SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Performance Analysis: Intel Core i5-12600KF + Intel Arc A750

This pairing combines Intel's 12th-generation Alder Lake desktop processor with Intel's Arc A750 discrete graphics card, creating an all-Intel desktop build. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussion below is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct game testing. The CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 66th percentile among all graphics cards, with a combined percentile of 73 for this desktop configuration.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Since no measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark results in the FACT PACK. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12,534 places it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs, which suggests solid 1080p and capable 1440p gaming performance, though not flagship-tier frame rates at 4K ultra settings. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,016 and multi-thread score of 7,956 indicate strong gaming foundations, as modern titles typically rely heavily on single-core performance for game logic while scaling across multiple cores for physics and AI.

At 1080p ultra settings, the estimated frame rates would likely be constrained more by the GPU than the CPU, given that the Arc A750's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are respectable mid-range figures. The GPU's DirectX 12 PassMark score of 70 and Vulkan score of 85,631 from Geekbench suggest modern API support is solid, which matters for DX12 and Vulkan titles that leverage async compute and explicit multi-adapter features. For esports titles and older games, the CPU's high single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,016, Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,302) would allow the GPU to stretch toward higher frame rates, potentially exceeding 100 FPS in less demanding games at 1080p.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the more significant factor, with the Arc A750's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus providing 512.0 GB/s bandwidth — sufficient for most titles at this resolution, though texture-heavy games may approach the VRAM limit. The estimated frame rates would likely land in the 50-80 FPS range for AAA titles at high settings, based on the GPU's benchmark positioning near the Intel Arc B570 (0.1% delta) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.2% delta). At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM capacity and mid-range compute throughput would likely yield playable but not ideal frame rates, perhaps 30-50 FPS on medium-to-high settings in demanding games.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 reflects modern API performance, and combined with the CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,956, the pairing should handle competitive gaming well at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors — though the estimated FPS in the most demanding new releases would likely fall short of 144 Hz at maximum settings. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,925 reinforces that frame pacing and minimum frame rates should be stable, which is often more important than average FPS for perceived smoothness.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,016 and 2-thread score of 1,995 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in esports and competitive titles. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12,534 at the 66th percentile suggests the Arc A750 can drive 1080p displays at refresh rates around 100-144 Hz in less demanding games, though the most graphically intensive AAA titles would likely cap out lower.

Streaming: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 27,575 and 3DMark max-threads score of 7,952 indicate that x264 encoding at medium presets should be feasible alongside gaming, though the GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores (null value) means hardware-accelerated AI-based encoding features are not available from the FACT PACK data.

Video editing: Content creators working in Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, or similar applications would benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core performance — Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,391 and Geekbench multicore score of 12,137 — for export and rendering tasks. The GPU's 28 ray tracing cores and 3,584 shading units provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading, while the 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with 4K timeline scrubbing and preview rendering.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9,824 positions it well for CPU-based rendering in Blender or Maya, while the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance enable GPU-accelerated rendering in supported applications. The 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity for GPU rendering, but the 256-bit memory bus helps maintain throughput on moderately sized scenes.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 343,231 and integer math score of 87,830 suggest strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and database workloads. The 20 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample caching for large codebases, while the 16 threads handle parallel build processes efficiently. The GPU's OpenCL score of 98,554 from Geekbench indicates reasonable compute capability for developers working on GPU-accelerated applications.

Student and office work: This configuration is substantially overkill for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work — the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,925 means everyday applications will feel extremely responsive, and the GPU's 2D performance (PassMark G2D score of 732) handles desktop composition and video playback without strain. The 125W CPU TDP and 225W GPU TDP mean power consumption is moderate, though not as efficient as lower-tier alternatives.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a reasonably balanced pairing, with the CPU slightly outperforming the GPU in relative terms. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 66th percentile means the Arc A750 is more likely to be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU compute and memory bandwidth become critical. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM capacity at 256-bit bus width provides 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but could constrain texture detail at 4K.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as low-resolution gaming with high frame rate targets, the i5-12600KF's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,016 and 2-thread score of 1,995 would allow it to feed the GPU effectively without becoming a bottleneck. However, the PassMark physics score of 1,539 and find prime numbers score of 91 indicate that some physics-heavy workloads may not scale perfectly with the hybrid core arrangement — though the 10-core, 16-thread configuration with 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores (inferred from the architecture) handles most gaming physics loads competently.

The FPS scaling pattern implied by the benchmark scores suggests that at 1080p, the CPU's headroom would allow the GPU to reach its maximum potential, while at 1440p and 4K, the GPU's compute throughput (17.20 TFLOPS FP32) and memory bandwidth (512.0 GB/s) would become the primary constraints. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27,799 versus the GPU's average of 20,582 reinforces this imbalance — the CPU has roughly 35% more raw compute headroom relative to its percentile position, meaning GPU upgrades would yield more gaming performance gains than CPU upgrades.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory selection — though the FACT PACK does not specify which memory type this particular configuration uses. The dual-channel memory bus and 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only) provide adequate bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and NVMe storage. The CPU's 125W TDP and the GPU's 225W TDP suggest a 550W PSU is recommended by the suggestedPsu field, leaving some headroom for additional components.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 79th percentile ranking means it has substantial headroom to drive higher-tier graphics cards. The Arc A750's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is fully supported by the CPU's 20 Gen 4 lanes, and the 550W PSU recommendation could accommodate a GPU with similar or slightly higher power requirements, though a PSU upgrade would be necessary for significantly more power-hungry cards. The CPU's unlocked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: true) allows overclocking to extract additional performance without changing the platform.

Memory upgrades represent another viable path — the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, and the memory bandwidth available to the system depends on the chosen memory type and speed. The 20 MB shared L3 cache mitigates some memory latency concerns, but faster memory could improve performance in bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The platform's production status is "Active" for the CPU, though the GPU is "End-of-life" with the successor being Battlemage, so future GPU upgrades would move to Intel's next-generation architecture.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It features a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 125W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The "KF" suffix indicates the absence of integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a well-rounded mid-range-to-upper-mid-range processor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,391 and single-core score of 3,302 demonstrate strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The 3DMark thread scaling from 2-thread (1,995) to 16-thread (7,956) to max-threads (7,952) shows near-linear scaling up to 8 threads, then plateauing — this suggests the 10-core, 16-thread configuration efficiently handles common gaming and productivity workloads. The Geekbench multicore score of 12,137 and single-core score of 2,157 reinforce the balanced performance profile.

The PassMark results are particularly informative: integer math at 87,830, floating-point math at 67,074, and extended instructions at 22,003 indicate strong general-purpose compute. The data encryption score of 18,445 and data compression score of 343,231 show capable cryptographic and compression throughput, which matters for file archiving, database operations, and secure communications. The random string sorting score of 35,602 indicates solid memory-bound performance. However, the find prime numbers score of 91 is notably low, suggesting the hybrid core arrangement may not optimize integer-heavy single-threaded loops as effectively as some rivals.

The CPU's nearest rivals are informative: it sits within 0.3% of the Intel Core i9-10900K (average score 27,872), the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE (27,712), the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (27,887), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (27,896). This means the i5-12600KF trades blows with a previous-generation flagship (i9-10900K) and a highly regarded gaming CPU (5800X3D), which is impressive for a mid-range i5 part.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It features 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, 112 raster output units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU runs at a base clock of 2050 MHz and boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The compute specifications include 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), with pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it has full support for modern graphics APIs including ray tracing and mesh shaders. The 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the performance level is mid-range.

The benchmark results position the Arc A750 at the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with a PassMark G3D score of 12,534 and an average benchmark score of 20,582. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 indicates modern DX12 performance is reasonable. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 and Vulkan score of 85,631 show solid compute and graphics API performance. The PassMark DirectX scores are notably varied: DirectX 9 at 181, DirectX 10 at 65, DirectX 11 at 72, and DirectX 12 at 70 — this could indicate driver overhead in older APIs, a known consideration for Intel Arc GPUs.

The GPU's nearest rivals are telling: it is within 0.5% of the Intel Arc B570 (20,556 average score), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534), the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20,662), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20,480). This places the Arc A750 in the same performance tier as a mid-range current-gen Intel GPU and a previous-gen NVIDIA mobile GPU, suggesting desktop-class performance that competes with mid-range offerings from other vendors.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27,799, which places it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Notable individual scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 23,391, single-core at 3,302, Geekbench multicore at 12,137, single-core at 2,157, and PassMark multithread at 27,575. The 3DMark scores range from 1,016 (single-thread) to 7,956 (16-thread), showing consistent scaling across thread counts. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, scores 27,872 on average, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the i5-12600KF is essentially tied with a previous-generation flagship.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20,582, placing it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. The PassMark G3D score of 12,534 is the most comprehensive gaming-oriented metric, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 reflects modern API performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 and Vulkan score of 85,631 indicate strong compute capabilities. The nearest rival, the Intel Arc B570, scores 20,556 on average (0.1% delta), making these two GPUs effectively identical in synthetic performance.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU in relative terms — the CPU's 79th percentile versus the GPU's 66th percentile. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this mid-range-to-upper-mid-range positioning. The CPU's average score is 35% higher than the GPU's (27,799 vs 20,582), which means in balanced workloads, the CPU will often be waiting on the GPU. For gaming, this is generally good — it means the GPU is the limiting factor, and the CPU has headroom to handle background tasks, streaming, or voice chat without impacting frame rates. For compute workloads that use both CPU and GPU, the system would be better balanced if the GPU were more powerful.

FAQ

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A750 GPU features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores based on the Xe-HPG architecture, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What memory types can this CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The specific memory type used in a build depends on the motherboard chosen for the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked (multiplierUnlocked: true), allowing overclocking of the 10-core, 16-thread processor beyond its 4.90 GHz boost clock, provided adequate cooling and motherboard VRM support are available.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU rating for the Intel Arc A750 GPU is 550W, which accounts for the GPU's 225W TDP and the CPU's 125W TDP, leaving headroom for other components such as storage and cooling.

Q: How does this CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-10900K?

A: The i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27,799, which is 0.3% lower than the i9-10900K's score of 27,872. This means the two processors perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks, despite the i5 being a lower-tier part from a newer generation.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory operates at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Is this GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A750 has reached end-of-life production status. Its successor is Battlemage, and its predecessor was Xe Graphics. The GPU was released on October 11, 2022.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p resolution with high-to-ultra settings would find this pairing appropriate — the GPU's 66th percentile ranking and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute deliver solid frame rates in most titles, while the CPU's 79th percentile ensures no bottleneck at these resolutions. Competitive gamers playing esports titles at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors would benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,016, PassMark single-thread score of 3,925), which enables high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

Content creators working on video editing or 3D rendering projects would appreciate the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,391 for export and render workloads, while the GPU's 28 ray tracing cores and 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and rendering. Software developers compiling large codebases would benefit from the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 87,830 and data compression score of 343,231, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 98,554 enables GPU compute development and testing.

Students and small business users would find this configuration more powerful than needed for typical office work, but the performance headroom means the system remains responsive for years without upgrades. The 10-core, 16-thread CPU handles multitasking with many browser tabs, office applications, and communication tools simultaneously, while the GPU provides hardware acceleration for video playback and any light graphics work. However, the 125W CPU TDP and 225W GPU TDP mean this is not an energy-efficient choice for users prioritizing low power consumption. The 8 GB GPU VRAM may limit users who work with very large textures or machine learning models, but for general use, this system covers a broad range of workloads effectively.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-12600KF processor with the Intel Arc A750 graphics card, representing an all-Intel platform pairing. The CPU, based on the Alder Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10nm process, provides 10 cores and 16 threads with a 4.90 GHz boost clock, while the GPU, based on the Xe-HPG architecture and manufactured on TSMC's 6nm process, delivers 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 73 places this system in the upper-mid-range tier, with the CPU at the 79th percentile and the GPU at the 66th percentile among their respective categories.

The pairing represents a balanced mid-range desktop configuration suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, content creation, and productivity workloads. The CPU's performance rivals the Intel Core i9-10900K (within 0.3% average benchmark score), while the GPU competes with the Intel Arc B570 (within 0.1%) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (within 0.2%). The system requires a discrete GPU (the "KF" CPU has no integrated graphics), which the Arc A750 provides with support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. With a 550W suggested PSU, dual-slot GPU form factor, and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, this build fits a standard ATX mid-tower case with room for expansion. The CPU's Intel Socket 1700 platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in memory selection, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking for additional performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + Intel Arc A750

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600KF

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds