SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400F and Intel Arc A770 pairing represents a complete desktop platform that blends a high-thread-count CPU with a GPU that targets the upper percentile of graphics performance. According to the data, the combined build sits at the 84th percentile against all other pairings, indicating a system that is positioned for demanding workloads. However, the fact pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion must be framed as estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores rather than from direct system testing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i5-13400F and the Arc A770 presents a study in complementary strengths. The CPU’s benchmark profile shows a massive divergence between single-threaded and multithreaded performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 960 versus a max-thread score of 7307. That ratio of roughly 7.6x suggests the processor scales exceptionally well with additional cores, meaning heavily threaded workloads will utilize the full die effectively. The GPU, meanwhile, posts an average benchmark score of 68809 and sits at the 90th percentile among all GPUs, which places it far ahead of the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs. This disparity implies the GPU is the more powerful component relative to its own market, so in graphics-bound scenarios the Arc A770 should be the primary driver of performance.

Examining the CPU’s thread scaling further reveals where bottlenecks might emerge. The 3DMark 2-thread score is 1880, and the 4-thread score jumps to 3459, an increase of about 84%. Moving from 4 threads to 8 threads yields a score of 5591, a further 62% improvement. From 8 threads to 16 threads, the score rises to 7314, a more modest 31% gain, and the max-thread score of 7307 is essentially identical to the 16-thread result. This plateau indicates that the processor’s 10 cores and 16 threads are fully saturated by the 16-thread workload, and adding more parallel tasks would not yield additional performance. For gaming, where most titles utilize fewer than 8 threads, the CPU’s 8-thread score of 5591 will be the relevant figure, and that is substantially lower than the GPU’s relative strength.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, points to the GPU as the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The Arc A770’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are high-end specifications that should prevent memory capacity from being a bottleneck at high resolutions. However, the CPU’s single-thread score of 960 in 3DMark is not particularly strong for a modern desktop part, and this could constrain frame rates in esports titles or games with heavy physics simulations. The data suggests a balance where the GPU dominates in raw graphics throughput, but the CPU’s lower percentile ranking means it will likely cap maximum frame rates in lightweight titles, while the GPU handles the heavy lifting in visually intensive games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is built on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Raptor Lake architecture of the Core i5-13400F. This socket is a mature design, and the processor’s 65 W TDP is modest for a 10-core part, suggesting that most motherboards with adequate VRM cooling can handle it without issue. The memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility to reuse older memory or invest in newer technology. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class, and the lack of ECC support indicates this is aimed at consumer workloads rather than error-critical server tasks.

The PCIe implementation is notable: the CPU provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is ahead of many rivals and ensures the graphics card has access to high-bandwidth connectivity. The Arc A770 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, and the bandwidth available from Gen 5 should not bottleneck the GPU. For storage, the Gen 5 lanes could also support next-generation NVMe drives, though the fact pack does not specify how the remaining lanes are allocated.

The power delivery requirements are well-defined by the suggested PSU rating of 550 W for the GPU alone. The Arc A770’s 225 W TDP, combined with the CPU’s 65 W TDP, means a 550 W power supply provides headroom for the rest of the system components. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector, which is a standard configuration for mid-range to high-end cards. A sensible next upgrade path would be to increase memory capacity or move to faster DDR5 modules, since the CPU supports both types and the memory bandwidth is a potential limiting factor in some workloads. Given the GPU’s end-of-life production status, a future upgrade would likely target a newer generation graphics card, but the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with upcoming components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. The die size is 215 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and the multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not officially supported. The processor was released in January 2023 and remains in active production.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in multithreaded throughput but is more modest in single-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604 is strong, placing it in a competitive range for productivity tasks. The single-core score of 3191 in the same test is adequate but not exceptional. In Geekbench, the multicore score of 11068 and single-core score of 1996 follow the same pattern, with the multicore result being proportionally much higher.

The PassMark suite provides insights into specific workload types. The integer math score of 79942 is robust, while the floating-point math score of 60539 is somewhat lower, suggesting the processor handles integer-heavy tasks like database operations or encryption more efficiently than floating-point-heavy scientific calculations. The data compression score of 311364 is very high, indicating strong performance in file archiving and compression workloads. The data encryption score of 16608 and extended instructions score of 19847 show solid SIMD and cryptographic capabilities. The find prime numbers score of 83 is extremely low, which is typical for this type of test as it measures a very specific algorithmic pattern.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-13400F is tightly clustered. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS has an average score of 25284, which is essentially identical to the Intel part’s 25292, a 0% delta. The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D are also within 0.3% of the i5-13400F’s score. This indicates that in pure average benchmark terms, these processors are interchangeable, and the choice between them would come down to platform features or price rather than performance.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13400F have integrated graphics?

A: No. The fact pack lists the integratedGraphics field as null, and the "F" suffix in the model name typically indicates a processor without iGPU, so a discrete graphics card like the Arc A770 is mandatory for display output.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Arc A770?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, delivered through a 256-bit bus with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory running at an effective speed of 16 Gbps.

Q: Can the i5-13400F be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplierUnlocked field is false, meaning the clock multiplier is locked, and the base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz are the maximum officially supported frequencies.

Q: What is the production status of the Arc A770?

A: The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of October 2022 and a successor named Battlemage listed in the fact pack.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No. The eccMemory field is false, so the processor does not support error-correcting code memory, which limits its suitability for mission-critical server or workstation applications that require data integrity guarantees.

Q: What is the GPU’s transistor count?

A: The Arc A770 has 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter.

Q: How does the i5-13400F compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D?

A: The two processors have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with the Ryzen 5 5600X3D at 25365 and the i5-13400F at 25292, a delta of -0.3%, meaning performance is statistically indistinguishable in aggregate benchmarks.

Gaming Performance

The fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination, so the following figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. The Arc A770’s 90th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it is capable of high frame rates at 1440p and entry-level 4K gaming. The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate are strong indicators of rasterization performance. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 960 in 3DMark might become a limiting factor in esports titles like competitive shooters, where frame rates can exceed 200 FPS and the CPU has to feed the GPU with draw calls. The 8-thread score of 5591 suggests that modern games utilizing 8 threads will see adequate CPU performance, but not top-tier.

At 1440p, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most titles. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution textures and heavy post-processing effects. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is generous and should prevent texture-related stuttering in the latest AAA releases, which often require 10-12 GB at high settings. At 4K, the GPU’s 90th percentile ranking means it should handle many games at medium to high settings, but the estimated FPS will drop significantly compared to 1440p due to the pixel throughput requirements.

The Vulkan score of 94284 and OpenCL score of 109175 in Geekbench indicate strong compute performance, which can benefit games that use asynchronous compute or ray tracing. The GPU has 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, and while the fact pack does not provide RT-specific benchmark scores, the hardware presence suggests it can handle ray-traced effects at reduced resolutions or with upscaling. Overall, the estimated gaming performance is that of a high-end GPU paired with a mid-range CPU, where the GPU excels in visual quality and resolution scaling, but the CPU may cap frame rates in lower-resolution, high-refresh-rate scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The die contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 2100 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and the memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with an effective data rate of 16 Gbps.

The memory subsystem is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial amount of VRAM for the GPU’s class, and it positions the card well for content creation tasks that require large working sets, such as 4K video editing or complex 3D scene rendering. The pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s are high figures that translate to strong fill rates in rasterized games.

Compute performance is impressive on paper. The FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS is competitive with much more expensive cards, and the FP16 performance of 39.32 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio indicates strong support for mixed-precision workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with the 12_2 feature set, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers the modern graphics API landscape. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 and Vulkan score of 94284 are both strong, placing the GPU in the upper echelon of compute performance.

The benchmark scores show the GPU at the 90th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 68809. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA CMP 90HX with an average score of 69000 (a -0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 at 68562 (0.4% delta), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 69870 (-1.5% delta). These are professional or mining-focused cards, which suggests the Arc A770 sits in a performance tier above typical consumer mid-range GPUs. The production status is end-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage, so the architecture is mature but not the latest generation.

Who Should Build It

The intended user for this build is someone who prioritizes GPU compute and graphics performance over raw CPU grunt. Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolution will find the Arc A770’s 90th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM well-suited for modern titles with high-resolution textures. The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide enough processing power for gaming while also handling background tasks like streaming overlays or Discord without significant frame drops. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, which accelerate tasks like rendering previews, applying effects, or exporting final cuts. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604 ensures that CPU-based encoding or physics simulations are not a bottleneck.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s high integer math score of 79942 and multithreaded performance, while the GPU’s OpenCL support enables GPU-accelerated compute in scientific or data-processing applications. Students in engineering or computer science programs can use this build for coursework involving simulation, rendering, or machine learning, where the GPU’s FP16 performance of 39.32 TFLOPS is useful for training smaller models. Small business workstations that handle CAD, graphic design, or video production will find the combination capable, though the end-of-life status of the GPU may be a consideration for long-term procurement. The CPU’s 65 W TDP keeps power consumption manageable, making the overall system suitable for environments where energy efficiency is a concern.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13400F, a 10-core Raptor Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A770, a high-end Xe-HPG graphics card. The combined percentile ranking is 84th, indicating that this system outperforms the majority of desktop configurations in the benchmark database. The CPU is a mainstream part with a 65 W TDP and a launch MSRP of $196, while the GPU is a 225 W card with a launch MSRP of 329 USD. The combination targets the upper mid-range to high-end segment of the desktop market, with the GPU being the more dominant component in terms of its relative performance ranking.

The build class is desktop, which means it is intended for a stationary tower or workstation setup. The CPU’s socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes. The overall tier is high, driven primarily by the GPU’s 90th percentile position, while the CPU’s 77th percentile is respectable but not flagship-level. This is not a budget build, but it is also not an extreme enthusiast setup; it sits in a sweet spot where the GPU provides near-top-tier graphics performance while the CPU handles mainstream workloads with ample headroom.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores show a clear multithreaded advantage. The 3DMark 16-thread score is 7314, nearly identical to the max-thread score of 7307, indicating the processor is fully utilized at 16 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604 is a strong result for a 10-core part, while the single-core score of 3191 is adequate for everyday tasks. The Geekbench multicore score of 11068 and single-core score of 1996 follow the same pattern. The PassMark multithread score of 25032 and single-thread score of 3634 confirm that the CPU is roughly 7x faster in multithreaded workloads than single-threaded ones. The CPU’s percentile rank is 77th among all CPUs, and its average benchmark score is 25292.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are dominated by compute-oriented tests. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 is a modern rasterization benchmark, and while the number appears low relative to the CPU’s scores, it is measured on a different scale. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 and Vulkan score of 94284 are more directly comparable, and both place the GPU in the top 10% of all GPUs. The GPU’s percentile rank is 90th, with an average benchmark score of 68809.

The combined picture is one of a system where the GPU is the star performer. The CPU’s 77th percentile is good, but the GPU’s 90th percentile is excellent. In workloads that use both components, such as gaming, the GPU will drive the visual experience while the CPU provides adequate support. In pure CPU workloads like compilation or spreadsheet analysis, the i5-13400F performs well relative to its peers, but it does not reach the same relative heights as the GPU. The combined percentile of 84 reflects this balance, showing a system that is better than most but not at the absolute top.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 960 may limit frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU’s 90th percentile ranking can push very high FPS in less CPU-intensive games. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and its 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth support high settings with smooth frame delivery.

Streaming: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide enough headroom for encoding video while gaming, and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604 indicates the processor can handle the additional load without significant performance degradation.

Video editing: The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute accelerates effects rendering and export, while the 16 GB VRAM allows for large timelines with multiple 4K streams. The CPU’s high data compression score of 311364 helps with proxy file generation and archiving.

3D rendering: The GPU’s FP16 performance of 39.32 TFLOPS is particularly useful for render engines that support mixed-precision computation. The 32 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported applications, and the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handles complex scene geometry.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 79942 and multithreaded performance make it suitable for compiling large codebases. The GPU’s OpenCL support allows developers to offload parallel computations, and the 16 GB VRAM is ample for running virtual machines or local test environments.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3634 in PassMark is more than sufficient for productivity applications like spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsing. The GPU’s power is largely unused in these tasks, but the system’s overall responsiveness is high, and the CPU’s 65 W TDP keeps energy costs low.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400F

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds