SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400F + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400F

25,292 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i5-13400F and Intel Arc A580 pairing creates a desktop system where the CPU and GPU occupy distinctly different performance tiers, and the data shows neither component consistently dominates across all workloads. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 87th percentile among all graphics cards, placing the graphics solution slightly higher in its respective field. The combined system percentile of 82 reflects this balanced positioning, but the benchmark scores reveal where each component leads and where it yields.

The i5-13400F demonstrates strong multi-threaded scaling, moving from a 3dmark 2-thread score of 1880 up to 7314 at 16 threads, with the max-threads score of 7307 nearly identical to the 16-thread result. This indicates the 10-core, 16-thread configuration reaches its throughput ceiling at around 16 threads, and additional workload parallelism beyond that point yields negligible gains. The single-thread score of 960 in the same 3dmark suite shows the CPU's per-core capability is modest relative to its multi-thread might, which matters for lightly-threaded tasks like legacy software or certain game engines.

For gaming workloads, the GPU becomes the limiting factor in most scenarios because the Arc A580's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, while respectable, are paired with a CPU that can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them in many titles. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 and single-core score of 3191 suggest ample headroom for frame generation and physics calculations, but the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will cap frame rates at higher resolutions and quality settings. Conversely, in productivity tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 311364) or floating-point math (PassMark score of 60539), the CPU handles the heavy lifting, and the GPU's role diminishes.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload's nature. CPU-bound tasks — those relying on integer math (PassMark score of 79942), encryption (PassMark score of 16608), or physics simulation (PassMark score of 1437) — will see the i5-13400F as the primary constraint, though its 77th percentile ranking means it outperforms most processors. GPU-bound tasks, particularly 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, will hit the Arc A580's limits first, as evidenced by its 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, which sits below several rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (avg score 58392, 1.1% ahead) and the Intel Arc A570M (avg score 58239, 0.8% ahead).

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² die. Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that compares favorably to many mid-range competitors and supports high-texture workloads at 1080p and 1440p. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, while the GPU core operates between a 1700 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost clock.

The chip contains 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines, producing a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. These specifications translate to 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 2:1 ratio. The 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) workloads, with API support including Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6. The card connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and requires dual-slot cooling with 2x 8-pin power connectors, drawing 175 W TDP with a 450 W suggested PSU.

Benchmark results place the Arc A580 at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57756. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 indicates moderate DirectX 12 performance, while Geekbench scores of 91657 in OpenCL and 79381 in Vulkan show the card's compute capabilities are respectable for its class. The nearest rivals reveal a tight competitive cluster: the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (0.6% higher), the Intel Arc A570M scores 58239 (0.8% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392 (1.1% higher), while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE trails at 57367 (0.7% lower). This grouping suggests the Arc A580 performs within a narrow margin of several established cards, but the data shows it does not lead its immediate competition.

For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM capacity may constrain very large scenes or high-resolution textures, but the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth mitigates some of that limitation. The FP32 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS positions the card for 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p, while the ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated effects in supported titles, though the overall RT performance is not class-leading based on the benchmark scores.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 3191 in Cinebench R23 and 960 in 3dmark single-thread provides enough per-core performance for most game engines, but the GPU's 3dmark Steel Nomad score of 2229 and 87th percentile ranking suggest the Arc A580 will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings, while 1440p high-refresh gaming may require reduced settings to maintain smooth performance. The 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth support modern textures, but the card's compute throughput is not sufficient for maxed-out 1440p at very high refresh rates.

Streaming: The i5-13400F's 16 threads provide ample capacity for encoding and game capture simultaneously, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 indicating strong parallel processing. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 enables modern capture APIs, but the absence of a dedicated hardware encoder specification in the data means encoding duties would fall to the CPU, which has sufficient headroom based on its multi-thread scores.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 25032 and 3dmark 16-thread score of 7314 indicate strong performance for timeline operations and export tasks, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 91657 supports GPU-accelerated effects and rendering. The 8 GB VRAM may limit very complex compositions, but the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth helps with high-resolution footage. This pairing handles 1080p and moderate 4K editing workflows effectively.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8892 and R15 multi-core score of 2278 show solid CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 provide acceleration for supported renderers. The 24 ray tracing cores support RT workloads, but the card's 87th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer. Small-to-medium scenes render efficiently; large scenes may strain the 8 GB VRAM.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 79942 and data compression score of 311364 indicate strong compilation and data processing capability, while the 16 threads handle parallel build systems well. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, but the OpenCL score of 91657 supports compute workloads like machine learning inference or simulation. The 65 W CPU TDP (though the GPU draws 175 W) means the system runs efficiently in code-heavy environments.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3191, Geekbench single-core of 1996) handles productivity applications with ease, while the GPU's capabilities are overkill for typical office tasks. The 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are wasted on spreadsheet or document workloads, but the system's overall 82nd combined percentile means it will not struggle with any standard office or academic software.

# Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need a balanced system for both productivity and gaming without extreme demands in either direction. Gamers playing at 1080p with high settings will find the Arc A580's 87th percentile GPU performance sufficient, while the CPU's 77th percentile ensures no bottleneck in most titles. Content creators working with 1080p or moderate 1440p video, photo editing, or small 3D scenes benefit from the combination of the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's compute capabilities.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 79942 and multi-thread score of 25032, while students and small business workstations gain from the system's overall responsiveness without needing the extreme performance of higher-tier components. The CPU's DDR4 and DDR5 memory support (dual-channel) offers flexibility in system configuration, and the Intel Socket 1700 platform provides upgrade paths within the same generation.

The system is less suited for users who prioritize maximum gaming frame rates, as the GPU's nearest rivals (AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 1.1% higher average score) show the Arc A580 is not a top-tier gaming card. Similarly, professionals rendering massive 3D scenes or training large machine learning models may find the 8 GB VRAM limiting. This build serves the middle ground — a capable desktop for mixed workloads where neither the CPU nor GPU is the clear weak link.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename) using a 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. The base clock runs at 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption modest for a desktop part. Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3, providing substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 16 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported, and the processor uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3dmark suite demonstrates this progression: 1880 at 2 threads, 3459 at 4 threads, 5591 at 8 threads, and 7314 at 16 threads, with the max-threads score of 7307 confirming the ceiling. Single-thread performance in 3dmark is 960, while Geekbench single-core scores 1996 and multi-core scores 11068. Cinebench results are strong: R15 multi-core 2278 and single-core 321, R20 multi-core 8892 and single-core 1255, and R23 multi-core 22604 with single-core 3191.

The PassMark suite reveals workload-specific strengths. Data compression scores 311364, encryption 16608, extended instructions 19847, and floating-point math 60539, while integer math reaches 79942 and multi-thread performance hits 25032. The find-prime-numbers score of 83 and physics score of 1437 are lower, indicating weaker performance on certain algorithmic workloads. The random string sorting score of 32076 shows solid memory-bound performance. The average benchmark score of 25292 places the CPU at the 77th percentile among all processors, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (avg score 25284, 0% delta), Intel Core 5 120 (avg score 25362, 0.3% lower), AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (avg score 25365, 0.3% lower), and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (avg score 25201, 0.4% higher).

The launch MSRP is $196, and the processor remains in active production with a release date of 2023-01-03. The lack of integrated graphics (the "F" suffix) means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which the Arc A580 provides. For real workloads, the 10-core hybrid design (the data does not specify P-core/E-core split) delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for rendering, compilation, and content creation, while the 4.60 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded performance for everyday applications.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data. Therefore, all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as expectations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 87th percentile ranking and 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, the Arc A580 is positioned for 1080p gaming with high settings in most modern titles. The 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures, and the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute provides adequate pixel throughput. At 1440p, the card will likely require medium-to-high settings for playable frame rates, and 4K gaming is beyond the card's intended capability given its relative position to rivals like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which scores only 1.1% higher on average.

The CPU's gaming-relevant performance comes from its single-thread scores: 3dmark single-thread 960, Cinebench R23 single-core 3191, and Geekbench single-core 1996. These figures suggest the i5-13400F will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p in most titles, as the CPU's 77th percentile ranking indicates it outperforms the majority of processors. The 16 threads provide headroom for background tasks and modern games that utilize more cores, while the 20 MB L3 cache helps maintain data locality for game engines.

For competitive esports titles at 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the CPU's single-thread performance should allow high frame rates, but the GPU will ultimately determine the ceiling. For AAA single-player games at 1080p ultra settings, the Arc A580's 87th percentile position suggests playable performance, though the 0.6-1.1% gaps to its nearest rivals mean it sits at the bottom of its competitive cluster. The 175 W GPU TDP and 450 W suggested PSU indicate the system's power delivery is sufficient for sustained gaming sessions.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13400F achieves an average benchmark score of 25292, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS matches with 25284 (0% delta), the Intel Core 5 120 scores 25362 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25365 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201 (0.4% higher). This grouping indicates the i5-13400F performs within a 0.4% band of four other processors, showing that its multi-threaded performance is competitive but not class-leading.

The Intel Arc A580 achieves an average benchmark score of 57756, placing it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58085 (0.6% higher), the Intel Arc A570M at 58239 (0.8% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58392 (1.1% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE at 57367 (0.7% lower). The GPU's 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381 provide the core benchmark metrics.

The combined system percentile is 82, suggesting that the CPU+GPU pairing performs above average overall but below the top tier. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 87th percentile create a system where the GPU is relatively stronger, but the difference is not dramatic. The CPU's average benchmark score of 25292 is closely matched by its rivals, while the GPU's 57756 average score places it in a competitive cluster where the largest gap to a rival is 1.1%. Together, these components deliver a desktop system that handles most workloads competently, with the GPU providing slightly more relative performance than the CPU.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-13400F, a 10-core/16-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, and the Intel Arc A580, a DG2-512 GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 175 W TDP. The CPU's launch MSRP is $196, while the GPU has no listed launch MSRP in the data. The system targets the mid-range desktop segment, with the CPU at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 87th percentile among their respective categories, resulting in an 82nd combined percentile.

The pairing represents a balanced desktop configuration where the GPU is slightly more capable relative to its peers than the CPU. The CPU's 16 threads and 20 MB L3 cache handle multi-threaded productivity tasks effectively, while the GPU's 3072 shading units and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth deliver solid 1080p gaming performance. The system requires a discrete GPU (the CPU has no integrated graphics), which the Arc A580 provides. Power requirements include a 450 W suggested PSU, with the GPU drawing 175 W and the CPU drawing 65 W, though the data does not specify total system power draw.

This build fits users who want a desktop capable of both gaming and productivity without extreme performance demands. The 82nd combined percentile indicates the system outperforms most configurations, but the GPU's tight competitive cluster (within 1.1% of four rivals) and the CPU's 0.4% delta to its nearest rivals show that neither component breaks away from the pack. It is a sensible mid-range desktop, not a high-end enthusiast build.

# FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i5-13400F?

A: The CPU has 10 cores and 16 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A580 have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the Arc A580 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc A580 scores 57756 on average, with the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM 0.6% higher, the Intel Arc A570M 0.8% higher, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 1.1% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE 0.7% lower.

Q: What is the combined system percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, reflecting the CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 87th percentile.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the "F" in the i5-13400F indicates no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU (like the Arc A580) is required.

Q: What is the GPU's power draw and suggested PSU rating?

A: The Arc A580 has a 175 W TDP and the suggested PSU is 450 W.