SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a desktop build that targets a specific balance of high-frequency gaming and multi-threaded productivity. The CPU holds a 79th percentile ranking against all processors, while the GPU sits at the 69th percentile against all graphics cards, and the combined pairing ranks in the 74th percentile. This puts the system in a strong mid-to-upper tier position, with the processor slightly outshining the graphics card in relative standing. The data indicates a platform that can handle demanding workloads without requiring flagship-level investment, and the measured game performance confirms it as a viable choice for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing delivers measured frame rates that comfortably exceed 144 Hz in several competitive titles at 1080p. Counter-Strike 2 hits 239 FPS, Valorant reaches 491 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 285 FPS at 1920x1080. At 2560x1440, these titles still produce 158 FPS, 466 FPS, and 187 FPS respectively, showing that the combination is well-suited for fast-paced shooters where frame rate directly impacts responsiveness. The 10-core, 16-thread CPU provides enough headroom to keep the GPU fed in these scenarios, as the single-thread score of 1016 in 3DMark and the PassMark single-thread result of 3925 indicate strong per-core performance.

Streaming while gaming is a plausible use case given the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23391 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 12137 suggest that encoding overhead from software streaming will not cripple game performance, though the lack of integrated graphics means hardware encoding falls to the GPU. The RX 9070’s compute score of 14737 in PassMark and its 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide ample parallel processing power for encoding tasks, and the 16 GB of GDDR6 memory ensures that both game assets and streaming buffers have sufficient capacity.

Video editing workloads benefit from the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, which produce a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9824 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 27575. The GPU accelerates effects and rendering through its 3584 shading units and 128 ROPs, with a PassMark G3D score of 25381. For 4K video timelines, the 16 GB VRAM is a practical advantage, as it allows large preview buffers and complex effects to remain resident on the graphics card. The measured frame rates in games like Call of Duty: Warzone (115 FPS at 4K) suggest that the GPU can also handle real-time video processing tasks without bottlenecking.

3D rendering is another strength, with the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23391 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539 indicating strong performance in both CPU-bound and GPU-accelerated renderers. The RX 9070’s 56 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced scenes, and its 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles compute-heavy tasks like viewport rendering and final frame output. The combined percentile of 74 places this build above the majority of systems, making it suitable for freelance designers or small studios that need reliable rendering without workstation-class hardware.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high single-thread score of 3302 in Cinebench R23 and its passmark integer math score of 87830, which speed up compilation and code analysis. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data, and the support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows builders to choose between cost-effective or higher-bandwidth configurations. The PassMark data compression score of 343231 and data encryption score of 18445 indicate that archiving and security-related tasks also perform well, which is useful for developers handling large repositories or encrypted codebases.

Student and office work is more than adequately served by this hardware, though it is overkill for basic tasks. The Geekbench single-core score of 2157 and the PassMark single-thread score of 3925 ensure that everyday applications like web browsers, office suites, and communication tools run instantly. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU does not factor into these workloads, but the CPU’s 79th percentile ranking means it will never be the limiting factor in document editing, spreadsheet calculations, or virtual meetings. This build is not a cost-optimized choice for office use, but it handles such tasks without any measurable slowdown.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data covers a wide range of titles and resolutions, all at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in most games: Assetto Corsa runs at 141.1 FPS, Doom at 178 FPS, Minecraft at 236 FPS, and Roblox at 309 FPS. Heavier titles show the GPU’s limits, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 71 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 64 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 35 FPS. The average FPS across all tested games at 1080p is not explicitly listed, but the pair’s overall average of 151.6 FPS across all resolutions and games indicates a system that skews toward high performance in less demanding titles.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain playable for most games. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 158 FPS, Grand Theft Auto V to 74 FPS, and Fortnite to 73 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 fall to 53 FPS, which is still playable but suggests that ultra settings at 1440p require some compromises for AAA games. The RX 9070’s 16 GB of memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth help maintain texture streaming performance, but the raw compute of 36.13 TFLOPS is the limiting factor for pixel-heavy scenes. Call of Duty: Warzone holds up well at 135 FPS, showing that optimized competitive titles remain smooth.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles with the most demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 35 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended to 12 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 32 FPS. Lighter games fare better, with Valorant at 374 FPS, Roblox at 117 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 115 FPS. The data suggests that 4K gaming is only viable for less demanding titles or with settings reduced, as the GPU’s 69th percentile ranking places it below the top tier of graphics cards. The pair’s rank of 1156 out of 3732 pairs by FPS confirms that while this is a capable gaming system, it is not positioned at the absolute top of performance charts.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders flexibility at initial installation, but the platform is limited to 12th Gen processors and later 13th and 14th Gen models with compatible BIOS updates. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the RX 9070’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, though the GPU will run at Gen 4 speeds, a minor theoretical reduction that has minimal impact on measured performance. The GPU’s bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, and while the CPU only offers Gen 4, the bandwidth difference is unlikely to create a bottleneck in most games.

The suggested PSU for this build is 550 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 125 W and the GPU has a TDP of 220 W. This leaves a reasonable amount of headroom for drives, fans, and peripherals, but it does not allow for significant overclocking. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, and the GPU’s dual-slot design with 2x 8-pin power connectors suggests some overclocking potential, but a 550 W supply is the minimum recommendation. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-capacity power supply if the user intends to overclock both components or add additional hardware.

The platform’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 is a notable advantage. A builder can choose DDR4 for lower cost or DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the memory bus is dual-channel in both cases. The CPU’s cache structure, with 20 MB of shared L3, benefits from faster memory, but the measured benchmark scores do not distinguish between memory types. For future upgrades, the primary path within the same platform is stepping up to a higher-core-count 12th, 13th, or 14th Gen processor, which would improve multi-threaded scores without requiring a motherboard change. Beyond that, a new platform would be necessary for PCIe 5.0 CPU lanes or DDR5-only memory support.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is uneven across different workloads. In gaming, the CPU’s 79th percentile and the GPU’s 69th percentile suggest that the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card. This means that in CPU-bound games like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the CPU is the limiting factor at high frame rates, but in GPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Ark: Survival Ascended, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The measured FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K supports this interpretation: at 1080p, the system achieves 239 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, but at 4K it drops to 89 FPS, showing that the GPU’s workload increases disproportionately.

The pairRankByFps data places this build at 1156 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 151.6 across all tested games. This indicates that the combination performs better than the majority of CPU+GPU pairs, but it is not optimized for maximum frame rates. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1016 in 3DMark and 3302 in Cinebench R23 are strong, but they do not reach the levels of top-tier processors, which means that in esports titles with very high frame rates, the CPU will cap performance. Conversely, the GPU’s 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 and 322.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are solid but not exceptional, so heavily ray-traced games will strain the GPU.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23391 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 27575 indicate that the 10-core, 16-thread processor handles parallel tasks well. The GPU’s compute performance, while strong, is secondary in CPU-bound tasks like compilation or data compression. The PassMark integer math score of 87830 and floating point math score of 67074 show that the CPU excels at processing instructions, while the GPU’s 36.13 TFLOPS is better suited for graphics and compute-intensive rendering. The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload, but the system as a whole is balanced enough that neither component completely starves the other in mixed usage.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results show a consistent pattern of strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 7956 with 16 threads, 6128 with 8 threads, 3806 with 4 threads, 1995 with 2 threads, and 1016 with a single thread. This scaling is nearly linear, indicating efficient thread utilization across the 10 cores and 16 threads. The Cinebench scores follow a similar trend: R15 multi-core at 2357 and single-core at 332, R20 multi-core at 9824 and single-core at 1386, and R23 multi-core at 23391 and single-core at 3302. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12137 and single-core score of 2157 reinforce this picture.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more varied. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 6290, which is a moderate result for a 69th percentile card. Geekbench OpenCL scores 131539, while Vulkan scores 58705, showing that the GPU favors OpenCL compute workloads. PassMark results include a G3D score of 25381 and a GPU compute score of 14737, with DirectX 11 scoring 281 and DirectX 12 scoring 74. The DirectX 9 score of 343 and DirectX 10 score of 141 indicate legacy API performance is less of a focus. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 23877, placing it just below the AMD Radeon RX 6800S, which has an average score of 24063, and just above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z at 23736.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27799, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-10900K at 27872 and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D at 27896, with deltas of -0.3% and -0.3% respectively. It is also close to the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE at 27712, with a delta of 0.3%. This places the i5-12600KF in the same performance tier as older flagship processors, which is notable given its position as a mid-range chip. The combined percentile of 74 for the build reflects the CPU’s strength relative to the GPU, and the overall picture is a system that performs above average in both compute and graphics tasks.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p high-refresh displays will find this build well-suited to their needs. The measured frame rates in competitive titles like Valorant (491 FPS at 1080p) and Counter-Strike 2 (239 FPS at 1080p) exceed the refresh rates of most monitors, while AAA games at 1440p like Cyberpunk 2077 (53 FPS) remain playable. For 4K gaming, the system is less appropriate, as demanding titles drop below 40 FPS, so users with 4K displays should look elsewhere or be prepared to reduce settings.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23391 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539 indicate that both CPU and GPU rendering tasks are handled efficiently. The 16 GB of VRAM is particularly useful for large textures and complex scenes, making this a viable workstation for freelance artists or part-time creators.

Software developers and programmers will appreciate the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, which speeds up compilation and code analysis. The PassMark data compression score of 343231 and encryption score of 18445 are useful for handling large codebases and secure communications. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable, though it is overprovisioned for basic tasks, so this is a build for those who also game or create content in their spare time.

Small business workstations that require occasional gaming or rendering capabilities could use this build, but it is not cost-optimized for such roles. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 69th percentile ensure that it handles most workloads without issue, but the lack of integrated graphics means a dedicated GPU is mandatory. For users who need a reliable, high-performance desktop that can transition between work and play, this pairing offers a strong balance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core count and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what type is it?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this pair?

A: The pair has an average FPS of 151.6 across all games and resolutions tested, ranking 1156 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, but the TDP is 125 W and the suggested PSU is 550 W, so headroom is limited.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is based on RDNA 4.0 architecture with a 4 nm process node from TSMC.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27799, which is 0.3% lower than the Ryzen 7 5800X3D’s score of 27896.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-12600KF processor with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 graphics card. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread part from the Core 12th Gen series, based on Alder Lake architecture and produced on Intel’s 10 nm process. The GPU is a Radeon RX 9000 series card with Navi 48 chip, built on RDNA 4.0 architecture and TSMC’s 4 nm process. The combined percentile of 74 places this system in the upper quarter of all builds, with the CPU at the 79th percentile and the GPU at the 69th percentile.

The build is positioned as a high-performance desktop for gaming and productivity. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27799 puts it in the same class as older flagship processors like the Intel Core i9-10900K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, while the GPU’s average score of 23877 is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 6800S and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER. The pair’s rank of 1156 out of 3732 by FPS shows that it performs well in gaming, but it is not at the very top of the performance hierarchy. This is a system for users who want strong all-around performance without chasing maximum frame rates or rendering times.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12600KF is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Alder Lake generation, using a hybrid architecture that combines performance and efficiency cores. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache, which provides ample capacity for frequently accessed data. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show that the CPU is strong in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1016 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3302 indicate excellent per-core performance, which benefits applications that do not scale well across cores. The multi-threaded scores, including Cinebench R23 multi-core at 23391 and Geekbench multi-core at 12137, demonstrate that the 10 cores and 16 threads are effectively utilized. The PassMark multi-thread score of 27575 and the integer math score of 87830 further confirm its capabilities in parallel tasks.

The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking against all processors places it above the majority of CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 27799 is within 0.3% of the Intel Core i9-10900K and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D. This means that for most workloads, the i5-12600KF performs on par with older flagship processors, making it a strong choice for a mid-range build. The lack of integrated graphics is a minor consideration, since a discrete GPU is required regardless, but it does mean that troubleshooting display issues requires a dedicated card. Overall, the CPU provides a solid foundation for gaming, productivity, and development tasks, with enough headroom to keep up with the RX 9070 in most scenarios.