SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

81 Score

Top 19% Ranking

81 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 19% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

78%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13400E

6,638 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13400E and Intel Arc A310 pairing represents a unique desktop configuration that prioritizes platform headroom and low power consumption over raw graphics muscle. The CPU is a substantial 10-core processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, while the GPU is a modest entry-level discrete card. This combination yields a system that is highly capable for productivity and CPU-intensive tasks, yet constrained in modern gaming and graphics workloads. The data indicates a balanced system in terms of its overall percentile ranking, but a closer look reveals a significant performance disparity between the processor and the graphics card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which houses the Core i5-13400E. This socket supports the 13th Gen Core series of processors, making it a viable base for a future CPU upgrade. The motherboard ecosystem for Socket 1700 offers flexibility in memory support, as the 13400E is compatible with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 modules or the higher-bandwidth DDR5 standard. The CPU itself supports dual-channel memory configurations, which is standard for desktop platforms and provides sufficient bandwidth for most workloads.

Connectivity is a strong point for the platform, with the CPU providing PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Specifically, it offers 16 lanes from the CPU, which is ideal for a high-end graphics card or NVMe storage. However, the Intel Arc A310 in this build utilizes a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, meaning it will run comfortably within the available lanes, leaving the Gen 5 bandwidth available for future expansion. The platform's power delivery is not a concern for this configuration. The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of just 30 watts, with a suggested power supply rating of 200 watts. This indicates that a modest, efficient power supply is sufficient, leaving significant headroom for upgrades.

Given this power headroom, a sensible next upgrade would be the graphics card. The platform can easily accommodate a much more powerful GPU without requiring a new power supply or motherboard. The data shows that the CPU is a strong performer, and it would not be the bottleneck in a system with a higher-tier graphics card. The 65-watt TDP of the CPU also leaves thermal headroom, meaning a capable air cooler is all that is required to manage temperatures, allowing for a quiet and efficient system. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for a consumer chip, suggesting it could be used in a small-scale workstation where data integrity is crucial.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the Intel Core i5-13400E?

A: The CPU sits at the 62nd percentile when compared to all CPUs in the database, placing it in the upper-midrange tier. Its average benchmark score of 6638 puts it in direct competition with processors like the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and the Intel Core i9-9940X.

Q: How much power does this entire platform require?

A: The combined power draw is remarkably low. The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 30 watts. Intel suggests a power supply of 200 watts for this GPU, indicating the entire system is very power-efficient.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A310 have enough video memory for modern games?

A: The graphics card is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. This is a limiting factor for modern games, especially at higher resolutions and detail settings, as many titles now require more memory for high-resolution textures.

Q: What kind of memory can be used with the i5-13400E?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory standards. It features a dual-channel memory bus, so builders can choose to install either two DDR4 or two DDR5 modules to take advantage of dual-channel operation.

Q: Is the CPU good for professional workloads?

A: Yes, the data shows it is quite capable. It scores 22950 points in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, which indicates strong multi-threaded performance suitable for rendering, video editing, and software compilation. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature often sought after for workstation stability.

Q: What is the manufacturer's market status for the Intel Arc A310?

A: The GPU is listed as "End-of-life" in its production status, with its successor being "Battlemage." This means it is the last of its generation and may see reduced availability over time.

Q: Does the processor have integrated graphics as a fallback?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13400E includes UHD Graphics 730. This integrated GPU is useful for troubleshooting or for basic display output if the discrete graphics card is not functioning, though it is not suitable for gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a substantial gap between the CPU and GPU capabilities. The Intel Core i5-13400E is a formidable processor, placing in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 6638 places it within 0.5% of rivals like the Intel Core i9-12900E and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. In the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, the CPU achieves an impressive 22950 points, demonstrating strong multi-threaded performance for demanding applications. Its single-core performance is also solid, with a score of 3240 in the same test, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks.

In stark contrast, the Intel Arc A310 is positioned much lower in the performance hierarchy. It sits in the 40th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 7550. This score puts it in the same performance class as the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, though the deltaPct shows the Arc A310 is about 1% ahead of that rival. The GPUs raw compute performance is limited, as evidenced by its Passmark G3D score of 5433 and its FP32 throughput of 2.688 TFLOPS. The combined picture is one of a system where the processor's potential is largely untapped due to the graphics card's limitations. The system's combined percentile is 51, which accurately reflects a build that is above average in CPU power but below average in GPU power, resulting in a mid-pack overall.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is not designed for hardcore gamers or high-end graphics professionals. Instead, it targets users whose primary workloads depend on CPU performance. Software developers will find the 10-core, 16-thread processor ideal for compiling code, running virtual machines, and managing multiple development containers. The high Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 indicates that compilation times will be short, and the ECC memory support adds a layer of stability for long-running build processes.

Students and small business users will appreciate the system's efficiency and responsiveness for office applications, spreadsheet analysis, and web development. The fast single-core score of 3240 ensures that everyday applications launch quickly and run smoothly. For content creators working with 2D graphics or light video editing, the CPU provides ample power for encoding and processing, though the GPU will limit the speed of effects-heavy work and 3D rendering. This is a build for users who need a powerful, reliable CPU for their daily work and only require entry-level discrete graphics for basic display output or light acceleration, rather than for high-end gaming or GPU compute tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a viable scenario for this build. The Arc A310's 40th percentile GPU ranking and 4 GB of VRAM place it in the entry-level class. The benchmark scores indicate it would struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles, making high-refresh-rate monitors a wasted investment.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped to handle the encoding workload required for streaming. With 10 cores and 16 threads, the i5-13400E can encode video without significantly impacting game performance. However, the GPU's low performance means the games being streamed would have to be visually modest or older titles, limiting the overall streaming experience.

Video Editing: The CPU is the star here. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 ensures that timeline scrubbing, rendering, and exporting will be efficient. The GPU can assist with some effects and decoding, but its 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance is too low to accelerate complex 3D effects or high-resolution color grading significantly.

3D Rendering: The CPU will handle CPU-based rendering engines very well, as the multi-core score suggests strong performance in ray-traced renders that rely on the processor. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A310's 768 shading units and 2.688 TFLOPS of compute performance will be a major bottleneck, resulting in very slow render times.

Software Development: This is an ideal workload for this build. The 10-core/16-thread CPU is excellent for parallel compilation, and the single-core performance ensures fast IDEs and tools. The GPU is sufficient for driving multiple 4K displays (via its 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs) for code and documentation, and the system's low power draw makes it a great always-on development machine.

Student and Office Work: The system excels here. The fast single-core performance (3240 in Cinebench R23) makes web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work feel instantaneous. The low TDP of both components (65W CPU and 30W GPU) means the system is quiet and energy-efficient, ideal for a dorm room or office environment.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination of the Intel Core i5-13400E and the Intel Arc A310. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than definitive results.

Based on the GPU's 40th percentile ranking and its performance class rivaling the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, the gaming experience will be restricted to 1080p resolution. The 4 GB VRAM will be a limiting factor in many modern titles, requiring lower texture quality settings to avoid stuttering. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or League of Legends may run at playable frame rates on low to medium settings, as they are not graphically demanding. However, AAA titles from recent years will likely require significant reductions in detail settings to achieve a stable 30 to 60 frames per second. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 29 and DirectX 11 score of 33 are low, suggesting that performance in modern graphics APIs will be particularly weak. The CPU will not be the limiting factor in games; its high single-core score of 3240 ensures it can feed frames to the GPU without bottlenecking. The bottleneck will clearly be the graphics card.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13400E is based on the Raptor Lake architecture and is built on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 215 mm². It is a 10-core processor, comprising a combination of performance and efficiency cores, which allows for 16 threads of processing power. The base clock is 2.40 GHz, which can boost up to 4.60 GHz for demanding single-threaded tasks. The CPU has a 65-watt TDP, making it a highly efficient part for its performance level. Cache is distributed with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache, which helps with multi-threaded workloads.

The benchmark scores confirm its position as a high-end mid-range processor. With an average score of 6638, it competes directly with the Intel Core i9-12900E and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, matching their performance within a 0.5% margin. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22950 highlights its strength in rendering and content creation, while the single-core score of 3240 ensures excellent performance in less parallelized tasks like gaming and general application responsiveness. The data indicates that for the vast majority of desktop workloads—from office productivity to software compilation—the 13400E provides more than enough processing power. Its locked multiplier means it is not intended for overclocking, but its stock performance is robust. This CPU is the clear workhorse of this build.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a powerful, high-core-count processor with an entry-level, low-profile graphics card. The Intel Core i5-13400E is a mainstream Raptor Lake processor, while the Intel Arc A310 is an Alchemist-series GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The system's combined percentile ranking is 51, placing it squarely in the middle of all possible configurations in the database. This overall tier is heavily influenced by the stark contrast between its components.

The CPU is a clear strength, ranking in the 62nd percentile, while the GPU is a relative weakness, ranking in the 40th percentile. This creates an unusual system that is far more capable in CPU-bound tasks than in GPU-bound ones. The GPU is a single-slot card that requires no external power connectors and has a TDP of just 30 watts, making it one of the most efficient discrete cards available. It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The pairing is best described as a "productivity-first" desktop with a discrete GPU for basic graphics acceleration and multi-monitor support, not a gaming machine. It is a build that leverages a top-tier CPU platform while keeping the graphics component minimal.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data paints a clear picture of system imbalance. The CPU is a high-performer, ranking in the 62nd percentile, while the GPU lags significantly in the 40th percentile. This indicates that the graphics card is the primary bottleneck in any workload that utilizes the GPU. In gaming, the CPU's strong single-core performance (3240 in Cinebench R23) will easily keep up with the demands of the game logic, but the GPU will be unable to render frames fast enough to utilize the CPU's full potential. The FPS will be limited by the GPU's fill rate and shader processing power. The 4 GB VRAM will also cause hitches in texture-heavy scenes.

Conversely, in CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering with a CPU-based engine, or software compilation, the bottleneck shifts. Here, the GPU is irrelevant, and the system's performance is dictated entirely by the CPU. The 22950 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates that the CPU will power through these tasks, while the GPU sits mostly idle. This means the system is effectively two different machines: a very capable workstation when the GPU is not involved, and a low-end gaming PC when it is. The balance is tilted heavily towards the CPU, and any upgrade path should prioritize replacing the GPU first to take full advantage of the platform's headroom.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13400E + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13400E

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds