SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E and Intel Arc A750 combination represents a modern, balanced desktop pairing that targets 1080p and 1440p gaming alongside serious productivity workloads. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part, while the GPU is Intel’s Alchemist-generation Arc A750. Together, they occupy the 64th percentile against all desktop builds, placing them firmly in the upper-midrange tier of performance. This analysis draws strictly from benchmark data, with all gaming frame rates treated as estimates since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact configuration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel’s 10 nm process, featuring a die size of 215 mm². It provides 10 physical cores and 16 threads via a hybrid design, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This is a locked multiplier part, so overclocking is not supported, but the 65 W TDP makes it efficient for a desktop CPU.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 22950 multi-core and 3240 single-core. The single-core figure indicates brisk responsiveness for everyday tasks, while the multi-core result is substantial for rendering and compilation workloads. The average benchmark score across all tests is 6638, placing the CPU at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-13400E trades blows with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (6647, delta -0.1%) and the Intel Core i9-9940X (6657, delta -0.3%). It edges out the Intel Core i9-12900E (6611, delta 0.4%) and the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (6605, delta 0.5%). These deltas are tiny, meaning the i5-13400E is statistically identical to these processors in aggregate performance, despite being a more modern and lower-power part.

Real-world workload interpretation: the 22950 Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggests the CPU can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The 3240 single-core score ensures snappy UI interaction and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with gaming and data-heavy tasks. The Raptor Lake architecture also includes support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i5-13400E and the Arc A750 is typical of a midrange build: neither component is overwhelmingly dominant, but the CPU has a slight edge in processing headroom. The CPU’s 62nd percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile are closely matched, with the combined build at the 64th percentile. This alignment means that, in most workloads, both components will be utilized effectively without one idling while the other maxes out.

The CPU’s multi-threaded throughput (Cinebench R23 22950) is more than sufficient to feed the GPU’s rendering pipeline in gaming scenarios. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 17.20 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s indicate it can push frames quickly, but the CPU’s single-core score of 3240 ensures it can keep up with game logic and draw calls. In CPU-bound titles at lower resolutions, the i5-13400E will likely be the limiting factor, but at higher resolutions, the Arc A750 becomes the bottleneck, which is the expected behavior.

FPS scaling is not directly measured, but the benchmark scores suggest that the GPU will be the primary constraint at 1440p and above. At 1080p, the CPU’s 4.60 GHz boost clock and 16 threads provide ample margin. The combination of 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth on the GPU is adequate for modern textures, but heavier titles may exceed this capacity, causing the GPU to throttle. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 225 W TDP create a reasonable power envelope, with a suggested PSU of 550 W providing headroom for both components.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows consistent strength. Cinebench R15 scores are 2313 multi-core and 326 single-core. Cinebench R20 scores are 9639 multi-core and 1360 single-core. The R23 scores are 22950 and 3240, respectively. These numbers indicate scaling across versions, with multi-core performance improving proportionally to thread count. The average CPU score of 6638 and 62nd percentile place it just below the Threadripper 2950X and i9-9940X, but within a fraction of a percent.

The GPU’s benchmarks are more varied. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it scores 2612. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 98554 and 85631, respectively. Passmark tests show DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores of 65, 72, and 70, respectively, while DirectX 9 scores much higher at 181. The G2D score is 732, G3D is 12534, and GPU compute is 5368. The average GPU score is 20582, placing it at the 66th percentile. Nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570 (20556, delta 0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, delta 0.2%), AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, delta -0.4%), and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, delta 0.5%). The Arc A750 is effectively tied with these parts, showing it competes with a mobile RTX 3070 and a newer Intel B570.

The combined picture shows a build that sits at the 64th percentile overall, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all desktop configurations. The CPU and GPU are evenly matched, which is ideal for avoiding severe bottlenecks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13400E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, a rare feature for desktop CPUs, which appeals to small business workstations or entry-level servers. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe drives. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a fallback display output, useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without a discrete GPU.

The Arc A750 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot, though it will operate at Gen 4 speeds. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W PSU, which is a modest requirement for this performance class. The power connectors are 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin, so builders must ensure their PSU has these cables.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, since the CPU has headroom to support faster graphics cards. The 65 W TDP and 10 cores mean the CPU can drive a more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most games. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, though the current dual-channel setup is already solid. The platform is end-of-life for the Arc A750, but the CPU socket remains active, so a future CPU upgrade on the same motherboard is possible, albeit limited to 13th Gen or 14th Gen parts.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 66th percentile and the CPU’s 62nd percentile suggest a system capable of smooth 1080p gaming at high settings and playable 1440p gaming at medium-to-high settings.

In eSports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU’s 3240 single-core score and the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput would drive frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p, likely exceeding 200 FPS in lighter scenes. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth would handle most games, with expected averages around 60-90 FPS depending on optimization. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with estimates dropping to 45-70 FPS in demanding titles. The 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for RT effects, but the performance impact would be significant, so ray tracing at 1440p is best avoided unless using upscaling.

The DirectX 12 score of 70 in Passmark suggests solid DX12 performance, which is relevant for modern games. The Vulkan score of 85631 in Geekbench indicates strong Vulkan support, benefiting titles that use this API. The GPU also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, ensuring compatibility with the latest features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading. Overall, this build is best suited for 1080p gaming with high refresh rates, with 1440p being a compromise.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC’s 6 nm process, with a die size of 406 mm² and 21,700 million transistors. It features 3584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, with 28 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 2050 MHz and the boost clock is 2400 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s at an effective 16 Gbps speed.

Compute performance is substantial: FP32 is rated at 17.20 TFLOPS, and FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel and texture rates are 268.8 GPixel/s and 537.6 GTexel/s, respectively. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 indicates modern DX12 rendering capability, though it trails higher-end cards. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 shows strong general-purpose compute, which benefits rendering and machine learning tasks. The Passmark G3D score of 12534 is respectable, while the G2D score of 732 is modest, suggesting the GPU is not optimized for 2D desktop workloads.

The GPU’s 66th percentile places it above the RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, delta 0.2%) and the Arc B570 (20556, delta 0.1%), though the differences are negligible. The 28 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, but with only 8 GB VRAM, RT-heavy scenes may hit memory limits. The 512 GB/s bandwidth is ample for 1080p textures and moderate 1440p usage. The GPU is end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor, so driver maturity is a consideration, but the benchmark scores show it performs well in current tests.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s 3240 single-core score and the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 should deliver frame rates above 144 FPS in competitive titles, with the GPU’s 512 GB/s bandwidth preventing texture streaming bottlenecks.

Streaming: The 10-core, 16-thread CPU can handle encoding via software or hardware, while the GPU’s 98554 OpenCL score supports encoding offload. The 225 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP keep power draw manageable under load.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 assists with effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and light 4K work.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 20 MB L3 cache and 16 threads provide strong CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 5368 Passmark compute score offers GPU-accelerated previews. The 66th percentile GPU rank ensures competitive render times for mid-tier projects.

Software development: The 16 threads and 4.60 GHz boost clock speed up compilation and testing, with the 62nd CPU percentile indicating above-average performance for developer machines. The ECC memory support is a bonus for professional work.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 730 handles basic display tasks, while the discrete GPU is overkill but provides headroom for occasional gaming or creative projects. The 65 W CPU TDP and 225 W GPU TDP are efficient for a desktop.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400E scores 22950 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the Arc A750 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc A750’s average benchmark score is 20582, which is within 0.5% of the Intel Arc B570 (20556), RTX 3070 Mobile (20534), Radeon R9 M390X (20662), and Quadro M4000M (20480).

Q: Does this build support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the GPU capable of ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A750 includes 28 ray tracing cores, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit performance in ray-traced scenes at higher resolutions.

Q: What PSU is recommended for this build?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, with the GPU requiring 225 W and the CPU 65 W.

Q: Are there measured gaming FPS figures for this combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU pairing, so all gaming frame rates are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh-rate play and are willing to accept 1440p at medium settings. The CPU’s 62nd percentile and GPU’s 66th percentile make it a balanced choice for budget-conscious enthusiasts. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 22950 Cinebench R23 score and the GPU’s 98554 OpenCL compute performance. Software developers gain from the 16 threads and ECC memory support, making it a solid workstation for coding and testing. Students and office users will find the integrated graphics useful for daily tasks, while the discrete GPU provides future-proofing for entertainment. Small businesses needing a reliable desktop with ECC memory and moderate compute power will find this pair suitable. The build’s 64th combined percentile ensures it handles most workloads without significant compromise, though users demanding 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing should look elsewhere.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + Intel Arc A750

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds