up, the 4-thread score is 3357, the 8-thread score is 4614, and the 16-thread score is 5518, with the max-thread score reaching 5587. In Cinebench, the R23 multicore score is 11084 and the single-core score is 1689, while the R20 multicore score is 6013 and single-core is 848.

These CPU figures paint a picture of a processor that scales well with thread count, but with diminishing returns after 8 threads, a classic sign of a hybrid architecture. The GPU's benchmark scores, while lower in absolute terms than a high-end desktop card, are consistent with its 70th percentile ranking. When viewed together, the data shows a system where the CPU is the dominant component in terms of relative performance. The CPU's 72nd percentile versus the GPU's 70th percentile suggests a near-balanced pairing, but the nature of the workloads will determine which component becomes the bottleneck. For tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that utilize the CPU's full 12 threads, the processor will be the workhorse, while the GPU handles graphics output and acceleration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13420H is a mobile processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture and codenamed Raptor Lake-H. It features 8 cores and 12 threads, a configuration that typically implies 4 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores, with the efficiency cores not supporting hyper-threading. The base clock is 2.10 GHz, which can boost up to 4.60 GHz under load. This is a 45 W TDP part, indicating it is designed for performance-oriented laptops rather than ultra-portables. The CPU is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node and uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket.

The cache hierarchy consists of an 80 KB L1 cache per core, a 2 MB L2 cache per core, and a 12 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, though the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. The processor also includes integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, which can serve as a fallback or for power-saving modes. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), providing fast connectivity for discrete GPUs and NVMe storage.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance. The Passmark multithread score is 17475, with integer math at 58156 and floating-point math at 42806. Data compression scores 209450, while encryption scores 11559. Extended instructions score 12897, and random string sorting scores 22045. The physics score is 1012, and finding prime numbers scores 52. Single-thread performance is solid as well, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3396. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 11084 is roughly 6.5 times the single-core score of 1689, demonstrating excellent scaling across the 12 threads.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-13420H is virtually indistinguishable from the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE, which has an average score of 18505 (0% delta), and the Intel Core i3-14100F, which scores 18519 (0% delta). It is slightly ahead of the Intel Core i3-13100, which scores 18380 (0.7% lower), and the Intel Core 7 360, which scores 18374 (0.7% lower). This places the 13420H squarely in the upper mid-range of mobile processors, offering performance that rivals many desktop parts from a generation ago.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13420H and the Intel Arc A350M is nuanced, with the bottleneck shifting depending on the workload. For CPU-intensive tasks such as data compression, encryption, and physics calculations, the processor is the clear workhorse. The Passmark data compression score of 209450 and the physics score of 1012 indicate a processor that can handle complex calculations with ease. In these scenarios, the GPU's role is minimal, and the CPU's 72nd percentile ranking ensures it will not be the limiting factor.

Conversely, for graphics-intensive workloads like 3D rendering or gaming, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. While the Arc A350M's 70th percentile is respectable, its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are restrictive. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings, but it will struggle with high-resolution textures or heavy anti-aliasing. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate, but it pales in comparison to desktop GPUs that can exceed 20 TFLOPS.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured for this exact combination, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 5518 suggests it can feed frames to the GPU without bottlenecking at lower resolutions. However, at higher resolutions where the GPU is fully saturated, the GPU's pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s will be the limiting factor. The data indicates a system where the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming and 3D rendering, while the CPU dominates in productivity and compute tasks. This is a common configuration for entry-level gaming laptops, where the CPU is over-provisioned relative to the GPU to ensure smooth multitasking performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is not suited for high-refresh gaming at 144Hz or above. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will limit frame rates, and the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is insufficient for pushing high frame rates at 1080p ultra settings. The CPU, however, with its 948 single-thread 3DMark score, is capable of handling the physics and game logic. Users should expect 60Hz gaming at 1080p with medium settings, but this is an estimate based on the GPU's 70th percentile and no measured FPS data exists.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads and strong multi-threaded performance (11084 in Cinebench R23) make it a capable encoder. The Passmark data compression score of 209450 indicates efficient handling of data streams. The GPU can assist with encoding via Intel Quick Sync, but its performance is secondary. This system can handle 1080p streaming while gaming, but the GPU may struggle with concurrent load.

Video Editing: The i5-13420H is well-suited for video editing, with a Passmark multithread score of 17475 and strong integer and floating-point math scores. The 12 MB L3 cache aids in handling large files. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing with basic effects, but 4K editing will be constrained. The system will handle timelines and exports smoothly, but rendering effects will be slow.

3D Rendering: This workload will be GPU-bound. The Arc A350M's 6 ray tracing cores and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide entry-level capability, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are severe limitations. The CPU's Cinebench R23 score of 11084 is excellent for CPU-based rendering, but GPU rendering will be slow. This is acceptable for hobbyists but not for professionals.

Software Development: The CPU excels here. The Passmark integer math score of 58156 and data compression score of 209450 indicate fast compilation and data processing. The 8 cores and 12 threads provide ample parallelism for build tools. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong choice for coders.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark 3396) ensures snappy application launches, while the GPU is more than sufficient for productivity applications. The 45 W TDP means it will run warm but is manageable in a laptop form factor. It is a competent, if slightly powerful, choice for students.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile is 71, meaning it outperforms 71% of all recorded systems in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE?

A: The Intel Core i5-13420H has an average benchmark score of 18511, which is exactly 0% different from the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE's score of 18505.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a total bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i5-13420H has 8 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this system in games?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all FPS figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's process node and transistor count?

A: The GPU is fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC and contains 7,200 million transistors.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is targeted at users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity tasks over raw gaming power. The Intel Core i5-13420H, with its 72nd percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11084, is an excellent choice for software developers who need fast compilation times, as evidenced by the Passmark integer math score of 58156. Content creators working with video editing will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded prowess, though they must accept the GPU's limitations for effects and 4K timelines.

Students and office workers will find this system more than capable for their needs, with the CPU's single-thread performance of 3396 in Passmark ensuring responsive everyday use. Small business workstations that handle data processing, encryption, and compression will benefit from the CPU's 209450 data compression score and 11559 encryption score. However, gamers should look elsewhere, as the 4 GB VRAM GPU is insufficient for modern titles at high settings. This is a builder's choice for a workstation that can do occasional light gaming, not a gaming laptop that can do occasional work.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i5-13420H with the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU is a 13th Gen Raptor Lake-H mobile processor with 8 cores and 12 threads, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 3 Mobile part with 768 shading units and 6 ray tracing cores. The system's combined percentile is 71, placing it in the upper-midrange of laptop configurations. The CPU's 72nd percentile and the GPU's 70th percentile indicate a well-matched pairing, though the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers. This is a balanced productivity-focused machine rather than a gaming beast.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's 70th percentile and its 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance, this system is estimated to handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will limit texture quality and may cause stuttering in games that require more than 4 GB of video memory. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (948 in 3DMark single-thread) ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p. At 1440p, the GPU will be severely constrained, and frame rates will drop significantly. Esports titles like League of Legends or CS:GO may achieve 60+ FPS at 1080p, but demanding AAA games will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS even at medium settings. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s means enabling ray tracing will substantially reduce performance. For users seeking a gaming machine, this is a secondary consideration; for those needing a portable workstation with light gaming ability, it is acceptable.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13420H + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13420H

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds