SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-12600KF

27,799 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i5-12600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT represents a capable desktop configuration that sits at the 75th percentile for combined performance. The CPU, built on the Alder Lake architecture with a 10 nm process, delivers a strong mix of single-threaded agility and multi-threaded throughput. The GPU, based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a 7 nm process, provides solid 1080p and 1440p rendering capabilities, with its performance being particularly notable in esports titles. Data indicates that this pairing is well-balanced for its intended desktop segment, with the CPU’s multi-threading capabilities and the GPU’s rasterization performance complementing each other across various workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, with 16 Gbps effective data rate. These specifications place the card in a position where its memory subsystem is sufficient for most 1080p and many 1440p gaming scenarios, though the 8 GB capacity may become a limiting factor in the most VRAM-intensive titles at higher resolutions.

The GPU’s compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The chip operates at a base clock of 1968 MHz and a boost clock of 2589 MHz, with a game clock of 2359 MHz. This results in a pixel rate of 165.7 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 331.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute performance is rated at 10.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1). For ray tracing, the card includes 32 RT cores, which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the overall compute throughput for such workloads is modest relative to higher-tier cards.

Benchmark data shows the RX 6600 XT achieving a Passmark G3D score of 16461 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1804. In compute-oriented tests, the card scores 88720 in Geekbench Metal, 80503 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 72417 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark GPU Compute score is 7520. These figures indicate that the card is positioned at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 6600 XT sits 0.7% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, 0.8% above the GTX 780 Ti, and 1.1% above the RTX 2080 SUPER. It trails the Intel Arc A350M by 0.8%. This rivalry data shows that the card’s average benchmark score of 24442 is competitive with those older or lower-tier alternatives, but it does not represent a significant generational leap in raw compute.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s benchmark scores demonstrate its balanced performance profile. In 3DMark tests, it scores 7956 in the 16-thread test, 1995 in the 2-thread test, 3806 in the 4-thread test, 6128 in the 8-thread test, 7952 in the max-thread test, and 1016 in the single-thread test. Cinebench results show 2357 in R15 multicore and 332 in R15 singlecore, 9824 in R20 multicore and 1386 in R20 singlecore, and 23391 in R23 multicore and 3302 in R23 singlecore. Geekbench scores are 12137 for multicore and 2157 for singlecore. Passmark results include 27575 for multithread, 3925 for single-thread, and a range of specialized tests such as 343231 for data compression, 18445 for data encryption, and 67074 for floating point math.

The CPU holds a percentile rank of 79 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27799. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-10900K, which scores 27872 and is 0.3% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which scores 27896 and is also 0.3% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27712, which is 0.3% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27887, which is 0.3% higher. This places the i5-12600KF in a tight competitive cluster where the differences are negligible in real-world terms. The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 75, indicating that the system outperforms three-quarters of all recorded configurations. The pair’s rank by FPS is 2635 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 102.2, confirming its position as a solid mid-range performer.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-12600KF features 10 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that leverages the hybrid Alder Lake architecture combining performance and efficiency cores. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. This architecture is fabricated on a 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The TDP is rated at 125 W, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking.

The benchmark scores translate into strong real-world performance for both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 indicates that the CPU can handle heavily threaded workloads such as 3D rendering and video encoding with ease. The single-core score of 3302 in the same test suggests excellent responsiveness in applications that rely on single-thread performance, such as many games and legacy software. The Geekbench multicore score of 12137 and singlecore score of 2157 reinforce this picture. The Passmark multithread score of 27575 and single-thread score of 3925 further confirm the CPU’s balanced nature.

For software development, the CPU’s 16 threads provide ample parallelism for compiling code and running virtual machines. The Passmark data encryption score of 18445 and extended instructions score of 22003 indicate solid performance in cryptography and SIMD-heavy workloads. The floating point math score of 67074 and integer math score of 87830 show strong number-crunching capabilities. The data compression score of 343231 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance in file archiving and decompression tasks. Overall, the CPU’s 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs underscores its capability as a mid-range to upper-mid-range processor that can handle a wide variety of professional and consumer workloads without significant bottlenecks.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-12600KF and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is 75, meaning it outperforms 75% of all recorded system configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D has an average score of 27896, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-12600KF’s score of 27799. The difference is negligible.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the average FPS across all games for this specific pairing?

A: The pair has an average FPS across games of 102.2, and it ranks 2635 out of 3732 pairs by FPS.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and base clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing, and how many RT cores does it have?

A: Yes, the Radeon RX 6600 XT includes 32 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is 450 W.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Analysis of the benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU are relatively well-matched, but specific workloads can shift the bottleneck. The CPU holds a percentile rank of 79, while the GPU holds a percentile rank of 70. This indicates that the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its peers. Consequently, in CPU-intensive tasks such as data compression, encryption, and physics calculations, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU may not be fully utilized. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming with demanding graphical effects, the GPU’s lower percentile will likely become the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling across resolutions provides evidence for this balance. At 1080p, the system often delivers high frame rates, such as 157.9 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 184 FPS in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege. At 1440p, these numbers drop to 105.9 FPS and 121 FPS respectively, and at 4K they fall further to 55.1 FPS and 67 FPS. This scaling pattern suggests that the GPU is the primary constraint as resolution increases, since the CPU’s performance headroom is more than sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions. For example, in Valorant, the system achieves 352.2 FPS at 1080p, 302.4 FPS at 1440p, and 243.1 FPS at 4K, indicating that the CPU can push very high frame rates when the GPU is not the limiting factor.

In more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the system only manages 45.4 FPS at 1080p and 32.4 FPS at 1440p, which shows that the GPU’s rendering capabilities are the bottleneck for such graphically intensive games. The same pattern is visible in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 42 FPS at 1080p and 31 FPS at 1440p. For productivity workloads, the CPU’s 79th percentile ranking relative to the GPU’s 70th percentile suggests that the CPU can handle multi-threaded tasks without being held back by the GPU. However, the GPU’s compute scores, such as 7520 in Passmark GPU Compute, indicate that it is not a primary accelerator for compute-heavy applications like machine learning or scientific simulation, where a more powerful GPU would be necessary.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The measured FPS data from the FACT PACK provides a detailed view of gaming performance at ultra settings across three resolutions. The data is marked as measured, indicating real-world testing results. At 1080p, the system excels in esports and lighter titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 343 FPS, Valorant at 352.2 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 184 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 156.2 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 157.9 FPS. These numbers demonstrate that the pair can easily drive high-refresh-rate monitors in competitive games.

For more demanding AAA titles at 1080p, the performance is adequate but not exceptional. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 45.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 42 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 23 FPS. Control achieves 64.9 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 56.4 FPS. These results show that while the system can handle most games at 1080p ultra, some of the most graphically intensive titles will require settings adjustments to achieve smooth frame rates.

At 1440p, the performance drops are consistent with the GPU becoming the primary constraint. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 139.1 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 105.9 FPS, and Valorant maintains 302.4 FPS. However, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 32.4 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 31 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 14 FPS. The 4K results show significant limitations, with only a few titles maintaining playable frame rates. Valorant runs at 243.1 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 117.4 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 55.1 FPS. Most other games fall below 40 FPS at 4K, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 20.7 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS. The overall average FPS across all games is 102.2, reflecting the system’s strength at lower resolutions.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this pairing is well-suited. The measured FPS in esports titles like Valorant at 352.2 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 343 FPS easily exceed the requirements of 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3302 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game logic and physics are handled efficiently, while the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking provides sufficient rendering power.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 16 threads, which can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously. The Passmark multithread score of 27575 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7956 indicate strong parallel processing capability, which is essential for live encoding without impacting game performance. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for streaming at 1080p, though higher resolutions may strain the system.

Video editing is a mixed scenario. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 and Geekbench multicore score of 12137 suggest that rendering and exporting timelines will be reasonably fast. The GPU can assist with effects and previews, as shown by its Passmark GPU Compute score of 7520, but it is not a top-tier accelerator for this task. For 1080p and light 4K editing, the system is capable.

3D rendering workloads will primarily rely on the CPU. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9824 and R15 multicore score of 2357 demonstrate that the CPU can handle complex scenes, though render times will be longer than with higher-core-count processors. The GPU’s compute performance is secondary here, with its FP32 rating of 10.60 TFLOPS being modest for GPU rendering.

Software development is a strong suit for this CPU. The 16 threads and high single-thread performance, as evidenced by the Passmark single-thread score of 3925, make compilation times shorter and provide smooth responsiveness in IDEs. The data encryption score of 18445 and extended instructions score of 22003 are useful for security-related development tasks.

For student and office work, this configuration is overkill but not wasteful. The CPU’s performance ensures that multitasking with multiple applications and browser tabs is seamless. The GPU’s G2D score of 912 and DirectX 9 score of 194 indicate that it handles 2D interfaces and basic graphics tasks effortlessly, making it a reliable choice for productivity.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build is a desktop configuration, as indicated by the build class. It pairs the Intel Core i5-12600KF, a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 12th Gen series, with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, a GPU from the Radeon RX 6000 series. The CPU holds a 79th percentile rank among all CPUs, and the GPU holds a 70th percentile rank among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the pair is 75, placing it in the upper-mid-range tier of system configurations.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27799, while the GPU’s average benchmark score is 24442. The pair’s rank by FPS is 2635 out of 3732, with an average FPS of 102.2 across games. This data confirms that the build is a solid mid-range desktop system, capable of handling most modern games at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, and proficient in productivity tasks that benefit from multi-threading. The class and tier indicate that it is not a flagship or high-end enthusiast build, but rather a practical and balanced choice for a wide range of users.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This configuration is best suited for gamers who primarily play at 1080p with high refresh rates. The measured FPS in esports titles like Valorant at 352.2 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 157.9 FPS demonstrates that the system can drive competitive games smoothly. For gamers who play at 1440p, the system is also viable, as seen in Call of Duty: Warzone at 139.1 FPS, though the most demanding titles will require some settings compromises.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 and Geekbench multicore score of 12137. The CPU can handle rendering tasks, while the GPU provides adequate acceleration for effects and previews. The Passmark multithread score of 27575 further supports this use case.

Software developers will find the CPU’s 16 threads and high single-thread performance useful for compilation and running development environments. The Passmark single-thread score of 3925 and data encryption score of 18445 indicate strong performance in code compilation and secure development tasks. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable for their needs, with the CPU’s performance ensuring smooth multitasking and the GPU handling any graphics-intensive presentations or light design work.

Small business workstations that run productivity suites, manage databases, or perform data analysis will benefit from the CPU’s data compression score of 343231 and floating point math score of 67074. The system’s balanced nature means it can handle a variety of tasks without significant downtime, making it a reliable investment for professional environments.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i5-12600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Alder Lake architecture. The motherboard platform supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on budget and performance needs. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, and allows for fast NVMe storage. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 160 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W for the GPU alone. This leaves headroom for additional components, though a higher-wattage PSU would be advisable if the user plans to add more peripherals or overclock.

The platform’s upgrade path is somewhat limited by the socket’s lifespan. While the Socket 1700 supports 12th Gen processors, future generations may require a new motherboard. However, within the current platform, a sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-tier CPU in the same socket, such as an i7 or i9 from the same generation, which would provide more cores and threads for demanding workloads. Alternatively, upgrading the GPU to a more powerful model would improve gaming performance at higher resolutions, though the current CPU’s 79th percentile ranking ensures it would not bottleneck a more powerful GPU in most scenarios.

Memory upgrades are also straightforward, given the dual-channel support for both DDR4 and DDR5. The system’s current performance is well-balanced, so the most impactful upgrades would be either a stronger CPU for multi-threaded tasks or a stronger GPU for gaming at 1440p and 4K. The PSU headroom from the 450 W suggestion and the CPU’s 125 W TDP suggests that a moderate GPU upgrade would not require a PSU change, but a significant jump in GPU power would necessitate a more robust power supply.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-12600KF

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds