SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the Intel Arc B570 forms a capable mid-range desktop foundation, evidenced by a combined percentile ranking of 72nd against all CPU-GPU pairings. The data indicates this is a system built for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and productive multitasking, with clear limitations emerging at 4K resolution. The pairing’s average FPS across all tested games stands at 86.5, placing it in the 3034th rank out of 3732 pairs, a position that highlights its strength in less demanding titles rather than absolute top-tier performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a 10-core, 16-thread processor built on the Alder Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 125W TDP. Benchmark data shows this chip in a tight competitive cluster, with its average benchmark score of 27799 placing it just 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-10900K and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE. This indicates that the 12600KF delivers performance nearly identical to these rivals, despite being from a different generation.

The CPU’s cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This configuration supports strong multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 23391 in multi-core and 3302 in single-core, demonstrating a robust balance between parallel throughput and single-thread responsiveness. The Geekbench scores of 12137 multi-core and 2157 single-core reinforce this, showing that the chip excels in both heavily threaded applications like video rendering and lightly threaded tasks such as gaming or office productivity.

The 3DMark thread scaling is particularly telling: it scores 7956 with 16 threads and 7952 with maximum threads, showing that performance scales nearly perfectly up to 16 threads. Interestingly, the 8-thread score is 6128, which is significantly lower than the 16-thread result, indicating that the two extra performance cores (beyond the 8 threads) provide a substantial boost. The single-thread score of 1016 and 2-thread score of 1995 highlight the efficiency of Alder Lake’s performance cores. Passmark results further detail the CPU’s nature: integer math scores 87830, floating-point math 67074, and extended instructions 22003, making it well-suited for scientific calculations and complex data processing. The data compression score of 343231 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance in file archival and database tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is a desktop graphics card based on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation), built on a 5 nm TSMC process. It features 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It includes 18 ray tracing cores, and while tensor core count is not specified, the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, indicating full modern API support.

Memory-wise, the card has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, with 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The clock speeds are listed at 2500 MHz base and boost, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). This configuration yields a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). For rendering, this translates to solid 1080p and 1440p capability, as shown in the gaming benchmarks. The GPU scores 14195 in Passmark G3D and 7281 in GPU compute, with a 65th percentile ranking against all GPUs.

The Arc B570’s average benchmark score of 20556 places it in a tight race with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% ahead) and the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% behind). This is a significant finding: the B570 matches a high-end laptop GPU and its own predecessor in raw compute, but the desktop context means it operates with fewer power constraints. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 is a modern benchmark, and Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 83514 and 96844 respectively show strong cross-API performance. The card’s 150W TDP and 1x 8-pin power connector make it efficient for its class, though the dual-slot design means case compatibility must be checked.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This offers flexibility for builders, allowing them to choose between older, more common DDR4 or newer DDR5 depending on motherboard choice and budget. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for a modern GPU and an NVMe SSD. The GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s lanes, though it means the card operates at half the electrical width of a x16 slot. In practice, this has minimal impact on gaming performance given the card’s tier.

The CPU has a 125W TDP, and the GPU has a 150W TDP with a suggested PSU of 450W. This indicates that a quality 450W power supply is sufficient for the entire system, leaving headroom for a modest overclock or additional drives. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is possible with a suitable Z-series motherboard and cooling solution, though the stock benchmarks already show strong performance. For a sensible next upgrade, users could consider increasing memory capacity or speed, or potentially moving to a higher-tier GPU if 4K gaming becomes a priority, though the current pair is well-matched for 1440p. The platform’s DDR5 support future-proofs the memory subsystem, and the PCIe Gen 4 lanes ensure compatibility with current high-speed storage.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, with the data showing excellent performance in esports titles. For example, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 293 FPS at 1080p, and Valorant at 304 FPS, making this ideal for competitive play. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 23391) and the GPU’s compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute 7281). Software developers compiling code will see strong integer math performance (87830 in Passmark), which accelerates build times. Students and small business users needing a versatile workstation for office tasks, web browsing, and light media creation will find this more than sufficient, given the high Passmark single-thread score of 3925.

The pairing is less suited for those seeking 4K gaming at maximum settings, as many titles drop below 30 FPS at that resolution (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077 at 19 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS). However, for users with 1080p or 1440p monitors, this build offers a balanced experience. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking and GPU’s 65th percentile ranking mean it sits above average in both categories, making it a sensible choice for mid-range builds. The unlock multiplier on the CPU also appeals to enthusiasts who want to tweak performance, while the GPU’s modern API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate) ensures compatibility with upcoming games.

Balance and Bottleneck

Analyzing the bottleneck dynamics, the CPU appears to be the stronger component relative to its peers. With a 79th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 65th percentile, the CPU is more capable in its respective market segment. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-FPS esports gaming at 1080p, the GPU may become the limiting factor. Evidence for this is seen in games like Valorant, where the 1080p score is 304 FPS, but this is likely constrained by the GPU’s rendering capabilities rather than the CPU’s processing power, given the CPU’s high single-thread score.

Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. At 4K, the average FPS across games drops significantly, with many titles falling below 30 FPS (e.g., Ark: Survival Ascended at 6 FPS, Control at 28 FPS). The CPU, with its strong multi-threading, is not the limiting factor here; the GPU’s 380 GB/s bandwidth and 10 GB VRAM are insufficient for maximum settings at 4K in demanding titles. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows a consistent pattern: a roughly 30-40% drop in FPS from 1080p to 1440p, and another 40-50% drop from 1440p to 4K across most games. This is classic GPU-bound behavior, confirming that the Arc B570 is the primary constraint at higher resolutions.

In mixed workloads, such as streaming while gaming, the CPU’s 16 threads provide ample headroom. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7956 indicates that the CPU can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously without significant frame drops. The balance is therefore well-suited for 1080p gaming, where the CPU has headroom and the GPU is the primary driver, but less balanced at 4K where the GPU is overwhelmed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27799, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. It is closely matched with its nearest rivals, being 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-10900K and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE. This level of performance makes it a strong contender for its generation, handling both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks effectively. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% behind the Intel Arc A750, showing that it sits at a performance parity with these cards.

When combined, the pair achieves a combined percentile of 72, and the measured FPS across games averages 86.5. This combined score reflects a system that excels in less demanding games but struggles with AAA titles at high resolutions. For instance, the pair achieves 152 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone at 1080p, but only 36 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2 at the same resolution. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score for the GPU is 2649, which is a modern benchmark indicating solid DX12 performance. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 scores (9824 multi-core, 1386 single-core) reinforce its capability in rendering workloads. Overall, the data shows a CPU that punches above its weight class and a GPU that is competitive with mid-range options, resulting in a pair that delivers strong 1080p and decent 1440p performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system delivers excellent frame rates in competitive titles. Valorant hits 304 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 293 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay on high-refresh monitors. In more demanding esports like Call of Duty: Warzone, the 152 FPS at 1080p is still well above the 144Hz threshold, making this a strong choice for fast-paced shooters.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and high 3DMark 16-thread score of 7956 provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. Games like Fortnite at 64 FPS at 1080p leave CPU resources available for streaming software, ensuring a stable broadcast without sacrificing playable frame rates.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23391 and Geekbench multi-core of 12137 indicate strong performance in video rendering. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 380 GB/s bandwidth assist with effects and timeline scrubbing. For 1080p editing, this system will handle most projects efficiently, though 4K editing may require proxy workflows.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 18 ray tracing cores and 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance support real-time rendering in applications like Blender or Unreal Engine. The Passmark GPU compute score of 7281 shows solid compute capability, while the CPU’s multi-threaded scores accelerate CPU-based rendering tasks.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 87830 and data compression score of 343231 indicate strong performance in code compilation and data processing. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, making this a responsive development machine.

Student and office work: The Passmark single-thread score of 3925 ensures snappy response in office applications and web browsing. For multitasking across documents, spreadsheets, and browsers, the 16 threads provide smooth operation, and the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for 2D workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-12600KF and Intel Arc B570. The CPU, as a 12th-generation Alder Lake processor, sits in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms roughly 79% of available processors. The GPU, as a Battlemage-generation card, sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Together, they achieve a combined percentile of 72, meaning this pairing outperforms 72% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

The pair’s average FPS across games is 86.5, with a rank of 3034 out of 3732 pairs. This places it in the upper echelon but not the top tier, reflecting its strength in mid-range gaming. The system is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with clear limitations at 4K. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier and the GPU’s modern feature set (DirectX 12 Ultimate, ray tracing) make this a future-proof platform for the next few years, though users seeking maximum 4K performance would need a more powerful GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance compared to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27799, which is 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-10900K (score 27872) and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE (score 27712).

Q: How does the GPU's average score compare to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, which is 0.1% behind the Intel Arc A750 (score 20582).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 72, meaning this pairing outperforms 72% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this build?

A: The average FPS across all games is 86.5, placing the pair at rank 3034 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc B570 has 18 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes hardware ray tracing.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility for system builders.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B570 is 450W, with the GPU itself having a 150W TDP.