SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13400F + Intel Arc B580: A Mid-Range Desktop Pairing with Surprising Depth

This desktop build pairs Intel's 13th-generation mainstream processor with Intel's Battlemage-generation graphics card, creating a combination that lands at the 73rd percentile overall among all CPU+GPU pairings in the benchmark database. The CPU, a 10-core/16-thread Raptor Lake part, sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, an Arc B580 with 12 GB of VRAM, holds the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The pairing produces an average of 96.4 frames per second across the measured game suite at 1920x1080, which places it at rank 2860 out of 3732 tracked pairs — a solidly mid-pack result that reveals interesting dynamics between the processor and graphics card.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, featuring 10 physical cores and 16 threads. Its configuration splits between performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for feeding 16 threads in multithreaded workloads. The chip carries a 65 W TDP and is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking headroom is limited to whatever the motherboard allows within locked frequency limits.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a CPU that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark tests show a progression from 960 in single-thread to 1880 in 2-thread, 3459 in 4-thread, 5591 in 8-thread, and 7314 in 16-thread. The near-identical scores between 16-thread (7314) and max-thread (7307) indicate that 16 threads fully saturate the chip's capabilities. Cinebench R23 scores of 3191 single-core and 22604 multi-core demonstrate that this CPU is competitive in both lightly-threaded and heavily-parallel workloads. The multi-core figure is roughly 7 times the single-core score, showing strong scaling efficiency across the 16 threads.

The average benchmark score of 25292 places the i5-13400F at the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25284, 0% delta), Intel Core 5 120 (25362, -0.3% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25365, -0.3% delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25201, 0.4% delta). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the i5-13400F sits in a tightly-packed performance cluster where architectural differences translate to negligible real-world differences. The Passmark multi-thread score of 25032 and integer math score of 79942 suggest strong general-purpose compute capability, while the floating-point math score of 60539 indicates solid number-crunching for scientific or engineering workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation) using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 19,600 million transistors into a 272 mm² die. The GPU runs at a fixed 2670 MHz clock for both base and boost, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a substantial amount that supports high-resolution textures and compute workloads. The shader configuration includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 80 raster output units, and 20 ray tracing cores.

Compute performance is rated at 13.67 TFLOPS for FP32 and 27.34 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s. The 20 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects, though the absence of tensor cores means AI-accelerated features rely on other pathways. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs comprehensively. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, enabling high refresh rate and high resolution monitor configurations.

Benchmark scores show the Arc B580 achieving 3068 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 92821 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 109672 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score of 15748 and GPU compute score of 7729 place it at the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The average benchmark score of 23021 puts it in close competition with the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061, -0.2% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, 0.6% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172, -0.7% delta), and NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, -1% delta). These deltas suggest the Arc B580 trades blows with previous-generation high-end cards, landing between the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 in aggregate performance — an impressive result for a 190 W GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-13400F uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 modules or faster DDR5 kits depending on motherboard selection. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is forward-looking for storage and future GPU upgrades, though the Arc B580 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The motherboard platform can accommodate either memory type but not both simultaneously, so the choice must be made at build time.

The suggested PSU for this pairing is 450 W, which accounts for the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 190 W TDP, leaving headroom for drives, fans, and other components. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot design measuring 272 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 45 mm in width. For upgrades, the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means a future GPU could theoretically use the full 16 lanes at Gen 5 speeds, though current cards like the Arc B580 only utilize 8 lanes at Gen 4.

A sensible next upgrade could involve moving to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake part on the same socket, since the 1700 platform supports the full 13th-gen lineup. Alternatively, the DDR5 memory support allows for bandwidth-hungry workloads to benefit from faster RAM kits. The 450 W PSU recommendation suggests that upgrading to a more power-hungry GPU would require a PSU change, so the current headroom is adequate for this pairing but not for significant GPU upgrades. The locked multiplier on the CPU means overclocking is not an option, but the boost clock of 4.60 GHz is already respectable for gaming and productivity.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, the pairing delivers 143.3 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 148.3 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, and 341.6 FPS in Valorant, making it excellent for esports and competitive shooters at 1080p. The 148 FPS in Minecraft and 194 FPS in Roblox further confirm strong performance for lighter titles, though heavier games like Cyberpunk 2077 (42 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (40 FPS) fall short of high-refresh territory at ultra settings.

Streaming: The 16 threads of the i5-13400F provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 indicating strong parallel processing. The Passmark data encryption score of 16608 and extended instructions score of 19847 suggest the CPU can handle streaming overhead without significantly impacting gaming frame rates. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM allows for high-quality textures while running capture software.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance, evidenced by 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 and Geekbench multi-core score of 11068, supports smooth timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The GPU's 456 GB/s memory bandwidth and 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerate effects and color grading. Passmark floating-point math score of 60539 indicates strong number-crunching for video processing tasks.

3D rendering: Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8892 and R15 multi-core score of 2278 show the CPU handles rendering workloads well, while the GPU's 20 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering. The 27.34 TFLOPS FP16 performance is particularly relevant for AI-accelerated denoising and certain render engines. The 12 GB VRAM allows for complex scenes that exceed 8 GB GPU memory limits.

Software development: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads handle compilation workloads efficiently, with Passmark integer math score of 79942 and random string sorting score of 32076 indicating strong code-processing capability. The 20 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently-accessed code paths. Developer workloads that benefit from parallel builds will see good scaling, though the locked multiplier limits tuning headroom.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 960, Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191) ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The GPU's 709 Passmark G2D score supports smooth 2D desktop rendering and office productivity. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption low, and the 450 W PSU recommendation means this system won't strain typical office power infrastructure.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a pairing where the CPU generally outpaces the GPU in relative performance. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile while the GPU holds the 68th percentile, suggesting that in CPU-intensive workloads, the processor has headroom that the graphics card cannot fully utilize. However, the combined percentile of 73 indicates that the overall system performance lands between the two individual percentiles, reflecting a reasonably balanced pairing for most applications.

In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, many titles show frame rates that suggest GPU limitation — for example, Cyberpunk 2077 at 42 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 40 FPS are likely GPU-bound, while Counter-Strike 2 at 148.3 FPS and Valorant at 341.6 FPS indicate the CPU is delivering high frame rates that the GPU can sustain. At 3840x2160, the GPU bottleneck becomes more pronounced, with frame rates dropping significantly across all titles — Call of Duty: Warzone drops from 143.3 to 106.6 FPS, and Valorant drops from 341.6 to 231.9 FPS.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K in most games shows a near-linear relationship with pixel count, which is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios. For instance, Assetto Corsa goes from 90.6 to 62.4 to 36.2 FPS, and Doom from 109.1 to 70.6 to 40.8 FPS. This pattern confirms that the Arc B580 is the primary limiter at higher resolutions, while the i5-13400F maintains sufficient CPU throughput to avoid becoming a bottleneck at 1080p in most titles. The pair rank of 2860 out of 3732, with an average FPS of 96.4, places this build in the upper-middle tier of all tracked pairings.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13400F support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, meaning the CPU operates at stock frequencies only. The boost clock reaches 4.60 GHz without user adjustment.

Q: What memory types are compatible with this CPU?

A: The i5-13400F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, using a dual-channel memory bus. The motherboard choice determines which type is used, as they are not interchangeable on the same board.

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the Arc B580 have?

A: The GPU features 20 ray tracing cores, which provide dedicated hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in supported games and applications.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 450 W, which accounts for the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 190 W TDP, plus headroom for other components.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: No, the i5-13400F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output. The Arc B580 serves this role in this pairing.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Arc B580 provides 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth through its 192-bit memory bus with GDDR6 memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

Q: When was the GPU released?

A: The Intel Arc B580 was released on December 12, 2024, as part of the Battlemage (Arc 5) generation.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who primarily play at 1920x1080 and want high frame rates in competitive titles — the 341.6 FPS in Valorant and 148.3 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p are standout results. For 1440p gaming, the system remains viable in many titles, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 129.2 FPS and Roblox at 129 FPS, though demanding single-player games like Cyberpunk 2077 (32.4 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (30 FPS) will require settings adjustments.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 16 threads (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604) and the GPU's 12 GB VRAM for larger textures and scenes. The 20 RT cores provide ray-tracing acceleration for compatible render engines, while the 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute handles general GPU-accelerated tasks. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the Passmark integer math score of 79942 and the 20 MB L3 cache for performance-critical workflows.

Students and small business users building a general-purpose desktop will find this system capable for office applications, web browsing, and light photo editing, with the 65 W CPU TDP keeping power costs moderate. The dual-slot GPU and 450 W PSU requirement make this a straightforward build for standard ATX cases. However, users seeking 4K gaming performance should note that the system averages only 20-40 FPS in most demanding titles at 3840x2160, making it unsuitable for that resolution in modern AAA games.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13400F (Raptor Lake, 10 cores, 16 threads, 65 W TDP) with the Intel Arc B580 (Xe2-HPG Battlemage, 12 GB GDDR6, 190 W TDP). The CPU occupies the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 68th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 73. The system is designed for 1080p and 1440p gaming, content creation, and general productivity, with the CPU providing strong multithreaded performance and the GPU offering competitive rasterization and ray tracing capabilities.

The build class is desktop, meaning it uses standard desktop components with upgrade potential through the Socket 1700 platform. The CPU's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility in memory selection, while the PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures future compatibility with high-bandwidth devices. The overall tier is upper-mid-range, with the CPU outperforming the GPU in relative terms, making this a CPU-forward pairing that benefits from GPU upgrades in the future.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 25292, with standout results including Cinebench R23 multi-core at 22604, Geekbench multi-core at 11068, and Passmark multi-thread at 25032. The single-thread performance is also solid, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3191 and Passmark single-thread at 3634. The GPU's average benchmark score is 23021, led by Geekbench Vulkan at 109672 and Geekbench OpenCL at 92821, with 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3068.

When compared to nearest rivals, the CPU is effectively tied with AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (0% delta) and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (0.4% delta), while slightly trailing Intel Core 5 120 (-0.3% delta) and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (-0.3% delta). The GPU is similarly closely matched, with deltas ranging from -1% (NVIDIA P106-100) to 0.6% (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080), placing it between the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 in aggregate performance. The combined picture is a system that performs at the 73rd percentile overall, with the CPU leading the GPU in relative standing.

Gaming Performance

The measured frame rates at ultra settings, based on actual data, show a wide range of performance across different game types. At 1920x1080, esports titles excel: Valorant hits 341.6 FPS, CS:GO reaches 332 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 achieves 148.3 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 143.3 FPS. Casual and indie games also perform well, with Roblox at 194 FPS, Minecraft at 148 FPS, and Barony at 124.2 FPS. However, demanding AAA titles show limitations: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 42 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 40 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at only 22 FPS.

At 2560x1440, frame rates drop noticeably but remain playable in many titles. Valorant still hits 291.9 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 129.2 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 96 FPS. But demanding games struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 32.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 30 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 14 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with most titles falling below 40 FPS. Valorant remains playable at 231.9 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 (22.3 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (20 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (7 FPS) are not viable at ultra settings. The overall average of 96.4 FPS across all measured games at 1080p reflects the strong performance in lighter titles balanced against weaknesses in the most demanding games.