SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is a compact desktop combination that lands in the 64th percentile overall — a solidly upper-mid-tier pairing built around efficient silicon rather than raw excess. The CPU contributes 10 cores and 16 threads on Intel's 10 nm Raptor Lake architecture with a modest 65 W TDP, while the GPU brings Blackwell 2.0 architecture on TSMC's 5 nm node with 8 GB of GDDR6 and a single 8-pin power connector. Neither part is a flagship, but the data shows a balanced pairing where the CPU's multi-core throughput (22950 in Cinebench R23) comfortably feeds a GPU that scores 17326 in PassMark G3D. An important note up front: this exact pairing has no measured frame-rate data in the benchmark database, so every FPS figure discussed below is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not a recorded result.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With the GPU sitting in the 66th percentile of all graphics cards and the CPU in the 62nd percentile, this combination is aimed squarely at 1080p high-refresh play. The RTX 5050's 13.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 320 GB/s of memory bandwidth are enough to push high frame rates at 1080p in most titles, and the CPU's 3240 single-core Cinebench R23 score indicates it can keep pace with frame delivery. At 1440p the GPU remains playable but the 128-bit bus and 8 GB framebuffer begin to bound headroom in demanding scenes.

Streaming. Streaming while gaming demands both a capable GPU encoder and spare CPU threads, and this pairing offers both. The RTX 5050's 80 tensor cores handle NVIDIA's encoding stack, offloading the stream from the CPU, while the i5-13400E's 16 threads leave room for OBS and chat overlays. With a 22950 multi-core R23 score, the CPU holds its own, though encode-heavy dual-PC setups will outpace it.

Video editing. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support give the CPU enough bandwidth for timeline scrubbing and preview playback in 1080p and light 4K work. The GPU contributes through 80 tensor cores and 20 RT cores, accelerating effects and export paths, but the Geekbench OpenCL score of 90334 places this firmly in enthusiast-editing territory rather than professional workstation class.

3D rendering. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 22950 puts the CPU ahead of rivals like the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (avg score 6647 versus 6638, effectively tied) — respectable for viewport work and small-to-medium renders. GPU rendering via the 9184 PassMark compute score and Vulkan score of 89381 is viable for previews, but 8 GB of VRAM limits large scenes.

Software development. Compilation, containerized workloads, and virtual machines scale with threads, and 16 threads with a 4.60 GHz boost clock handles medium-sized codebases without complaint. ECC memory support is a genuine bonus here for long-running build servers or reliability-sensitive environments.

Student and office work. For document work, browsing, video calls, and coursework, this pairing is overkill in the best way — the UHD Graphics 730 iGPU even provides a fallback display output if the discrete card is ever removed. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet under light load.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5050 is built on the GB207 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process, packing 16900 million transistors into a 149 mm² die — a density of 113.4M transistors per square millimetre. The specifications read as a modern entry-to-mid tier card: 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, 32 render output units, 20 RT cores, and 80 tensor cores.

Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective) for a total of 320 GB/s of bandwidth. That bandwidth figure is the practical ceiling for texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions — at 1080p it is comfortable, at 1440p it is workable, and at 4K it becomes the limiting factor alongside the framebuffer size.

Clocks are a 2317 MHz base and a 2572 MHz boost, delivering 13.17 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio (also 13.17 TFLOPS). Pixel fill rate is 82.30 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 205.8 GTexel/s. The API support is thoroughly current: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, with HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs for modern displays.

What do the benchmark numbers say? The PassMark G3D score of 17326 and the 66th percentile placement put the RTX 5050 within a hair of cards like the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153 average, a 0.6 percent gap in the RTX 5050's disfavor per its rival list) and effectively tied with the AMD Radeon HD 8970M. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 is the headline modern-gaming figure and defines the realistic ceiling: smooth 1080p ultra play in most current titles, with settings adjustments needed at 1440p in the heaviest games.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks tell a consistent story across Cinebench generations: 2313 multi-core and 326 single-core in R15, 9639 multi-core and 1360 single-core in R20, and 22950 multi-core and 3240 single-core in R23. The multi-core-to-single-core ratio shows a chip that scales well across its 16 threads while retaining strong per-core speed from the 4.60 GHz boost.

Against its nearest rivals by average benchmark score (6638), the i5-13400E sits essentially level with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (6647, a 0.1 percent gap), the Intel Core i9-9940X (6657, 0.3 percent ahead), the Intel Core i9-12900E (6611, 0.4 percent behind the i5), and — a statistical curiosity worth flagging — the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (6605, 0.5 percent behind). That Pentium proximity is an artifact of averaged mixed workloads in the database rather than a genuine equivalence; the R23 multi-core score of 22950 reflects far more real throughput than that average suggests for parallel tasks.

On the GPU side, the average benchmark score of 21035 across the test suite includes the Geekbench OpenCL result of 90334, Vulkan at 89381, PassMark G3D at 17326, PassMark GPU compute at 9184, and a spread of PassMark DirectX tests (186 in DX9, 150 in DX11, 103 in DX10, 66 in DX12). The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 64 — a coherent, balanced number given the CPU's 62nd and the GPU's 66th percentile placements individually.

The overall picture: a mid-tier system where neither component dramatically overshoots or undershoots the other, which is exactly what you want in a pre-built or self-assembled pairing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700, which supports this Raptor Lake-S chip and gives the build a defined upgrade lane within Intel's 13th-generation desktop family. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus — DDR5 is the forward-looking choice, and the CPU's ECC support adds a reliability option for workstation use.

For expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the RTX 5050 itself connects via PCIe 5.0 x8. That x8 link is not a practical bottleneck for this card class on a Gen 5 link, but it is worth knowing when the upgrade question arrives. A future graphics card upgrade to something substantially faster would still have a hosting platform ready for it, subject to the slot's lane configuration.

Power is where this build is genuinely easy to plan. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU a 130 W TDP, with NVIDIA suggesting a 300 W power supply for the RTX 5050. That suggested figure already accounts for a full system of this class, and the single 8-pin connector on a dual-slot card means no exotic cabling or case clearance requirements. The 300 W recommendation is conservative for the paired components — there is comfortable headroom, though anyone planning a future GPU upgrade should size the PSU for the new card rather than this one.

A sensible next upgrade, based strictly on the measured percentiles: the GPU first. At the 66th percentile versus the CPU's 62nd, the two are close, but GPU headroom delivers the most perceptible gaming improvement, and Socket 1700 keeps a CPU upgrade path open without touching the motherboard.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13400E is a 10-core, 16-thread part built on Intel's 10 nm process under the Raptor Lake architecture (codename Raptor Lake-S), released on 3 January 2023. It runs a 2.40 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.60 GHz. The core configuration produces the hybrid-style thread count (10 cores feeding 16 threads), and the cache hierarchy — 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 — gives multi-threaded workloads a comfortable working set.

The multiplier is locked, so this is not an overclocker's chip; the "E" designation and 65 W TDP point at efficiency-first deployments: compact desktops, small-form-factor builds, and always-on machines. The 215 mm² die is manufactured in-house by Intel.

In practical terms, the R23 single-core score of 3240 means snappy everyday responsiveness — application launches, browser tabs, and lightly threaded game logic all sit in the strong band for its generation. The multi-core score of 22950 means sustained parallel work (rendering, encoding, compiling) completes at a pace statistically tied with the Threadripper 2950X and i9-9940X on averaged database scores. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 is basic but functional as a troubleshooting fallback. One caveat: sustained all-core loads in a 65 W envelope will behave differently than in higher-TDP siblings, and the benchmark results reflect this chip's own measured envelope.

Who Should Build It

1080p gamers are the primary audience. The 66th-percentile GPU with 2502 in 3DMark Steel Nomad and a 62nd-percentile CPU behind it is a coherent 1080p ultra / 1440p medium machine.

Content creators on a measured scale — 1080p video editors, hobbyist 3D artists, and streamers — get 16 threads, 20 MB of L3 cache, tensor and RT core acceleration, and 8 GB of VRAM for previews and effects.

Software developers and students benefit from ECC support, dual-channel DDR5 compatibility, and multi-core throughput that rivals older HEDT silicon in the database averages. Compile times and VM workloads land right at the performance tier those averaged scores imply.

Small business workstations are arguably the sweet spot for the "E" chip: the 65 W TDP, ECC memory option, Socket 1700 platform, and quiet dual-slot GPU suit an office machine that occasionally handles rendering, CAD preview, or GPU compute (9184 PassMark compute score) without workstation-class power demands.

What this build is not: a 4K ultra gaming rig or a professional rendering box. The 8 GB framebuffer and 128-bit bus draw those lines clearly.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the benchmark database — the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` dataset is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. All frame-rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, and should be treated as such.

Working from the GPU's numbers — 17326 PassMark G3D, 2502 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 13.17 TFLOPS FP32, 320 GB/s bandwidth — the estimate profile is:

1080p ultra: high frame rates in the majority of current titles, with the CPU's 3240 R23 single-core score and 4.60 GHz boost capable of feeding the card without a significant CPU limit in most games.
1440p ultra: playable but settings-dependent; the 128-bit bus and 8 GB of GDDR6 begin to constrain texture-heavy scenes, so expectations shift toward adjusted settings for consistent smoothness.
4K: not the target. The bandwidth and framebuffer figures, plus the percentile placement, indicate settings reductions would be substantial.

These are estimates, not measurements. Anyone needing exact per-title numbers should wait for measured data for this specific pairing to appear in the database.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Core i5-13400E have?

A: 10 cores and 16 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture at a 10 nm process, with a 2.40 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clock.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5050 have, and is 8 GB enough?

A: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 320 GB/s of bandwidth. It is comfortable for 1080p ultra gaming and workable at 1440p with adjusted settings; heavier resolutions and large professional scenes will press against it.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: NVIDIA suggests a 300 W power supply for the RTX 5050, which covers this pairing given the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP with its single 8-pin connector.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No — the multiplier is locked. Performance tuning headroom is limited by design on this efficiency-focused part.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured frame-rate rows for this combination, so all FPS discussion on this page is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: Both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory supported — a notable option for reliability-focused workstation builds on Socket 1700.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 6638 sits within a fraction of a percent of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (6647), Intel Core i9-9940X (6657), Intel Core i9-12900E (6611), and Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (6605), while its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 reflects strong real parallel throughput.

Balance and Bottleneck

The headline numbers frame the balance question: CPU at the 62nd percentile, GPU at the 66th, combined at the 64th. This is one of the more evenly matched pairings in the database — a four-percentile spread between components is essentially a wash in practice.

At 1080p, the GPU is the first limit. In graphically demanding titles, the RTX 5050's 17326 G3D score and 2502 Steel Nomad result will saturate before the CPU's 16 threads or 3240 single-core R23 score do. That is the correct orientation for this class of build — the GPU defines the ceiling, and the CPU has room in reserve for background tasks, streaming, or heavier simulation.

At higher resolutions, the GPU limit deepens. Moving from 1080p toward 1440p shifts demand onto the 128-bit bus and 320 GB/s of bandwidth; CPU load actually drops as the frame rate falls, so the i5-13400E never becomes the constraint in GPU-bound scenarios.

In production workloads, the CPU and VRAM alternate as the limit. CPU rendering hits the 65 W TDP and 22950 R23 ceiling; GPU rendering and compute hit the 8 GB framebuffer and the 9184 PassMark compute score. Neither is dramatically ahead of the other, which is why the combined percentile (64) sits neatly between the two individual placements.

The practical verdict from the data: this pairing neither wastes the CPU behind an underpowered GPU nor starves a strong GPU with a weak processor. If a future upgrade targets one component, the GPU is the higher-leverage choice — but at stock, this is a well-balanced 1080p-first build with respectable creation capability on the side, and every frame-rate claim above should be read as a benchmark-derived estimate until measured data lands for this exact combination.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds