SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This system pairing brings together a 10-core Raptor Lake desktop processor and an Ada Lovelace mainstream GPU, targeting a balanced 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming experience. The data shows a combined percentile of 62, placing this configuration above the median of all tracked desktop builds, with both components landing within a similar performance tier. Because no measured frame-rate rows exist for this exact combination in the database, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component, not direct observations. The following analysis interprets the synthetic benchmark data to explain where this pairing excels, where it may struggle, and who should consider building it.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13400E and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is well-matched for typical gaming workloads, though the data reveals distinct limits for each component. The CPU holds a 62nd percentile position among all tracked processors, while the GPU sits at a 61st percentile among all GPUs, indicating that neither component dramatically outclasses the other in aggregate performance. The processor’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 shows substantial headroom for feeding the GPU in most scenarios, while the single-core score of 3240 ensures responsive frame pacing in titles that rely on one or two threads.

The RTX 4060’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 and Passmark G3D score of 19545 are solid for a mainstream card, but they do not suggest that the CPU will be the primary constraint in GPU-bound scenes. Benchmark data indicates that at ultra settings and 1080p, the GPU will typically become the limiting factor in graphically intensive games, as the CPU’s multi-threaded throughput is more than sufficient to sustain high frame rates. Conversely, in light e-sports titles or at lower resolutions where the GPU has spare capacity, the processor’s single-core score of 326 in Cinebench R15 and 1360 in R20 will determine the ceiling for frame rates, potentially capping performance before the GPU reaches full utilization.

The 10-core, 16-thread configuration with a 4.60 GHz boost clock provides a wide safety margin for background tasks while gaming, reducing the likelihood of stutter from system overhead. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 115 W TDP of the GPU create a power profile that suggests the system will not exhibit thermal throttling in standard ATX cases, but the GPU’s 300 W suggested PSU rating indicates that a modest power supply is adequate. The balance leans slightly toward the CPU being the stronger partner in CPU-light workloads, but for pure gaming, the RTX 4060 will be the component that decides visual quality and frame rate scaling.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, the following are estimates based on the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302, Passmark DirectX 12 score of 76, and the CPU’s Cinebench R23 scores. At 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 4060’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 272.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient to deliver playable frame rates in most AAA titles, likely ranging from 60 to 100 FPS depending on the game’s optimization. For competitive shooters like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2, the CPU’s single-core score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 suggests that frame rates could exceed 144 FPS at high settings, as these titles are typically CPU-bound at lower resolutions.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU will become the primary constraint, with the 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM and 128-bit bus width limiting performance in texture-heavy scenes. Estimated frame rates at 1440p would drop to the 40-70 FPS range for demanding titles, pushing the system into a territory where adjusting settings to high or medium becomes necessary for smooth gameplay. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 175 is notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 76, suggesting that the card performs relatively better in older APIs, which may benefit titles that have not adopted modern rendering pipelines.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 indicates that the i5-13400E will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, even in CPU-intensive open-world games that spawn many NPCs. However, in simulation games like Microsoft Flight Simulator or strategy titles that rely heavily on single-thread performance, the processor’s single-core scores will dictate frame rates more than the GPU’s raw throughput. For ray tracing workloads, the RTX 4060’s 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration, but the 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest, so expect significant frame rate drops when enabling full ray tracing at 1440p.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, using a 10 nm process node from Intel. The chip combines six performance cores and four efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, delivering a peak single-thread performance that is well-suited for gaming and responsiveness. The 20 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 per core provide adequate data locality for most workloads, though the 80 KB L1 per core is modest by modern standards.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950, which places the processor near the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Intel Core i9-9940X, with delta percentages of -0.1% and -0.3% respectively. This indicates that the i5-13400E offers multi-threaded performance comparable to older high-end HEDT processors, making it capable for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core score of 3240 in Cinebench R23 is stronger than the multi-threaded deltas suggest, showing that the architecture prioritizes frequency and IPC for lightly-threaded tasks.

The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop chip and valuable for workstation builds where data integrity is critical. The Intel UHD Graphics 730 integrated GPU provides a fallback for troubleshooting or basic display output, but it is not intended for gaming. The 65 W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 compatibility make this a straightforward drop-in upgrade for existing LGA1700 motherboards, though PCIe Gen 5 support is limited to 16 CPU lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU but not for multi-GPU configurations.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The combination of the i5-13400E’s single-core score of 3240 and the RTX 4060’s Passmark G3D score of 19545 suggests this system can drive 1080p monitors at 144 Hz or higher in competitive titles, provided settings are adjusted to medium or high. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p high textures, but frame rates will vary widely by title.

Streaming: The 16 threads of the processor provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 indicates strong parallel throughput. The GPU’s NVENC encoder is not detailed in the data, but the tensor cores and Ada architecture support hardware encoding, which would offload the CPU for better frame stability.

Video Editing: With a multi-core score comparable to the Threadripper 2950X, the i5-13400E can handle 1080p and 1440p video editing timelines with ease, while the RTX 4060’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 and 96 tensor cores accelerate effects and AI-based tools. The 20 MB L3 cache and 10 cores will keep export times reasonable, though the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may limit large 4K projects.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9639 demonstrates solid CPU rendering performance for Blender or similar applications, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 indicates it can handle GPU-accelerated rendering. The 24 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the 8 GB VRAM is a constraint for complex scenes.

Software Development: The 10 cores and 16 threads are well-suited for compiling code and running virtual machines, with the single-core performance ensuring responsive IDE interactions. The ECC memory support is a bonus for developers working on long-running processes where memory errors are unacceptable.

Student and Office Work: The integrated UHD Graphics 730 and 65 W TDP make this an efficient system for productivity tasks, with the CPU’s single-core score of 326 in Cinebench R15 ensuring snappy application launches. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, but the system will handle spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing without breaking a sweat.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 6638 places it in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X at a 0.1% higher average score of 6647. The Intel Core i9-9940X scores 6657, which is 0.3% higher, while the Intel Core i9-12900E scores 6611, which is 0.4% lower. These tight deltas show that the i5-13400E sits in a highly competitive performance band, offering near-identical multi-threaded performance to much more expensive older HEDT chips.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 17639 places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at a 0.2% higher average score of 17666. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, which is 0.3% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551, which is 0.5% lower. This positioning indicates that the RTX 4060 is a mainstream performer that sits just above the median, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 confirming its capability for modern DX12 titles.

The combined percentile of 62 for this pairing reflects a system that is slightly above average for desktop builds, with the CPU and GPU contributing nearly equal shares of the overall performance. The Passmark G3D score of 19545 is significantly higher than the average benchmark score, suggesting that the GPU performs better in rasterization workloads than in compute-heavy tasks, as indicated by the Passmark GPU Compute score of 9213. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 show strong compute performance for the GPU, though the DirectX 12 score of 76 remains the lowest of the Passmark DX benchmarks, hinting at potential driver optimizations needed in modern APIs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform provides a clear upgrade path, as the i5-13400E can be replaced with higher-tier Raptor Lake processors without changing the motherboard. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means that most LGA1700 motherboards with adequate VRM cooling can handle it, and the support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows for incremental memory upgrades. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes is forward-looking, though the RTX 4060 only uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so the bandwidth is not fully utilized in the current configuration.

The GPU’s 115 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU rating indicate that the power supply has ample headroom for future upgrades. A sensible next step would be to replace the RTX 4060 with a higher-tier GPU that uses the full PCIe Gen 5 bandwidth, though the 8-pin power connector on the current card may require an adapter for newer power supplies. The 1x 12-pin power connector on the RTX 4060 is a point of consideration, as it may not be compatible with older PSUs without an adapter, but the 300 W suggested PSU rating makes this a low-risk upgrade path.

The CPU’s 20 MB L3 cache and 10 cores provide a solid foundation for a multi-year build, and the ECC memory support is a unique feature that can be leveraged in workstation configurations. The motherboard choice will determine the memory speed and PCIe lane allocation, but the data shows that the i5-13400E does not require exotic cooling, as its 65 W TDP can be managed by a capable air cooler. For users seeking more GPU performance, the platform can accommodate it, but the 8 GB VRAM on the RTX 4060 may become the first bottleneck in future titles, so a GPU upgrade should be prioritized over a CPU upgrade.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for gamers who prioritize 1080p performance with high settings and are comfortable adjusting a few options to maintain frame rates above 60 FPS. The RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for current titles, and the CPU’s single-core performance ensures that competitive gamers can achieve high refresh rates in e-sports. Content creators who work with 1080p or 1440p footage will benefit from the 16 threads and the GPU’s tensor cores for AI-accelerated editing, though they should be aware of the VRAM limitation for 4K projects.

Software developers and students will find the ECC memory support and 10-core configuration valuable for long compile times and heavy multitasking, while the 65 W TDP makes this an energy-efficient choice for a workstation that runs all day. Small business users who need a reliable desktop for office work, light CAD, or database management will appreciate the combination of the integrated graphics for failover and the discrete GPU for occasional rendering tasks. The 62nd combined percentile means this is not a top-tier enthusiast build, but it is a well-rounded system that covers a broad range of use cases without significant weaknesses.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 62, which places this system above the median of all tracked desktop builds.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

A: The i5-13400E has an average benchmark score of 6638, which is 0.1% lower than the Threadripper 2950X’s score of 6647.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes, the RTX 4060 has 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4060?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s, using 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 4060?

A: The launch MSRP is 299 USD.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU rating for the RTX 4060 is 300 W.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the i5-13400E does not support overclocking.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 159 mm² and 18,900 million transistors. The GPU has a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, with memory running at 2125 MHz for an effective 17 Gbps, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 128-bit bus. The 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming with high textures, but it is a limiting factor for 1440p ultra settings or texture-heavy mods.

The shader configuration includes 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, yielding a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 15.11 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio, which is modest compared to higher-tier Ada GPUs but adequate for mainstream gaming. The 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and DLSS, though the data suggests that the card’s DirectX 12 performance (Passmark score of 76) lags behind its DirectX 11 performance (score of 175).

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 and Passmark G3D score of 19545 indicate that the GPU is a capable 1080p performer, with the Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 showing strong compute for non-gaming tasks. The GPU’s 61st percentile ranking places it near the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.2% higher) and AMD Radeon 780M (0.3% lower), showing that it is a solid mainstream option. The dual-slot design, 240 mm length, and 1x 12-pin power connector make it compatible with most cases, and the 300 W suggested PSU rating means it will run on modest power supplies. The production status is end-of-life, so builders should consider availability, but the GPU remains a viable choice for 1080p gaming and light 1440p workloads.