SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the Intel Arc A380 is a desktop build that prioritizes processor headroom over graphical fidelity. Benchmark data indicates a significant imbalance: the CPU performs in the 79th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 44th percentile. This is a configuration where the central processor is the clear dominant component, capable of driving demanding computational tasks, but the graphics card will be the limiting factor in any modern 3D application. The data shows a system built for productivity, development, and esports-level gaming rather than high-end AAA visual experiences.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes directly from the processor. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. The processor is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and is designed for the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 79th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 27799. The nearest rival comparison shows it trading blows with several notable chips: it is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900K, 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D. This places the i5-12600KF in a performance tier that competes with previous-generation flagship processors and modern mid-range options.

Multi-threaded performance is exceptional for the class, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 and a Geekbench multicore score of 12137. These scores indicate substantial capability in heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7956 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 7952, suggesting the processor scales well with thread count up to its physical and logical limits. Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3302 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2157, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly threaded applications.

The PassMark suite reinforces the CPU's versatility. A multi-thread score of 27575 and a single-thread score of 3925 show balanced performance across both metrics. The integer math score of 87830 and floating-point math score of 67074 indicate robust computational throughput, while the data encryption score of 18445 and data compression score of 343231 highlight its efficiency in data-centric workloads. The extended instructions score of 22003 suggests solid performance in modern, optimized software. For real workloads, this CPU handles 1440p and 4K video editing timelines, complex code compilation, and multi-tasking with ease, though its 125 W TDP means it requires a capable air cooler for sustained loads.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system percentile is 62, which reflects a build where the CPU's strong performance is dragged down by the GPU's modest showing. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion must be estimated from the benchmark scores.

The CPU's benchmark scores are its clear strength. In Cinebench R23, it achieves 23391 multicore and 3302 single-core. The 3DMark suite shows a progression from 1995 in 2-thread to 7956 in 16-thread, with the max-thread score of 7952 nearly matching the 16-thread result, indicating that the processor is fully utilized at this thread count. The Geekbench scores of 12137 multicore and 2157 single-core reinforce the CPU's position in the 79th percentile.

The GPU, by contrast, presents a less impressive picture. Its average benchmark score is 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5170M, which is 0.4% faster, and the AMD Radeon HD 8870M, which is 1.1% slower. The NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is 1.2% slower, and the AMD Radeon 880M is 1.4% slower. This places the Arc A380 in the field of entry-level discrete GPUs and modern integrated graphics. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is modest, and the PassMark G3D score of 6252 reflects a GPU that can handle older titles and light esports but will struggle with modern AAA titles at high settings.

The combined picture is one of significant imbalance. The CPU is capable of feeding a much more powerful GPU, but the Arc A380 will bottleneck it in gaming scenarios. For non-gaming workloads that rely on the CPU—such as rendering, encoding, and compilation—the system performs at a high level. For gaming, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and the estimated FPS in modern titles will be limited to low or medium settings at 1080p.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the 12th Gen Core series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the motherboard choice will determine which type is used. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes for graphics and storage. The unlocked multiplier on the i5-12600KF allows for overclocking to extract additional performance, provided the motherboard and cooling solution support it.

The GPU is an Intel Arc A380, which uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. It has a TDP of 75 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 250 W, which is quite low and indicates that the power supply is not a limiting factor in this build. The CPU's 125 W TDP combined with the GPU's 75 W TDP means a standard 400-500 W power supply would be more than sufficient, though the suggested 250 W for the GPU alone is a useful baseline.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the GPU. The CPU's 79th percentile performance and its ability to match or exceed the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D in average benchmark score mean it has years of useful life left. Upgrading to a more powerful graphics card would unlock the CPU's full potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is adequate for current mid-range cards, though a future upgrade to a higher-tier GPU would likely use the full x16 slot. The platform's support for DDR5 memory is a future-proofing feature, though the performance gain over DDR4 in most workloads is modest. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes are sufficient for a single high-end GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs, which covers most typical configurations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is more than capable of high-refresh gaming, with a 3DMark 8-thread score of 6128 and a single-thread score of 1016 indicating strong per-core performance. However, the Arc A380's 44th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 will limit frame rates. Estimated FPS in esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant would be high, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p with low settings, but modern AAA titles will struggle to reach 60 FPS at medium settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391, make it well-suited for software encoding via x264. The PassMark data encryption score of 18445 also indicates solid performance for stream encryption. However, the GPU's modest compute performance (PassMark GPU compute score of 2762) limits hardware encoding quality, so software encoding is the recommended path, which will tax the CPU but leave the GPU for rendering the game.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for the i5-12600KF. The 10 cores and 16 threads handle 4K timeline editing smoothly, and the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9824 indicates fast rendering in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU can accelerate effects and color grading to a limited extent, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse. The Geekbench multicore score of 12137 supports this, showing that the system can handle complex projects without significant lag.

3D rendering: The CPU excels here. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 places it in the top tier for CPU-based rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D. The 3DMark max-thread score of 7952 confirms that the processor scales well across all available threads. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is usable for GPU rendering but is not a primary driver; the CPU is the main engine, and it performs admirably.

Software development: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance is a clear asset here. The PassMark integer math score of 87830 and floating-point math score of 67074 indicate fast code compilation. The 20 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a highly efficient configuration for compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, and managing multiple containers.

Student and office work: This is overkill for most student and office tasks. The CPU's single-thread score of 3925 in PassMark ensures instant application launches and smooth multitasking in spreadsheets, documents, and web browsers. The GPU is more than sufficient for 2D applications and basic video playback, with a PassMark G2D score of 610. The system would be silent and cool under these loads, given the low GPU TDP of 75 W.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows that the GPU is the bottleneck in this system for all graphics-related workloads. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 44th percentile creates a significant mismatch. In gaming, the Arc A380 will limit frame rates to what its 6252 PassMark G3D score and 808 3DMark Steel Nomad score can deliver, which is entry-level performance. The CPU will often be idle, waiting for the GPU to render frames, meaning the i5-12600KF's potential is largely untapped in 3D applications.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU has minimal impact. Here, the system performs at a high level, with the CPU's 23391 Cinebench R23 multicore score driving fast render times. The GPU's compute capabilities, while present (2762 PassMark GPU compute score), are secondary.

The estimated FPS scaling reflects this imbalance. In a CPU-bound game at low resolution, the CPU could push high frame rates, but the GPU would cap it. In a GPU-bound game at high settings, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7956 versus the GPU's 808 Steel Nomad score illustrates the gap. The system is well-balanced for productivity, where the CPU dominates, but poorly balanced for gaming, where the GPU is the weak link. Upgrading the GPU would create a more balanced system, allowing the CPU to drive higher frame rates and enabling higher graphical settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined system percentile is 62, driven by a CPU in the 79th percentile and a GPU in the 44th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12600KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D?

A: The i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27799, which is 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 7 5800X3D's score of 27896.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has a memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s, based on a 96-bit bus and 15.5 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking on compatible Intel Socket 1700 motherboards.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A380 is 250 W, and it uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A380 is marked as end-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive. Software developers will benefit from the 10 cores and 16 threads, which handle code compilation and virtual machines efficiently, as shown by the PassMark integer math score of 87830. Content creators focused on video editing and 3D rendering will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 to be a strong asset, allowing for fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing. Students and office workers will find the system vastly overqualified for their needs, but the CPU's single-thread performance of 3925 in PassMark ensures a responsive experience in any productivity suite.

Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles will find the system adequate, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance enabling high frame rates in CPU-bound games, though the GPU will limit settings to low or medium. Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K, or those who play modern AAA titles, should look elsewhere, as the Arc A380's 44th percentile ranking will be a significant hindrance. Small business workstations that rely on heavy data processing, such as financial modeling or database management, will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 343231 and data encryption score of 18445. The system is not suitable for high-end gaming or GPU-accelerated machine learning, but it is a competent and powerful platform for productivity and development.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i5-12600KF, a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Alder Lake generation, with the Intel Arc A380, an entry-level discrete GPU from the Alchemist series. The CPU is a high performer, sitting in the 79th percentile of all processors with an average benchmark score of 27799. The GPU is an entry-level part, sitting in the 44th percentile with an average score of 8558. The combined system percentile is 62, reflecting a configuration that is heavily weighted toward CPU performance.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is that of a workstation or productivity-focused system rather than a gaming rig. The CPU's benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multicore of 23391 and a PassMark multi-thread of 27575, place it in competition with previous-generation flagship processors. The GPU's scores, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad of 808 and a PassMark G3D of 6252, place it in the range of modern integrated graphics. This is a system where the processor is the star, and the graphics card is a placeholder for basic display output and light acceleration. It is a sensible foundation for a future GPU upgrade, but as configured, it is a CPU-first build.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-128 chip, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Memory is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It also features 8 RT cores for ray tracing, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1).

Benchmark results show the A380 in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8558. Its nearest rivals are all older or integrated parts: the AMD FirePro W5170M is 0.4% faster, the AMD Radeon HD 8870M is 1.1% slower, the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is 1.2% slower, and the AMD Radeon 880M is 1.4% slower. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is low, indicating limited DX12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 and Vulkan score of 36736 show moderate compute capability. The PassMark G3D score of 6252 is modest, and the GPU compute score of 2762 is low, suggesting weak compute throughput for GPGPU tasks.

For rendering, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can accelerate basic 3D renders in applications like Blender, but the low compute score means it will be slower than most dedicated workstation GPUs. The 6 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but will be a constraint at higher resolutions or with high-detail textures. The 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the GPU's core count but will limit performance in memory-intensive tasks. The RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low overall performance means ray tracing will only be viable at low resolutions and settings. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, which support modern high-refresh monitors. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. Overall, this GPU is suitable for basic display output, light gaming at 1080p, and as a stopgap until a more powerful card is installed, but it is not a high-performance part.